linux.git/fs/btrfs/tests, branch v6.10

btrfs: use btrfs_is_testing() everywhere

2024-05-07T19:31:07+00:00

There are open coded tests of BTRFS_FS_STATE_DUMMY_FS_INFO and we have a
wrapper for that that's a compile-time constant when self-tests are not
built in. As this is only for development we can save some bytes and
conditions on release configs by using the helper in the remaining
cases.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: pass the extent map tree's inode to remove_extent_mapping()

2024-05-07T19:31:06+00:00

Extent maps are always associated to an inode's extent map tree, so
there's no need to pass the extent map tree explicitly to
remove_extent_mapping().

In order to facilitate an upcoming change that adds a shrinker for extent
maps, change remove_extent_mapping() to receive the inode instead of its
extent map tree.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo 
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: tests: error out on unexpected extent map reference count

2024-05-07T19:31:03+00:00

In the extent map self tests, when freeing all extent maps from a test
extent map tree we are not expecting to find any extent map with a
reference count different from 1 (the tree reference). If we find any,
we just log a message but we don't fail the test, which makes it very easy
to miss any bug/regression - no one reads the test messages unless a test
fails. So change the behaviour to make a test fail if we find an extent
map in the tree with a reference count different from 1. Make the failure
happen only after removing all extent maps, so that we don't leak memory.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo 
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: pass an inode to btrfs_add_extent_mapping()

2024-05-07T19:31:03+00:00

Instead of passing fs_info and extent map tree arguments to
btrfs_add_extent_mapping(), we can pass an inode instead, as extent maps
are always inserted in the extent map tree of an inode, and the fs_info
can be extracted from the inode (inode->root->fs_info). The only exception
is in the self tests where we allocate an extent map tree and then use it
to insert/update/remove extent maps. However the tests can be changed to
use a test inode and then use the inode's extent map tree.

So change btrfs_add_extent_mapping() to have an inode as an argument
instead of a fs_info and an extent map tree. This reduces the number of
parameters and will also be needed for an upcoming change.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo 
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: fix wrong block_start calculation for btrfs_drop_extent_map_range()

2024-04-18T16:18:50+00:00

[BUG]
During my extent_map cleanup/refactor, with extra sanity checks,
extent-map-tests::test_case_7() would not pass the checks.

The problem is, after btrfs_drop_extent_map_range(), the resulted
extent_map has a @block_start way too large.
Meanwhile my btrfs_file_extent_item based members are returning a
correct @disk_bytenr/@offset combination.

The extent map layout looks like this:

     0        16K    32K       48K
     | PINNED |      | Regular |

The regular em at [32K, 48K) also has 32K @block_start.

Then drop range [0, 36K), which should shrink the regular one to be
[36K, 48K).
However the @block_start is incorrect, we expect 32K + 4K, but got 52K.

[CAUSE]
Inside btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() function, if we hit an extent_map
that covers the target range but is still beyond it, we need to split
that extent map into half:

	|<-- drop range -->|
		 |<----- existing extent_map --->|

And if the extent map is not compressed, we need to forward
extent_map::block_start by the difference between the end of drop range
and the extent map start.

However in that particular case, the difference is calculated using
(start + len - em->start).

The problem is @start can be modified if the drop range covers any
pinned extent.

This leads to wrong calculation, and would be caught by my later
extent_map sanity checks, which checks the em::block_start against
btrfs_file_extent_item::disk_bytenr + btrfs_file_extent_item::offset.

This is a regression caused by commit c962098ca4af ("btrfs: fix
incorrect splitting in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range"), which removed the
@len update for pinned extents.

[FIX]
Fix it by avoiding using @start completely, and use @end - em->start
instead, which @end is exclusive bytenr number.

And update the test case to verify the @block_start to prevent such
problem from happening.

Thankfully this is not going to lead to any data corruption, as IO path
does not utilize btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() with @skip_pinned set.

So this fix is only here for the sake of consistency/correctness.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+
Fixes: c962098ca4af ("btrfs: fix incorrect splitting in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: tests: allocate dummy fs_info and root in test_find_delalloc()

2024-03-04T15:24:49+00:00

Allocate fs_info and root to have a valid fs_info pointer in case it's
dereferenced by a helper outside of tests, like find_lock_delalloc_range().

Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: remove the pg_offset parameter from btrfs_get_extent()

2024-03-04T15:24:45+00:00

The parameter @pg_offset of btrfs_get_extent() is only utilized for
inlined extent, and we already have an ASSERT() and tree-checker, to
make sure we can only get inline extent at file offset 0.

Any invalid inline extent with non-zero file offset would be rejected by
tree-checker in the first place.

Thus the @pg_offset parameter is not really necessary, just remove it.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: migrate extent_buffer::pages[] to folio

2023-12-15T22:01:04+00:00

For now extent_buffer::pages[] are still only accepting single page
pointer, thus we can migrate to folios pretty easily.

As for single page, page and folio are 1:1 mapped, including their page
flags.

This patch would just do the conversion from struct page to struct
folio, providing the first step to higher order folio in the future.

This conversion is pretty simple:

- extent_buffer::pages[] -> extent_buffer::folios[]

- page_address(eb->pages[i]) -> folio_address(eb->pages[i])

- eb->pages[i] -> folio_page(eb->folios[i], 0)

There would be more specific cleanups preparing for the incoming higher
order folio support.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: use the flags of an extent map to identify the compression type

2023-12-15T21:59:02+00:00

Currently, in struct extent_map, we use an unsigned int (32 bits) to
identify the compression type of an extent and an unsigned long (64 bits
on a 64 bits platform, 32 bits otherwise) for flags. We are only using
6 different flags, so an unsigned long is excessive and we can use flags
to identify the compression type instead of using a dedicated 32 bits
field.

We can easily have tens or hundreds of thousands (or more) of extent maps
on busy and large filesystems, specially with compression enabled or many
or large files with tons of small extents. So it's convenient to have the
extent_map structure as small as possible in order to use less memory.

So remove the compression type field from struct extent_map, use flags
to identify the compression type and shorten the flags field from an
unsigned long to a u32. This saves 8 bytes (on 64 bits platforms) and
reduces the size of the structure from 136 bytes down to 128 bytes, using
now only two cache lines, and increases the number of extent maps we can
have per 4K page from 30 to 32. By using a u32 for the flags instead of
an unsigned long, we no longer use test_bit(), set_bit() and clear_bit(),
but that level of atomicity is not needed as most flags are never cleared
once set (before adding an extent map to the tree), and the ones that can
be cleared or set after an extent map is added to the tree, are always
performed while holding the write lock on the extent map tree, while the
reader holds a lock on the tree or tests for a flag that never changes
once the extent map is in the tree (such as compression flags).

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: unexport add_extent_mapping()

2023-12-15T21:59:01+00:00

There's no need to export add_extent_mapping(), as it's only used inside
extent_map.c and in the self tests. For the tests we can use instead
btrfs_add_extent_mapping(), which will accomplish exactly the same as we
don't expect collisions in any of them. So unexport it and make the tests
use btrfs_add_extent_mapping() instead of add_extent_mapping().

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba