Fixing following sparse warning
>drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:2780:15: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
>drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:2780:15:    expected restricted unsigned short [usertype] channel
>drivers/net/wireless/mwl8k.c:2780:15:    got unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] hw_value

Signed-off-by: Yogesh Ashok Powar <yogeshp@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The intent here was to check whether key->cipher was WEP40 or WEP104.
We do a similar check correctly in several other places in this file.
The current condition is always true.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br> says:

"It's an issue brought about by GCC 4.7's partial-inlining, that ends up
splitting the udelay function just at the wrong spot, in such a way that
some sanity checks for constants fails, and we end up calling
bad_udelay.

This patch fixes the problem.  Feel free to push it upstream if it makes
sense to you."

Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The brcmsmac driver isn't a PCI driver any more, it's a bcma one.  The
PCI device has been resumed by the PCI driver (the generic PCI layer,
really), we should be resuming just our own driver state.

Also add pr_debug() calls to show that we now actually get the
suspend/resume events.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Now the low-level driver actually gets informed that it is getting suspended and resumed.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Fix the following build warning:

drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c: In function ‘iwlagn_request_scan’:
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-scan.c:572: warning: ‘cmd_len’ may be used uninitialized in this function

Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Documentation states that the KeyMiss flag is only valid if RxFrameOK is
unset, however empirical evidence has shown that this is false.
When KeyMiss is set (and RxFrameOK is 1), the hardware passes a valid frame
which has not been decrypted. The driver then falsely marks the frame
as decrypted, and when using CCMP this corrupts the rx CCMP PN, leading
to connection hangs.

Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Same devices can generate interrupt without properly setting bit in
INT_SOURCE_CSR register (spurious interrupt), what will cause IRQ line
will be disabled by interrupts controller driver.

We discovered that clearing INT_MASK_CSR stops such behaviour. We
previously first read that register, and then clear all know interrupt
sources bits and do not touch reserved bits. After this patch, we write
to all register content (I believe writing to reserved bits on that
register will not cause any problems, I tested that on my rt2800pci
device).

This fix very bad performance problem, practically making device
unusable (since worked without interrupts), reported in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658451

We previously tried to workaround that issue in commit
4ba7d9997869d25bd223dea7536fc1ce9fab3b3b "rt2800pci: handle spurious
interrupts", but it was reverted in commit
82e5fc2a34fa9ffea38f00c4066b7e600a0ca5e6
as thing, that will prevent to detect real spurious interrupts.

Reported-and-tested-by: Amir Hedayaty <hedayaty@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This is basically just a cleanup.  Large positive numbers get counted as
negative but then get implicitly cast to positive again for the checks
that matter.

This does make a small difference in ipw_handle_promiscuous_rx() when we
test "if (unlikely((len + IPW_RX_FRAME_SIZE) > skb_tailroom(rxb->skb)))"
It should return there, but we don't return until a couple lines later
when we test "if (len > IPW_RX_BUF_SIZE - sizeof(struct ipw_rt_hdr)) {".
The difference is that in the second test the sizeof() means that there
is an implied cast to unsigned.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

An Oops has once been observed, when the SDIO card had been ejected during
IO. The PC value shows, that the dev pointer in b43_op_stop() was NULL.

(I moved the NULL check before the lock, based upon a suggestion from
Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>. -- JWL)

Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>