linux.git/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml, branch v6.8 Linux kernel source tree Revert "drm/amd/display: increased min_dcfclk_mhz and min_fclk_mhz" 2024-02-15T19:18:43+00:00 Sohaib Nadeem sohaib.nadeem@amd.com 2024-01-29T22:33:40+00:00 a538dabf772c169641e151834e161e241802ab33 [why]: This reverts commit 2ff33c759a4247c84ec0b7815f1f223e155ba82a. The commit caused corruption when running some applications in fullscreen Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com> Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sohaib Nadeem <sohaib.nadeem@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
[why]:
This reverts commit 2ff33c759a4247c84ec0b7815f1f223e155ba82a.

The commit caused corruption when running some applications in fullscreen

Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sohaib Nadeem <sohaib.nadeem@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: Increase frame-larger-than for all display_mode_vba files 2024-02-07T23:29:09+00:00 Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org 2024-02-05T21:54:05+00:00 e63e35f0164c43fbc1adb481d6604f253b9f9667 After a recent change in LLVM, allmodconfig (which has CONFIG_KCSAN=y and CONFIG_WERROR=y enabled) has a few new instances of -Wframe-larger-than for the mode support and system configuration functions: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/display_mode_vba_20v2.c:3393:6: error: stack frame size (2144) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dml20v2_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] 3393 | void dml20v2_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull(struct display_mode_lib *mode_lib) | ^ 1 error generated. drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn21/display_mode_vba_21.c:3520:6: error: stack frame size (2192) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dml21_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] 3520 | void dml21_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull(struct display_mode_lib *mode_lib) | ^ 1 error generated. drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/display_mode_vba_20.c:3286:6: error: stack frame size (2128) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dml20_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] 3286 | void dml20_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull(struct display_mode_lib *mode_lib) | ^ 1 error generated. Without the sanitizers enabled, there are no warnings. This was the catalyst for commit 6740ec97bcdb ("drm/amd/display: Increase frame warning limit with KASAN or KCSAN in dml2") and that same change was made to dml in commit 5b750b22530f ("drm/amd/display: Increase frame warning limit with KASAN or KCSAN in dml") but the frame_warn_flag variable was not applied to all files. Do so now to clear up the warnings and make all these files consistent. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Closes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issue/1990 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
After a recent change in LLVM, allmodconfig (which has CONFIG_KCSAN=y
and CONFIG_WERROR=y enabled) has a few new instances of
-Wframe-larger-than for the mode support and system configuration
functions:

  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/display_mode_vba_20v2.c:3393:6: error: stack frame size (2144) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dml20v2_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
   3393 | void dml20v2_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull(struct display_mode_lib *mode_lib)
        |      ^
  1 error generated.

  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn21/display_mode_vba_21.c:3520:6: error: stack frame size (2192) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dml21_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
   3520 | void dml21_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull(struct display_mode_lib *mode_lib)
        |      ^
  1 error generated.

  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/display_mode_vba_20.c:3286:6: error: stack frame size (2128) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dml20_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
   3286 | void dml20_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull(struct display_mode_lib *mode_lib)
        |      ^
  1 error generated.

Without the sanitizers enabled, there are no warnings.

This was the catalyst for commit 6740ec97bcdb ("drm/amd/display:
Increase frame warning limit with KASAN or KCSAN in dml2") and that same
change was made to dml in commit 5b750b22530f ("drm/amd/display:
Increase frame warning limit with KASAN or KCSAN in dml") but the
frame_warn_flag variable was not applied to all files. Do so now to
clear up the warnings and make all these files consistent.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Closes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issue/1990
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: set odm_combine_policy based on context in dcn32 resource 2024-02-07T23:16:46+00:00 Wenjing Liu wenjing.liu@amd.com 2024-01-18T23:12:15+00:00 2103370afba74dda39ff5d2d69163c86644ce528 [why] When populating dml pipes, odm combine policy should be assigned based on the pipe topology of the context passed in. DML pipes could be repopulated multiple times during single validate bandwidth attempt. We need to make sure that whenever we repopulate the dml pipes it is always aligned with the updated context. There is a case where DML pipes get repopulated during FPO optimization after ODM combine policy is changed. Since in the current code we reinitlaize ODM combine policy, even though the current context has ODM combine enabled, we overwrite it despite the pipes are already split. This causes DML to think that MPC combine is used so we mistakenly enable MPC combine because we apply pipe split with ODM combine policy reset. This issue doesn't impact non windowed MPO with ODM case because the legacy policy has restricted use cases. We don't encounter the case where both ODM and FPO optimizations are enabled together. So we decide to leave it as is because it is about to be replaced anyway. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com> Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
[why]
When populating dml pipes, odm combine policy should be assigned based
on the pipe topology of the context passed in. DML pipes could be
repopulated multiple times during single validate bandwidth attempt. We
need to make sure that whenever we repopulate the dml pipes it is always
aligned with the updated context. There is a case where DML pipes get
repopulated during FPO optimization after ODM combine policy is changed.
Since in the current code we reinitlaize ODM combine policy, even though
the current context has ODM combine enabled, we overwrite it despite the
pipes are already split. This causes DML to think that MPC combine is
used so we mistakenly enable MPC combine because we apply pipe split
with ODM combine policy reset. This issue doesn't impact non windowed
MPO with ODM case because the legacy policy has restricted use cases. We
don't encounter the case where both ODM and FPO optimizations are
enabled together. So we decide to leave it as is because it is about to
be replaced anyway.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: Underflow workaround by increasing SR exit latency 2024-01-31T22:30:38+00:00 Nicholas Susanto nicholas.susanto@amd.com 2024-01-18T18:34:40+00:00 191cb4ed33a61c90feed8bda0f0df3a419604fc8 [Why] On 14us for exit latency time causes underflow for 8K monitor with HDR on. Increasing the latency to 28us fixes the underflow. [How] Increase the latency to 28us. This workaround should be sufficient before we figure out why SR exit so long. Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com> Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Susanto <nicholas.susanto@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
[Why]
On 14us for exit latency time causes underflow for 8K monitor with HDR on.
Increasing the latency to 28us fixes the underflow.

[How]
Increase the latency to 28us. This workaround should be sufficient
before we figure out why SR exit so long.

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Susanto <nicholas.susanto@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: fix incorrect mpc_combine array size 2024-01-31T22:29:58+00:00 Wenjing Liu wenjing.liu@amd.com 2024-01-18T20:14:15+00:00 39079fe8e660851abbafa90cd55cbf029210661f [why] MAX_SURFACES is per stream, while MAX_PLANES is per asic. The mpc_combine is an array that records all the planes per asic. Therefore MAX_PLANES should be used as the array size. Using MAX_SURFACES causes array overflow when there are more than 3 planes. [how] Use the MAX_PLANES for the mpc_combine array size. Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <nevenko.stupar@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com> Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
[why]
MAX_SURFACES is per stream, while MAX_PLANES is per asic. The
mpc_combine is an array that records all the planes per asic. Therefore
MAX_PLANES should be used as the array size. Using MAX_SURFACES causes
array overflow when there are more than 3 planes.

[how]
Use the MAX_PLANES for the mpc_combine array size.

Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <nevenko.stupar@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: increased min_dcfclk_mhz and min_fclk_mhz 2024-01-31T22:25:12+00:00 Sohaib Nadeem sohaib.nadeem@amd.com 2024-01-16T16:00:00+00:00 2ff33c759a4247c84ec0b7815f1f223e155ba82a [why] Originally, PMFW said min FCLK is 300Mhz, but min DCFCLK can be increased to 400Mhz because min FCLK is now 600Mhz so FCLK >= 1.5 * DCFCLK hardware requirement will still be satisfied. Increasing min DCFCLK addresses underflow issues (underflow occurs when phantom pipe is turned on for some Sub-Viewport configs). [how] Increasing DCFCLK by raising the min_dcfclk_mhz Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com> Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sohaib Nadeem <sohaib.nadeem@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
[why]
Originally, PMFW said min FCLK is 300Mhz, but min DCFCLK can be increased
to 400Mhz because min FCLK is now 600Mhz so FCLK >= 1.5 * DCFCLK hardware
requirement will still be satisfied. Increasing min DCFCLK addresses
underflow issues (underflow occurs when phantom pipe is turned on for some
Sub-Viewport configs).

[how]
Increasing DCFCLK by raising the min_dcfclk_mhz

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sohaib Nadeem <sohaib.nadeem@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: Update z8 latency 2024-01-09T20:43:54+00:00 Charlene Liu charlene.liu@amd.com 2023-12-21T14:42:28+00:00 2476bf4328d1a55db709ce9ad2c274d26040311b Adjust z8 latency for performance. Reviewed-by: Muhammad Ahmed <ahmed.ahmed@amd.com> Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
Adjust z8 latency for performance.

Reviewed-by: Muhammad Ahmed <ahmed.ahmed@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: revert "for FPO & SubVP/DRR config program vmin/max" 2024-01-09T20:43:53+00:00 Martin Leung martin.leung@amd.com 2023-12-20T21:54:05+00:00 51c7e6ac24101af3147ebc45627810da367c6b66 This reverts commit 6b2b782ad6a25734ae847d1659bea3f613dbb563. The original commit causes issues with certain features when DRR is disabled, need to revisit this change later after resolving issues with new DRR policy. Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Leung <martin.leung@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
This reverts commit 6b2b782ad6a25734ae847d1659bea3f613dbb563.

The original commit causes issues with certain features when DRR is
disabled, need to revisit this change later after resolving issues with
new DRR policy.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Leung <martin.leung@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: add nv12 bounding box 2024-01-05T21:05:02+00:00 Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com 2023-12-20T17:33:45+00:00 1b0b232ee4e005e402a9cd21e47cecb6d6f54a29 This was included in gpu_info firmware, move it into the driver for consistency with other nv1x parts. Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2318 Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
This was included in gpu_info firmware, move it into the
driver for consistency with other nv1x parts.

Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2318
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: For FPO and SubVP/DRR configs program vmin/max sel 2024-01-03T15:47:20+00:00 Alvin Lee alvin.lee2@amd.com 2023-12-12T17:17:31+00:00 6b2b782ad6a25734ae847d1659bea3f613dbb563 For FPO and SubVP/DRR cases we need to ensure to program OTG_V_TOTAL_MIN/MAX_SEL, otherwise stretching the vblank in FPO / SubVP / DRR cases will not have any effect and we could hit underflow / corruption. Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com> Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
For FPO and SubVP/DRR cases we need to ensure to program
OTG_V_TOTAL_MIN/MAX_SEL, otherwise stretching the vblank in FPO / SubVP
/ DRR cases will not have any effect and we could hit underflow /
corruption.

Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>