linux.git/fs/afs/write.c, branch v4.0

afs_fsync: don't bother with ->f_path.dentry

2014-11-19T18:01:22+00:00

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

assorted conversions to %p[dD]

2014-11-19T18:01:20+00:00

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

afs: switch to ->write_iter()

2014-05-06T21:39:39+00:00

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

aio: don't include aio.h in sched.h

2013-05-08T03:16:25+00:00

Faster kernel compiles by way of fewer unnecessary includes.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet 
Cc: Zach Brown 
Cc: Felipe Balbi 
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Cc: Mark Fasheh 
Cc: Joel Becker 
Cc: Rusty Russell 
Cc: Jens Axboe 
Cc: Asai Thambi S P 
Cc: Selvan Mani 
Cc: Sam Bradshaw 
Cc: Jeff Moyer 
Cc: Al Viro 
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise 
Reviewed-by: "Theodore Ts'o" 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

new helper: file_inode(file)

2013-02-23T04:31:31+00:00

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers

2011-07-21T00:47:59+00:00

Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called
in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and
the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers.  Some
file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and
ocfs2.  For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make
sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each
individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there.
Thanks,

Acked-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro

afs: afs_fill_page reads too much, or wrong data

2011-06-16T15:44:46+00:00

afs_fill_page should read the page that is about to be written but
the current implementation has a number of issues. If we aren't
extending the file we always read PAGE_CACHE_SIZE at offset 0. If we
are extending the file we try to read the entire file.

Change afs_fill_page to read PAGE_CACHE_SIZE at the right offset,
clamped to i_size.

While here, avoid calling afs_fill_page when we are doing a
PAGE_CACHE_SIZE write.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard 
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: Al Viro

afs: Fix oops in afs_unlink_writeback

2011-02-25T19:12:37+00:00

I'm seeing the following oops when testing afs:

  Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000008
  ...
  NIP [c0000000003393b0] .afs_unlink_writeback+0x38/0xc0
  LR [c00000000033987c] .afs_put_writeback+0x98/0xec
  Call Trace:
  [c00000000345f600] [c00000000033987c] .afs_put_writeback+0x98/0xec
  [c00000000345f690] [c00000000033ae80] .afs_write_begin+0x6a4/0x75c
  [c00000000345f790] [c00000000012b77c] .generic_file_buffered_write+0x148/0x320
  [c00000000345f8d0] [c00000000012e1b8] .__generic_file_aio_write+0x37c/0x3e4
  [c00000000345f9d0] [c00000000012e2a8] .generic_file_aio_write+0x88/0xfc
  [c00000000345fa90] [c0000000003390a8] .afs_file_write+0x10c/0x178
  [c00000000345fb40] [c000000000188788] .do_sync_write+0xc4/0x128
  [c00000000345fcc0] [c000000000189658] .vfs_write+0xe8/0x1d8
  [c00000000345fd70] [c000000000189884] .SyS_write+0x68/0xb0
  [c00000000345fe30] [c000000000008564] syscall_exit+0x0/0x40

afs_write_begin hits an error and calls afs_unlink_writeback. In there
we do list_del_init on an uninitialised list.

The patch below initialises ->link when creating the afs_writeback struct.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard 
Signed-off-by: David Howells 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

writeback: remove nonblocking/encountered_congestion references

2010-10-26T23:52:05+00:00

This removes more dead code that was somehow missed by commit 0d99519efef
(writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks).  There are
no behavior change except for the removal of two entries from one of the
ext4 tracing interface.

The nonblocking checks in ->writepages are no longer used because the
flusher now prefer to block on get_request_wait() than to skip inodes on
IO congestion.  The latter will lead to more seeky IO.

The nonblocking checks in ->writepage are no longer used because it's
redundant with the WB_SYNC_NONE check.

We no long set ->nonblocking in VM page out and page migration, because
a) it's effectively redundant with WB_SYNC_NONE in current code
b) it's old semantic of "Don't get stuck on request queues" is mis-behavior:
   that would skip some dirty inodes on congestion and page out others, which
   is unfair in terms of LRU age.

Inspired by Christoph Hellwig. Thanks!

Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang 
Cc: Theodore Ts'o 
Cc: David Howells 
Cc: Sage Weil 
Cc: Steve French 
Cc: Chris Mason 
Cc: Jens Axboe 
Cc: Christoph Hellwig 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

writeback: remove writeback_inodes_wbc

2010-07-06T06:54:03+00:00

This was just an odd wrapper around writeback_inodes_wb.  Removing this
also allows to get rid of the bdi member of struct writeback_control
which was rather out of place there.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe