linux.git/drivers/regulator, branch v3.0-rc2 Linux kernel source tree regulator: Fix _regulator_get_voltage if get_voltage callback is NULL 2011-05-27T09:49:30+00:00 Axel Lin axel.lin@gmail.com 2011-05-23T12:08:10+00:00 cb220d16f91f8d5fa1450c7af17e028e8cb3f0f1 In the case of get_voltage callback is NULL, current implementation in _regulator_get_voltage will return -EINVAL. Also returns proper error if ret is negative value. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk> 
In the case of get_voltage callback is NULL, current implementation in
_regulator_get_voltage will return -EINVAL.

Also returns proper error if ret is negative value.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
REGULATOR: TWL6025: add support to twl-regulator 2011-05-27T09:49:29+00:00 Graeme Gregory gg@slimlogic.co.uk 2011-05-22T20:21:23+00:00 4d94aee577ea8179bd40f0f17e64cada25c66b85 Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how regulators are enabled and disabled. The names of the regulators also changed. The DCDCs of the 6025 are software controllable as well. Since V1 Use the features variable passed via platform data instead of calling global function. Change the very switch like if statements to be a more readable switch statement. Since V2 twl6025 doesn't use remap so remove it from the macros. Since V3 enable/disable functions for 4030/6030 were seperated upstream so rebase on top of this. Change DCDC reference to SMPS as this is used in TRM. Change list_voltage slightly to have less code. Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk> 
Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the
group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how
regulators are enabled and disabled.

The names of the regulators also changed.

The DCDCs of the 6025 are software controllable as well.

Since V1

Use the features variable passed via platform data instead of calling
global function.

Change the very switch like if statements to be a more readable
switch statement.

Since V2

twl6025 doesn't use remap so remove it from the macros.

Since V3

enable/disable functions for 4030/6030 were seperated upstream so rebase
on top of this. Change DCDC reference to SMPS as this is used in TRM.
Change list_voltage slightly to have less code.

Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
regulator: twl6030: do not write to _GRP for regulator disable 2011-05-27T09:49:29+00:00 Balaji T K balajitk@ti.com 2011-05-20T13:33:52+00:00 0ff3897d79d4607d37432b3eb81a304f7e4b4841 TWL6030: regulator is disabled via VREG_STATE TWL4030: regulator is disabled via VREG_GRP Since there is nothing common, split twlreg_enable similar to other regulator_ops Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk> 
TWL6030: regulator is disabled via VREG_STATE
TWL4030: regulator is disabled via VREG_GRP
Since there is nothing common, split twlreg_enable similar to other regulator_ops

Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
regulator: twl6030: do not write to _GRP for regulator enable 2011-05-27T09:49:29+00:00 Balaji T K balajitk@ti.com 2011-05-20T13:33:51+00:00 f8c2940bcd623b4d185d4ff7ff5678a4508939b3 TWL6030: regulator is enabled via VREG_STATE TWL4030: regulator is enabled via VREG_GRP Since there is nothing common, split twlreg_enable similar to other regulator_ops Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk> 
TWL6030: regulator is enabled via VREG_STATE
TWL4030: regulator is enabled via VREG_GRP
Since there is nothing common, split twlreg_enable similar to other regulator_ops

Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
regulator: tps65911: Add new chip version 2011-05-27T09:49:10+00:00 Jorge Eduardo Candelaria jedu@slimlogic.co.uk 2011-05-16T23:35:03+00:00 a320e3c3d6351814afa5182159df88d2637e0f6f The tps65911 chip introduces new features, including changes in the regulator module. - VDD1 and VDD2 remain unchanged. - VDD3 is now named VDDCTRL and has a wider voltage range. - LDOs are now named LDO1...8 and voltage ranges are sequential, making LDOs easier to handle. Signed-off-by: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk> 
The tps65911 chip introduces new features, including changes in
the regulator module.

- VDD1 and VDD2 remain unchanged.
- VDD3 is now named VDDCTRL and has a wider voltage range.
- LDOs are now named LDO1...8 and voltage ranges are sequential,
  making LDOs easier to handle.

Signed-off-by: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
regulator: Fix off-by-one value range checking for mc13xxx_regulator_get_voltage 2011-05-27T09:49:10+00:00 Axel Lin axel.lin@gmail.com 2011-05-18T12:56:45+00:00 3c24019ddeab71ddf125ad2ad13a38041655c1fd We use val as array index, thus the valid value rangae for val should be 0 .. n_voltages-1. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk> 
We use val as array index,
thus the valid value rangae for val should be 0 .. n_voltages-1.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
regulator: mc13892: Fix voltage unit in test case. 2011-05-27T09:49:10+00:00 Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com 2011-05-16T13:54:27+00:00 6dc4efc6d5429292f29009f6569fbb9a53929dd6 Voltage values should be expressed in microvolts, not in milivolts. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Ranjani Vaidyanathan <ra5478@freescale.com> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk> 
Voltage values should be expressed in microvolts, not in milivolts.

Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Ranjani Vaidyanathan <ra5478@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
regulator: Remove MAX8997_REG_BUCK1DVS/MAX8997_REG_BUCK2DVS/MAX8997_REG_BUCK5DVS macros 2011-05-27T09:49:10+00:00 Axel Lin axel.lin@gmail.com 2011-05-16T10:20:34+00:00 ecb9c4f5956afa2ca0a20a1f99932b9ff81de854 In current implementation, the original macro implementation assumes the caller pass the parameter starting from 1 (to match the register names in datasheet). Thus we have unneeded plus one then minus one operations when using MAX8997_REG_BUCK1DVS/MAX8997_REG_BUCK2DVS/MAX8997_REG_BUCK5DVS macros. This patch removes these macros to avoid unneeded plus one then minus one operations without reducing readability. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk> 
In current implementation, the original macro implementation assumes the caller
pass the parameter starting from 1 (to match the register names in datasheet).
Thus we have unneeded plus one then minus one operations
when using MAX8997_REG_BUCK1DVS/MAX8997_REG_BUCK2DVS/MAX8997_REG_BUCK5DVS macros.

This patch removes these macros to avoid unneeded plus one then minus one operations
without reducing readability.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
regulator: Only apply voltage constraints from consumers that set them 2011-05-27T09:49:09+00:00 Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com 2011-05-14T20:42:34+00:00 4aa922c024b2a194d7b68b22a66dfcf86e7838b3 When applying the set_voltage() requests from consumers skip over those consumers that haven't set anything, otherwise we'll come out with a maximum voltage of zero. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk> 
When applying the set_voltage() requests from consumers skip over those
consumers that haven't set anything, otherwise we'll come out with a
maximum voltage of zero.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
regulator: If we can't configure optimum mode we're always in the best one 2011-05-27T09:49:09+00:00 Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com 2011-05-14T18:19:45+00:00 a4b4148379ef1ad460fc1aa6bcf2cde99cd91166 If either a regulator driver can't tell us what the optimum mode is (or doesn't have modes in the first place) or the system doesn't allow DRMS changes then it's more helpful for users to just say that we're in the optimal mode, even if it's from a selection of one. Still report errors if the process of picking and setting a mode changes as this may indicate that we're stuck in a low power mode and unable to deliver a higher current that the consumer just asked for. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk> 
If either a regulator driver can't tell us what the optimum mode is (or
doesn't have modes in the first place) or the system doesn't allow DRMS
changes then it's more helpful for users to just say that we're in the
optimal mode, even if it's from a selection of one.

Still report errors if the process of picking and setting a mode changes as
this may indicate that we're stuck in a low power mode and unable to deliver
a higher current that the consumer just asked for.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>