linux.git/fs/btrfs/relocation.c, branch v5.17

btrfs: do not start relocation until in progress drops are done

2022-03-02T15:52:39+00:00

We hit a bug with a recovering relocation on mount for one of our file
systems in production.  I reproduced this locally by injecting errors
into snapshot delete with balance running at the same time.  This
presented as an error while looking up an extent item

  WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1501 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:866 lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680
  CPU: 5 PID: 1501 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8+ #8
  RIP: 0010:lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680
  RSP: 0018:ffffae0a023ab960 EFLAGS: 00010202
  RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000c RDI: 0000000000000000
  RBP: ffff943fd2a39b60 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
  R10: 0001434088152de0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000001d05000
  R13: ffff943fd2a39b60 R14: ffff943fdb96f2a0 R15: ffff9442fc923000
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff944e9eb40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f1157b1fca8 CR3: 000000010f092000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0
  Call Trace:
   
   insert_inline_extent_backref+0x46/0xd0
   __btrfs_inc_extent_ref.isra.0+0x5f/0x200
   ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x164/0x190
   __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x561/0xfa0
   ? btrfs_search_slot+0x7b4/0xb30
   ? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0
   btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x73/0x1f0
   ? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0
   btrfs_commit_transaction+0x50/0xa50
   ? btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x122/0x220
   prepare_to_merge+0x29f/0x320
   relocate_block_group+0x2b8/0x550
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x1a6/0x350
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x27/0xe0
   btrfs_balance+0x777/0xe60
   balance_kthread+0x35/0x50
   ? btrfs_balance+0xe60/0xe60
   kthread+0x16b/0x190
   ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
   

Normally snapshot deletion and relocation are excluded from running at
the same time by the fs_info->cleaner_mutex.  However if we had a
pending balance waiting to get the ->cleaner_mutex, and a snapshot
deletion was running, and then the box crashed, we would come up in a
state where we have a half deleted snapshot.

Again, in the normal case the snapshot deletion needs to complete before
relocation can start, but in this case relocation could very well start
before the snapshot deletion completes, as we simply add the root to the
dead roots list and wait for the next time the cleaner runs to clean up
the snapshot.

Fix this by setting a bit on the fs_info if we have any DEAD_ROOT's that
had a pending drop_progress key.  If they do then we know we were in the
middle of the drop operation and set a flag on the fs_info.  Then
balance can wait until this flag is cleared to start up again.

If there are DEAD_ROOT's that don't have a drop_progress set then we're
safe to start balance right away as we'll be properly protected by the
cleaner_mutex.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: add an inode-item.h

2022-01-07T13:18:23+00:00

We have a few helpers in inode-item.c, and I'm going to make a few
changes to how we do truncate in the future, so break out these
definitions into their own header file to trim down ctree.h some and
make it easier to do the work on truncate in the future.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: make send work with concurrent block group relocation

2022-01-07T13:18:23+00:00

We don't allow send and balance/relocation to run in parallel in order
to prevent send failing or silently producing some bad stream. This is
because while send is using an extent (specially metadata) or about to
read a metadata extent and expecting it belongs to a specific parent
node, relocation can run, the transaction used for the relocation is
committed and the extent gets reallocated while send is still using the
extent, so it ends up with a different content than expected. This can
result in just failing to read a metadata extent due to failure of the
validation checks (parent transid, level, etc), failure to find a
backreference for a data extent, and other unexpected failures. Besides
reallocation, there's also a similar problem of an extent getting
discarded when it's unpinned after the transaction used for block group
relocation is committed.

The restriction between balance and send was added in commit 9e967495e0e0
("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocation"),
kernel 5.3, while the more general restriction between send and relocation
was added in commit 1cea5cf0e664 ("btrfs: ensure relocation never runs
while we have send operations running"), kernel 5.14.

Both send and relocation can be very long running operations. Relocation
because it has to do a lot of IO and expensive backreference lookups in
case there are many snapshots, and send due to read IO when operating on
very large trees. This makes it inconvenient for users and tools to deal
with scheduling both operations.

For zoned filesystem we also have automatic block group relocation, so
send can fail with -EAGAIN when users least expect it or send can end up
delaying the block group relocation for too long. In the future we might
also get the automatic block group relocation for non zoned filesystems.

This change makes it possible for send and relocation to run in parallel.
This is achieved the following way:

1) For all tree searches, send acquires a read lock on the commit root
   semaphore;

2) After each tree search, and before releasing the commit root semaphore,
   the leaf is cloned and placed in the search path (struct btrfs_path);

3) After releasing the commit root semaphore, the changed_cb() callback
   is invoked, which operates on the leaf and writes commands to the pipe
   (or file in case send/receive is not used with a pipe). It's important
   here to not hold a lock on the commit root semaphore, because if we did
   we could deadlock when sending and receiving to the same filesystem
   using a pipe - the send task blocks on the pipe because it's full, the
   receive task, which is the only consumer of the pipe, triggers a
   transaction commit when attempting to create a subvolume or reserve
   space for a write operation for example, but the transaction commit
   blocks trying to write lock the commit root semaphore, resulting in a
   deadlock;

4) Before moving to the next key, or advancing to the next change in case
   of an incremental send, check if a transaction used for relocation was
   committed (or is about to finish its commit). If so, release the search
   path(s) and restart the search, to where we were before, so that we
   don't operate on stale extent buffers. The search restarts are always
   possible because both the send and parent roots are RO, and no one can
   add, remove of update keys (change their offset) in RO trees - the
   only exception is deduplication, but that is still not allowed to run
   in parallel with send;

5) Periodically check if there is contention on the commit root semaphore,
   which means there is a transaction commit trying to write lock it, and
   release the semaphore and reschedule if there is contention, so as to
   avoid causing any significant delays to transaction commits.

This leaves some room for optimizations for send to have less path
releases and re searching the trees when there's relocation running, but
for now it's kept simple as it performs quite well (on very large trees
with resulting send streams in the order of a few hundred gigabytes).

Test case btrfs/187, from fstests, stresses relocation, send and
deduplication attempting to run in parallel, but without verifying if send
succeeds and if it produces correct streams. A new test case will be added
that exercises relocation happening in parallel with send and then checks
that send succeeds and the resulting streams are correct.

A final note is that for now this still leaves the mutual exclusion
between send operations and deduplication on files belonging to a root
used by send operations. A solution for that will be slightly more complex
but it will eventually be built on top of this change.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: stop accessing ->csum_root directly

2022-01-03T14:09:49+00:00

We are going to have multiple csum roots in the future, so convert all
users of ->csum_root to btrfs_csum_root() and rename ->csum_root to
->_csum_root so we can easily find remaining users in the future.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: stop accessing ->extent_root directly

2022-01-03T14:09:49+00:00

When we start having multiple extent roots we'll need to use a helper to
get to the correct extent_root.  Rename fs_info->extent_root to
_extent_root and convert all of the users of the extent root to using
the btrfs_extent_root() helper.  This will allow us to easily clean up
the remaining direct accesses in the future.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: change root to fs_info for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes

2022-01-03T14:09:45+00:00

We used to need the root for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes to check the
orphan cleanup state, but we no longer need that, we simply need the
fs_info.  Change btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() to use the fs_info, and
change both btrfs_block_rsv_refill() and btrfs_block_rsv_add() to do the
same as they simply call btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() and then
manipulate the block_rsv that is being used.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: drop the _nr from the item helpers

2022-01-03T14:09:43+00:00

Now that all call sites are using the slot number to modify item values,
rename the SETGET helpers to raw_item_*(), and then rework the _nr()
helpers to be the btrfs_item_*() btrfs_set_item_*() helpers, and then
rename all of the callers to the new helpers.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications

2021-10-26T17:08:07+00:00

When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in
the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with
another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk.

These contexts are the following:

* When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers
  that belong to the chunk btree;

* When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item
  to the chunk btree;

* When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item
  from the chunk btree;

* When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in
  the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond
  the new device size when shrinking a device.

The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following:

1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the
   chunk mutex;

2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent
   buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as
   well as its parent extent buffer;

3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none
   of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because
   the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation,
   task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to
   acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A;

4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert
   the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device
   items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer
   that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B
   is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A,
   therefore resulting in a deadlock.

One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation:

  INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
        Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
  "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  task:kworker/u9:5    state:D stack:25936 pid:  546 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004000
  Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space
  Call Trace:
   context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
   __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
   schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
   rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993
   __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline]
   __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline]
   down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590
   __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47
   btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline]
   btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191
   btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline]
   btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728
   btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794
   btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504
   do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline]
   btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653
   flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670
   btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953
   process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297
   worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
   kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
  INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
        Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
  "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  task:syz-executor    state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid:  7792 flags:0x00004004
  Call Trace:
   context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
   __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
   schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
   schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425
   __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline]
   __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
   btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631
   find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline]
   find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335
   btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415
   btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813
   __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
   btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
   btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
   relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline]
   relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757
   relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181
   __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline]
   btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137
   btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949
   vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
   __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
   __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree
and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove
context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree.

Reported-by: Hao Sun 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: pull up qgroup checks from delayed-ref core to init time

2021-10-26T17:08:06+00:00

Instead of checking whether qgroup processing for a dealyed ref has to
happen in the core of delayed ref, simply pull the check at init time of
respective delayed ref structures. This eliminates the final use of
real_root in delayed-ref core paving the way to making this member
optional.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref

2021-10-26T17:08:06+00:00

In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's required to
have the necessary context to perform the same checks that this member
is used for. So add 'mod_root' which will contain the root on behalf of
which a delayed ref was created and a 'skip_group' parameter which
will contain callsite-specific override of skip_qgroup.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba