Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
- fix freeing allocated id for anon dev when snapshot creation fails
- fiemap fixes:
- followup for a recent deadlock fix, ranges that fiemap can access
can still race with ordered extent completion
- make sure fiemap with SYNC flag does not race with writes
* tag 'for-6.8-rc6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: fix double free of anonymous device after snapshot creation failure
btrfs: ensure fiemap doesn't race with writes when FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC is given
btrfs: fix race between ordered extent completion and fiemap
When creating a snapshot we may do a double free of an anonymous device
in case there's an error committing the transaction. The second free may
result in freeing an anonymous device number that was allocated by some
other subsystem in the kernel or another btrfs filesystem.
The steps that lead to this:
1) At ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we allocate an anonymous device number
and assign it to pending_snapshot->anon_dev;
2) Then we call btrfs_commit_transaction() and end up at
transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot();
3) There we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root() and pass it the anonymous device
number stored in pending_snapshot->anon_dev;
4) btrfs_get_new_fs_root() frees that anonymous device number because
btrfs_lookup_fs_root() returned a root - someone else did a lookup
of the new root already, which could some task doing backref walking;
5) After that some error happens in the transaction commit path, and at
ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we jump to the 'fail' label, and after
that we free again the same anonymous device number, which in the
meanwhile may have been reallocated somewhere else, because
pending_snapshot->anon_dev still has the same value as in step 1.
Recently syzbot ran into this and reported the following trace:
------------[ cut here ]------------
ida_free called for id=51 which is not allocated.
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 31038 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-00410-gc02197fc9076 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024
RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525
Code: 10 42 80 3c 28 (...)
RSP: 0018:ffffc90015a67300 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: be5130472f5dd000 RBX: 0000000000000033 RCX: 0000000000040000
RDX: ffffc90009a7a000 RSI: 000000000003ffff RDI: 0000000000040000
RBP: ffffc90015a673f0 R08: ffffffff81577992 R09: 1ffff92002b4cdb4
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52002b4cdb5 R12: 0000000000000246
R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff8e256b80 R15: 0000000000000246
FS: 00007fca3f4b46c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f167a17b978 CR3: 000000001ed26000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
btrfs_get_root_ref+0xa48/0xaf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1346
create_pending_snapshot+0xff2/0x2bc0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1837
create_pending_snapshots+0x195/0x1d0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1931
btrfs_commit_transaction+0xf1c/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2404
create_snapshot+0x507/0x880 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:848
btrfs_mksubvol+0x5d0/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:998
btrfs_mksnapshot+0xb5/0xf0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1044
__btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x387/0x4b0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1306
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1ca/0x400 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1393
btrfs_ioctl+0xa74/0xd40
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfe/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77
RIP: 0033:0x7fca3e67dda9
Code: 28 00 00 00 (...)
RSP: 002b:00007fca3f4b40c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fca3e7abf80 RCX: 00007fca3e67dda9
RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007fca3e6ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fca3e7abf80 R15: 00007fff6bf95658
</TASK>
Where we get an explicit message where we attempt to free an anonymous
device number that is not currently allocated. It happens in a different
code path from the example below, at btrfs_get_root_ref(), so this change
may not fix the case triggered by syzbot.
To fix at least the code path from the example above, change
btrfs_get_root_ref() and its callers to receive a dev_t pointer argument
for the anonymous device number, so that in case it frees the number, it
also resets it to 0, so that up in the call chain we don't attempt to do
the double free.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000f673a1061202f630@google.com/
Fixes: e03ee2fe873e ("btrfs: do not ASSERT() if the newly created subvolume already got read")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC is given to fiemap the expectation is that that are no concurrent writes and we get a stable view of the inode's extent layout. When the flag is given we flush all IO (and wait for ordered extents to complete) and then lock the inode in shared mode, however that leaves open the possibility that a write might happen right after the flushing and before locking the inode. So fix this by flushing again after locking the inode - we leave the initial flushing before locking the inode to avoid holding the lock and blocking other RO operations while waiting for IO and ordered extents to complete. The second flushing while holding the inode's lock will most of the time do nothing or very little since the time window for new writes to have happened is small. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For fiemap we recently stopped locking the target extent range for the
whole duration of the fiemap call, in order to avoid a deadlock in a
scenario where the fiemap buffer happens to be a memory mapped range of
the same file. This use case is very unlikely to be useful in practice but
it may be triggered by fuzz testing (syzbot, etc).
However by not locking the target extent range for the whole duration of
the fiemap call we can race with an ordered extent. This happens like
this:
1) The fiemap task finishes processing a file extent item that covers
the file range [512K, 1M[, and that file extent item is the last item
in the leaf currently being processed;
2) And ordered extent for the file range [768K, 2M[, in COW mode,
completes (btrfs_finish_one_ordered()) and the file extent item
covering the range [512K, 1M[ is trimmed to cover the range
[512K, 768K[ and then a new file extent item for the range [768K, 2M[
is inserted in the inode's subvolume tree;
3) The fiemap task calls fiemap_next_leaf_item(), which then calls
btrfs_next_leaf() to find the next leaf / item. This finds that the
the next key following the one we previously processed (its type is
BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY and its offset is 512K), is the key corresponding
to the new file extent item inserted by the ordered extent, which has
a type of BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY and an offset of 768K;
4) Later the fiemap code ends up at emit_fiemap_extent() and triggers
the warning:
if (cache->offset + cache->len > offset) {
WARN_ON(1);
return -EINVAL;
}
Since we get 1M > 768K, because the previously emitted entry for the
old extent covering the file range [512K, 1M[ ends at an offset that
is greater than the new extent's start offset (768K). This makes fiemap
fail with -EINVAL besides triggering the warning that produces a stack
trace like the following:
[1621.677651] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[1621.677656] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 204366 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2492 emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs]
[1621.677899] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic (...)
[1621.677951] CPU: 1 PID: 204366 Comm: pool Not tainted 6.8.0-rc5-btrfs-next-151+ #1
[1621.677954] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[1621.677956] RIP: 0010:emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs]
[1621.678033] Code: 2b 4c 89 63 (...)
[1621.678035] RSP: 0018:ffffab16089ffd20 EFLAGS: 00010206
[1621.678037] RAX: 00000000004fa000 RBX: ffffab16089ffe08 RCX: 0000000000009000
[1621.678039] RDX: 00000000004f9000 RSI: 00000000004f1000 RDI: ffffab16089ffe90
[1621.678040] RBP: 00000000004f9000 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: 0000000000000000
[1621.678041] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: 0000000041d78000
[1621.678043] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9434f0b17850
[1621.678044] FS: 00007fa6e20006c0(0000) GS:ffff943bdfa40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[1621.678046] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[1621.678048] CR2: 00007fa6b0801000 CR3: 000000012d404002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
[1621.678053] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[1621.678055] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[1621.678056] Call Trace:
[1621.678074] <TASK>
[1621.678076] ? __warn+0x80/0x130
[1621.678082] ? emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs]
[1621.678159] ? report_bug+0x1f4/0x200
[1621.678164] ? handle_bug+0x42/0x70
[1621.678167] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70
[1621.678170] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
[1621.678178] ? emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs]
[1621.678253] extent_fiemap+0x766/0xa30 [btrfs]
[1621.678339] btrfs_fiemap+0x45/0x80 [btrfs]
[1621.678420] do_vfs_ioctl+0x1e4/0x870
[1621.678431] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xc0
[1621.678434] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x120
[1621.678445] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
There's also another case where before calling btrfs_next_leaf() we are
processing a hole or a prealloc extent and we had several delalloc ranges
within that hole or prealloc extent. In that case if the ordered extents
complete before we find the next key, we may end up finding an extent item
with an offset smaller than (or equals to) the offset in cache->offset.
So fix this by changing emit_fiemap_extent() to address these three
scenarios like this:
1) For the first case, steps listed above, adjust the length of the
previously cached extent so that it does not overlap with the current
extent, emit the previous one and cache the current file extent item;
2) For the second case where he had a hole or prealloc extent with
multiple delalloc ranges inside the hole or prealloc extent's range,
and the current file extent item has an offset that matches the offset
in the fiemap cache, just discard what we have in the fiemap cache and
assign the current file extent item to the cache, since it's more up
to date;
3) For the third case where he had a hole or prealloc extent with
multiple delalloc ranges inside the hole or prealloc extent's range
and the offset of the file extent item we just found is smaller than
what we have in the cache, just skip the current file extent item
if its range end at or behind the cached extent's end, because we may
have emitted (to the fiemap user space buffer) delalloc ranges that
overlap with the current file extent item's range. If the file extent
item's range goes beyond the end offset of the cached extent, just
emit the cached extent and cache a subrange of the file extent item,
that goes from the end offset of the cached extent to the end offset
of the file extent item.
Dealing with those cases in those ways makes everything consistent by
reflecting the current state of file extent items in the btree and
without emitting extents that have overlapping ranges (which would be
confusing and violating expectations).
This issue could be triggered often with test case generic/561, and was
also hit and reported by Wang Yugui.
Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20240223104619.701F.409509F4@e16-tech.com/
Fixes: b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
"A more fixes for recently reported or discovered problems:
- fix corner case of send that would generate potentially large
stream of zeros if there's a hole at the end of the file
- fix chunk validation in zoned mode on conventional zones, it was
possible to create chunks that would not be allowed on sequential
zones
- fix validation of dev-replace ioctl filenames
- fix KCSAN warnings about access to block reserve struct members"
* tag 'for-6.8-rc6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: fix data race at btrfs_use_block_rsv() when accessing block reserve
btrfs: fix data races when accessing the reserved amount of block reserves
btrfs: send: don't issue unnecessary zero writes for trailing hole
btrfs: dev-replace: properly validate device names
btrfs: zoned: don't skip block group profile checks on conventional zones
At btrfs_use_block_rsv() we read the size of a block reserve without locking its spinlock, which makes KCSAN complain because the size of a block reserve is always updated while holding its spinlock. The report from KCSAN is the following: [653.313148] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv [btrfs] / btrfs_use_block_rsv [btrfs] [653.314755] read to 0x000000017f5871b8 of 8 bytes by task 7519 on cpu 0: [653.314779] btrfs_use_block_rsv+0xe4/0x2f8 [btrfs] [653.315606] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xdc/0x998 [btrfs] [653.316421] btrfs_force_cow_block+0x220/0xe38 [btrfs] [653.317242] btrfs_cow_block+0x1ac/0x568 [btrfs] [653.318060] btrfs_search_slot+0xda2/0x19b8 [btrfs] [653.318879] btrfs_del_csums+0x1dc/0x798 [btrfs] [653.319702] __btrfs_free_extent.isra.0+0xc24/0x2028 [btrfs] [653.320538] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xd3c/0x2390 [btrfs] [653.321340] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xae/0x290 [btrfs] [653.322140] flush_space+0x5e4/0x718 [btrfs] [653.322958] btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space+0x102/0x2f8 [btrfs] [653.323781] process_one_work+0x3b6/0x838 [653.323800] worker_thread+0x75e/0xb10 [653.323817] kthread+0x21a/0x230 [653.323836] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8 [653.323855] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30 [653.323887] write to 0x000000017f5871b8 of 8 bytes by task 576 on cpu 3: [653.323906] btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv+0x1a4/0x250 [btrfs] [653.324699] btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x468/0x6d8 [btrfs] [653.325494] btrfs_free_extent+0x76/0x120 [btrfs] [653.326280] __btrfs_mod_ref+0x6a8/0x6b8 [btrfs] [653.327064] btrfs_dec_ref+0x50/0x70 [btrfs] [653.327849] walk_up_proc+0x236/0xa50 [btrfs] [653.328633] walk_up_tree+0x21c/0x448 [btrfs] [653.329418] btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x802/0x1328 [btrfs] [653.330205] btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x184/0x238 [btrfs] [653.330995] cleaner_kthread+0x2b0/0x2f0 [btrfs] [653.331781] kthread+0x21a/0x230 [653.331800] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8 [653.331818] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30 So add a helper to get the size of a block reserve while holding the lock. Reading the field while holding the lock instead of using the data_race() annotation is used in order to prevent load tearing. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
At space_info.c we have several places where we access the ->reserved field of a block reserve without taking the block reserve's spinlock first, which makes KCSAN warn about a data race since that field is always updated while holding the spinlock. The reports from KCSAN are like the following: [117.193526] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_block_rsv_release [btrfs] / need_preemptive_reclaim [btrfs] [117.195148] read to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 6303 on cpu 3: [117.195172] need_preemptive_reclaim+0x222/0x2f0 [btrfs] [117.195992] __reserve_bytes+0xbb0/0xdc8 [btrfs] [117.196807] btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes+0x4c/0x120 [btrfs] [117.197620] btrfs_block_rsv_add+0x78/0xa8 [btrfs] [117.198434] btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x154/0x368 [btrfs] [117.199300] btrfs_update_inode+0x108/0x1c8 [btrfs] [117.200122] btrfs_dirty_inode+0xb4/0x140 [btrfs] [117.200937] btrfs_update_time+0x8c/0xb0 [btrfs] [117.201754] touch_atime+0x16c/0x1e0 [117.201789] filemap_read+0x674/0x728 [117.201823] btrfs_file_read_iter+0xf8/0x410 [btrfs] [117.202653] vfs_read+0x2b6/0x498 [117.203454] ksys_read+0xa2/0x150 [117.203473] __s390x_sys_read+0x68/0x88 [117.203495] do_syscall+0x1c6/0x210 [117.203517] __do_syscall+0xc8/0xf0 [117.203539] system_call+0x70/0x98 [117.203579] write to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 11 on cpu 0: [117.203604] btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x2e8/0x578 [btrfs] [117.204432] btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata+0x7c/0x1d0 [btrfs] [117.205259] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x37c/0x5e0 [btrfs] [117.206093] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x356/0x498 [btrfs] [117.206917] btrfs_work_helper+0x160/0x7a0 [btrfs] [117.207738] process_one_work+0x3b6/0x838 [117.207768] worker_thread+0x75e/0xb10 [117.207797] kthread+0x21a/0x230 [117.207830] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8 [117.207861] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30 So add a helper to get the reserved amount of a block reserve while holding the lock. The value may be not be up to date anymore when used by need_preemptive_reclaim() and btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space(), but that's ok since the worst it can do is cause more reclaim work do be done sooner rather than later. Reading the field while holding the lock instead of using the data_race() annotation is used in order to prevent load tearing. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If we have a sparse file with a trailing hole (from the last extent's end
to i_size) and then create an extent in the file that ends before the
file's i_size, then when doing an incremental send we will issue a write
full of zeroes for the range that starts immediately after the new extent
ends up to i_size. While this isn't incorrect because the file ends up
with exactly the same data, it unnecessarily results in using extra space
at the destination with one or more extents full of zeroes instead of
having a hole. In same cases this results in using megabytes or even
gigabytes of unnecessary space.
Example, reproducer:
$ cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/sdh
MNT=/mnt/sdh
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT
# Create 1G sparse file.
xfs_io -f -c "truncate 1G" $MNT/foobar
# Create base snapshot.
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/mysnap1
# Create send stream (full send) for the base snapshot.
btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap $MNT/mysnap1
# Now write one extent at the beginning of the file and one somewhere
# in the middle, leaving a gap between the end of this second extent
# and the file's size.
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 128K" \
-c "pwrite -S 0xcd 512M 128K" \
$MNT/foobar
# Now create a second snapshot which is going to be used for an
# incremental send operation.
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/mysnap2
# Create send stream (incremental send) for the second snapshot.
btrfs send -p $MNT/mysnap1 -f /tmp/2.snap $MNT/mysnap2
# Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and
# verify we get the same content that the original filesystem had
# and file foobar has only two extents with a size of 128K each.
umount $MNT
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT
btrfs receive -f /tmp/1.snap $MNT
btrfs receive -f /tmp/2.snap $MNT
echo -e "\nFile fiemap in the second snapshot:"
# Should have:
#
# 128K extent at file range [0, 128K[
# hole at file range [128K, 512M[
# 128K extent file range [512M, 512M + 128K[
# hole at file range [512M + 128K, 1G[
xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/mysnap2/foobar
# File should be using 256K of data (two 128K extents).
echo -e "\nSpace used by the file: $(du -h $MNT/mysnap2/foobar | cut -f 1)"
umount $MNT
Running the test, we can see with fiemap that we get an extent for the
range [512M, 1G[, while in the source filesystem we have an extent for
the range [512M, 512M + 128K[ and a hole for the rest of the file (the
range [512M + 128K, 1G[):
$ ./test.sh
(...)
File fiemap in the second snapshot:
/mnt/sdh/mysnap2/foobar:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..255]: 26624..26879 256 0x0
1: [256..1048575]: hole 1048320
2: [1048576..2097151]: 2156544..3205119 1048576 0x1
Space used by the file: 513M
This happens because once we finish processing an inode, at
finish_inode_if_needed(), we always issue a hole (write operations full
of zeros) if there's a gap between the end of the last processed extent
and the file's size, even if that range is already a hole in the parent
snapshot. Fix this by issuing the hole only if the range is not already
a hole.
After this change, running the test above, we get the expected layout:
$ ./test.sh
(...)
File fiemap in the second snapshot:
/mnt/sdh/mysnap2/foobar:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..255]: 26624..26879 256 0x0
1: [256..1048575]: hole 1048320
2: [1048576..1048831]: 26880..27135 256 0x1
3: [1048832..2097151]: hole 1048320
Space used by the file: 256K
A test case for fstests will follow soon.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reported-by: Dorai Ashok S A <dash.btrfs@inix.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c0bf7818-9c45-46a8-b3d3-513230d0c86e@inix.me/
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There's a syzbot report that device name buffers passed to device replace are not properly checked for string termination which could lead to a read out of bounds in getname_kernel(). Add a helper that validates both source and target device name buffers. For devid as the source initialize the buffer to empty string in case something tries to read it later. This was originally analyzed and fixed in a different way by Edward Adam Davis (see links). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000d1a1d1060cc9c5e7@google.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/tencent_44CA0665C9836EF9EEC80CB9E7E206DF5206@qq.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ CC: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+33f23b49ac24f986c9e8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
On a zoned filesystem with conventional zones, we're skipping the block group profile checks for the conventional zones. This allows converting a zoned filesystem's data block groups to RAID when all of the zones backing the chunk are on conventional zones. But this will lead to problems, once we're trying to allocate chunks backed by sequential zones. So also check for conventional zones when loading a block group's profile on them. Reported-by: HAN Yuwei <hrx@bupt.moe> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1ACD2E3643008A17+da260584-2c7f-432a-9e22-9d390aae84cc@bupt.moe/#t Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>