<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c, branch v7.2-rc2</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel source tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdgpu: reject mapping a reserved doorbell to a new queue</title>
<updated>2026-07-01T17:00:10+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Zhu Lingshan</name>
<email>lingshan.zhu@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-06-24T07:52:35+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=a609b6278bf3cde17eeee6620091465521e4b02c'/>
<id>a609b6278bf3cde17eeee6620091465521e4b02c</id>
<content type='text'>
When creating an user-queue, the user space
provides a doorbell BO handle and an offset within
the bo to obtain a doorbell.

However current implementation using xa_store_irq()
to store a doorbell, which allows a later queue created
with the same BO and offset parameters to overwrite an
existing queue and doorbell mapping.

This can cause problems like misrouting fence IRQ
processing to a wrong queue, and mislead the cleanup
process of one queue erasing the mapping of another queue.

This commit fixes this issue by replacing xa_store_irq with
xa_insert_irq, which rejects mapping a reserved
doorbell to a newly created queue

Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan &lt;lingshan.zhu@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
(cherry picked from commit 6244eae22966350db52faf9c1369d3b2ffc5de4e)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
When creating an user-queue, the user space
provides a doorbell BO handle and an offset within
the bo to obtain a doorbell.

However current implementation using xa_store_irq()
to store a doorbell, which allows a later queue created
with the same BO and offset parameters to overwrite an
existing queue and doorbell mapping.

This can cause problems like misrouting fence IRQ
processing to a wrong queue, and mislead the cleanup
process of one queue erasing the mapping of another queue.

This commit fixes this issue by replacing xa_store_irq with
xa_insert_irq, which rejects mapping a reserved
doorbell to a newly created queue

Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan &lt;lingshan.zhu@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
(cherry picked from commit 6244eae22966350db52faf9c1369d3b2ffc5de4e)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdgpu/userq: move wptr_obj cleanup in mqd_destroy</title>
<updated>2026-06-03T17:58:51+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sunil Khatri</name>
<email>sunil.khatri@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-05-25T04:26:23+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=43355f62cd2ef5386c2693df537c232ea0f2ce6c'/>
<id>43355f62cd2ef5386c2693df537c232ea0f2ce6c</id>
<content type='text'>
In case when queue_create fails and mqd has already been
allocated and hence wptr_obj is not cleaned up.

So moving that cleanup part to mqd_destroy so it takes
care of all the cases of clean up and during tear down of
the queue.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
In case when queue_create fails and mqd has already been
allocated and hence wptr_obj is not cleaned up.

So moving that cleanup part to mqd_destroy so it takes
care of all the cases of clean up and during tear down of
the queue.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdgpu/userq: remove the vital queue unmap logging</title>
<updated>2026-06-03T17:55:33+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sunil Khatri</name>
<email>sunil.khatri@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-05-25T07:48:00+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=758a868043dcb07eca923bc451c16da3e73dc47c'/>
<id>758a868043dcb07eca923bc451c16da3e73dc47c</id>
<content type='text'>
Mesa userqueues free does not wait for the free to complete and go ahead
in unmapping the vital bos while kernel is still in queue free and
corresponding cleanup.

So ideally we don't need the logging for that and hence remove the warn
message as this is expected behaviour and functionally, we are making
sure to wait for the required fences before unmap.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Mesa userqueues free does not wait for the free to complete and go ahead
in unmapping the vital bos while kernel is still in queue free and
corresponding cleanup.

So ideally we don't need the logging for that and hence remove the warn
message as this is expected behaviour and functionally, we are making
sure to wait for the required fences before unmap.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdgpu: unmap userq for evicting user queue</title>
<updated>2026-06-03T17:49:41+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Prike Liang</name>
<email>Prike.Liang@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-05-14T09:21:09+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=d87c9d86727a0bcc95c3009a213a1b27a11b691e'/>
<id>d87c9d86727a0bcc95c3009a213a1b27a11b691e</id>
<content type='text'>
If the driver only preempts queues, there can still be inflight waves,
pending dispatch state, or resume/redispatch possibility tied to the
same queue. Then the VM/TTM side may proceed to move/unmap queue related
BOs during evicting userq objects while shader TCP clients still need to
access them.

So for eviction, unmap is safer because it makes the queue nonrunnable
before memory backing is invalidated. Meanwhile, for a idle queue it's
more sutiable for unmapping it rather preempt and unmapping also can
save more processing time than preempt.

Signed-off-by: Prike Liang &lt;Prike.Liang@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
If the driver only preempts queues, there can still be inflight waves,
pending dispatch state, or resume/redispatch possibility tied to the
same queue. Then the VM/TTM side may proceed to move/unmap queue related
BOs during evicting userq objects while shader TCP clients still need to
access them.

So for eviction, unmap is safer because it makes the queue nonrunnable
before memory backing is invalidated. Meanwhile, for a idle queue it's
more sutiable for unmapping it rather preempt and unmapping also can
save more processing time than preempt.

