MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE was added in pre-git era and never was
implemented. We can safely remove it, because the kernel has grown
to have many more reliable mechanisms to determine if device is
supported or not.

Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

ezusb_read_ltv() is always invoked via the ->read_ltv() callback. This
callback is mostly invoked under orinoco_lock() which disables BH.

There are a few invocations during probe which occur in preemptible
context via:
   ezusb_probe() -> orinoco_init() -> determine_fw_capabilities()

Extend `hermes_ops' with the ->read_ltv_pr callback which is implemented
with the same callback like ->read_ltv on `hermes_ops_local'.
On `ezusb_ops' ->read_ltv is used for callbacks under the lock which
need to poll.
The new ->read_ltv_pr() is used in the preemptible context in which it
is possible to wait for the completion. Provide HERMES_READ_RECORD_PR()
and hermes_read_wordrec_pr() which behave like their non _pr equivalents
and invoke ->read_ltv_pr().

This removes the last user of ezusb_req_ctx_wait() and can now be
removed.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113212252.2243570-11-bigeasy@linutronix.de

All invocations of ezusb_docmd_wait() happen via ->cmd_wait(). This
callback is always invoked under the orinoco_lock() which disables BH.

Use ezusb_req_ctx_wait_poll() for ezusb_docmd_wait() because it must not
sleep.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113212252.2243570-10-bigeasy@linutronix.de

ezusb_doicmd_wait() is invoked via ->init_cmd_wait() callback.
This callback is only invoked hermesi_program_init() and
hermesi_program_end() which are the ->program_init() and ->program_end()
callbacks as assigned by `hermes_ops_local'. They are never used by the
USB interface since the USB interface provides its own set of callbacks
by `ezusb_ops'.

Replace ezusb_doicmd_wait() with a warning in case I missed the obvious.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113212252.2243570-9-bigeasy@linutronix.de

All invocation of ezusb_write_ltv() happen via ->write_ltv() and are
performed under the orinoco_lock() which disables BH.

Use ezusb_req_ctx_wait_poll() for ezusb_write_ltv() because it must not
sleep.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113212252.2243570-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de

ezusb_read_pda() is invoked via ->read_pda() while firmware is loaded in
preemtible context.

Use ezusb_req_ctx_wait_compl() in ezusb_read_pda().

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113212252.2243570-7-bigeasy@linutronix.de

The ezusb_program() is invoked via ->program() in preemptible
context during firmware loading. This is also true for the
->program_init() and ->program_end() callback.

Use ezusb_req_ctx_wait_compl() in ezusb_program_init(),
ezusb_program_bytes(), ezusb_program_end() which are part of firmware
loading during device probe.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113212252.2243570-6-bigeasy@linutronix.de

ezusb_init() is always invoked in preemptible context during device
probe. Only orinoco_up() -> orinoco_reinit_firmware() may invoke the
function from atomic context but this is never used for the USB
interface.

Use ezusb_req_ctx_wait_compl() for the ezusb_write_ltv() and
ezusb_docmd_wait() invocations from within ezusb_init().
Preserve the generic versions which have still other user via the
callback.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113212252.2243570-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de

ezusb_xmit() sets ->in_rid in its request which means it does not wait
for an answer.

Use the ezusb_req_ctx_wait_skip() to denote that an answer is not
expected.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113212252.2243570-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de

ezusb_access_ltv() sends the prepared request to the USB device.
Requests which have ->in_rid set expect an answer from the USB device
and the function has to wait until the URB with the answer arrives.
The function uses in_interrupt() to determine if it can simply sleep on
the completion and be woken up once the answer arrives or if it needs to
poll on the completion.

The usage of in_interrupt() in drivers is phased out and Linus clearly
requested that code which changes behaviour depending on context should
either be separated or the context be conveyed in an argument passed by the
caller, which usually knows the context.

Aside of that in_interrupt() is not correct as it does not catch preempt
disabled regions in which sleeping is also not allowed.

Provide stubs which can be used as a replacement. The current default is
the current behaviour which sleeps/polls depending on in_interrupt().
The goal is to audit all callers and use either the poll or sleep
version.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113212252.2243570-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de