linux.git/fs/btrfs/backref.c, branch v5.12

btrfs: do not warn if we can't find the reloc root when looking up backref

2021-02-08T21:58:56+00:00

The backref code is looking for a reloc_root that corresponds to the
given fs root.  However any number of things could have gone wrong while
initializing that reloc_root, like ENOMEM while trying to allocate the
root itself, or EIO while trying to write the root item.  This would
result in no corresponding reloc_root being in the reloc root cache, and
thus would return NULL when we do the find_reloc_root() call.

Because of this we do not want to WARN_ON().  This presumably was meant
to catch developer errors, cases where we messed up adding the reloc
root.  However we can easily hit this case with error injection, and
thus should not do a WARN_ON().

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: document btrfs_check_shared parameters

2021-02-08T21:58:54+00:00

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: do not cleanup upper nodes in btrfs_backref_cleanup_node

2021-02-08T21:58:52+00:00

Zygo reported the following panic when testing my error handling patches
for relocation:

  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/backref.c:2545!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 3 PID: 8472 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W 14
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX,

  Call Trace:
   btrfs_backref_error_cleanup+0x4df/0x530
   build_backref_tree+0x1a5/0x700
   ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x30
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x225/0x280
   ? free_extent_buffer.part.52+0xd7/0x140
   relocate_tree_blocks+0x2a6/0xb60
   ? kasan_unpoison_shadow+0x35/0x50
   ? do_relocation+0xc10/0xc10
   ? kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10
   ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x6a3/0xcb0
   ? free_extent_buffer.part.52+0xd7/0x140
   ? rb_insert_color+0x342/0x360
   ? add_tree_block.isra.36+0x236/0x2b0
   relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780
   ? merge_reloc_roots+0x470/0x470
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120
   btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x18f0
   ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xeb/0x190
   ? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x120/0x120
   ? lock_contended+0x620/0x6e0
   ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x1e0/0x1e0
   ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x1f9/0x460
   btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4380
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
   ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20
   ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30
   ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x18/0x30
   ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
   ? lock_downgrade+0x3f0/0x3f0
   ? handle_mm_fault+0xad6/0x2150
   ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xfc/0x9d0
   ? ioctl_file_clone+0xe0/0xe0
   ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
   ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
   ? check_flags+0x26/0x30
   ? lock_is_held_type+0xc3/0xf0
   ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1b/0x60
   ? do_syscall_64+0x13/0x80
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? __fget_light+0xae/0x110
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
   do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

This occurs because of this check

  if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&upper->rb_node))
	  BUG_ON(!list_empty(&node->upper));

As we are dropping the backref node, if we discover that our upper node
in the edge we just cleaned up isn't linked into the cache that we are
now done with this node, thus the BUG_ON().

However this is an erroneous assumption, as we will look up all the
references for a node first, and then process the pending edges.  All of
the 'upper' nodes in our pending edges won't be in the cache's rb_tree
yet, because they haven't been processed.  We could very well have many
edges still left to cleanup on this node.

The fact is we simply do not need this check, we can just process all of
the edges only for this node, because below this check we do the
following

  if (list_empty(&upper->lower)) {
	  list_add_tail(&upper->lower, &cache->leaves);
	  upper->lowest = 1;
  }

If the upper node truly isn't used yet, then we add it to the
cache->leaves list to be cleaned up later.  If it is still used then the
last child node that has it linked into its node will add it to the
leaves list and then it will be cleaned up.

Fix this problem by dropping this logic altogether.  With this fix I no
longer see the panic when testing with error injection in the backref
code.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: do not double free backref nodes on error

2021-01-18T14:44:53+00:00

Zygo reported the following KASAN splat:

  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
  Read of size 8 at addr ffff888112402950 by task btrfs/28836

  CPU: 0 PID: 28836 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W         5.10.0-e35f27394290-for-next+ #23
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0xbc/0xf9
   ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
   print_address_description.constprop.8+0x21/0x210
   ? record_print_text.cold.34+0x11/0x11
   ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
   ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
   kasan_report.cold.10+0x20/0x37
   ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
   __asan_load8+0x69/0x90
   btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
   btrfs_backref_release_cache+0x83/0x1b0
   relocate_block_group+0x394/0x780
   ? merge_reloc_roots+0x4a0/0x4a0
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120
   btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900
   ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
   ? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x120/0x120
   ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xa06/0xcb0
   ? _copy_from_user+0x83/0xc0
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460
   btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
   ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20
   ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30
   ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x18/0x30
   ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
   ? lock_downgrade+0x3f0/0x3f0
   ? handle_mm_fault+0xad6/0x2150
   ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xfc/0x9d0
   ? ioctl_file_clone+0xe0/0xe0
   ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
   ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
   ? check_flags+0x26/0x30
   ? lock_is_held_type+0xc3/0xf0
   ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1b/0x60
   ? do_syscall_64+0x13/0x80
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? __fget_light+0xae/0x110
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
   do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  RIP: 0033:0x7f4c4bdfe427

