During a reset, releasing the swflag after it failed to be acquired would cause a double unlock of the mutex. Instead, test whether acquisition of the swflag was successful and if not, do not release the swflag. The reset must still be done to bring the device to a quiescent state. This resolves [BUG 12200] BUG: bad unlock balance detected! e1000e http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12200 Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
remove redundant argument comments in files of drivers/net/* Signed-off-by: Qinghuang Feng <qhfeng.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Some users reported that they have machines with BMCs enabled that cannot receive IPMI traffic after e1000e is loaded. http://marc.info/?l=e1000-devel&m=121909039127414&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=e1000-devel&m=121365543823387&w=2 This fixes the issue if they load with the new parameter = 0 by disabling crc stripping, but leaves the performance feature on for most users. Based on work done by Hong Zhang. Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
If the driver fails to initialize the first time due to the failure in the phy_id check the kernel triggers a warn_on on the second try to load the driver because the driver did not free the msi/x resources in the first load because of the previous failure in phy_id check. Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Since dev->power.should_wakeup bit is used by the PCI core to decide whether the device should wake up the system from sleep states, set/unset this bit whenever WOL is enabled/disabled using e1000_set_wol(). Accordingly, use device_can_wakeup() for checking if wake-up is supported by the device. Signed-off-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When offloading transmit checksums only, the driver was not correctly configuring the hardware to handle the case of a zero checksum. For UDP the correct behavior is to leave it alone, but for tcp the checksum must be changed from 0x0000 to 0xFFFF. The hardware takes care of this case but only if it is told the packet is tcp. Signed-off-by: Dave Graham <david.graham@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Since e1000e has been existance in linux-2.6, we've never released the hardware semaphore after a successful write to the SPI EEPROM. I guess we don't write to SPI EEPROM much -- but those few of us that do appreciate it when we can later read from the EEPROM without having to reboot. Found-by: Nick Van Fossen <Nick.VanFossen@riverbed.com> Signed-off-by: Arthur Jones <ajones@riverbed.com> Reviewed-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Conflicts: drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
Doing 'WARN_ON(preempt_count())' was horribly horribly wrong, and would cause tons of warnings at bootup if PREEMPT was enabled because the initcalls currently run with the kernel lock, which increments the preempt count. At the same time, the warning was also insufficient, since it didn't check that interrupts were enabled. The proper debug function to use for something that can sleep and wants a warning if it's called in the wrong context is 'might_sleep()'. Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>