RCU pathwalk relies upon the assumption that anything that changes
->d_inode of a dentry will invalidate its ->d_seq.  That's almost
true - the one exception is that the final dput() of already unhashed
dentry does *not* touch ->d_seq at all.  Unhashing does, though,
so for anything we'd found by RCU dcache lookup we are fine.
Unfortunately, we can *start* with an unhashed dentry or jump into
it.

We could try and be careful in the (few) places where that could
happen.  Or we could just make the final dput() invalidate the damn
thing, unhashed or not.  The latter is much simpler and easier to
backport, so let's do it that way.

Reported-by: "Dae R. Jeong" <threeearcat@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Since mountpoint crossing can happen without leaving lazy mode,
root dentries do need the same protection against having their
memory freed without RCU delay as everything else in the tree.

It's partially hidden by RCU delay between detaching from the
mount tree and dropping the vfsmount reference, but the starting
point of pathwalk can be on an already detached mount, in which
case umount-caused RCU delay has already passed by the time the
lazy pathwalk grabs rcu_read_lock().  If the starting point
happens to be at the root of that vfsmount *and* that vfsmount
covers the entire filesystem, we get trouble.

Fixes: 48a066e72d97 ("RCU'd vsfmounts")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Pull misc vfs updates from Al Viro:
 "Misc bits and pieces not fitting into anything more specific"

* 'work.misc' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
  vfs: delete unnecessary assignment in vfs_listxattr
  Documentation: filesystems: update filesystem locking documentation
  vfs: namei: use path_equal() in follow_dotdot()
  fs.h: fix outdated comment about file flags
  __inode_security_revalidate() never gets NULL opt_dentry
  make xattr_getsecurity() static
  vfat: simplify checks in vfat_lookup()
  get rid of dead code in d_find_alias()
  it's SB_BORN, not MS_BORN...
  msdos_rmdir(): kill BS comment
  remove rpc_rmdir()
  fs: avoid fdput() after failed fdget() in vfs_dedupe_file_range()

Pull dcache updates from Al Viro:
 "This is the first part of dealing with livelocks etc around
  shrink_dcache_parent()."

* 'work.dcache' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
  restore cond_resched() in shrink_dcache_parent()
  dput(): turn into explicit while() loop
  dcache: move cond_resched() into the end of __dentry_kill()
  d_walk(): kill 'finish' callback
  d_invalidate(): unhash immediately

All "try disconnected alias if nothing else fits" logics in d_find_alias()
got accidentally disabled by Neil a while ago; for most of the callers it
was the right thing to do, so fixes belong in few callers that *do* want
disconnected aliases.  This just takes the now-dead code in d_find_alias()
out.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

For anything NFS-exported we do _not_ want to unlock new inode
before it has grown an alias; original set of fixes got the
ordering right, but missed the nasty complication in case of
lockdep being enabled - unlock_new_inode() does
	lockdep_annotate_inode_mutex_key(inode)
which can only be done before anyone gets a chance to touch
->i_mutex.  Unfortunately, flipping the order and doing
unlock_new_inode() before d_instantiate() opens a window when
mkdir can race with open-by-fhandle on a guessed fhandle, leading
to multiple aliases for a directory inode and all the breakage
that follows from that.

	Correct solution: a new primitive (d_instantiate_new())
combining these two in the right order - lockdep annotate, then
d_instantiate(), then the rest of unlock_new_inode().  All
combinations of d_instantiate() with unlock_new_inode() should
be converted to that.

Cc: stable@kernel.org	# 2.6.29 and later
Tested-by: Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

No need to mess with gotos when the code yielded by straight while()
isn't any worse...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

cond_resched() in shrink_dentry_list() is too early

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

no users left

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>