Pull ext4 bugfixes from Ted Ts'o:
 "Revert a potential seek_data/hole regression which shows up when using
  ext4 to handle ext3 file systems, plus two minor bug fixes"

* tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4:
  ext4: remove spurious KERN_INFO from ext4_warning call
  Revert "ext4: fix suboptimal seek_{data,hole} extents traversial"
  ext4: prevent online resize with backup superblock

Signed-off-by: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@jwilk.net>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o:
 "Lots of bugs fixes, including Zheng and Jan's extent status shrinker
  fixes, which should improve CPU utilization and potential soft lockups
  under heavy memory pressure, and Eric Whitney's bigalloc fixes"

* tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (26 commits)
  ext4: ext4_da_convert_inline_data_to_extent drop locked page after error
  ext4: fix suboptimal seek_{data,hole} extents traversial
  ext4: ext4_inline_data_fiemap should respect callers argument
  ext4: prevent fsreentrance deadlock for inline_data
  ext4: forbid journal_async_commit in data=ordered mode
  jbd2: remove unnecessary NULL check before iput()
  ext4: Remove an unnecessary check for NULL before iput()
  ext4: remove unneeded code in ext4_unlink
  ext4: don't count external journal blocks as overhead
  ext4: remove never taken branch from ext4_ext_shift_path_extents()
  ext4: create nojournal_checksum mount option
  ext4: update comments regarding ext4_delete_inode()
  ext4: cleanup GFP flags inside resize path
  ext4: introduce aging to extent status tree
  ext4: cleanup flag definitions for extent status tree
  ext4: limit number of scanned extents in status tree shrinker
  ext4: move handling of list of shrinkable inodes into extent status code
  ext4: change LRU to round-robin in extent status tree shrinker
  ext4: cache extent hole in extent status tree for ext4_da_map_blocks()
  ext4: fix block reservation for bigalloc filesystems
  ...

Option journal_async_commit breaks gurantees of data=ordered mode as it
sends only a single cache flush after writing a transaction commit
block. Thus even though the transaction including the commit block is
fully stored on persistent storage, file data may still linger in drives
caches and will be lost on power failure. Since all checksums match on
journal recovery, we replay the transaction thus possibly exposing stale
user data.

To fix this data exposure issue, remove the possibility to use
journal_async_commit in data=ordered mode.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

This was fixed for ext3 with:

e6d8fb3 ext3: Count internal journal as bsddf overhead in ext3_statfs

but was never fixed for ext4.

With a large external journal and no used disk blocks, df comes
out negative without this, as journal blocks are added to the
overhead & subtracted from used blocks unconditionally.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Create a mount option to disable journal checksumming (because the
metadata_csum feature turns it on by default now), and fix remount not
to allow changing the journal checksumming option, since changing the
mount options has no effect on the journal.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

We must use GFP_NOFS instead GFP_KERNEL inside ext4_mb_add_groupinfo
and ext4_calculate_overhead() because they are called from inside a
journal transaction. Call trace:

ioctl
 ->ext4_group_add
   ->journal_start
   ->ext4_setup_new_descs
     ->ext4_mb_add_groupinfo -> GFP_KERNEL
   ->ext4_flex_group_add
     ->ext4_update_super
       ->ext4_calculate_overhead  -> GFP_KERNEL
   ->journal_stop

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Currently we scan extent status trees of inodes until we reclaim nr_to_scan
extents. This can however require a lot of scanning when there are lots
of delayed extents (as those cannot be reclaimed).

Change shrinker to work as shrinkers are supposed to and *scan* only
nr_to_scan extents regardless of how many extents did we actually
reclaim. We however need to be careful and avoid scanning each status
tree from the beginning - that could lead to a situation where we would
not be able to reclaim anything at all when first nr_to_scan extents in
the tree are always unreclaimable. We remember with each inode offset
where we stopped scanning and continue from there when we next come
across the inode.

Note that we also need to update places calling __es_shrink() manually
to pass reasonable nr_to_scan to have a chance of reclaiming anything and
not just 1.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Currently callers adding extents to extent status tree were responsible
for adding the inode to the list of inodes with freeable extents. This
is error prone and puts list handling in unnecessarily many places.

Just add inode to the list automatically when the first non-delay extent
is added to the tree and remove inode from the list when the last
non-delay extent is removed.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

In this commit we discard the lru algorithm for inodes with extent
status tree because it takes significant effort to maintain a lru list
in extent status tree shrinker and the shrinker can take a long time to
scan this lru list in order to reclaim some objects.

We replace the lru ordering with a simple round-robin.  After that we
never need to keep a lru list.  That means that the list needn't be
sorted if the shrinker can not reclaim any objects in the first round.

Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>