linux.git/fs/btrfs/backref.c, branch v5.11

btrfs: do not double free backref nodes on error

2021-01-18T14:44:53+00:00

Zygo reported the following KASAN splat:

  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
  Read of size 8 at addr ffff888112402950 by task btrfs/28836

  CPU: 0 PID: 28836 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W         5.10.0-e35f27394290-for-next+ #23
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0xbc/0xf9
   ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
   print_address_description.constprop.8+0x21/0x210
   ? record_print_text.cold.34+0x11/0x11
   ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
   ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
   kasan_report.cold.10+0x20/0x37
   ? btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
   __asan_load8+0x69/0x90
   btrfs_backref_cleanup_node+0x18a/0x420
   btrfs_backref_release_cache+0x83/0x1b0
   relocate_block_group+0x394/0x780
   ? merge_reloc_roots+0x4a0/0x4a0
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120
   btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900
   ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
   ? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x120/0x120
   ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xa06/0xcb0
   ? _copy_from_user+0x83/0xc0
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460
   btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
   ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20
   ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30
   ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x18/0x30
   ? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
   ? lock_downgrade+0x3f0/0x3f0
   ? handle_mm_fault+0xad6/0x2150
   ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xfc/0x9d0
   ? ioctl_file_clone+0xe0/0xe0
   ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
   ? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
   ? check_flags+0x26/0x30
   ? lock_is_held_type+0xc3/0xf0
   ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1b/0x60
   ? do_syscall_64+0x13/0x80
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? __fget_light+0xae/0x110
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
   do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  RIP: 0033:0x7f4c4bdfe427

  Allocated by task 28836:
   kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50
   __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.18+0xbe/0xd0
   kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10
   kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x410/0xcb0
   btrfs_backref_alloc_node+0x46/0xf0
   btrfs_backref_add_tree_node+0x60d/0x11d0
   build_backref_tree+0xc5/0x700
   relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90
   relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120
   btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460
   btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
   do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  Freed by task 28836:
   kasan_save_stack+0x21/0x50
   kasan_set_track+0x20/0x30
   kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x30
   __kasan_slab_free+0xf3/0x140
   kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10
   kfree+0xde/0x200
   btrfs_backref_error_cleanup+0x452/0x530
   build_backref_tree+0x1a5/0x700
   relocate_tree_blocks+0x2be/0xb90
   relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120
   btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x1900
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3a7/0x460
   btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4360
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
   do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

This occurred because we freed our backref node in
btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(), but then tried to free it again in
btrfs_backref_release_cache().  This is because
btrfs_backref_release_cache() will cycle through all of the
cache->leaves nodes and free them up.  However
btrfs_backref_error_cleanup() freed the backref node with
btrfs_backref_free_node(), which simply kfree()d the backref node
without unlinking it from the cache.  Change this to a
btrfs_backref_drop_node(), which does the appropriate cleanup and
removes the node from the cache->leaves list, so when we go to free the
remaining cache we don't trip over items we've already dropped.

Fixes: 75bfb9aff45e ("Btrfs: cleanup error handling in build_backref_tree")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: pass root owner to read_tree_block

2020-12-08T14:54:07+00:00

In order to properly set the lockdep class of a newly allocated block we
need to know the owner of the block.  For non-refcounted trees this is
straightforward, we always know in advance what tree we're reading from.
For refcounted trees we don't necessarily know, however all refcounted
trees share the same lockdep class name, tree-.

Fix all the callers of read_tree_block() to pass in the root objectid
we're using.  In places like relocation and backref we could probably
unconditionally use 0, but just in case use the root when we have it,
otherwise use 0 in the cases we don't have the root as it's going to be
a refcounted tree anyway.

This is a preparation patch for further changes.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: locking: rip out path->leave_spinning

2020-12-08T14:54:02+00:00

We no longer distinguish between blocking and spinning, so rip out all
this code.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: locking: remove all the blocking helpers

2020-12-08T14:54:01+00:00

Now that we're using a rw_semaphore we no longer need to indicate if a
lock is blocking or not, nor do we need to flip the entire path from
blocking to spinning.  Remove these helpers and all the places they are
called.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: add a helper to read the tree_root commit root for backref lookup

2020-10-26T14:04:57+00:00

I got the following lockdep splat with tree locks converted to rwsem
patches on btrfs/104:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.9.0+ #102 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  btrfs-cleaner/903 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8e7fab6ffe30 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_read+0x40/0x130
	 caching_thread+0x53/0x5a0
	 btrfs_work_helper+0xfa/0x520
	 process_one_work+0x238/0x540
	 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
	 kthread+0x13a/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  -> #2 (&caching_ctl->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
	 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x1e0/0x510
	 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
	 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330
	 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60
	 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580
	 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220
	 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0
	 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0
	 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90
	 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100
	 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
	 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20
	 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0
	 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190
	 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0
	 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200
	 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_read+0x40/0x130
	 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
	 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330
	 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60
	 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580
	 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220
	 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0
	 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0
	 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90
	 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100
	 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
	 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20
	 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0
	 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190
	 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0
	 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200
	 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
	 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0
	 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170
	 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0
	 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0
	 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120
	 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600
	 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30
	 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130
	 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80
	 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40
	 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460
	 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100
	 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0
	 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400
	 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180
	 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780
	 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110
	 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140
	 kthread+0x13a/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    btrfs-root-00 --> &caching_ctl->mutex --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
				 lock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
				 lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
    lock(btrfs-root-00);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/903:
   #0: ffff8e7fab628838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140
   #1: ffff8e7faadac640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0
   #2: ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 903 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ #102
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
   check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
   __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
   ? __bfs+0x42/0x210
   lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0
   ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170
   down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
   ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170
   __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170
   __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50
   btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0
   ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
   btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0
   ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0
   btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120
   btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600
   find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30
   btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130
   btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80
   btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40
   btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460
   btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100
   __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0
   walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400
   walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180
   btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780
   ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110
   btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110
   cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140
   ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50
   kthread+0x13a/0x150
   ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
  BTRFS info (device sdb): disk space caching is enabled
  BTRFS info (device sdb): has skinny extents

This happens because qgroups does a backref lookup when we create a
delayed ref.  From here it may have to look up a root from an indirect
ref, which does a normal lookup on the tree_root, which takes the read
lock on the tree_root nodes.

To fix this we need to add a variant for looking up roots that searches
the commit root of the tree_root.  Then when we do the backref search
using the commit root we are sure to not take any locks on the tree_root
nodes.  This gets rid of the lockdep splat when running btrfs/104.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: remove unnecessarily shadowed variables

2020-10-07T10:06:55+00:00

In btrfs_orphan_cleanup, there's another instance of fs_info, but it's
the same as the one we already have.

In btrfs_backref_finish_upper_links, rb_node is same type and used
as temporary cursor to the tree.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: check correct variable after allocation in btrfs_backref_iter_alloc

2020-08-10T17:50:54+00:00

The `if (!ret)` check will always be false and it may result in
ret->path being dereferenced while it is a NULL pointer.

Fixes: a37f232b7b65 ("btrfs: backref: introduce the skeleton of btrfs_backref_iter")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov 
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo 
Signed-off-by: Boleyn Su 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: fix double free on ulist after backref resolution failure

2020-07-21T19:59:15+00:00

At btrfs_find_all_roots_safe() we allocate a ulist and set the **roots
argument to point to it. However if later we fail due to an error returned
by find_parent_nodes(), we free that ulist but leave a dangling pointer in
the **roots argument. Upon receiving the error, a caller of this function
can attempt to free the same ulist again, resulting in an invalid memory
access.

One such scenario is during qgroup accounting:

btrfs_qgroup_account_extents()

 --> calls btrfs_find_all_roots() passes &new_roots (a stack allocated
     pointer) to btrfs_find_all_roots()

   --> btrfs_find_all_roots() just calls btrfs_find_all_roots_safe()
       passing &new_roots to it

     --> allocates ulist and assigns its address to **roots (which
         points to new_roots from btrfs_qgroup_account_extents())

     --> find_parent_nodes() returns an error, so we free the ulist
         and leave **roots pointing to it after returning

 --> btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() sees btrfs_find_all_roots() returned
     an error and jumps to the label 'cleanup', which just tries to
     free again the same ulist

Stack trace example:

 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 BTRFS: tree first key check failed
 WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1763215 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:422 btrfs_verify_level_key+0xe0/0x180 [btrfs]
 Modules linked in: dm_snapshot dm_thin_pool (...)
 CPU: 1 PID: 1763215 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G        W         5.8.0-rc3-btrfs-next-64 #1
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
 RIP: 0010:btrfs_verify_level_key+0xe0/0x180 [btrfs]
 Code: 28 5b 5d (...)
 RSP: 0018:ffffb89b473779a0 EFLAGS: 00010286
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff90397759bf08 RCX: 0000000000000000
 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
 RBP: ffff9039a419c000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffb89b43301000 R12: 000000000000005e
 R13: ffffb89b47377a2e R14: ffffb89b473779af R15: 0000000000000000
 FS:  00007fc47e1e1000(0000) GS:ffff9039ac200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00007fc47e1df000 CR3: 00000003d9e4e001 CR4: 00000000003606e0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 Call Trace:
  read_block_for_search+0xf6/0x350 [btrfs]
  btrfs_next_old_leaf+0x242/0x650 [btrfs]
  resolve_indirect_refs+0x7cf/0x9e0 [btrfs]
  find_parent_nodes+0x4ea/0x12c0 [btrfs]
  btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xbf/0x130 [btrfs]
  btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0x9d/0x390 [btrfs]
  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4f7/0xb20 [btrfs]
  btrfs_sync_file+0x3d4/0x4d0 [btrfs]
  do_fsync+0x38/0x70
  __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x13/0x20
  do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xe0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
 RIP: 0033:0x7fc47e2d72e3
 Code: Bad RIP value.
 RSP: 002b:00007fffa32098c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004b
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fc47e2d72e3
 RDX: 00007fffa3209830 RSI: 00007fffa3209830 RDI: 0000000000000003
 RBP: 000000000000072e R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000003
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000003e8
 R13: 0000000051eb851f R14: 00007fffa3209970 R15: 00005607c4ac8b50
 irq event stamp: 0
 hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [] copy_process+0x755/0x1eb0
 softirqs last  enabled at (0): [] copy_process+0x755/0x1eb0
 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
 ---[ end trace 8639237550317b48 ]---
 BTRFS error (device sdc): tree first key mismatch detected, bytenr=62324736 parent_transid=94 key expected=(262,108,1351680) has=(259,108,1921024)
 general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
 CPU: 2 PID: 1763215 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G        W         5.8.0-rc3-btrfs-next-64 #1
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
 RIP: 0010:ulist_release+0x14/0x60 [btrfs]
 Code: c7 07 00 (...)
 RSP: 0018:ffffb89b47377d60 EFLAGS: 00010282
 RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff903959b56b90 RCX: 0000000000000000
 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000270024 RDI: ffff9036e2adc840
 RBP: ffff9036e2adc848 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9036e2adc840
 R13: 0000000000000015 R14: ffff9039a419ccf8 R15: ffff90395d605840
 FS:  00007fc47e1e1000(0000) GS:ffff9039ac600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00007f8c1c0a51c8 CR3: 00000003d9e4e004 CR4: 00000000003606e0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 Call Trace:
  ulist_free+0x13/0x20 [btrfs]
  btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0xf3/0x390 [btrfs]
  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4f7/0xb20 [btrfs]
  btrfs_sync_file+0x3d4/0x4d0 [btrfs]
  do_fsync+0x38/0x70
  __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x13/0x20
  do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xe0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
 RIP: 0033:0x7fc47e2d72e3
 Code: Bad RIP value.
 RSP: 002b:00007fffa32098c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004b
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fc47e2d72e3
 RDX: 00007fffa3209830 RSI: 00007fffa3209830 RDI: 0000000000000003
 RBP: 000000000000072e R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000003
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000003e8
 R13: 0000000051eb851f R14: 00007fffa3209970 R15: 00005607c4ac8b50
 Modules linked in: dm_snapshot dm_thin_pool (...)
 ---[ end trace 8639237550317b49 ]---
 RIP: 0010:ulist_release+0x14/0x60 [btrfs]
 Code: c7 07 00 (...)
 RSP: 0018:ffffb89b47377d60 EFLAGS: 00010282
 RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff903959b56b90 RCX: 0000000000000000
 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000270024 RDI: ffff9036e2adc840
 RBP: ffff9036e2adc848 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9036e2adc840
 R13: 0000000000000015 R14: ffff9039a419ccf8 R15: ffff90395d605840
 FS:  00007fc47e1e1000(0000) GS:ffff9039ad200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00007f6a776f7d40 CR3: 00000003d9e4e002 CR4: 00000000003606e0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400

Fix this by making btrfs_find_all_roots_safe() set *roots to NULL after
it frees the ulist.

Fixes: 8da6d5815c592b ("Btrfs: added btrfs_find_all_roots()")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: simplify root lookup by id

2020-05-25T09:25:36+00:00

The main function to lookup a root by its id btrfs_get_fs_root takes the
whole key, while only using the objectid. The value of offset is preset
to (u64)-1 but not actually used until btrfs_find_root that does the
actual search.

Switch btrfs_get_fs_root to use only objectid and remove all local
variables that existed just for the lookup. The actual key for search is
set up in btrfs_get_fs_root, reusing another key variable.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: rename BTRFS_ROOT_REF_COWS to BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE

2020-05-25T09:25:35+00:00

The name BTRFS_ROOT_REF_COWS is not very clear about the meaning.

In fact, that bit can only be set to those trees:

- Subvolume roots
- Data reloc root
- Reloc roots for above roots

All other trees won't get this bit set.  So just by the result, it is
obvious that, roots with this bit set can have tree blocks shared with
other trees.  Either shared by snapshots, or by reloc roots (an special
snapshot created by relocation).

This patch will rename BTRFS_ROOT_REF_COWS to BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE to
make it easier to understand, and update all comment mentioning
"reference counted" to follow the rename.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba