Commit 0dc23567c206 ("thermal: core: Move lists of thermal instances
to trip descriptors") overlooked the case in which the Power Allocator
governor attempts to bind to a tripless thermal zone and params->trip_max
is NULL in check_power_actors().

No power actors can be found in that case, so check_power_actors() needs
to be made return 0 then to restore its previous behavior.

Fixes: 0dc23567c206 ("thermal: core: Move lists of thermal instances to trip descriptors")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/Z0NeGF4ryCe_b5rr@sashalap/
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2761105.mvXUDI8C0e@rjwysocki.net

When total_req_power is 0, divvy_up_power() will set granted_power to 0,
and cdev will be limited to the lowest performance. If our polling delay
is set to 200ms, it means that cdev cannot perform better within 200ms
even if cdev has a sudden load. This will affect the performance of cdev
and is not as expected.

For this reason, if nobody requests power, then set the granted power to
the max_power.

Signed-off-by: ZhengShaobo <zhengshaobo1@xiaomi.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241021121138.422-1-zhengshaobo1@xiaomi.com
[ rjw: Fixed up tags ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add and use a special guard for cooling devices.

This allows quite a few error code paths to be simplified among
other things and brings in code size reduction for a good measure.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5837621.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>

Three thermal governors call __thermal_cdev_update() under the
cdev lock without doing any checks, so in order to reduce the
related code duplication, introduce a new helper function called
thermal_cdev_update_nocheck() for them and make them use it.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1835097.VLH7GnMWUR@rjwysocki.net
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>

In almost all places where a thermal zone's list of thermal instances
is walked, there is a check to match a specific trip point and it is
walked in vain whenever there are no cooling devices associated with
the given trip.

To address this, store the lists of thermal instances in trip point
descriptors instead of storing them in thermal zones and adjust all
code using those lists accordingly.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5522726.Sb9uPGUboI@rjwysocki.net
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>

Commit da781936e7c3 ("thermal: gov_power_allocator: Allow binding
without trip points") allowed the governor to bind even when trip_max
is NULL. This allows a NULL pointer dereference to happen in the manage
callback.

Add an early return to prevent it, since the governor is expected to not do
anything in this case.

Fixes: da781936e7c3 ("thermal: gov_power_allocator: Allow binding without trip points")
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240702-power-allocator-null-trip-max-v1-1-47a60dc55414@collabora.com
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Passive polling is enabled by setting the 'passive' field in
struct thermal_zone_device to a positive value so long as the
'passive_delay_jiffies' field is greater than zero.  It causes
the thermal core to actively check the thermal zone temperature
periodically which in theory should be done after crossing a
passive trip point on the way up in order to allow governors to
react more rapidly to temperature changes and adjust mitigation
more precisely.

However, the 'passive' field in struct thermal_zone_device is currently
managed by governors which is quite problematic.  First of all, only
two governors, Step-Wise and Power Allocator, update that field at
all, so the other governors do not benefit from passive polling,
although in principle they should.  Moreover, if the zone governor is
changed from, say, Step-Wise to Fair-Share after 'passive' has been
incremented by the former, it is not going to be reset back to zero by
the latter even if the zone temperature falls down below all passive
trip points.

For this reason, make handle_thermal_trip() increment 'passive'
to enable passive polling for the given thermal zone whenever a
passive trip point is crossed on the way up and decrement it
whenever a passive trip point is crossed on the way down.  Also
remove the 'passive' field updates from governors and additionally
clear it in thermal_zone_device_init() to prevent passive polling
from being enabled after a system resume just beacuse it was enabled
before suspending the system.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>

Notice that the passive field in struct thermal_zone_device is not
used by the Power Allocator governor itself and so the ordering of
its updates with respect to allow_maximum_power() or allocate_power()
does not matter.

Accordingly, make power_allocator_manage() update that field right
before returning, which allows the current value of it to be passed
directly to allow_maximum_power() without using the additional update
variable that can be dropped.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>

The Power Allocator governor really only wants to be called once per
thermal zone update and it does a special check to skip the extra,
from its perspective, invocations of the .throttle() callback.

Make it use .manage() instead of .throttle().

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>

The threshold field in struct thermal_trip is only used internally by
the thermal core and it is better to prevent drivers from misusing it.
It also takes some space unnecessarily in the trip tables passed by
drivers to the core during thermal zone registration.

For this reason, introduce struct thermal_trip_desc as a wrapper around
struct thermal_trip, move the threshold field directly into it and make
the thermal core store struct thermal_trip_desc objects in the internal
thermal zone trip tables.  Adjust all of the code using trip tables in
the thermal core accordingly.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>