Use spin_lock_bh for all spinlocks involved in message processing,
in preparation for softirq message processing.  DLM lock requests
from user space involve dlm processing in user context, in addition
to the standard kernel context, necessitating bh variants.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>

Get rid of the unnecessary refcounting on callback structs.
Copy interesting callback info into the lkb struct rather
than maintaining pointers to callback structs from the lkb.
This goes back to the way things were done prior to
commit 61bed0baa4db ("fs: dlm: use a non-static queue for callbacks").

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>

This patch fixes the following issue:

node 1 is dir
node 2 is master
node 3 is other

1->2: unlock
2: put final lkb, rsb moved to toss
2->1: unlock_reply
1: queue lkb callback with EUNLOCK
2->1: remove
1: receive_remove ignored (rsb on keep because of queued lkb callback)
1: complete lkb callback, put_lkb, move rsb to toss
3->1: lookup
1->3: lookup_reply master=2
3->2: request
2->3: request_reply EBADR

In summary:
An unexpected lkb reference causes the rsb to remain on the wrong list.
The rsb being on the wrong list causes receive_remove to be ignored.
An ignored receive_remove causes inconsistent dir and master state.

This sequence requires an unusually long delay in delivering the unlock
callback, because the remove message from 2->1 usually happens after
some seconds.  So, it's not known exactly how frequently this sequence
occurs in pratice.  It's possible that the same end result could also
have another unknown cause.

The solution for this issue is to further separate callback state
from the lkb, so that an lkb reference (and from that, an rsb ref)
are not held while a callback remains queued.  Then, within the
unlock_reply, the lkb will be freed and the rsb moved to the toss
list. So, the receive_remove will not be ignored.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>

This patch combines the failure and default cases for enqueue and
dequeue a callback to the lkb callback queue that should end in both
cases as it should never happen.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>

Stop using lkb structs in the callback tracepoints so that lkb
references are not needed. This prepares for separating lkb
structs from callbacks.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>

This patch fixes the copy lvb decision for user space lock requests.
Checking dlm_lvb_operations is done earlier, where granted/requested
lock modes are available to use in the matrix.

The decision had been moved to the wrong location, where granted mode
and requested mode where the same, which causes the dlm_lvb_operations
matix to produce the wrong copy decision. For PW or EX requests, the
caller could get invalid lvb data.

Fixes: 61bed0baa4db ("fs: dlm: use a non-static queue for callbacks")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>

This patch fixes to check on the right return value if it was the last
callback. The rv variable got overwritten by the return of
copy_result_to_user(). Fixing it by introducing a second variable for
the return value and don't let rv being overwritten.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 61bed0baa4db ("fs: dlm: use a non-static queue for callbacks")
Reported-by: Valentin Vidić <vvidic@valentin-vidic.from.hr>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/gfs2/Ze4qSvzGJDt5yxC3@valentin-vidic.from.hr
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>

This patch moves the dlm_purge_lkb_callbacks() function from ast to user
dlm module as it is only a function being used by dlm user
implementation. I got be hinted to hold specific locks regarding the
callback handling for dlm_purge_lkb_callbacks() but it was false
positive. It is confusing because ast dlm implementation uses a
different locking behaviour as user locks uses as DLM handles kernel and
user dlm locks differently. To avoid the confusing we move this function
to dlm user implementation.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>

This patch will move the lkb_flags value to the recently introduced
lkb_iflags value. For lkb_iflags we use atomic bit operations because
some flags like DLM_IFL_CB_PENDING are used while non rsb lock is held
to avoid issues with other flag manipulations which might run at the
same time we switch to atomic bit operations. Snapshot the bit values to
an uint32_t value is only used for debugging/logging use cases and don't
need to be 100% correct.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>

Currently manipulating lkb_dflags assumes to held the rsb lock assigned
to the lkb. This is held by dlm message processing after certain
time to lookup the right rsb from the received lkb message id. For user
space locks flags, which is currently the only use case for lkb_dflags,
flags are also being set during dlm character device handling without
holding the rsb lock. To minimize the risk that bit operations are
getting corrupted we switch to atomic bit operations. This patch will
also introduce helpers to snapshot atomic bit values in an non atomic
way. There might be still issues with the flag handling e.g. running in
case of manipulating bit ops and snapshot them at the same time, but this
patch minimize them and will start to use atomic bit operations.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>