  Allocated by task 28836:
   kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50
   __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.18+0xbe/0xd0
   kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10
   kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x410/0xcb0
   btrfs_backref_alloc_node+0x46/0xf0
   btrfs_backref_add_tree_node+0x60d/0x11d0
   build_backref_tree+0xc5/0x700
   relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90
   relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120
   btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460
   btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
   do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  Freed by task 28836:
   kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50
   kasan_set_track+0x20/0x30
   kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x30
   __kasan_slab_free+0xf3/0x140
   kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10
   kfree+0xde/0x200
   btrfs_backref_error_cleanup+0x452/0x530
   build_backref_tree+0x1a5/0x700
   relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90
   relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120
   btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460
   btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
   do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

This occurred because we freed our backref node in
btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(), but then tried to free it again in
btrfs_backref_release_cache().  This is because
btrfs_backref_release_cache() will cycle through all of the
cache->leaves nodes and free them up.  However
btrfs_backref_error_cleanup() freed the backref node with
btrfs_backref_free_node(), which simply kfree()d the backref node
without unlinking it from the cache.  Change this to a
btrfs_backref_drop_node(), which does the appropriate cleanup and
removes the node from the cache->leaves list, so when we go to free the
remaining cache we don't trip over items we've already dropped.

Fixes: 75bfb9aff45e ("Btrfs: cleanup error handling in build_backref_tree")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: pass root owner to read_tree_block

2020-12-08T14:54:07+00:00

In order to properly set the lockdep class of a newly allocated block we
need to know the owner of the block.  For non-refcounted trees this is
straightforward, we always know in advance what tree we're reading from.
For refcounted trees we don't necessarily know, however all refcounted
trees share the same lockdep class name, tree-.

Fix all the callers of read_tree_block() to pass in the root objectid
we're using.  In places like relocation and backref we could probably
unconditionally use 0, but just in case use the root when we have it,
otherwise use 0 in the cases we don't have the root as it's going to be
a refcounted tree anyway.

This is a preparation patch for further changes.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: locking: rip out path->leave_spinning

2020-12-08T14:54:02+00:00

We no longer distinguish between blocking and spinning, so rip out all
this code.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: locking: remove all the blocking helpers

2020-12-08T14:54:01+00:00

Now that we're using a rw_semaphore we no longer need to indicate if a
lock is blocking or not, nor do we need to flip the entire path from
blocking to spinning.  Remove these helpers and all the places they are
called.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: add a helper to read the tree_root commit root for backref lookup

2020-10-26T14:04:57+00:00

I got the following lockdep splat with tree locks converted to rwsem
patches on btrfs/104:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.9.0+ #102 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  btrfs-cleaner/903 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8e7fab6ffe30 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_read+0x40/0x130
	 caching_thread+0x53/0x5a0
	 btrfs_work_helper+0xfa/0x520
	 process_one_work+0x238/0x540
	 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
	 kthread+0x13a/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  -> #2 (&caching_ctl->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
	 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x1e0/0x510
	 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
	 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330
	 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60
	 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580
	 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220
	 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0
	 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0
	 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90
	 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100
	 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
	 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20
	 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0
	 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190
	 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0
	 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200
	 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_read+0x40/0x130
	 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
	 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330
	 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60
	 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580
	 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220
	 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0
	 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0
	 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90
	 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100
	 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
	 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20
	 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0
	 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190
	 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0
	 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200
	 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
	 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0
	 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170
	 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0
	 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0
	 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120
	 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600
	 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30
	 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130
	 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80
	 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40
	 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460
	 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100
	 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0
	 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400
	 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180
	 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780
	 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110
	 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140
	 kthread+0x13a/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    btrfs-root-00 --> &caching_ctl->mutex --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
				 lock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
				 lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
    lock(btrfs-root-00);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/903:
   #0: ffff8e7fab628838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140
   #1: ffff8e7faadac640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0
   #2: ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 903 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ #102
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
   check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
   __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
   ? __bfs+0x42/0x210
   lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0
   ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170
   down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
   ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170
   __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170
   __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
   btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0
   ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
   btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0
   ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0
   btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120
   btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600
   find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30
   btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130
   btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80
   btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40
   btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460
   btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100
   __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0
   walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400
   walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180
   btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780
   ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110
   btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110
   cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140
   ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50
   kthread+0x13a/0x150
   ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
  BTRFS info (device sdb): disk space caching is enabled
  BTRFS info (device sdb): has skinny extents

This happens because qgroups does a backref lookup when we create a
delayed ref.  From here it may have to look up a root from an indirect
ref, which does a normal lookup on the tree_root, which takes the read
lock on the tree_root nodes.

To fix this we need to add a variant for looking up roots that searches
the commit root of the tree_root.  Then when we do the backref search
using the commit root we are sure to not take any locks on the tree_root
nodes.  This gets rid of the lockdep splat when running btrfs/104.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: remove unnecessarily shadowed variables

2020-10-07T10:06:55+00:00

In btrfs_orphan_cleanup, there's another instance of fs_info, but it's
the same as the one we already have.

In btrfs_backref_finish_upper_links, rb_node is same type and used
as temporary cursor to the tree.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: check correct variable after allocation in btrfs_backref_iter_alloc

2020-08-10T17:50:54+00:00

The `if (!ret)` check will always be false and it may result in
ret->path being dereferenced while it is a NULL pointer.

Fixes: a37f232b7b65 ("btrfs: backref: introduce the skeleton of btrfs_backref_iter")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo 
Signed-off-by: Boleyn Su 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba