linux.git/fs/btrfs/relocation.c, branch v4.17

btrfs: Fix wrong first_key parameter in replace_path

2018-04-26T11:21:04+00:00

Commit 581c1760415c ("btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first
key") introduced new @first_key parameter for read_tree_block(), however
caller in replace_path() is parasing wrong key to read_tree_block().

It should use parameter @first_key other than @key.

Normally it won't expose problem as @key is normally initialzied to the
same value of @first_key we expect.
However in relocation recovery case, @key can be set to (0, 0, 0), and
since no valid key in relocation tree can be (0, 0, 0), it will cause
read_tree_block() to return -EUCLEAN and interrupt relocation recovery.

Fix it by setting @first_key correctly.

Fixes: 581c1760415c ("btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first key")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: replace GPL boilerplate by SPDX -- sources

2018-04-12T14:29:51+00:00

Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest,
ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the
SPDX header.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first key

2018-03-31T00:01:06+00:00

We have several reports about node pointer points to incorrect child
tree blocks, which could have even wrong owner and level but still with
valid generation and checksum.

Although btrfs check could handle it and print error message like:
leaf parent key incorrect 60670574592

Kernel doesn't have enough check on this type of corruption correctly.
At least add such check to read_tree_block() and btrfs_read_buffer(),
where we need two new parameters @level and @first_key to verify the
child tree block.

The new @level check is mandatory and all call sites are already
modified to extract expected level from its call chain.

While @first_key is optional, the following call sites are skipping such
check:
1) Root node/leaf
   As ROOT_ITEM doesn't contain the first key, skip @first_key check.
2) Direct backref
   Only parent bytenr and level is known and we need to resolve the key
   all by ourselves, skip @first_key check.

Another note of this verification is, it needs extra info from nodeptr
or ROOT_ITEM, so it can't fit into current tree-checker framework, which
is limited to node/leaf boundary.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: qgroup: Use separate meta reservation type for delalloc

2018-03-30T23:41:14+00:00

Before this patch, btrfs qgroup is mixing per-transcation meta rsv with
preallocated meta rsv, making it quite easy to underflow qgroup meta
reservation.

Since we have the new qgroup meta rsv types, apply it to delalloc
reservation.

Now for delalloc, most of its reserved space will use META_PREALLOC qgroup
rsv type.

And for callers reducing outstanding extent like btrfs_finish_ordered_io(),
they will convert corresponding META_PREALLOC reservation to
META_PERTRANS.

This is mainly due to the fact that current qgroup numbers will only be
updated in btrfs_commit_transaction(), that's to say if we don't keep
such placeholder reservation, we can exceed qgroup limitation.

And for callers freeing outstanding extent in error handler, we will
just free META_PREALLOC bytes.

This behavior makes callers of btrfs_qgroup_release_meta() or
btrfs_qgroup_convert_meta() to be aware of which type they are.
So in this patch, btrfs_delalloc_release_metadata() and its callers get
an extra parameter to info qgroup to do correct meta convert/release.

The good news is, even we use the wrong type (convert or free), it won't
cause obvious bug, as prealloc type is always in good shape, and the
type only affects how per-trans meta is increased or not.

So the worst case will be at most metadata limitation can be sometimes
exceeded (no convert at all) or metadata limitation is reached too soon
(no free at all).

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: Handle btrfs_set_extent_delalloc failure in relocate_file_extent_cluster

2018-03-01T15:16:12+00:00

Essentially duplicate the error handling from the above block which
handles the !PageUptodate(page) case and additionally clear
EXTENT_BOUNDARY.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

Btrfs: fix reported number of inode blocks after buffered append writes

2017-11-15T16:27:46+00:00

The patch from commit a7e3b975a0f9 ("Btrfs: fix reported number of inode
blocks") introduced a regression where if we do a buffered write starting
at position equal to or greater than the file's size and then stat(2) the
file before writeback is triggered, the number of used blocks does not
change (unless there's a prealloc/unwritten extent). Example:

  $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 64K" foobar
  $ du -h foobar
  0	foobar
  $ sync
  $ du -h foobar
  64K	foobar

The first version of that patch didn't had this regression and the second
version, which was the one committed, was made only to address some
performance regression detected by the intel test robots using fs_mark.

This fixes the regression by setting the new delaloc bit in the range, and
doing it at btrfs_dirty_pages() while setting the regular dealloc bit as
well, so that this way we set both bits at once avoiding navigation of the
inode's io tree twice. Doing it at btrfs_dirty_pages() is also the most
meaninful place, as we should set the new dellaloc bit when if we set the
delalloc bit, which happens only if we copied bytes into the pages at
__btrfs_buffered_write().

This was making some of LTP's du tests fail, which can be quickly run
using a command line like the following:

  $ ./runltp -q -p -l /ltp.log -f commands -s du -d /mnt

Fixes: a7e3b975a0f9 ("Btrfs: fix reported number of inode blocks")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

Btrfs: rework outstanding_extents

2017-11-01T19:45:35+00:00

Right now we do a lot of weird hoops around outstanding_extents in order
to keep the extent count consistent.  This is because we logically
transfer the outstanding_extent count from the initial reservation
through the set_delalloc_bits.  This makes it pretty difficult to get a
handle on how and when we need to mess with outstanding_extents.

Fix this by revamping the rules of how we deal with outstanding_extents.
Now instead everybody that is holding on to a delalloc extent is
required to increase the outstanding extents count for itself.  This
means we'll have something like this

btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata	- outstanding_extents = 1
 btrfs_set_extent_delalloc	- outstanding_extents = 2
btrfs_release_delalloc_extents	- outstanding_extents = 1

for an initial file write.  Now take the append write where we extend an
existing delalloc range but still under the maximum extent size

btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata - outstanding_extents = 2
  btrfs_set_extent_delalloc
    btrfs_set_bit_hook		- outstanding_extents = 3
    btrfs_merge_extent_hook	- outstanding_extents = 2
btrfs_delalloc_release_extents	- outstanding_extnets = 1

In order to make the ordered extent transition we of course must now
make ordered extents carry their own outstanding_extent reservation, so
for cow_file_range we end up with

btrfs_add_ordered_extent	- outstanding_extents = 2
clear_extent_bit		- outstanding_extents = 1
btrfs_remove_ordered_extent	- outstanding_extents = 0

This makes all manipulations of outstanding_extents much more explicit.
Every successful call to btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata _must_ now be
combined with btrfs_release_delalloc_extents, even in the error case, as
that is the only function that actually modifies the
outstanding_extents counter.

The drawback to this is now we are much more likely to have transient
cases where outstanding_extents is much larger than it actually should
be.  This could happen before as we manipulated the delalloc bits, but
now it happens basically at every write.  This may put more pressure on
the ENOSPC flushing code, but I think making this code simpler is worth
the cost.  I have another change coming to mitigate this side-effect
somewhat.

I also added trace points for the counter manipulation.  These were used
by a bpf script I wrote to help track down leak issues.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: pass root to various extent ref mod functions

2017-10-30T11:28:00+00:00

We need the actual root for the ref verifier tool to work, so change
these functions to pass the root around instead.  This will be used in
a subsequent patch.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: fix NULL pointer dereference from free_reloc_roots()

2017-09-26T12:51:49+00:00

__del_reloc_root should be called before freeing up reloc_root->node.
If not, calling __del_reloc_root() dereference reloc_root->node, causing
the system BUG.

Fixes: 6bdf131fac23 ("Btrfs: don't leak reloc root nodes on error")
Cc:  # 4.9
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota 
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

Btrfs: remove BUG_ON in __add_tree_block

2017-08-21T15:47:43+00:00

The BUG_ON() can be triggered when the caller is processing an invalid
extent inline ref, e.g.

a shared data ref is offered instead of an extent data ref, such that
it tries to find a non-existent tree block and then btrfs_search_slot
returns 1 for no such item.

This replaces the BUG_ON() with a WARN() followed by calling
btrfs_print_leaf() to show more details about what's going on and
returning -EINVAL to upper callers.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba