Using the structure btrfs_sector_sum to keep the checksum value is
unnecessary, because the extents that btrfs_sector_sum points to are
continuous, we can find out the expected checksums by btrfs_ordered_sum's
bytenr and the offset, so we can remove btrfs_sector_sum's bytenr. After
removing bytenr, there is only one member in the structure, so it makes
no sense to keep the structure, just remove it, and use a u32 array to
store the checksum value.

By this change, we don't use the while loop to get the checksums one by
one. Now, we can get several checksum value at one time, it improved the
performance by ~74% on my SSD (31MB/s -> 54MB/s).

test command:
 # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/file0 bs=1M count=1024 oflag=sync

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We unconditionally search for the EXTENT_ITEM_KEY for metadata during balance,
and then check the key that we found to see if it is actually a
METADATA_ITEM_KEY, but this doesn't work right because METADATA is a higher key
value, so if what we are looking for happens to be the first item in the leaf
the search will dump us out at the previous leaf, and we won't find our item.
So instead do what we do everywhere else, search for the skinny extent first and
if we don't find it go back and re-search for the extent item.  This patch fixes
the panic I was hitting when balancing a large file system with skinny extents.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Balance will create reloc_root for each fs root, and it's going to
record last_snapshot to filter shared blocks.  The side effect of
setting last_snapshot is to break nocow attributes of files.

Since the extents are not shared by the relocation tree after the balance,
we can recover the old last_snapshot safely if no one snapshoted the
source tree. We fix the above problem by this way.

Reported-by: Kyle Gates <kylegates@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The reason we introduce per-subvolume ordered extent list is the same
as the per-subvolume delalloc inode list.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

When we create a snapshot, we need flush all delalloc inodes in the
fs, just flushing the inodes in the source tree is OK. So we introduce
per-subvolume delalloc inode list.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

There are several functions whose code is similar, such as
  btrfs_find_last_root()
  btrfs_read_fs_root_no_radix()

Besides that, some functions are invoked twice, it is unnecessary,
for example, we are sure that all roots which is found in
  btrfs_find_orphan_roots()
have their orphan items, so it is unnecessary to check the orphan
item again.

So cleanup it.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Dave reported a NULL pointer deref.  This is caused because he thought he'd be
smart and add sanity checks to the extent_io bit operations, but he didn't
expect a tree to have a NULL mapping.  To fix this we just need to init the
relocation's processed_blocks with the btree_inode->i_mapping.  Thanks,

Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

It is very likely that there are lots of subvolumes/snapshots in the filesystem,
so if we use global block reservation to do inode cache truncation, we may hog
all the free space that is reserved in global rsv. So it is better that we do
the free space reservation for inode cache truncation by ourselves.

Cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

In replace_path(), if read_tree_block() fails, we cannot return
directly, we should free some allocated memory otherwise memory
leak happens.

Similar to Wang's "Btrfs: fix possible memory leak in the
find_parent_nodes()" patch, the current commit fixes an issue that
is related to the "Btrfs: fix all callers of read_tree_block"
commit.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>