linux.git/fs/btrfs/relocation.c, branch v5.6

btrfs: make btrfs_ordered_extent naming consistent with btrfs_file_extent_item

2020-01-20T15:40:54+00:00

ordered->start, ordered->len, and ordered->disk_len correspond to
fi->disk_bytenr, fi->num_bytes, and fi->disk_num_bytes, respectively.
It's confusing to translate between the two naming schemes. Since a
btrfs_ordered_extent is basically a pending btrfs_file_extent_item,
let's make the former use the naming from the latter.

Note that I didn't touch the names in tracepoints just in case there are
scripts depending on the current naming.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn 
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: relocation: Output current relocation stage at btrfs_relocate_block_group()

2020-01-20T15:40:51+00:00

There are two relocation stages but both print the same message. Add the
description of the stage. This can help debugging or provides
informative message to users.

  BTRFS info (device dm-5): balance: start -d -m -s
  BTRFS info (device dm-5): relocating block group 30408704 flags metadata|dup
  BTRFS info (device dm-5): found 2 extents, stage: move data extents
  BTRFS info (device dm-5): relocating block group 22020096 flags system|dup
  BTRFS info (device dm-5): found 1 extents, stage: move data extents
  BTRFS info (device dm-5): relocating block group 13631488 flags data
  BTRFS info (device dm-5): found 1 extents, stage: move data extents
  BTRFS info (device dm-5): found 1 extents, stage: update data pointers
  BTRFS info (device dm-5): balance: ended with status: 0

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: relocation: fix reloc_root lifespan and access

2020-01-13T22:10:56+00:00

[BUG]
There are several different KASAN reports for balance + snapshot
workloads.  Involved call paths include:

   should_ignore_root+0x54/0xb0 [btrfs]
   build_backref_tree+0x11af/0x2280 [btrfs]
   relocate_tree_blocks+0x391/0xb80 [btrfs]
   relocate_block_group+0x3e5/0xa00 [btrfs]
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x240/0x4d0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x53/0xf0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_balance+0xc91/0x1840 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x416/0x4e0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl+0x8af/0x3e60 [btrfs]
   do_vfs_ioctl+0x831/0xb10

   create_reloc_root+0x9f/0x460 [btrfs]
   btrfs_reloc_post_snapshot+0xff/0x6c0 [btrfs]
   create_pending_snapshot+0xa9b/0x15f0 [btrfs]
   create_pending_snapshots+0x111/0x140 [btrfs]
   btrfs_commit_transaction+0x7a6/0x1360 [btrfs]
   btrfs_mksubvol+0x915/0x960 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x1d5/0x1e0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1d3/0x270 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl+0x241b/0x3e60 [btrfs]
   do_vfs_ioctl+0x831/0xb10

   btrfs_reloc_pre_snapshot+0x85/0xc0 [btrfs]
   create_pending_snapshot+0x209/0x15f0 [btrfs]
   create_pending_snapshots+0x111/0x140 [btrfs]
   btrfs_commit_transaction+0x7a6/0x1360 [btrfs]
   btrfs_mksubvol+0x915/0x960 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x1d5/0x1e0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1d3/0x270 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl+0x241b/0x3e60 [btrfs]
   do_vfs_ioctl+0x831/0xb10

[CAUSE]
All these call sites are only relying on root->reloc_root, which can
undergo btrfs_drop_snapshot(), and since we don't have real refcount
based protection to reloc roots, we can reach already dropped reloc
root, triggering KASAN.

[FIX]
To avoid such access to unstable root->reloc_root, we should check
BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE bit first.

This patch introduces wrappers that provide the correct way to check the
bit with memory barriers protection.

Most callers don't distinguish merged reloc tree and no reloc tree.  The
only exception is should_ignore_root(), as merged reloc tree can be
ignored, while no reloc tree shouldn't.

[CRITICAL SECTION ANALYSIS]
Although test_bit()/set_bit()/clear_bit() doesn't imply a barrier, the
DEAD_RELOC_TREE bit has extra help from transaction as a higher level
barrier, the lifespan of root::reloc_root and DEAD_RELOC_TREE bit are:

	NULL: reloc_root is NULL	PTR: reloc_root is not NULL
	0: DEAD_RELOC_ROOT bit not set	DEAD: DEAD_RELOC_ROOT bit set

	(NULL, 0)    Initial state		 __
	  |					 /\ Section A
        btrfs_init_reloc_root()			 \/
	  |				 	 __
	(PTR, 0)     reloc_root initialized      /\
          |					 |
	btrfs_update_reloc_root()		 |  Section B
          |					 |
	(PTR, DEAD)  reloc_root has been merged  \/
          |					 __
	=== btrfs_commit_transaction() ====================
	  |					 /\
	clean_dirty_subvols()			 |
	  |					 |  Section C
	(NULL, DEAD) reloc_root cleanup starts   \/
          |					 __
	btrfs_drop_snapshot()			 /\
	  |					 |  Section D
	(NULL, 0)    Back to initial state	 \/

Every have_reloc_root() or test_bit(DEAD_RELOC_ROOT) caller holds
transaction handle, so none of such caller can cross transaction boundary.

In Section A, every caller just found no DEAD bit, and grab reloc_root.

In the cross section A-B, caller may get no DEAD bit, but since reloc_root
is still completely valid thus accessing reloc_root is completely safe.

No test_bit() caller can cross the boundary of Section B and Section C.

In Section C, every caller found the DEAD bit, so no one will access
reloc_root.

In the cross section C-D, either caller gets the DEAD bit set, avoiding
access reloc_root no matter if it's safe or not.  Or caller get the DEAD
bit cleared, then access reloc_root, which is already NULL, nothing will
be wrong.

The memory write barriers are between the reloc_root updates and bit
set/clear, the pairing read side is before test_bit.

Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell 
Fixes: d2311e698578 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
[ barriers ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: do not leak reloc root if we fail to read the fs root

2019-12-13T13:10:45+00:00

If we fail to read the fs root corresponding with a reloc root we'll
just break out and free the reloc roots.  But we remove our current
reloc_root from this list higher up, which means we'll leak this
reloc_root.  Fix this by adding ourselves back to the reloc_roots list
so we are properly cleaned up.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: remove extent_map::bdev

2019-11-18T22:43:44+00:00

We can now remove the bdev from extent_map. Previous patches made sure
that bio_set_dev is correctly in all places and that we don't need to
grab it from latest_bdev or pass it around inside the extent map.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: scrub: Don't check free space before marking a block group RO

2019-11-18T17:07:55+00:00

[BUG]
When running btrfs/072 with only one online CPU, it has a pretty high
chance to fail:

  btrfs/072 12s ... _check_dmesg: something found in dmesg (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.dmesg)
  - output mismatch (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad)
      --- tests/btrfs/072.out     2019-10-22 15:18:14.008965340 +0800
      +++ /xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad      2019-11-14 15:56:45.877152240 +0800
      @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
       QA output created by 072
       Silence is golden
      +Scrub find errors in "-m dup -d single" test
      ...

And with the following call trace:

  BTRFS info (device dm-5): scrub: started on devid 1
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -27)
  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 55087 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1890 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs]
  CPU: 0 PID: 55087 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W  O      5.4.0-rc1-custom+ #13
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs]
  Call Trace:
   __btrfs_end_transaction+0xdb/0x310 [btrfs]
   btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x20 [btrfs]
   btrfs_inc_block_group_ro+0x1c9/0x210 [btrfs]
   scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x264/0x940 [btrfs]
   btrfs_scrub_dev+0x45c/0x8f0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl+0x31a1/0x3fb0 [btrfs]
   do_vfs_ioctl+0x636/0xaa0
   ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50
   do_syscall_64+0x79/0xe0
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
  ---[ end trace 166c865cec7688e7 ]---

[CAUSE]
The error number -27 is -EFBIG, returned from the following call chain:
btrfs_end_transaction()
|- __btrfs_end_transaction()
   |- btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()
      |- btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc()
         |- btrfs_add_system_chunk()

This happens because we have used up all space of
btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array.

The root cause is, we have the following bad loop of creating tons of
system chunks:

1. The only SYSTEM chunk is being scrubbed
   It's very common to have only one SYSTEM chunk.
2. New SYSTEM bg will be allocated
   As btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() will check if we have enough space
   after marking current bg RO. If not, then allocate a new chunk.
3. New SYSTEM bg is still empty, will be reclaimed
   During the reclaim, we will mark it RO again.
4. That newly allocated empty SYSTEM bg get scrubbed
   We go back to step 2, as the bg is already mark RO but still not
   cleaned up yet.

If the cleaner kthread doesn't get executed fast enough (e.g. only one
CPU), then we will get more and more empty SYSTEM chunks, using up all
the space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array.

[FIX]
Since scrub/dev-replace doesn't always need to allocate new extent,
especially chunk tree extent, so we don't really need to do chunk
pre-allocation.

To break above spiral, here we introduce a new parameter to
btrfs_inc_block_group(), @do_chunk_alloc, which indicates whether we
need extra chunk pre-allocation.

For relocation, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=true, while for scrub, we pass
@do_chunk_alloc=false.
This should keep unnecessary empty chunks from popping up for scrub.

Also, since there are two parameters for btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(),
add more comment for it.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group_cache

2019-11-18T16:51:51+00:00

The type name is misleading, a single entry is named 'cache' while this
normally means a collection of objects. Rename that everywhere. Also the
identifier was quite long, making function prototypes harder to format.

Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: add dedicated members for start and length of a block group

2019-11-18T16:51:45+00:00

The on-disk format of block group item makes use of the key that stores
the offset and length. This is further used in the code, although this
makes thing harder to understand. The key is also packed so the
offset/length is not properly aligned as u64.

Add start (key.objectid) and length (key.offset) members to block group
and remove the embedded key.  When the item is searched or written, a
local variable for key is used.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn 
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: move block_group_item::used to block group

2019-11-18T16:51:44+00:00

For unknown reasons, the member 'used' in the block group struct is
stored in the b-tree item and accessed everywhere using the special
accessor helper. Let's unify it and make it a regular member and only
update the item before writing it to the tree.

The item is still being used for flags and chunk_objectid, there's some
duplication until the item is removed in following patches.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn 
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: opencode extent_buffer_get

2019-11-18T11:46:54+00:00

The helper is trivial and we can understand what the atomic_inc on
something named refs does.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn 
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba