<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/fs/btrfs/backref.c, branch v4.18</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel source tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: replace GPL boilerplate by SPDX -- sources</title>
<updated>2018-04-12T14:29:51+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Sterba</name>
<email>dsterba@suse.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-04-03T17:23:33+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=c1d7c514f745628eb096c5cbb10737855879ae25'/>
<id>c1d7c514f745628eb096c5cbb10737855879ae25</id>
<content type='text'>
Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest,
ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the
SPDX header.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest,
ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the
SPDX header.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first key</title>
<updated>2018-03-31T00:01:06+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Qu Wenruo</name>
<email>wqu@suse.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-03-29T01:08:11+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=581c1760415c48cca9349b198bba52dd38750765'/>
<id>581c1760415c48cca9349b198bba52dd38750765</id>
<content type='text'>
We have several reports about node pointer points to incorrect child
tree blocks, which could have even wrong owner and level but still with
valid generation and checksum.

Although btrfs check could handle it and print error message like:
leaf parent key incorrect 60670574592

Kernel doesn't have enough check on this type of corruption correctly.
At least add such check to read_tree_block() and btrfs_read_buffer(),
where we need two new parameters @level and @first_key to verify the
child tree block.

The new @level check is mandatory and all call sites are already
modified to extract expected level from its call chain.

While @first_key is optional, the following call sites are skipping such
check:
1) Root node/leaf
   As ROOT_ITEM doesn't contain the first key, skip @first_key check.
2) Direct backref
   Only parent bytenr and level is known and we need to resolve the key
   all by ourselves, skip @first_key check.

Another note of this verification is, it needs extra info from nodeptr
or ROOT_ITEM, so it can't fit into current tree-checker framework, which
is limited to node/leaf boundary.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo &lt;wqu@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
We have several reports about node pointer points to incorrect child
tree blocks, which could have even wrong owner and level but still with
valid generation and checksum.

Although btrfs check could handle it and print error message like:
leaf parent key incorrect 60670574592

Kernel doesn't have enough check on this type of corruption correctly.
At least add such check to read_tree_block() and btrfs_read_buffer(),
where we need two new parameters @level and @first_key to verify the
child tree block.

The new @level check is mandatory and all call sites are already
modified to extract expected level from its call chain.

While @first_key is optional, the following call sites are skipping such
check:
1) Root node/leaf
   As ROOT_ITEM doesn't contain the first key, skip @first_key check.
2) Direct backref
   Only parent bytenr and level is known and we need to resolve the key
   all by ourselves, skip @first_key check.

Another note of this verification is, it needs extra info from nodeptr
or ROOT_ITEM, so it can't fit into current tree-checker framework, which
is limited to node/leaf boundary.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo &lt;wqu@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: Remove unused op_key var from add_delayed_refs</title>
<updated>2018-03-30T23:26:57+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Nikolay Borisov</name>
<email>nborisov@suse.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-03-15T12:36:22+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=a6dbceafb915e86d1a34d8d61403c59e01c2875c'/>
<id>a6dbceafb915e86d1a34d8d61403c59e01c2875c</id>
<content type='text'>
Added as part of 86d5f9944252 ("btrfs: convert prelimary reference
tracking to use rbtrees") but never used. tmp_op_key essentially
subsumed that variable.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov &lt;nborisov@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Added as part of 86d5f9944252 ("btrfs: convert prelimary reference
tracking to use rbtrees") but never used. tmp_op_key essentially
subsumed that variable.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov &lt;nborisov@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: add more __cold annotations</title>
<updated>2018-03-26T13:09:39+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Sterba</name>
<email>dsterba@suse.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-02-19T16:24:18+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=e67c718b5b9a306bde7e966be7b4ca48fa063d73'/>
<id>e67c718b5b9a306bde7e966be7b4ca48fa063d73</id>
<content type='text'>
The __cold functions are placed to a special section, as they're
expected to be called rarely. This could help i-cache prefetches or help
compiler to decide which branches are more/less likely to be taken
without any other annotations needed.

Though we can't add more __exit annotations, it's still possible to add
__cold (that's also added with __exit). That way the following function
categories are tagged:

- printf wrappers, error messages
- exit helpers

Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The __cold functions are placed to a special section, as they're
expected to be called rarely. This could help i-cache prefetches or help
compiler to decide which branches are more/less likely to be taken
without any other annotations needed.

Though we can't add more __exit annotations, it's still possible to add
__cold (that's also added with __exit). That way the following function
categories are tagged:

- printf wrappers, error messages
- exit helpers

Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: add missing initialization in btrfs_check_shared</title>
<updated>2018-03-14T21:26:46+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Edmund Nadolski</name>
<email>enadolski@suse.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-03-14T15:03:11+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=18bf591ba9753e3e5ba91f38f756a800693408f4'/>
<id>18bf591ba9753e3e5ba91f38f756a800693408f4</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch addresses an issue that causes fiemap to falsely
report a shared extent.  The test case is as follows:

xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite -b 16k 0 64k" -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5
sync
xfs_io  -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5

which gives the resulting output:

wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (121.359 MiB/sec and 7766.9903 ops/sec)
/media/scratch/file5:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..127]:        24576..24703       128 0x2001
/media/scratch/file5:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..127]:        24576..24703       128   0x1

This is because btrfs_check_shared calls find_parent_nodes
repeatedly in a loop, passing a share_check struct to report
the count of shared extent. But btrfs_check_shared does not
re-initialize the count value to zero for subsequent calls
from the loop, resulting in a false share count value. This
is a regressive behavior from 4.13.

With proper re-initialization the test result is as follows:

wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (110.035 MiB/sec and 7042.2535 ops/sec)
/media/scratch/file5:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..127]:        24576..24703       128   0x1
/media/scratch/file5:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..127]:        24576..24703       128   0x1

which corrects the regression.

Fixes: 3ec4d3238ab ("btrfs: allow backref search checks for shared extents")
Signed-off-by: Edmund Nadolski &lt;enadolski@suse.com&gt;
[ add text from cover letter to changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This patch addresses an issue that causes fiemap to falsely
report a shared extent.  The test case is as follows:

xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite -b 16k 0 64k" -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5
sync
xfs_io  -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5

which gives the resulting output:

wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (121.359 MiB/sec and 7766.9903 ops/sec)
/media/scratch/file5:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..127]:        24576..24703       128 0x2001
/media/scratch/file5:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..127]:        24576..24703       128   0x1

This is because btrfs_check_shared calls find_parent_nodes
repeatedly in a loop, passing a share_check struct to report
the count of shared extent. But btrfs_check_shared does not
re-initialize the count value to zero for subsequent calls
from the loop, resulting in a false share count value. This
is a regressive behavior from 4.13.

With proper re-initialization the test result is as follows:

wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (110.035 MiB/sec and 7042.2535 ops/sec)
/media/scratch/file5:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..127]:        24576..24703       128   0x1
/media/scratch/file5:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..127]:        24576..24703       128   0x1

which corrects the regression.

Fixes: 3ec4d3238ab ("btrfs: allow backref search checks for shared extents")
Signed-off-by: Edmund Nadolski &lt;enadolski@suse.com&gt;
[ add text from cover letter to changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: remove spurious WARN_ON(ref-&gt;count &lt; 0) in find_parent_nodes</title>
<updated>2018-02-02T15:25:33+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Zygo Blaxell</name>
<email>ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org</email>
</author>
<published>2018-01-24T03:22:09+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=c8195a7b1ad5648857ce20ba24f384faed8512bc'/>
<id>c8195a7b1ad5648857ce20ba24f384faed8512bc</id>
<content type='text'>
Until v4.14, this warning was very infrequent:

	WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 18172 at fs/btrfs/backref.c:1391 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
	Modules linked in: [...]
	CPU: 3 PID: 18172 Comm: bees Tainted: G      D W    L  4.11.9-zb64+ #1
	Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/M5A78L-M/USB3, BIOS 2101    12/02/2014
	Call Trace:
	 dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
	 __warn+0xd1/0xf0
	 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
	 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
	 __btrfs_find_all_roots+0xad/0x120
	 ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
	 iterate_extent_inodes+0x168/0x300
	 iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
	 ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
	 ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x8ac/0x2820
	 ? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x200
	 do_vfs_ioctl+0x91/0x700
	 ? __fget+0x112/0x200
	 SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6
	 ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0x140

Starting with v4.14 (specifically 86d5f9944252 ("btrfs: convert prelimary
reference tracking to use rbtrees")) the WARN_ON occurs three orders of
magnitude more frequently--almost once per second while running workloads
like bees.

Replace the WARN_ON() with a comment rationale for its removal.
The rationale is paraphrased from an explanation by Edmund Nadolski
&lt;enadolski@suse.de&gt; on the linux-btrfs mailing list.

Fixes: 8da6d5815c59 ("Btrfs: added btrfs_find_all_roots()")
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell &lt;ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi &lt;lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Until v4.14, this warning was very infrequent:

	WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 18172 at fs/btrfs/backref.c:1391 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
	Modules linked in: [...]
	CPU: 3 PID: 18172 Comm: bees Tainted: G      D W    L  4.11.9-zb64+ #1
	Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/M5A78L-M/USB3, BIOS 2101    12/02/2014
	Call Trace:
	 dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
	 __warn+0xd1/0xf0
	 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
	 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
	 __btrfs_find_all_roots+0xad/0x120
	 ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
	 iterate_extent_inodes+0x168/0x300
	 iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
	 ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
	 ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x8ac/0x2820
	 ? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x200
	 do_vfs_ioctl+0x91/0x700
	 ? __fget+0x112/0x200
	 SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6
	 ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0x140

Starting with v4.14 (specifically 86d5f9944252 ("btrfs: convert prelimary
reference tracking to use rbtrees")) the WARN_ON occurs three orders of
magnitude more frequently--almost once per second while running workloads
like bees.

Replace the WARN_ON() with a comment rationale for its removal.
The rationale is paraphrased from an explanation by Edmund Nadolski
&lt;enadolski@suse.de&gt; on the linux-btrfs mailing list.

Fixes: 8da6d5815c59 ("Btrfs: added btrfs_find_all_roots()")
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell &lt;ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi &lt;lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: make function update_share_count static</title>
<updated>2018-01-22T15:08:14+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Colin Ian King</name>
<email>colin.king@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-11-30T12:14:47+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=ccc8dc758da0deeddaec2d8a37524401654e99de'/>
<id>ccc8dc758da0deeddaec2d8a37524401654e99de</id>
<content type='text'>
The function update_share_count is local to the source and does
not need to be in global scope, so make it static.

Cleans up sparse warning:
fs/btrfs/backref.c:219:6: warning: symbol 'update_share_count' was not
declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King &lt;colin.king@canonical.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The function update_share_count is local to the source and does
not need to be in global scope, so make it static.

Cleans up sparse warning:
fs/btrfs/backref.c:219:6: warning: symbol 'update_share_count' was not
declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King &lt;colin.king@canonical.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: track refs in a rb_tree instead of a list</title>
<updated>2017-11-01T19:45:35+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Josef Bacik</name>
<email>josef@toxicpanda.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-10-19T18:16:00+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=0e0adbcfdc908684317c99a9bf5e13383f03b7ec'/>
<id>0e0adbcfdc908684317c99a9bf5e13383f03b7ec</id>
<content type='text'>
If we get a significant amount of delayed refs for a single block (think
modifying multiple snapshots) we can end up spending an ungodly amount
of time looping through all of the entries trying to see if they can be
merged.  This is because we only add them to a list, so we have O(2n)
for every ref head.  This doesn't make any sense as we likely have refs
for different roots, and so they cannot be merged.  Tracking in a tree
will allow us to break as soon as we hit an entry that doesn't match,
making our worst case O(n).

With this we can also merge entries more easily.  Before we had to hope
that matching refs were on the ends of our list, but with the tree we
can search down to exact matches and merge them at insert time.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik &lt;jbacik@fb.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
If we get a significant amount of delayed refs for a single block (think
modifying multiple snapshots) we can end up spending an ungodly amount
of time looping through all of the entries trying to see if they can be
merged.  This is because we only add them to a list, so we have O(2n)
for every ref head.  This doesn't make any sense as we likely have refs
for different roots, and so they cannot be merged.  Tracking in a tree
will allow us to break as soon as we hit an entry that doesn't match,
making our worst case O(n).

With this we can also merge entries more easily.  Before we had to hope
that matching refs were on the ends of our list, but with the tree we
can search down to exact matches and merge them at insert time.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik &lt;jbacik@fb.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: add a flag to iterate_inodes_from_logical to find all extent refs for uncompressed extents</title>
<updated>2017-11-01T19:45:34+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Zygo Blaxell</name>
<email>ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org</email>
</author>
<published>2017-09-22T17:58:45+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=c995ab3cda3f4178c1f1a47926bea5f8372880cb'/>
<id>c995ab3cda3f4178c1f1a47926bea5f8372880cb</id>
<content type='text'>
The LOGICAL_INO ioctl provides a backward mapping from extent bytenr and
offset (encoded as a single logical address) to a list of extent refs.
LOGICAL_INO complements TREE_SEARCH, which provides the forward mapping
(extent ref -&gt; extent bytenr and offset, or logical address).  These are
useful capabilities for programs that manipulate extents and extent
references from userspace (e.g. dedup and defrag utilities).

When the extents are uncompressed (and not encrypted and not other),
check_extent_in_eb performs filtering of the extent refs to remove any
extent refs which do not contain the same extent offset as the 'logical'
parameter's extent offset.  This prevents LOGICAL_INO from returning
references to more than a single block.

To find the set of extent references to an uncompressed extent from [a, b),
userspace has to run a loop like this pseudocode:

	for (i = a; i &lt; b; ++i)
		extent_ref_set += LOGICAL_INO(i);

At each iteration of the loop (up to 32768 iterations for a 128M extent),
data we are interested in is collected in the kernel, then deleted by
the filter in check_extent_in_eb.

When the extents are compressed (or encrypted or other), the 'logical'
parameter must be an extent bytenr (the 'a' parameter in the loop).
No filtering by extent offset is done (or possible?) so the result is
the complete set of extent refs for the entire extent.  This removes
the need for the loop, since we get all the extent refs in one call.

Add an 'ignore_offset' argument to iterate_inodes_from_logical,
[...several levels of function call graph...], and check_extent_in_eb, so
that we can disable the extent offset filtering for uncompressed extents.
This flag can be set by an improved version of the LOGICAL_INO ioctl to
get either behavior as desired.

There is no functional change in this patch.  The new flag is always
false.

Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell &lt;ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
[ minor coding style fixes ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The LOGICAL_INO ioctl provides a backward mapping from extent bytenr and
offset (encoded as a single logical address) to a list of extent refs.
LOGICAL_INO complements TREE_SEARCH, which provides the forward mapping
(extent ref -&gt; extent bytenr and offset, or logical address).  These are
useful capabilities for programs that manipulate extents and extent
references from userspace (e.g. dedup and defrag utilities).

When the extents are uncompressed (and not encrypted and not other),
check_extent_in_eb performs filtering of the extent refs to remove any
extent refs which do not contain the same extent offset as the 'logical'
parameter's extent offset.  This prevents LOGICAL_INO from returning
references to more than a single block.

To find the set of extent references to an uncompressed extent from [a, b),
userspace has to run a loop like this pseudocode:

	for (i = a; i &lt; b; ++i)
		extent_ref_set += LOGICAL_INO(i);

At each iteration of the loop (up to 32768 iterations for a 128M extent),
data we are interested in is collected in the kernel, then deleted by
the filter in check_extent_in_eb.

When the extents are compressed (or encrypted or other), the 'logical'
parameter must be an extent bytenr (the 'a' parameter in the loop).
No filtering by extent offset is done (or possible?) so the result is
the complete set of extent refs for the entire extent.  This removes
the need for the loop, since we get all the extent refs in one call.

Add an 'ignore_offset' argument to iterate_inodes_from_logical,
[...several levels of function call graph...], and check_extent_in_eb, so
that we can disable the extent offset filtering for uncompressed extents.
This flag can be set by an improved version of the LOGICAL_INO ioctl to
get either behavior as desired.

There is no functional change in this patch.  The new flag is always
false.

Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell &lt;ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
[ minor coding style fixes ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: remove delayed_ref_node from ref_head</title>
<updated>2017-10-30T11:28:00+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Josef Bacik</name>
<email>josef@toxicpanda.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-09-29T19:43:57+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=d278850eff3053ef166cf64c16f798dfe36278a2'/>
<id>d278850eff3053ef166cf64c16f798dfe36278a2</id>
<content type='text'>
This is just excessive information in the ref_head, and makes the code
complicated.  It is a relic from when we had the heads and the refs in
the same tree, which is no longer the case.  With this removal I've
cleaned up a bunch of the cruft around this old assumption as well.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik &lt;jbacik@fb.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This is just excessive information in the ref_head, and makes the code
complicated.  It is a relic from when we had the heads and the refs in
the same tree, which is no longer the case.  With this removal I've
cleaned up a bunch of the cruft around this old assumption as well.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik &lt;jbacik@fb.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
