amd-drm-fixes-6.10-2024-07-03:

amdgpu:
- Freesync fixes
- DML1 bandwidth fix
- DCN 3.5 fixes
- DML2 fix
- Silence an UBSAN warning

radeon:
- GPUVM fix

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240703184723.1981997-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com

drm-misc-fixes for v6.10-rc7:
- Add panel quirks.
- Firmware sysfb refcount fix.
- Another null pointer mode deref fix for nouveau.
- Panthor sync and uobj fixes.
- Fix fbdev regression since v6.7.
- Delay free imported bo in ttm to fix lockdep splat.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ffba0c63-2798-40b6-948d-361cd3b14e9f@linux.intel.com

Driver Changes:
- One copy/paste mistake fix.
- One error path fix causing an error pointer dereference.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
From: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ZoZ-wD66lgjiNh72@fedora

A couple copy/paste mistakes in the code that selects steering targets
for OADDRM and INSTANCE0 unintentionally clobbered the steering target
for DSS ranges in some cases.

The OADDRM/INSTANCE0 values were also not assigned as intended, although
that mistake wound up being harmless since the desired values for those
specific ranges were '0' which the kzalloc of the GT structure should
have already taken care of implicitly.

Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240626210536.1620176-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 4f82ac6102788112e599a6074d2c1f2afce923df)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>

Don't call drm_suballoc_free with sa_bo pointing to PTR_ERR.

References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2120
Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240620102025.127699-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit ce6b63336f79ec5f3996de65f452330e395f99ae)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>

Bos can be put with multiple unrelated dma-resv locks held. But
imported bos attempt to grab the bo dma-resv during dma-buf detach
that typically happens during cleanup. That leads to lockde splats
similar to the below and a potential ABBA deadlock.

Fix this by always taking the delayed workqueue cleanup path for
imported bos.

Requesting stable fixes from when the Xe driver was introduced,
since its usage of drm_exec and wide vm dma_resvs appear to be
the first reliable trigger of this.

[22982.116427] ============================================
[22982.116428] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[22982.116429] 6.10.0-rc2+ #10 Tainted: G     U  W
[22982.116430] --------------------------------------------
[22982.116430] glxgears:sh0/5785 is trying to acquire lock:
[22982.116431] ffff8c2bafa539a8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116438]
               but task is already holding lock:
[22982.116438] ffff8c2d9aba6da8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x49/0x2b0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116442]
               other info that might help us debug this:
[22982.116442]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[22982.116443]        CPU0
[22982.116444]        ----
[22982.116444]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[22982.116445]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[22982.116447]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[22982.116447]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

[22982.116448] 5 locks held by glxgears:sh0/5785:
[22982.116449]  #0: ffff8c2d9aba58c8 (&xef->vm.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xe_file_close+0xde/0x1c0 [xe]
[22982.116507]  #1: ffff8c2e28cc8480 (&vm->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: xe_vm_close_and_put+0x161/0x9b0 [xe]
[22982.116578]  #2: ffff8c2e31982970 (&val->lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: xe_validation_ctx_init+0x6d/0x70 [xe]
[22982.116647]  #3: ffffacdc469478a8 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: xe_vma_destroy_unlocked+0x7f/0xe0 [xe]
[22982.116716]  #4: ffff8c2d9aba6da8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x49/0x2b0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116719]
               stack backtrace:
[22982.116720] CPU: 8 PID: 5785 Comm: glxgears:sh0 Tainted: G     U  W          6.10.0-rc2+ #10
[22982.116721] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 2001 02/01/2023
[22982.116723] Call Trace:
[22982.116724]  <TASK>
[22982.116725]  dump_stack_lvl+0x77/0xb0
[22982.116727]  __lock_acquire+0x1232/0x2160
[22982.116730]  lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0
[22982.116732]  ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116734]  ? __lock_acquire+0x417/0x2160
[22982.116736]  __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xd0/0x13b0
[22982.116738]  ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116741]  ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116743]  ? ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90
[22982.116745]  ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90
[22982.116747]  dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116749]  drm_prime_gem_destroy+0x2f/0x40 [drm]
[22982.116775]  xe_ttm_bo_destroy+0x32/0x220 [xe]
[22982.116818]  ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x3a/0x290
[22982.116821]  drm_exec_unlock_all+0xa1/0xd0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116823]  drm_exec_fini+0x12/0xb0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116824]  xe_validation_ctx_fini+0x15/0x40 [xe]
[22982.116892]  xe_vma_destroy_unlocked+0xb1/0xe0 [xe]
[22982.116959]  xe_vm_close_and_put+0x41a/0x9b0 [xe]
[22982.117025]  ? xa_find+0xe3/0x1e0
[22982.117028]  xe_file_close+0x10a/0x1c0 [xe]
[22982.117074]  drm_file_free+0x22a/0x280 [drm]
[22982.117099]  drm_release_noglobal+0x22/0x70 [drm]
[22982.117119]  __fput+0xf1/0x2d0
[22982.117122]  task_work_run+0x59/0x90
[22982.117125]  do_exit+0x330/0xb40
[22982.117127]  do_group_exit+0x36/0xa0
[22982.117129]  get_signal+0xbd2/0xbe0
[22982.117131]  arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x3e/0x240
[22982.117134]  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1e7/0x290
[22982.117137]  do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x180
[22982.117139]  ? lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0
[22982.117140]  ? __set_task_comm+0x28/0x1e0
[22982.117141]  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[22982.117144]  ? __set_task_comm+0xe1/0x1e0
[22982.117145]  ? lock_release+0xca/0x290
[22982.117147]  ? __do_sys_prctl+0x245/0xab0
[22982.117149]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xde/0x190
[22982.117150]  ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xb0/0x290
[22982.117152]  ? do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x180
[22982.117154]  ? __lock_acquire+0x417/0x2160
[22982.117155]  ? reacquire_held_locks+0xd1/0x1f0
[22982.117156]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x30c/0x790
[22982.117158]  ? lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0
[22982.117160]  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[22982.117162]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x357/0x790
[22982.117163]  ? lock_release+0xca/0x290
[22982.117164]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x361/0x790
[22982.117166]  ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x4b/0xc0
[22982.117168]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0
[22982.117170]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0
[22982.117172]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0
[22982.117174]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[22982.117176] RIP: 0033:0x7f943d267169
[22982.117192] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f943d26713f.
[22982.117193] RSP: 002b:00007f9430bffc80 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca
[22982.117195] RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f943d267169
[22982.117196] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000189 RDI: 00005622f89579d0
[22982.117197] RBP: 00007f9430bffcb0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffffff
[22982.117198] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[22982.117199] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00005622f89579d0
[22982.117202]  </TASK>

Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240628153848.4989-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com

Starting with kernel 6.7, the framebuffer text console is not working
anymore with the virtio-gpu device on s390x hosts. Such big endian fb
devices are usinga different pixel ordering than little endian devices,
e.g. DRM_FORMAT_BGRX8888 instead of DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888.

This used to work fine as long as drm_client_buffer_addfb() was still
calling drm_mode_addfb() which called drm_driver_legacy_fb_format()
internally to get the right format. But drm_client_buffer_addfb() has
recently been reworked to call drm_mode_addfb2() instead with the
format value that has been passed to it as a parameter (see commit
6ae2ff23aa43 ("drm/client: Convert drm_client_buffer_addfb() to drm_mode_addfb2()").

That format parameter is determined in drm_fbdev_generic_helper_fb_probe()
via the drm_mode_legacy_fb_format() function - which only generates
formats suitable for little endian devices. So to fix this issue
switch to drm_driver_legacy_fb_format() here instead to take the
device endianness into consideration.

Fixes: 6ae2ff23aa43 ("drm/client: Convert drm_client_buffer_addfb() to drm_mode_addfb2()")
Closes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-45158
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240627173530.460615-1-thuth@redhat.com

A sync-only job is meant to provide a synchronization point on a
queue, so we can't return a NULL fence there, we have to add a signal
operation to the command stream which executes after all other
previously submitted jobs are done.

v2:
- Fixed a UAF bug
- Added R-bs

Fixes: de8548813824 ("drm/panthor: Add the scheduler logical block")
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240703071640.231278-3-boris.brezillon@collabora.com

The user is likely to leave all the drm_panthor_obj_array fields
to zero when the array is empty, which will cause an EINVAL failure.

v2:
- Added R-bs

Fixes: 4bdca1150792 ("drm/panthor: Add the driver frontend block")
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240703071640.231278-2-boris.brezillon@collabora.com

This is a variable sized array.

Link: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/2024-June/110420.html
Tested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org