linux.git/drivers/platform, branch v6.6-rc4 Linux kernel source tree platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Take mutex in hotkey_resume 2023-09-18T13:16:19+00:00 Dennis Bonke admin@dennisbonke.com 2023-09-14T13:03:56+00:00 81bf4a4e9cb754e957ab614cde6a3b16244d670b hotkey_status_set expects the hotkey_mutex to be held. It seems like it was missed here and that gives lockdep warnings while resuming. Fixes: 38831eaf7d4c ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: use lockdep annotations") Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Signed-off-by: Dennis Bonke <admin@dennisbonke.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914130356.235912-1-admin@dennisbonke.com Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> 
hotkey_status_set expects the hotkey_mutex to be held.
It seems like it was missed here and that gives lockdep
warnings while resuming.

Fixes: 38831eaf7d4c ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: use lockdep annotations")
Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Bonke <admin@dennisbonke.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914130356.235912-1-admin@dennisbonke.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Fail IPC send if still busy 2023-09-18T13:15:15+00:00 Stephen Boyd swboyd@chromium.org 2023-09-13T21:27:22+00:00 85e654c9f722853a595fa941dca60c157b707b86 It's possible for interrupts to get significantly delayed to the point that callers of intel_scu_ipc_dev_command() and friends can call the function once, hit a timeout, and call it again while the interrupt still hasn't been processed. This driver will get seriously confused if the interrupt is finally processed after the second IPC has been sent with ipc_command(). It won't know which IPC has been completed. This could be quite disastrous if calling code assumes something has happened upon return from intel_scu_ipc_dev_simple_command() when it actually hasn't. Let's avoid this scenario by simply returning -EBUSY in this case. Hopefully higher layers will know to back off or fail gracefully when this happens. It's all highly unlikely anyway, but it's better to be correct here as we have no way to know which IPC the status register is telling us about if we send a second IPC while the previous IPC is still processing. Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org> Cc: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Fixes: ed12f295bfd5 ("ipc: Added support for IPC interrupt mode") Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913212723.3055315-5-swboyd@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> 
It's possible for interrupts to get significantly delayed to the point
that callers of intel_scu_ipc_dev_command() and friends can call the
function once, hit a timeout, and call it again while the interrupt
still hasn't been processed. This driver will get seriously confused if
the interrupt is finally processed after the second IPC has been sent
with ipc_command(). It won't know which IPC has been completed. This
could be quite disastrous if calling code assumes something has happened
upon return from intel_scu_ipc_dev_simple_command() when it actually
hasn't.

Let's avoid this scenario by simply returning -EBUSY in this case.
Hopefully higher layers will know to back off or fail gracefully when
this happens. It's all highly unlikely anyway, but it's better to be
correct here as we have no way to know which IPC the status register is
telling us about if we send a second IPC while the previous IPC is still
processing.

Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
Cc: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: ed12f295bfd5 ("ipc: Added support for IPC interrupt mode")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913212723.3055315-5-swboyd@chromium.org
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Don't override scu in intel_scu_ipc_dev_simple_command() 2023-09-18T13:15:02+00:00 Stephen Boyd swboyd@chromium.org 2023-09-13T21:27:21+00:00 efce78584e583226e9a1f6cb2fb555d6ff47c3e7 Andy discovered this bug during patch review. The 'scu' argument to this function shouldn't be overridden by the function itself. It doesn't make any sense. Looking at the commit history, we see that commit f57fa18583f5 ("platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Introduce new SCU IPC API") removed the setting of the scu to ipcdev in other functions, but not this one. That was an oversight. Remove this line so that we stop overriding the scu instance that is used by this function. Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZPjdZ3xNmBEBvNiS@smile.fi.intel.com Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Fixes: f57fa18583f5 ("platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Introduce new SCU IPC API") Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913212723.3055315-4-swboyd@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> 
Andy discovered this bug during patch review. The 'scu' argument to this
function shouldn't be overridden by the function itself. It doesn't make
any sense. Looking at the commit history, we see that commit
f57fa18583f5 ("platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Introduce new SCU IPC API")
removed the setting of the scu to ipcdev in other functions, but not
this one. That was an oversight. Remove this line so that we stop
overriding the scu instance that is used by this function.

Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZPjdZ3xNmBEBvNiS@smile.fi.intel.com
Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: f57fa18583f5 ("platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Introduce new SCU IPC API")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913212723.3055315-4-swboyd@chromium.org
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Check status upon timeout in ipc_wait_for_interrupt() 2023-09-18T13:14:53+00:00 Stephen Boyd swboyd@chromium.org 2023-09-13T21:27:20+00:00 427fada620733e6474d783ae6037a66eae42bf8c It's possible for the completion in ipc_wait_for_interrupt() to timeout, simply because the interrupt was delayed in being processed. A timeout in itself is not an error. This driver should check the status register upon a timeout to ensure that scheduling or interrupt processing delays don't affect the outcome of the IPC return value. CPU0 SCU ---- --- ipc_wait_for_interrupt() wait_for_completion_timeout(&scu->cmd_complete) [TIMEOUT] status[IPC_STATUS_BUSY]=0 Fix this problem by reading the status bit in all cases, regardless of the timeout. If the completion times out, we'll assume the problem was that the IPC_STATUS_BUSY bit was still set, but if the status bit is cleared in the meantime we know that we hit some scheduling delay and we should just check the error bit. Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Fixes: ed12f295bfd5 ("ipc: Added support for IPC interrupt mode") Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913212723.3055315-3-swboyd@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> 
It's possible for the completion in ipc_wait_for_interrupt() to timeout,
simply because the interrupt was delayed in being processed. A timeout
in itself is not an error. This driver should check the status register
upon a timeout to ensure that scheduling or interrupt processing delays
don't affect the outcome of the IPC return value.

 CPU0                                                   SCU
 ----                                                   ---
 ipc_wait_for_interrupt()
  wait_for_completion_timeout(&scu->cmd_complete)
  [TIMEOUT]                                             status[IPC_STATUS_BUSY]=0

Fix this problem by reading the status bit in all cases, regardless of
the timeout. If the completion times out, we'll assume the problem was
that the IPC_STATUS_BUSY bit was still set, but if the status bit is
cleared in the meantime we know that we hit some scheduling delay and we
should just check the error bit.

Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: ed12f295bfd5 ("ipc: Added support for IPC interrupt mode")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913212723.3055315-3-swboyd@chromium.org
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Check status after timeout in busy_loop() 2023-09-18T13:14:22+00:00 Stephen Boyd swboyd@chromium.org 2023-09-13T21:27:19+00:00 e0b4ab3bb92bda8d12f55842614362989d5b2cb3 It's possible for the polling loop in busy_loop() to get scheduled away for a long time. status = ipc_read_status(scu); // status = IPC_STATUS_BUSY <long time scheduled away> if (!(status & IPC_STATUS_BUSY)) If this happens, then the status bit could change while the task is scheduled away and this function would never read the status again after timing out. Instead, the function will return -ETIMEDOUT when it's possible that scheduling didn't work out and the status bit was cleared. Bit polling code should always check the bit being polled one more time after the timeout in case this happens. Fix this by reading the status once more after the while loop breaks. The readl_poll_timeout() macro implements all of this, and it is shorter, so use that macro here to consolidate code and fix this. There were some concerns with using readl_poll_timeout() because it uses timekeeping, and timekeeping isn't running early on or during the late stages of system suspend or early stages of system resume, but an audit of the code concluded that this code isn't called during those times so it is safe to use the macro. Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Fixes: e7b7ab3847c9 ("platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Sleeping is fine when polling") Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913212723.3055315-2-swboyd@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> 
It's possible for the polling loop in busy_loop() to get scheduled away
for a long time.

  status = ipc_read_status(scu); // status = IPC_STATUS_BUSY
  <long time scheduled away>
  if (!(status & IPC_STATUS_BUSY))

If this happens, then the status bit could change while the task is
scheduled away and this function would never read the status again after
timing out. Instead, the function will return -ETIMEDOUT when it's
possible that scheduling didn't work out and the status bit was cleared.
Bit polling code should always check the bit being polled one more time
after the timeout in case this happens.

Fix this by reading the status once more after the while loop breaks.
The readl_poll_timeout() macro implements all of this, and it is
shorter, so use that macro here to consolidate code and fix this.

There were some concerns with using readl_poll_timeout() because it uses
timekeeping, and timekeeping isn't running early on or during the late
stages of system suspend or early stages of system resume, but an audit
of the code concluded that this code isn't called during those times so
it is safe to use the macro.

Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: e7b7ab3847c9 ("platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Sleeping is fine when polling")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913212723.3055315-2-swboyd@chromium.org
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
platform/x86: asus-wmi: Support 2023 ROG X16 tablet mode 2023-09-11T11:26:13+00:00 Luke D. Jones luke@ljones.dev 2023-09-05T08:28:13+00:00 4106a70ddad57ee6d8f98b81d6f036740c72762b Add quirk for ASUS ROG X16 (GV601V, 2023 versions) Flow 2-in-1 to enable tablet mode with lid flip (all screen rotations). Signed-off-by: Luke D. Jones <luke@ljones.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230905082813.13470-1-luke@ljones.dev Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> 
Add quirk for ASUS ROG X16 (GV601V, 2023 versions) Flow 2-in-1
to enable tablet mode with lid flip (all screen rotations).

Signed-off-by: Luke D. Jones <luke@ljones.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230905082813.13470-1-luke@ljones.dev
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
platform/mellanox: NVSW_SN2201 should depend on ACPI 2023-09-11T11:21:46+00:00 Geert Uytterhoeven geert+renesas@glider.be 2023-09-04T12:00:35+00:00 0a138f1670bd1af13ba6949c48ea86ddd4bf557e The only probing method supported by the Nvidia SN2201 platform driver is probing through an ACPI match table. Hence add a dependency on ACPI, to prevent asking the user about this driver when configuring a kernel without ACPI support. Fixes: 662f24826f95 ("platform/mellanox: Add support for new SN2201 system") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Acked-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ec5a4071691ab08d58771b7732a9988e89779268.1693828363.git.geert+renesas@glider.be Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> 
The only probing method supported by the Nvidia SN2201 platform driver
is probing through an ACPI match table.  Hence add a dependency on
ACPI, to prevent asking the user about this driver when configuring a
kernel without ACPI support.

Fixes: 662f24826f95 ("platform/mellanox: Add support for new SN2201 system")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ec5a4071691ab08d58771b7732a9988e89779268.1693828363.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
platform/mellanox: mlxbf-bootctl: add NET dependency into Kconfig 2023-09-11T11:13:25+00:00 David Thompson davthompson@nvidia.com 2023-09-05T13:32:43+00:00 c2dffda1d8f7511505bbbf16ba282f2079b30089 The latest version of the mlxbf_bootctl driver utilizes "sysfs_format_mac", and this API is only available if NET is defined in the kernel configuration. This patch changes the mlxbf_bootctl Kconfig to depend on NET. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309031058.JvwNDBKt-lkp@intel.com/ Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230905133243.31550-1-davthompson@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> 
The latest version of the mlxbf_bootctl driver utilizes
"sysfs_format_mac", and this API is only available if
NET is defined in the kernel configuration. This patch
changes the mlxbf_bootctl Kconfig to depend on NET.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309031058.JvwNDBKt-lkp@intel.com/
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230905133243.31550-1-davthompson@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Fix reading of unprogrammed events 2023-09-11T11:13:24+00:00 Shravan Kumar Ramani shravankr@nvidia.com 2023-09-05T12:49:33+00:00 0f5969452e162efc50bdc98968fb62b424a9874b This fix involves 2 changes: - All event regs have a reset value of 0, which is not a valid event_number as per the event_list for most blocks and hence seen as an error. Add a "disable" event with event_number 0 for all blocks. - The enable bit for each counter need not be checked before reading the event info, and hence removed. Fixes: 1a218d312e65 ("platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Add Mellanox BlueField PMC driver") Signed-off-by: Shravan Kumar Ramani <shravankr@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/04d0213932d32681de1c716b54320ed894e52425.1693917738.git.shravankr@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> 
This fix involves 2 changes:
 - All event regs have a reset value of 0, which is not a valid
   event_number as per the event_list for most blocks and hence seen
   as an error. Add a "disable" event with event_number 0 for all blocks.

 - The enable bit for each counter need not be checked before
   reading the event info, and hence removed.

Fixes: 1a218d312e65 ("platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Add Mellanox BlueField PMC driver")
Signed-off-by: Shravan Kumar Ramani <shravankr@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/04d0213932d32681de1c716b54320ed894e52425.1693917738.git.shravankr@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Fix potential buffer overflows 2023-09-11T11:13:24+00:00 Shravan Kumar Ramani shravankr@nvidia.com 2023-09-05T12:49:32+00:00 80ccd40568bcd3655b0fd0be1e9b3379fd6e1056 Replace sprintf with sysfs_emit where possible. Size check in mlxbf_pmc_event_list_show should account for "\0". Fixes: 1a218d312e65 ("platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Add Mellanox BlueField PMC driver") Signed-off-by: Shravan Kumar Ramani <shravankr@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bef39ef32319a31b32f999065911f61b0d3b17c3.1693917738.git.shravankr@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> 
Replace sprintf with sysfs_emit where possible.
Size check in mlxbf_pmc_event_list_show should account for "\0".

Fixes: 1a218d312e65 ("platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Add Mellanox BlueField PMC driver")
Signed-off-by: Shravan Kumar Ramani <shravankr@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bef39ef32319a31b32f999065911f61b0d3b17c3.1693917738.git.shravankr@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>