<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/drivers/md/bcache/super.c, branch v4.16</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel source tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>bcache: don't attach backing with duplicate UUID</title>
<updated>2018-03-05T21:43:07+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Michael Lyle</name>
<email>mlyle@lyle.org</email>
</author>
<published>2018-03-05T21:41:55+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=86755b7a96faed57f910f9e6b8061e019ac1ec08'/>
<id>86755b7a96faed57f910f9e6b8061e019ac1ec08</id>
<content type='text'>
This can happen e.g. during disk cloning.

This is an incomplete fix: it does not catch duplicate UUIDs earlier
when things are still unattached.  It does not unregister the device.
Further changes to cope better with this are planned but conflict with
Coly's ongoing improvements to handling device errors.  In the meantime,
one can manually stop the device after this has happened.

Attempts to attach a duplicate device result in:

[  136.372404] loop: module loaded
[  136.424461] bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device loop0
[  136.424464] bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Tried to attach loop0 but duplicate UUID already attached

My test procedure is:

  dd if=/dev/sdb1 of=imgfile bs=1024 count=262144
  losetup -f imgfile

Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This can happen e.g. during disk cloning.

This is an incomplete fix: it does not catch duplicate UUIDs earlier
when things are still unattached.  It does not unregister the device.
Further changes to cope better with this are planned but conflict with
Coly's ongoing improvements to handling device errors.  In the meantime,
one can manually stop the device after this has happened.

Attempts to attach a duplicate device result in:

[  136.372404] loop: module loaded
[  136.424461] bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device loop0
[  136.424464] bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Tried to attach loop0 but duplicate UUID already attached

My test procedure is:

  dd if=/dev/sdb1 of=imgfile bs=1024 count=262144
  losetup -f imgfile

Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bcache: fix crashes in duplicate cache device register</title>
<updated>2018-03-05T21:43:05+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Tang Junhui</name>
<email>tang.junhui@zte.com.cn</email>
</author>
<published>2018-03-05T21:41:54+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=cc40daf91bdddbba72a4a8cd0860640e06668309'/>
<id>cc40daf91bdddbba72a4a8cd0860640e06668309</id>
<content type='text'>
Kernel crashed when register a duplicate cache device, the call trace is
bellow:
[  417.643790] CPU: 1 PID: 16886 Comm: bcache-register Tainted: G
   W  OE    4.15.5-amd64-preempt-sysrq-20171018 #2
[  417.643861] Hardware name: LENOVO 20ERCTO1WW/20ERCTO1WW, BIOS
N1DET41W (1.15 ) 12/31/2015
[  417.643870] RIP: 0010:bdevname+0x13/0x1e
[  417.643876] RSP: 0018:ffffa3aa9138fd38 EFLAGS: 00010282
[  417.643884] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8c8f2f2f8000 RCX: ffffd6701f8
c7edf
[  417.643890] RDX: ffffa3aa9138fd88 RSI: ffffa3aa9138fd88 RDI: 00000000000
00000
[  417.643895] RBP: ffffa3aa9138fde0 R08: ffffa3aa9138fae8 R09: 00000000000
1850e
[  417.643901] R10: ffff8c8eed34b271 R11: ffff8c8eed34b250 R12: 00000000000
00000
[  417.643906] R13: ffffd6701f78f940 R14: ffff8c8f38f80000 R15: ffff8c8ea7d
90000
[  417.643913] FS:  00007fde7e66f500(0000) GS:ffff8c8f61440000(0000) knlGS:
0000000000000000
[  417.643919] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  417.643925] CR2: 0000000000000314 CR3: 00000007e6fa0001 CR4: 00000000003
606e0
[  417.643931] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 00000000000
00000
[  417.643938] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000000000
00400
[  417.643946] Call Trace:
[  417.643978]  register_bcache+0x1117/0x1270 [bcache]
[  417.643994]  ? slab_pre_alloc_hook+0x15/0x3c
[  417.644001]  ? slab_post_alloc_hook.isra.44+0xa/0x1a
[  417.644013]  ? kernfs_fop_write+0xf6/0x138
[  417.644020]  kernfs_fop_write+0xf6/0x138
[  417.644031]  __vfs_write+0x31/0xcc
[  417.644043]  ? current_kernel_time64+0x10/0x36
[  417.644115]  ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xbf/0xe3
[  417.644124]  vfs_write+0xa5/0xe2
[  417.644133]  SyS_write+0x5c/0x9f
[  417.644144]  do_syscall_64+0x72/0x81
[  417.644161]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
[  417.644169] RIP: 0033:0x7fde7e1c1974
[  417.644175] RSP: 002b:00007fff13009a38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000
000000001
[  417.644183] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000001658280 RCX: 00007fde7e1c
1974
[  417.644188] RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000001658280 RDI: 000000000000
0001
[  417.644193] RBP: 000000000000000a R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 000000000000
0077
[  417.644198] R10: 000000000000089e R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000
0001
[  417.644203] R13: 000000000000000a R14: 7fffffffffffffff R15: 000000000000
0000
[  417.644213] Code: c7 c2 83 6f ee 98 be 20 00 00 00 48 89 df e8 6c 27 3b 0
0 48 89 d8 5b c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 47 70 48 89 f2 48 8b bf 80 00 00 00 &lt;8
b&gt; b0 14 03 00 00 e9 73 ff ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 47 40 39
[  417.644302] RIP: bdevname+0x13/0x1e RSP: ffffa3aa9138fd38
[  417.644306] CR2: 0000000000000314

When registering duplicate cache device in register_cache(), after failure
on calling register_cache_set(), bch_cache_release() will be called, then
bdev will be freed, so bdevname(bdev, name) caused kernel crash.

Since bch_cache_release() will free bdev, so in this patch we make sure
bdev being freed if register_cache() fail, and do not free bdev again in
register_bcache() when register_cache() fail.

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Reported-by: Marc MERLIN &lt;marc@merlins.org&gt;
Tested-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Kernel crashed when register a duplicate cache device, the call trace is
bellow:
[  417.643790] CPU: 1 PID: 16886 Comm: bcache-register Tainted: G
   W  OE    4.15.5-amd64-preempt-sysrq-20171018 #2
[  417.643861] Hardware name: LENOVO 20ERCTO1WW/20ERCTO1WW, BIOS
N1DET41W (1.15 ) 12/31/2015
[  417.643870] RIP: 0010:bdevname+0x13/0x1e
[  417.643876] RSP: 0018:ffffa3aa9138fd38 EFLAGS: 00010282
[  417.643884] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8c8f2f2f8000 RCX: ffffd6701f8
c7edf
[  417.643890] RDX: ffffa3aa9138fd88 RSI: ffffa3aa9138fd88 RDI: 00000000000
00000
[  417.643895] RBP: ffffa3aa9138fde0 R08: ffffa3aa9138fae8 R09: 00000000000
1850e
[  417.643901] R10: ffff8c8eed34b271 R11: ffff8c8eed34b250 R12: 00000000000
00000
[  417.643906] R13: ffffd6701f78f940 R14: ffff8c8f38f80000 R15: ffff8c8ea7d
90000
[  417.643913] FS:  00007fde7e66f500(0000) GS:ffff8c8f61440000(0000) knlGS:
0000000000000000
[  417.643919] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  417.643925] CR2: 0000000000000314 CR3: 00000007e6fa0001 CR4: 00000000003
606e0
[  417.643931] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 00000000000
00000
[  417.643938] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000000000
00400
[  417.643946] Call Trace:
[  417.643978]  register_bcache+0x1117/0x1270 [bcache]
[  417.643994]  ? slab_pre_alloc_hook+0x15/0x3c
[  417.644001]  ? slab_post_alloc_hook.isra.44+0xa/0x1a
[  417.644013]  ? kernfs_fop_write+0xf6/0x138
[  417.644020]  kernfs_fop_write+0xf6/0x138
[  417.644031]  __vfs_write+0x31/0xcc
[  417.644043]  ? current_kernel_time64+0x10/0x36
[  417.644115]  ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xbf/0xe3
[  417.644124]  vfs_write+0xa5/0xe2
[  417.644133]  SyS_write+0x5c/0x9f
[  417.644144]  do_syscall_64+0x72/0x81
[  417.644161]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
[  417.644169] RIP: 0033:0x7fde7e1c1974
[  417.644175] RSP: 002b:00007fff13009a38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000
000000001
[  417.644183] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000001658280 RCX: 00007fde7e1c
1974
[  417.644188] RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000001658280 RDI: 000000000000
0001
[  417.644193] RBP: 000000000000000a R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 000000000000
0077
[  417.644198] R10: 000000000000089e R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000
0001
[  417.644203] R13: 000000000000000a R14: 7fffffffffffffff R15: 000000000000
0000
[  417.644213] Code: c7 c2 83 6f ee 98 be 20 00 00 00 48 89 df e8 6c 27 3b 0
0 48 89 d8 5b c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 47 70 48 89 f2 48 8b bf 80 00 00 00 &lt;8
b&gt; b0 14 03 00 00 e9 73 ff ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 47 40 39
[  417.644302] RIP: bdevname+0x13/0x1e RSP: ffffa3aa9138fd38
[  417.644306] CR2: 0000000000000314

When registering duplicate cache device in register_cache(), after failure
on calling register_cache_set(), bch_cache_release() will be called, then
bdev will be freed, so bdevname(bdev, name) caused kernel crash.

Since bch_cache_release() will free bdev, so in this patch we make sure
bdev being freed if register_cache() fail, and do not free bdev again in
register_bcache() when register_cache() fail.

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Reported-by: Marc MERLIN &lt;marc@merlins.org&gt;
Tested-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bcache: correct flash only vols (check all uuids)</title>
<updated>2018-02-27T17:54:25+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Coly Li</name>
<email>colyli@suse.de</email>
</author>
<published>2018-02-27T17:49:29+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=02aa8a8b2b84531fa78b9a486d9b2a0700f7bc08'/>
<id>02aa8a8b2b84531fa78b9a486d9b2a0700f7bc08</id>
<content type='text'>
Commit 2831231d4c3f ("bcache: reduce cache_set devices iteration by
devices_max_used") adds c-&gt;devices_max_used to reduce iteration of
c-&gt;uuids elements, this value is updated in bcache_device_attach().

But for flash only volume, when calling flash_devs_run(), the function
bcache_device_attach() is not called yet and c-&gt;devices_max_used is not
updated. The unexpected result is, the flash only volume won't be run
by flash_devs_run().

This patch fixes the issue by iterate all c-&gt;uuids elements in
flash_devs_run(). c-&gt;devices_max_used will be updated properly when
bcache_device_attach() gets called.

[mlyle: commit subject edited for character limit]

Fixes: 2831231d4c3f ("bcache: reduce cache_set devices iteration by devices_max_used")
Reported-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Coly Li &lt;colyli@suse.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Commit 2831231d4c3f ("bcache: reduce cache_set devices iteration by
devices_max_used") adds c-&gt;devices_max_used to reduce iteration of
c-&gt;uuids elements, this value is updated in bcache_device_attach().

But for flash only volume, when calling flash_devs_run(), the function
bcache_device_attach() is not called yet and c-&gt;devices_max_used is not
updated. The unexpected result is, the flash only volume won't be run
by flash_devs_run().

This patch fixes the issue by iterate all c-&gt;uuids elements in
flash_devs_run(). c-&gt;devices_max_used will be updated properly when
bcache_device_attach() gets called.

[mlyle: commit subject edited for character limit]

Fixes: 2831231d4c3f ("bcache: reduce cache_set devices iteration by devices_max_used")
Reported-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Coly Li &lt;colyli@suse.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bcache: fix for data collapse after re-attaching an attached device</title>
<updated>2018-02-07T19:50:01+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Tang Junhui</name>
<email>tang.junhui@zte.com.cn</email>
</author>
<published>2018-02-07T19:41:46+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=73ac105be390c1de42a2f21643c9778a5e002930'/>
<id>73ac105be390c1de42a2f21643c9778a5e002930</id>
<content type='text'>
back-end device sdm has already attached a cache_set with ID
f67ebe1f-f8bc-4d73-bfe5-9dc88607f119, then try to attach with
another cache set, and it returns with an error:
[root]# cd /sys/block/sdm/bcache
[root]# echo 5ccd0a63-148e-48b8-afa2-aca9cbd6279f &gt; attach
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument

After that, execute a command to modify the label of bcache
device:
[root]# echo data_disk1 &gt; label

Then we reboot the system, when the system power on, the back-end
device can not attach to cache_set, a messages show in the log:
Feb  5 12:05:52 ceph152 kernel: [922385.508498] bcache:
bch_cached_dev_attach() couldn't find uuid for sdm in set

In sysfs_attach(), dc-&gt;sb.set_uuid was assigned to the value
which input through sysfs, no matter whether it is success
or not in bch_cached_dev_attach(). For example, If the back-end
device has already attached to an cache set, bch_cached_dev_attach()
would fail, but dc-&gt;sb.set_uuid was changed. Then modify the
label of bcache device, it will call bch_write_bdev_super(),
which would write the dc-&gt;sb.set_uuid to the super block, so we
record a wrong cache set ID in the super block, after the system
reboot, the cache set couldn't find the uuid of the back-end
device, so the bcache device couldn't exist and use any more.

In this patch, we don't assigned cache set ID to dc-&gt;sb.set_uuid
in sysfs_attach() directly, but input it into bch_cached_dev_attach(),
and assigned dc-&gt;sb.set_uuid to the cache set ID after the back-end
device attached to the cache set successful.

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
back-end device sdm has already attached a cache_set with ID
f67ebe1f-f8bc-4d73-bfe5-9dc88607f119, then try to attach with
another cache set, and it returns with an error:
[root]# cd /sys/block/sdm/bcache
[root]# echo 5ccd0a63-148e-48b8-afa2-aca9cbd6279f &gt; attach
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument

After that, execute a command to modify the label of bcache
device:
[root]# echo data_disk1 &gt; label

Then we reboot the system, when the system power on, the back-end
device can not attach to cache_set, a messages show in the log:
Feb  5 12:05:52 ceph152 kernel: [922385.508498] bcache:
bch_cached_dev_attach() couldn't find uuid for sdm in set

In sysfs_attach(), dc-&gt;sb.set_uuid was assigned to the value
which input through sysfs, no matter whether it is success
or not in bch_cached_dev_attach(). For example, If the back-end
device has already attached to an cache set, bch_cached_dev_attach()
would fail, but dc-&gt;sb.set_uuid was changed. Then modify the
label of bcache device, it will call bch_write_bdev_super(),
which would write the dc-&gt;sb.set_uuid to the super block, so we
record a wrong cache set ID in the super block, after the system
reboot, the cache set couldn't find the uuid of the back-end
device, so the bcache device couldn't exist and use any more.

In this patch, we don't assigned cache set ID to dc-&gt;sb.set_uuid
in sysfs_attach() directly, but input it into bch_cached_dev_attach(),
and assigned dc-&gt;sb.set_uuid to the cache set ID after the back-end
device attached to the cache set successful.

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bcache: fix for allocator and register thread race</title>
<updated>2018-02-07T19:50:01+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Tang Junhui</name>
<email>tang.junhui@zte.com.cn</email>
</author>
<published>2018-02-07T19:41:43+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=682811b3ce1a5a4e20d700939a9042f01dbc66c4'/>
<id>682811b3ce1a5a4e20d700939a9042f01dbc66c4</id>
<content type='text'>
After long time running of random small IO writing,
I reboot the machine, and after the machine power on,
I found bcache got stuck, the stack is:
[root@ceph153 ~]# cat /proc/2510/task/*/stack
[&lt;ffffffffa06b2455&gt;] closure_sync+0x25/0x90 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06b6be8&gt;] bch_journal+0x118/0x2b0 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06b6dc7&gt;] bch_journal_meta+0x47/0x70 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06be8f7&gt;] bch_prio_write+0x237/0x340 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06a8018&gt;] bch_allocator_thread+0x3c8/0x3d0 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffff810a631f&gt;] kthread+0xcf/0xe0
[&lt;ffffffff8164c318&gt;] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
[&lt;ffffffffffffffff&gt;] 0xffffffffffffffff
[root@ceph153 ~]# cat /proc/2038/task/*/stack
[&lt;ffffffffa06b1abd&gt;] __bch_btree_map_nodes+0x12d/0x150 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06b1bd1&gt;] bch_btree_insert+0xf1/0x170 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06b637f&gt;] bch_journal_replay+0x13f/0x230 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06c75fe&gt;] run_cache_set+0x79a/0x7c2 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06c0cf8&gt;] register_bcache+0xd48/0x1310 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffff812f702f&gt;] kobj_attr_store+0xf/0x20
[&lt;ffffffff8125b216&gt;] sysfs_write_file+0xc6/0x140
[&lt;ffffffff811dfbfd&gt;] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1e0
[&lt;ffffffff811e069f&gt;] SyS_write+0x7f/0xe0
[&lt;ffffffff8164c3c9&gt;] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1
The stack shows the register thread and allocator thread
were getting stuck when registering cache device.

I reboot the machine several times, the issue always
exsit in this machine.

I debug the code, and found the call trace as bellow:
register_bcache()
   ==&gt;run_cache_set()
      ==&gt;bch_journal_replay()
         ==&gt;bch_btree_insert()
            ==&gt;__bch_btree_map_nodes()
               ==&gt;btree_insert_fn()
                  ==&gt;btree_split() //node need split
                     ==&gt;btree_check_reserve()
In btree_check_reserve(), It will check if there is enough buckets
of RESERVE_BTREE type, since allocator thread did not work yet, so
no buckets of RESERVE_BTREE type allocated, so the register thread
waits on c-&gt;btree_cache_wait, and goes to sleep.

Then the allocator thread initialized, the call trace is bellow:
bch_allocator_thread()
==&gt;bch_prio_write()
   ==&gt;bch_journal_meta()
      ==&gt;bch_journal()
         ==&gt;journal_wait_for_write()
In journal_wait_for_write(), It will check if journal is full by
journal_full(), but the long time random small IO writing
causes the exhaustion of journal buckets(journal.blocks_free=0),
In order to release the journal buckets,
the allocator calls btree_flush_write() to flush keys to
btree nodes, and waits on c-&gt;journal.wait until btree nodes writing
over or there has already some journal buckets space, then the
allocator thread goes to sleep. but in btree_flush_write(), since
bch_journal_replay() is not finished, so no btree nodes have journal
(condition "if (btree_current_write(b)-&gt;journal)" never satisfied),
so we got no btree node to flush, no journal bucket released,
and allocator sleep all the times.

Through the above analysis, we can see that:
1) Register thread wait for allocator thread to allocate buckets of
   RESERVE_BTREE type;
2) Alloctor thread wait for register thread to replay journal, so it
   can flush btree nodes and get journal bucket.
   then they are all got stuck by waiting for each other.

Hua Rui provided a patch for me, by allocating some buckets of
RESERVE_BTREE type in advance, so the register thread can get bucket
when btree node splitting and no need to waiting for the allocator
thread. I tested it, it has effect, and register thread run a step
forward, but finally are still got stuck, the reason is only 8 bucket
of RESERVE_BTREE type were allocated, and in bch_journal_replay(),
after 2 btree nodes splitting, only 4 bucket of RESERVE_BTREE type left,
then btree_check_reserve() is not satisfied anymore, so it goes to sleep
again, and in the same time, alloctor thread did not flush enough btree
nodes to release a journal bucket, so they all got stuck again.

So we need to allocate more buckets of RESERVE_BTREE type in advance,
but how much is enough?  By experience and test, I think it should be
as much as journal buckets. Then I modify the code as this patch,
and test in the machine, and it works.

This patch modified base on Hua Rui’s patch, and allocate more buckets
of RESERVE_BTREE type in advance to avoid register thread and allocate
thread going to wait for each other.

[patch v2] ca-&gt;sb.njournal_buckets would be 0 in the first time after
cache creation, and no journal exists, so just 8 btree buckets is OK.

Signed-off-by: Hua Rui &lt;huarui.dev@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
After long time running of random small IO writing,
I reboot the machine, and after the machine power on,
I found bcache got stuck, the stack is:
[root@ceph153 ~]# cat /proc/2510/task/*/stack
[&lt;ffffffffa06b2455&gt;] closure_sync+0x25/0x90 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06b6be8&gt;] bch_journal+0x118/0x2b0 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06b6dc7&gt;] bch_journal_meta+0x47/0x70 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06be8f7&gt;] bch_prio_write+0x237/0x340 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06a8018&gt;] bch_allocator_thread+0x3c8/0x3d0 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffff810a631f&gt;] kthread+0xcf/0xe0
[&lt;ffffffff8164c318&gt;] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
[&lt;ffffffffffffffff&gt;] 0xffffffffffffffff
[root@ceph153 ~]# cat /proc/2038/task/*/stack
[&lt;ffffffffa06b1abd&gt;] __bch_btree_map_nodes+0x12d/0x150 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06b1bd1&gt;] bch_btree_insert+0xf1/0x170 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06b637f&gt;] bch_journal_replay+0x13f/0x230 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06c75fe&gt;] run_cache_set+0x79a/0x7c2 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffffa06c0cf8&gt;] register_bcache+0xd48/0x1310 [bcache]
[&lt;ffffffff812f702f&gt;] kobj_attr_store+0xf/0x20
[&lt;ffffffff8125b216&gt;] sysfs_write_file+0xc6/0x140
[&lt;ffffffff811dfbfd&gt;] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1e0
[&lt;ffffffff811e069f&gt;] SyS_write+0x7f/0xe0
[&lt;ffffffff8164c3c9&gt;] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1
The stack shows the register thread and allocator thread
were getting stuck when registering cache device.

I reboot the machine several times, the issue always
exsit in this machine.

I debug the code, and found the call trace as bellow:
register_bcache()
   ==&gt;run_cache_set()
      ==&gt;bch_journal_replay()
         ==&gt;bch_btree_insert()
            ==&gt;__bch_btree_map_nodes()
               ==&gt;btree_insert_fn()
                  ==&gt;btree_split() //node need split
                     ==&gt;btree_check_reserve()
In btree_check_reserve(), It will check if there is enough buckets
of RESERVE_BTREE type, since allocator thread did not work yet, so
no buckets of RESERVE_BTREE type allocated, so the register thread
waits on c-&gt;btree_cache_wait, and goes to sleep.

Then the allocator thread initialized, the call trace is bellow:
bch_allocator_thread()
==&gt;bch_prio_write()
   ==&gt;bch_journal_meta()
      ==&gt;bch_journal()
         ==&gt;journal_wait_for_write()
In journal_wait_for_write(), It will check if journal is full by
journal_full(), but the long time random small IO writing
causes the exhaustion of journal buckets(journal.blocks_free=0),
In order to release the journal buckets,
the allocator calls btree_flush_write() to flush keys to
btree nodes, and waits on c-&gt;journal.wait until btree nodes writing
over or there has already some journal buckets space, then the
allocator thread goes to sleep. but in btree_flush_write(), since
bch_journal_replay() is not finished, so no btree nodes have journal
(condition "if (btree_current_write(b)-&gt;journal)" never satisfied),
so we got no btree node to flush, no journal bucket released,
and allocator sleep all the times.

Through the above analysis, we can see that:
1) Register thread wait for allocator thread to allocate buckets of
   RESERVE_BTREE type;
2) Alloctor thread wait for register thread to replay journal, so it
   can flush btree nodes and get journal bucket.
   then they are all got stuck by waiting for each other.

Hua Rui provided a patch for me, by allocating some buckets of
RESERVE_BTREE type in advance, so the register thread can get bucket
when btree node splitting and no need to waiting for the allocator
thread. I tested it, it has effect, and register thread run a step
forward, but finally are still got stuck, the reason is only 8 bucket
of RESERVE_BTREE type were allocated, and in bch_journal_replay(),
after 2 btree nodes splitting, only 4 bucket of RESERVE_BTREE type left,
then btree_check_reserve() is not satisfied anymore, so it goes to sleep
again, and in the same time, alloctor thread did not flush enough btree
nodes to release a journal bucket, so they all got stuck again.

So we need to allocate more buckets of RESERVE_BTREE type in advance,
but how much is enough?  By experience and test, I think it should be
as much as journal buckets. Then I modify the code as this patch,
and test in the machine, and it works.

This patch modified base on Hua Rui’s patch, and allocate more buckets
of RESERVE_BTREE type in advance to avoid register thread and allocate
thread going to wait for each other.

[patch v2] ca-&gt;sb.njournal_buckets would be 0 in the first time after
cache creation, and no journal exists, so just 8 btree buckets is OK.

Signed-off-by: Hua Rui &lt;huarui.dev@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bcache: set error_limit correctly</title>
<updated>2018-02-07T19:50:01+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Coly Li</name>
<email>colyli@suse.de</email>
</author>
<published>2018-02-07T19:41:42+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=7ba0d830dc0e4c7e88602c91656029b6ae8a1766'/>
<id>7ba0d830dc0e4c7e88602c91656029b6ae8a1766</id>
<content type='text'>
Struct cache uses io_errors for two purposes,
- Error decay: when cache set error_decay is set, io_errors is used to
  generate a small piece of delay when I/O error happens.
- I/O errors counter: in order to generate big enough value for error
  decay, I/O errors counter value is stored by left shifting 20 bits (a.k.a
  IO_ERROR_SHIFT).

In function bch_count_io_errors(), if I/O errors counter reaches cache set
error limit, bch_cache_set_error() will be called to retire the whold cache
set. But current code is problematic when checking the error limit, see the
following code piece from bch_count_io_errors(),

 90     if (error) {
 91             char buf[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
 92             unsigned errors = atomic_add_return(1 &lt;&lt; IO_ERROR_SHIFT,
 93                                                 &amp;ca-&gt;io_errors);
 94             errors &gt;&gt;= IO_ERROR_SHIFT;
 95
 96             if (errors &lt; ca-&gt;set-&gt;error_limit)
 97                     pr_err("%s: IO error on %s, recovering",
 98                            bdevname(ca-&gt;bdev, buf), m);
 99             else
100                     bch_cache_set_error(ca-&gt;set,
101                                         "%s: too many IO errors %s",
102                                         bdevname(ca-&gt;bdev, buf), m);
103     }

At line 94, errors is right shifting IO_ERROR_SHIFT bits, now it is real
errors counter to compare at line 96. But ca-&gt;set-&gt;error_limit is initia-
lized with an amplified value in bch_cache_set_alloc(),
1545         c-&gt;error_limit  = 8 &lt;&lt; IO_ERROR_SHIFT;

It means by default, in bch_count_io_errors(), before 8&lt;&lt;20 errors happened
bch_cache_set_error() won't be called to retire the problematic cache
device. If the average request size is 64KB, it means bcache won't handle
failed device until 512GB data is requested. This is too large to be an I/O
threashold. So I believe the correct error limit should be much less.

This patch sets default cache set error limit to 8, then in
bch_count_io_errors() when errors counter reaches 8 (if it is default
value), function bch_cache_set_error() will be called to retire the whole
cache set. This patch also removes bits shifting when store or show
io_error_limit value via sysfs interface.

Nowadays most of SSDs handle internal flash failure automatically by LBA
address re-indirect mapping. If an I/O error can be observed by upper layer
code, it will be a notable error because that SSD can not re-indirect
map the problematic LBA address to an available flash block. This situation
indicates the whole SSD will be failed very soon. Therefore setting 8 as
the default io error limit value makes sense, it is enough for most of
cache devices.

Changelog:
v2: add reviewed-by from Hannes.
v1: initial version for review.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li &lt;colyli@suse.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke &lt;hare@suse.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Cc: Junhui Tang &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Struct cache uses io_errors for two purposes,
- Error decay: when cache set error_decay is set, io_errors is used to
  generate a small piece of delay when I/O error happens.
- I/O errors counter: in order to generate big enough value for error
  decay, I/O errors counter value is stored by left shifting 20 bits (a.k.a
  IO_ERROR_SHIFT).

In function bch_count_io_errors(), if I/O errors counter reaches cache set
error limit, bch_cache_set_error() will be called to retire the whold cache
set. But current code is problematic when checking the error limit, see the
following code piece from bch_count_io_errors(),

 90     if (error) {
 91             char buf[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
 92             unsigned errors = atomic_add_return(1 &lt;&lt; IO_ERROR_SHIFT,
 93                                                 &amp;ca-&gt;io_errors);
 94             errors &gt;&gt;= IO_ERROR_SHIFT;
 95
 96             if (errors &lt; ca-&gt;set-&gt;error_limit)
 97                     pr_err("%s: IO error on %s, recovering",
 98                            bdevname(ca-&gt;bdev, buf), m);
 99             else
100                     bch_cache_set_error(ca-&gt;set,
101                                         "%s: too many IO errors %s",
102                                         bdevname(ca-&gt;bdev, buf), m);
103     }

At line 94, errors is right shifting IO_ERROR_SHIFT bits, now it is real
errors counter to compare at line 96. But ca-&gt;set-&gt;error_limit is initia-
lized with an amplified value in bch_cache_set_alloc(),
1545         c-&gt;error_limit  = 8 &lt;&lt; IO_ERROR_SHIFT;

It means by default, in bch_count_io_errors(), before 8&lt;&lt;20 errors happened
bch_cache_set_error() won't be called to retire the problematic cache
device. If the average request size is 64KB, it means bcache won't handle
failed device until 512GB data is requested. This is too large to be an I/O
threashold. So I believe the correct error limit should be much less.

This patch sets default cache set error limit to 8, then in
bch_count_io_errors() when errors counter reaches 8 (if it is default
value), function bch_cache_set_error() will be called to retire the whole
cache set. This patch also removes bits shifting when store or show
io_error_limit value via sysfs interface.

Nowadays most of SSDs handle internal flash failure automatically by LBA
address re-indirect mapping. If an I/O error can be observed by upper layer
code, it will be a notable error because that SSD can not re-indirect
map the problematic LBA address to an available flash block. This situation
indicates the whole SSD will be failed very soon. Therefore setting 8 as
the default io error limit value makes sense, it is enough for most of
cache devices.

Changelog:
v2: add reviewed-by from Hannes.
v1: initial version for review.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li &lt;colyli@suse.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke &lt;hare@suse.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Cc: Junhui Tang &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bcache: fix misleading error message in bch_count_io_errors()</title>
<updated>2018-01-08T20:29:00+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Coly Li</name>
<email>colyli@suse.de</email>
</author>
<published>2018-01-08T20:21:29+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=5138ac6748e381501894976f995fb7d1a63f80f4'/>
<id>5138ac6748e381501894976f995fb7d1a63f80f4</id>
<content type='text'>
Bcache only does recoverable I/O for read operations by calling
cached_dev_read_error(). For write opertions there is no I/O recovery for
failed requests.

But in bch_count_io_errors() no matter read or write I/Os, before errors
counter reaches io error limit, pr_err() always prints "IO error on %,
recoverying". For write requests this information is misleading, because
there is no I/O recovery at all.

This patch adds a parameter 'is_read' to bch_count_io_errors(), and only
prints "recovering" by pr_err() when the bio direction is READ.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li &lt;colyli@suse.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Bcache only does recoverable I/O for read operations by calling
cached_dev_read_error(). For write opertions there is no I/O recovery for
failed requests.

But in bch_count_io_errors() no matter read or write I/Os, before errors
counter reaches io error limit, pr_err() always prints "IO error on %,
recoverying". For write requests this information is misleading, because
there is no I/O recovery at all.

This patch adds a parameter 'is_read' to bch_count_io_errors(), and only
prints "recovering" by pr_err() when the bio direction is READ.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li &lt;colyli@suse.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bcache: reduce cache_set devices iteration by devices_max_used</title>
<updated>2018-01-08T20:29:00+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Coly Li</name>
<email>colyli@suse.de</email>
</author>
<published>2018-01-08T20:21:28+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=2831231d4c3f999d2d062b23dfbc8b0faa4bc6e0'/>
<id>2831231d4c3f999d2d062b23dfbc8b0faa4bc6e0</id>
<content type='text'>
Member devices of struct cache_set is used to reference all attached
bcache devices to this cache set. If it is treated as array of pointers,
size of devices[] is indicated by member nr_uuids of struct cache_set.

nr_uuids is calculated in drivers/md/super.c:bch_cache_set_alloc(),
	bucket_bytes(c) / sizeof(struct uuid_entry)
Bucket size is determined by user space tool "make-bcache", by default it
is 1024 sectors (defined in bcache-tools/make-bcache.c:main()). So default
nr_uuids value is 4096 from the above calculation.

Every time when bcache code iterates bcache devices of a cache set, all
the 4096 pointers are checked even only 1 bcache device is attached to the
cache set, that's a wast of time and unncessary.

This patch adds a member devices_max_used to struct cache_set. Its value
is 1 + the maximum used index of devices[] in a cache set. When iterating
all valid bcache devices of a cache set, use c-&gt;devices_max_used in
for-loop may reduce a lot of useless checking.

Personally, my motivation of this patch is not for performance, I use it
in bcache debugging, which helps me to narrow down the scape to check
valid bcached devices of a cache set.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li &lt;colyli@suse.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Member devices of struct cache_set is used to reference all attached
bcache devices to this cache set. If it is treated as array of pointers,
size of devices[] is indicated by member nr_uuids of struct cache_set.

nr_uuids is calculated in drivers/md/super.c:bch_cache_set_alloc(),
	bucket_bytes(c) / sizeof(struct uuid_entry)
Bucket size is determined by user space tool "make-bcache", by default it
is 1024 sectors (defined in bcache-tools/make-bcache.c:main()). So default
nr_uuids value is 4096 from the above calculation.

Every time when bcache code iterates bcache devices of a cache set, all
the 4096 pointers are checked even only 1 bcache device is attached to the
cache set, that's a wast of time and unncessary.

This patch adds a member devices_max_used to struct cache_set. Its value
is 1 + the maximum used index of devices[] in a cache set. When iterating
all valid bcache devices of a cache set, use c-&gt;devices_max_used in
for-loop may reduce a lot of useless checking.

Personally, my motivation of this patch is not for performance, I use it
in bcache debugging, which helps me to narrow down the scape to check
valid bcached devices of a cache set.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li &lt;colyli@suse.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bcache: stop writeback thread after detaching</title>
<updated>2018-01-08T20:29:00+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Tang Junhui</name>
<email>tang.junhui@zte.com.cn</email>
</author>
<published>2018-01-08T20:21:19+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=8d29c4426b9f8afaccf28de414fde8a722b35fdf'/>
<id>8d29c4426b9f8afaccf28de414fde8a722b35fdf</id>
<content type='text'>
Currently, when a cached device detaching from cache, writeback thread is
not stopped, and writeback_rate_update work is not canceled. For example,
after the following command:
echo 1 &gt;/sys/block/sdb/bcache/detach
you can still see the writeback thread. Then you attach the device to the
cache again, bcache will create another writeback thread, for example,
after below command:
echo  ba0fb5cd-658a-4533-9806-6ce166d883b9 &gt; /sys/block/sdb/bcache/attach
then you will see 2 writeback threads.
This patch stops writeback thread and cancels writeback_rate_update work
when cached device detaching from cache.

Compare with patch v1, this v2 patch moves code down into the register
lock for safety in case of any future changes as Coly and Mike suggested.

[edit by mlyle: commit log spelling/formatting]

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Currently, when a cached device detaching from cache, writeback thread is
not stopped, and writeback_rate_update work is not canceled. For example,
after the following command:
echo 1 &gt;/sys/block/sdb/bcache/detach
you can still see the writeback thread. Then you attach the device to the
cache again, bcache will create another writeback thread, for example,
after below command:
echo  ba0fb5cd-658a-4533-9806-6ce166d883b9 &gt; /sys/block/sdb/bcache/attach
then you will see 2 writeback threads.
This patch stops writeback thread and cancels writeback_rate_update work
when cached device detaching from cache.

Compare with patch v1, this v2 patch moves code down into the register
lock for safety in case of any future changes as Coly and Mike suggested.

[edit by mlyle: commit log spelling/formatting]

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui &lt;tang.junhui@zte.com.cn&gt;
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle &lt;mlyle@lyle.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>block: convert to bio_first_bvec_all &amp; bio_first_page_all</title>
<updated>2018-01-06T16:18:00+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Ming Lei</name>
<email>ming.lei@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-12-18T12:22:04+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=263663cd3c4fbfc40cb7504c4be2dadbc0992cc1'/>
<id>263663cd3c4fbfc40cb7504c4be2dadbc0992cc1</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch converts to bio_first_bvec_all() &amp; bio_first_page_all() for
retrieving the 1st bvec/page, and prepares for supporting multipage bvec.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei &lt;ming.lei@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This patch converts to bio_first_bvec_all() &amp; bio_first_page_all() for
retrieving the 1st bvec/page, and prepares for supporting multipage bvec.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei &lt;ming.lei@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
