linux.git/drivers/md/raid5.h, branch v4.1

md/raid5: be more selective about distributing flags across batch.

2015-05-28T01:40:01+00:00

When a batch of stripes is broken up, we keep some of the flags
that were per-stripe, and copy other flags from the head to all
others.

This only happens while a stripe is being handled, so many of the
flags are irrelevant.

The "SYNC_FLAGS" (which I've renamed to make it clear there are
several) and STRIPE_DEGRADED are set per-stripe and so need to be
preserved.  STRIPE_INSYNC is the only flag that is set on the head
that needs to be propagated to all others.

For safety, add a WARN_ON if others are set, except:
 STRIPE_HANDLE - this is safe and per-stripe and we are going to set
      in several cases anyway
 STRIPE_INSYNC
 STRIPE_IO_STARTED - this is just a hint and doesn't hurt.
 STRIPE_ON_PLUG_LIST
 STRIPE_ON_RELEASE_LIST - It is a point pointless for a batched
           stripe to be on one of these lists, but it can happen
           as can be safely ignored.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md/raid5: close race between STRIPE_BIT_DELAY and batching.

2015-05-28T01:34:40+00:00

When we add a write to a stripe we need to make sure the bitmap
bit is set.  While doing that the stripe is not locked so it could
be added to a batch after which further changes to STRIPE_BIT_DELAY
and ->bm_seq are ineffective.

So we need to hold off adding to a stripe until bitmap_startwrite has
completed at least once, and we need to avoid further changes to
STRIPE_BIT_DELAY once the stripe has been added to a batch.

If a bitmap_startwrite() completes after the stripe was added to a
batch, it will not have set the bit, only incremented a counter, so no
extra delay of the stripe is needed.

Reported-by: Shaohua Li 
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md/raid5: allow the stripe_cache to grow and shrink.

2015-04-21T22:00:43+00:00

The default setting of 256 stripe_heads is probably
much too small for many configurations.  So it is best to make it
auto-configure.

Shrinking the cache under memory pressure is easy.  The only
interesting part here is that we put a fairly high cost
('seeks') on shrinking the cache as the cost is greater than
just having to read more data, it reduces parallelism.

Growing the cache on demand needs to be done carefully.  If we allow
fast growth, that can upset memory balance as lots of dirty memory can
quickly turn into lots of memory queued in the stripe_cache.
It is important for the raid5 block device to appear congested to
allow write-throttling to work.

So we only add stripes slowly. We set a flag when an allocation
fails because all stripes are in use, allocate at a convenient
time when that flag is set, and don't allow it to be set again
until at least one stripe_head has been released for re-use.

This means that a spurt of requests will only cause one stripe_head
to be allocated, but a steady stream of requests will slowly
increase the cache size - until memory pressure puts it back again.

It could take hours to reach a steady state.

The value written to, and displayed in, stripe_cache_size is
used as a minimum.  The cache can grow above this and shrink back
down to it.  The actual size is not directly visible, though it can
be deduced to some extent by watching stripe_cache_active.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md/raid5: change ->inactive_blocked to a bit-flag.

2015-04-21T22:00:43+00:00

This allows us to easily add more (atomic) flags.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md/raid5: introduce configuration option rmw_level

2015-04-21T22:00:42+00:00

Depending on the available coding we allow optimized rmw logic for write
operations. To support easier testing this patch allows manual control
of the rmw/rcw descision through the interface /sys/block/mdX/md/rmw_level.

The configuration can handle three levels of control.

rmw_level=0: Disable rmw for all RAID types. Hardware assisted P/Q
calculation has no implementation path yet to factor in/out chunks of
a syndrome. Enforcing this level can be benefical for slow CPUs with
hardware syndrome support and fast SSDs.

rmw_level=1: Estimate rmw IOs and rcw IOs. Execute rmw only if we will
save IOs. This equals the "old" unpatched behaviour and will be the
default.

rmw_level=2: Execute rmw even if calculated IOs for rmw and rcw are
equal. We might have higher CPU consumption because of calculating the
parity twice but it can be benefical otherwise. E.g. RAID4 with fast
dedicated parity disk/SSD. The option is implemented just to be
forward-looking and will ONLY work with this patch!

Signed-off-by: Markus Stockhausen 
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md/raid5: activate raid6 rmw feature

2015-04-21T22:00:42+00:00

Glue it altogehter. The raid6 rmw path should work the same as the
already existing raid5 logic. So emulate the prexor handling/flags
and split functions as needed.

1) Enable xor_syndrome() in the async layer.

2) Split ops_run_prexor() into RAID4/5 and RAID6 logic. Xor the syndrome
at the start of a rmw run as we did it before for the single parity.

3) Take care of rmw run in ops_run_reconstruct6(). Again process only
the changed pages to get syndrome back into sync.

4) Enhance set_syndrome_sources() to fill NULL pages if we are in a rmw
run. The lower layers will calculate start & end pages from that and
call the xor_syndrome() correspondingly.

5) Adapt the several places where we ignored Q handling up to now.

Performance numbers for a single E5630 system with a mix of 10 7200k
desktop/server disks. 300 seconds random write with 8 threads onto a
3,2TB (10*400GB) RAID6 64K chunk without spare (group_thread_cnt=4)

bsize   rmw_level=1   rmw_level=0   rmw_level=1   rmw_level=0
        skip_copy=1   skip_copy=1   skip_copy=0   skip_copy=0
   4K      115 KB/s      141 KB/s      165 KB/s      140 KB/s
   8K      225 KB/s      275 KB/s      324 KB/s      274 KB/s
  16K      434 KB/s      536 KB/s      640 KB/s      534 KB/s
  32K      751 KB/s    1,051 KB/s    1,234 KB/s    1,045 KB/s
  64K    1,339 KB/s    1,958 KB/s    2,282 KB/s    1,962 KB/s
 128K    2,673 KB/s    3,862 KB/s    4,113 KB/s    3,898 KB/s
 256K    7,685 KB/s    7,539 KB/s    7,557 KB/s    7,638 KB/s
 512K   19,556 KB/s   19,558 KB/s   19,652 KB/s   19,688 Kb/s

Signed-off-by: Markus Stockhausen 
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

raid5: handle expansion/resync case with stripe batching

2015-04-21T22:00:41+00:00

expansion/resync can grab a stripe when the stripe is in batch list. Since all
stripes in batch list must be in the same state, we can't allow some stripes
run into expansion/resync. So we delay expansion/resync for stripe in batch
list.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li 
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

raid5: handle io error of batch list

2015-04-21T22:00:41+00:00

If io error happens in any stripe of a batch list, the batch list will be
split, then normal process will run for the stripes in the list.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li 
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

RAID5: batch adjacent full stripe write

2015-04-21T22:00:41+00:00

stripe cache is 4k size. Even adjacent full stripe writes are handled in 4k
unit. Idealy we should use big size for adjacent full stripe writes. Bigger
stripe cache size means less stripes runing in the state machine so can reduce
cpu overhead. And also bigger size can cause bigger IO size dispatched to under
layer disks.

With below patch, we will automatically batch adjacent full stripe write
together. Such stripes will be added to the batch list. Only the first stripe
of the list will be put to handle_list and so run handle_stripe(). Some steps
of handle_stripe() are extended to cover all stripes of the list, including
ops_run_io, ops_run_biodrain and so on. With this patch, we have less stripes
running in handle_stripe() and we send IO of whole stripe list together to
increase IO size.

Stripes added to a batch list have some limitations. A batch list can only
include full stripe write and can't cross chunk boundary to make sure stripes
have the same parity disks. Stripes in a batch list must be in the same state
(no written, toread and so on). If a stripe is in a batch list, all new
read/write to add_stripe_bio will be blocked to overlap conflict till the batch
list is handled. The limitations will make sure stripes in a batch list be in
exactly the same state in the life circly.

I did test running 160k randwrite in a RAID5 array with 32k chunk size and 6
PCIe SSD. This patch improves around 30% performance and IO size to under layer
disk is exactly 32k. I also run a 4k randwrite test in the same array to make
sure the performance isn't changed with the patch.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li 
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

raid5: track overwrite disk count

2015-04-21T22:00:41+00:00

Track overwrite disk count, so we can know if a stripe is a full stripe write.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li 
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown