linux.git/drivers/md/dm-raid.c, branch v5.19

dm raid: fix accesses beyond end of raid member array

2022-06-27T23:31:47+00:00

On dm-raid table load (using raid_ctr), dm-raid allocates an array
rs->devs[rs->raid_disks] for the raid device members. rs->raid_disks
is defined by the number of raid metadata and image tupples passed
into the target's constructor.

In the case of RAID layout changes being requested, that number can be
different from the current number of members for existing raid sets as
defined in their superblocks. Example RAID layout changes include:
- raid1 legs being added/removed
- raid4/5/6/10 number of stripes changed (stripe reshaping)
- takeover to higher raid level (e.g. raid5 -> raid6)

When accessing array members, rs->raid_disks must be used in control
loops instead of the potentially larger value in rs->md.raid_disks.
Otherwise it will cause memory access beyond the end of the rs->devs
array.

Fix this by changing code that is prone to out-of-bounds access.
Also fix validate_raid_redundancy() to validate all devices that are
added. Also, use braces to help clean up raid_iterate_devices().

The out-of-bounds memory accesses was discovered using KASAN.

This commit was verified to pass all LVM2 RAID tests (with KASAN
enabled).

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen 
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer

Revert "md: don't unregister sync_thread with reconfig_mutex held"

2022-06-15T17:30:14+00:00

The 07reshape5intr test is broke because of below path.

    md_reap_sync_thread
            -> mddev_unlock
            -> md_unregister_thread(&mddev->sync_thread)

And md_check_recovery is triggered by,

mddev_unlock -> md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread)

then mddev->reshape_position is set to MaxSector in raid5_finish_reshape
since MD_RECOVERY_INTR is cleared in md_check_recovery, which means
feature_map is not set with MD_FEATURE_RESHAPE_ACTIVE and superblock's
reshape_position can't be updated accordingly.

Fixes: 8b48ec23cc51a ("md: don't unregister sync_thread with reconfig_mutex held")
Reported-by: Logan Gunthorpe 
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu

md: don't unregister sync_thread with reconfig_mutex held

2022-05-23T06:07:21+00:00

Unregister sync_thread doesn't need to hold reconfig_mutex since it
doesn't reconfigure array.

And it could cause deadlock problem for raid5 as follows:

1. process A tried to reap sync thread with reconfig_mutex held after echo
   idle to sync_action.
2. raid5 sync thread was blocked if there were too many active stripes.
3. SB_CHANGE_PENDING was set (because of write IO comes from upper layer)
   which causes the number of active stripes can't be decreased.
4. SB_CHANGE_PENDING can't be cleared since md_check_recovery was not able
   to hold reconfig_mutex.

More details in the link:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/5ed54ffc-ce82-bf66-4eff-390cb23bc1ac@molgen.mpg.de/T/#t

And add one parameter to md_reap_sync_thread since it could be called by
dm-raid which doesn't hold reconfig_mutex.

Reported-and-tested-by: Donald Buczek 
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu

block: remove QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD

2022-04-18T01:49:59+00:00

Just use a non-zero max_discard_sectors as an indicator for discard
support, similar to what is done for write zeroes.

The only places where needs special attention is the RAID5 driver,
which must clear discard support for security reasons by default,
even if the default stacking rules would allow for it.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen 
Acked-by: Christoph Böhmwalder  [drbd]
Acked-by: Jan Höppner  [s390]
Acked-by: Coly Li  [bcache]
Acked-by: David Sterba  [btrfs]
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220415045258.199825-25-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

dm: use bdev_nr_sectors and bdev_nr_bytes instead of open coding them

2021-10-18T20:43:22+00:00

Use the proper helpers to read the block device size.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook 
Acked-by: Mike Snitzer 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018101130.1838532-6-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

dm: update target status functions to support IMA measurement

2021-08-10T17:34:23+00:00

For device mapper targets to take advantage of IMA's measurement
capabilities, the status functions for the individual targets need to be
updated to handle the status_type_t case for value STATUSTYPE_IMA.

Update status functions for the following target types, to log their
respective attributes to be measured using IMA.
 01. cache
 02. crypt
 03. integrity
 04. linear
 05. mirror
 06. multipath
 07. raid
 08. snapshot
 09. striped
 10. verity

For rest of the targets, handle the STATUSTYPE_IMA case by setting the
measurement buffer to NULL.

For IMA to measure the data on a given system, the IMA policy on the
system needs to be updated to have the following line, and the system
needs to be restarted for the measurements to take effect.

/etc/ima/ima-policy
 measure func=CRITICAL_DATA label=device-mapper template=ima-buf

The measurements will be reflected in the IMA logs, which are located at:

/sys/kernel/security/integrity/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements
/sys/kernel/security/integrity/ima/binary_runtime_measurements

These IMA logs can later be consumed by various attestation clients
running on the system, and send them to external services for attesting
the system.

The DM target data measured by IMA subsystem can alternatively
be queried from userspace by setting DM_IMA_MEASUREMENT_FLAG with
DM_TABLE_STATUS_CMD.

Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi 
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer

dm raid: remove unnecessary discard limits for raid0 and raid10

2021-04-30T18:38:37+00:00

Commit 29efc390b946 ("md/md0: optimize raid0 discard handling") and
commit d30588b2731f ("md/raid10: improve raid10 discard request")
remove MD raid0's and raid10's inability to properly handle large
discards. So eliminate associated constraints from dm-raid's support.

Depends-on: 29efc390b946 ("md/md0: optimize raid0 discard handling")
Depends-on: d30588b2731f ("md/raid10: improve raid10 discard request")
Reported-by: Matthew Ruffell 
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer

dm raid: fix inconclusive reshape layout on fast raid4/5/6 table reload sequences

2021-04-21T22:39:03+00:00

If fast table reloads occur during an ongoing reshape of raid4/5/6
devices the target may race reading a superblock vs the the MD resync
thread; causing an inconclusive reshape state to be read in its
constructor.

lvm2 test lvconvert-raid-reshape-stripes-load-reload.sh can cause
BUG_ON() to trigger in md_run(), e.g.:
"kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:7567!".

Scenario triggering the bug:

1. the MD sync thread calls end_reshape() from raid5_sync_request()
   when done reshaping. However end_reshape() _only_ updates the
   reshape position to MaxSector keeping the changed layout
   configuration though (i.e. any delta disks, chunk sector or RAID
   algorithm changes). That inconclusive configuration is stored in
   the superblock.

2. dm-raid constructs a mapping, loading named inconsistent superblock
   as of step 1 before step 3 is able to finish resetting the reshape
   state completely, and calls md_run() which leads to mentioned bug
   in raid5.c.

3. the MD RAID personality's finish_reshape() is called; which resets
   the reshape information on chunk sectors, delta disks, etc. This
   explains why the bug is rarely seen on multi-core machines, as MD's
   finish_reshape() superblock update races with the dm-raid
   constructor's superblock load in step 2.

Fix identifies inconclusive superblock content in the dm-raid
constructor and resets it before calling md_run(), factoring out
identifying checks into rs_is_layout_change() to share in existing
rs_reshape_requested() and new rs_reset_inclonclusive_reshape(). Also
enhance a comment and remove an empty line.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen 
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer

dm raid: fix fall-through warning in rs_check_takeover() for Clang

2021-04-20T22:10:04+00:00

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva 
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer

dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1

2021-01-04T20:02:30+00:00

Block core warned that discard_granularity was 0 for dm-raid with
personality of raid1.  Reason is that raid_io_hints() was incorrectly
special-casing raid1 rather than raid0.

Fix raid_io_hints() by removing discard limits settings for
raid1. Check for raid0 instead.

Fixes: 61697a6abd24a ("dm: eliminate 'split_discard_bios' flag from DM target interface")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Zdenek Kabelac 
Reported-by: Mikulas Patocka 
Reported-by: Stephan Bärwolf 
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer