linux.git/fs/ext4/migrate.c, branch v5.4

ext4: clean up indentation issues, remove extraneous tabs

2018-12-04T05:16:44+00:00

There are several lines that are indented too far, clean these
up by removing the tabs.

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o

ext4: add ext4_sb_bread() to disambiguate ENOMEM cases

2018-11-25T22:20:31+00:00

Today, when sb_bread() returns NULL, this can either be because of an
I/O error or because the system failed to allocate the buffer.  Since
it's an old interface, changing would require changing many call
sites.

So instead we create our own ext4_sb_bread(), which also allows us to
set the REQ_META flag.

Also fixed a problem in the xattr code where a NULL return in a
function could also mean that the xattr was not found, which could
lead to the wrong error getting returned to userspace.

Fixes: ac27a0ec112a ("ext4: initial copy of files from ext3")
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 2.6.19
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o

ext4: fix up remaining files with SPDX cleanups

2017-12-18T03:00:59+00:00

A number of ext4 source files were skipped due because their copyright
permission statements didn't match the expected text used by the
automated conversion utilities.  I've added SPDX tags for the rest.

While looking at some of these files, I've noticed that we have quite
a bit of variation on the licenses that were used --- in particular
some of the Red Hat licenses on the jbd2 files use a GPL2+ license,
and we have some files that have a LGPL-2.1 license (which was quite
surprising).

I've not attempted to do any license changes.  Even if it is perfectly
legal to relicense to GPL 2.0-only for consistency's sake, that should
be done with ext4 developer community discussion.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o

ext4: do not set posix acls on xattr inodes

2017-06-22T01:21:39+00:00

We don't need acls on xattr inodes because they are not directly
accessible from user mode.

Besides lockdep complains about recursive locking of xattr_sem as seen
below.

  =============================================
  [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
  4.11.0-rc8+ #402 Not tainted
  ---------------------------------------------
  python/1894 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [] ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
    lock(&ei->xattr_sem);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

   May be due to missing lock nesting notation

  3 locks held by python/1894:
   #0:  (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50
   #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0
   #2:  (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 1894 Comm: python Not tainted 4.11.0-rc8+ #402
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x67/0x99
   __lock_acquire+0x5f3/0x1830
   lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1d0
   down_read+0x2f/0x60
   ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270
   ext4_get_acl+0x43/0x1e0
   get_acl+0x72/0xf0
   posix_acl_create+0x5e/0x170
   ext4_init_acl+0x21/0xc0
   __ext4_new_inode+0xffd/0x16b0
   ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x5ea/0xb70
   ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b5/0x970
   ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x351/0x5d0
   ext4_xattr_set+0x124/0x180
   ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
   __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
   __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
   vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
   setxattr+0x129/0x160
   path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
   SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
   entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o

ext4: fix misspellings in comments.

2016-03-10T04:49:05+00:00

Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o

ext4: clean up feature test macros with predicate functions

2015-10-17T20:18:43+00:00

Create separate predicate functions to test/set/clear feature flags,
thereby replacing the wordy old macros.  Furthermore, clean out the
places where we open-coded feature tests.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong

ext4: correctly migrate a file with a hole at the beginning

2015-07-04T04:03:44+00:00

Currently ext4_ind_migrate() doesn't correctly handle a file which
contains a hole at the beginning of the file.  This caused the migration
to be done incorrectly, and then if there is a subsequent following
delayed allocation write to the "hole", this would reclaim the same data
blocks again and results in fs corruption.

  # assmuing 4k block size ext4, with delalloc enabled
  # skip the first block and write to the second block
  xfs_io -fc "pwrite 4k 4k" -c "fsync" /mnt/ext4/testfile

  # converting to indirect-mapped file, which would move the data blocks
  # to the beginning of the file, but extent status cache still marks
  # that region as a hole
  chattr -e /mnt/ext4/testfile

  # delayed allocation writes to the "hole", reclaim the same data block
  # again, results in i_blocks corruption
  xfs_io -c "pwrite 0 4k" /mnt/ext4/testfile
  umount /mnt/ext4
  e2fsck -nf /dev/sda6
  ...
  Inode 53, i_blocks is 16, should be 8.  Fix? no
  ...

Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

ext4: be more strict when migrating to non-extent based file

2015-07-04T03:56:50+00:00

Currently the check in ext4_ind_migrate() is not enough before doing the
real conversion:

a) delayed allocated extents could bypass the check on eh->eh_entries
   and eh->eh_depth

This can be demonstrated by this script

  xfs_io -fc "pwrite 0 4k" -c "pwrite 8k 4k" /mnt/ext4/testfile
  chattr -e /mnt/ext4/testfile

where testfile has two extents but still be converted to non-extent
based file format.

b) only extent length is checked but not the offset, which would result
   in data lose (delalloc) or fs corruption (nodelalloc), because
   non-extent based file only supports at most (12 + 2^10 + 2^20 + 2^30)
   blocks

This can be demostrated by

  xfs_io -fc "pwrite 5T 4k" /mnt/ext4/testfile
  chattr -e /mnt/ext4/testfile
  sync

If delalloc is enabled, dmesg prints
  EXT4-fs warning (device dm-4): ext4_block_to_path:105: block 1342177280 > max in inode 53
  EXT4-fs (dm-4): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 53 at logical offset 1342177280 with max blocks 1 with error 5
  EXT4-fs (dm-4): This should not happen!! Data will be lost

If delalloc is disabled, e2fsck -nf shows corruption
  Inode 53, i_size is 5497558142976, should be 4096.  Fix? no

Fix the two issues by

a) forcing all delayed allocation blocks to be allocated before checking
   eh->eh_depth and eh->eh_entries
b) limiting the last logical block of the extent is within direct map

Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

VFS: normal filesystems (and lustre): d_inode() annotations

2015-04-15T19:06:57+00:00

that's the bulk of filesystem drivers dealing with inodes of their own

Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro

ext4: update comments regarding ext4_delete_inode()

2014-11-25T21:17:29+00:00

ext4_delete_inode() has been renamed for a long time, update
comments for this.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong 
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o