Signed-off-by: Prike Liang &lt;Prike.Liang@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdgpu: reserve TTM move fences slot for rearming eviction fences</title>
<updated>2026-06-03T17:49:29+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Prike Liang</name>
<email>Prike.Liang@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-05-26T08:42:14+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=113fa3ca614a865776f81759bb245dabf99859a7'/>
<id>113fa3ca614a865776f81759bb245dabf99859a7</id>
<content type='text'>
The eviction rearming does not cover possible TTM move fences. If TTM
moves the BO and consumes move fence slots, the later eviction fence
add can hit the dma_resv_add_fence() BUG.

Signed-off-by: Prike Liang &lt;Prike.Liang@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The eviction rearming does not cover possible TTM move fences. If TTM
moves the BO and consumes move fence slots, the later eviction fence
add can hit the dma_resv_add_fence() BUG.

Signed-off-by: Prike Liang &lt;Prike.Liang@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdgpu/userq: use array instead of list for userq_vas</title>
<updated>2026-05-27T14:50:02+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sunil Khatri</name>
<email>sunil.khatri@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-05-20T11:09:49+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=ef7dc711a664b0c548ecfdf13a00436b7446b8e7'/>
<id>ef7dc711a664b0c548ecfdf13a00436b7446b8e7</id>
<content type='text'>
Use arrays instead of list for userq_vas since we have fixed no
of bos. Also, we dont have to worry to free that memory later
since this array would be free along with queue only.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Use arrays instead of list for userq_vas since we have fixed no
of bos. Also, we dont have to worry to free that memory later
since this array would be free along with queue only.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdgpu/userq: move mqd_destroy to later stage to keep core obj valid</title>
<updated>2026-05-27T14:48:42+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sunil Khatri</name>
<email>sunil.khatri@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-05-20T10:55:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=4ad65d610096498c8e265615aba42b3c47441bb5'/>
<id>4ad65d610096498c8e265615aba42b3c47441bb5</id>
<content type='text'>
mqd_destroy cleans up queue core objects like mqd and fw_object
which are needed for any pending fence to signal properly.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
mqd_destroy cleans up queue core objects like mqd and fw_object
which are needed for any pending fence to signal properly.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdgpu/userq: remove amdgpu_userq_create/destroy_object wrapper</title>
<updated>2026-05-27T14:48:34+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sunil Khatri</name>
<email>sunil.khatri@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-05-20T10:43:09+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=deb02080ca5d3f015cf71e56067a39ef2f141998'/>
<id>deb02080ca5d3f015cf71e56067a39ef2f141998</id>
<content type='text'>
Remove the amdgpu_userq_create/destroy_object wrappers and
use directly the kernel bo allocation function which does all the
things which are done in wrapper.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Suggested-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Remove the amdgpu_userq_create/destroy_object wrappers and
use directly the kernel bo allocation function which does all the
things which are done in wrapper.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Suggested-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdgpu/userq: make sure queue is valid in the hang_detect_work</title>
<updated>2026-05-27T14:40:29+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sunil Khatri</name>
<email>sunil.khatri@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-05-18T14:28:08+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=1a66ceb98b137d18d303b9889f0e7d8c4db73943'/>
<id>1a66ceb98b137d18d303b9889f0e7d8c4db73943</id>
<content type='text'>
Thread 1: Running amdgpu_userq_destroy which eventually remove
the queue from door bell and set userq_mgr = NULL.

Thread2: An interrupt might have scheduled the hang_detect_work
which still need userq_mgr to be valid but could get an NULL
ptrs.

To fix that make sure we cancel the hang_detect_work again before
setting userq_mgr to NULL.

Along with that we also need all the queue va to remain valid till
we could be running anything on the queue and hence moving the
userq_va post hang_detect handler is cancelled.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Thread 1: Running amdgpu_userq_destroy which eventually remove
the queue from door bell and set userq_mgr = NULL.

Thread2: An interrupt might have scheduled the hang_detect_work
which still need userq_mgr to be valid but could get an NULL
ptrs.

To fix that make sure we cancel the hang_detect_work again before
setting userq_mgr to NULL.

Along with that we also need all the queue va to remain valid till
we could be running anything on the queue and hence moving the
userq_va post hang_detect handler is cancelled.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdgpu/userq: reserve root bo without interruption</title>
<updated>2026-05-27T14:40:19+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sunil Khatri</name>
<email>sunil.khatri@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-05-18T13:25:25+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=d409ab4e387d94b2e593d558b54b7bfd315e0e75'/>
<id>d409ab4e387d94b2e593d558b54b7bfd315e0e75</id>
<content type='text'>
Fix the code to make it an uninterruptible reservation
for root bo.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Fix the code to make it an uninterruptible reservation
for root bo.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri &lt;sunil.khatri@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christian König &lt;christian.koenig@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
