Change-Id: I62b892a22af37b32e6b4aefca80a25cf45426ed2
Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

We don't need the last VM use any more, keep the owner directly.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <davdi1.zhou@amd.com>

It's not a good idea to duplicate that code.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <davdi1.zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Fix the indentation and move the VM functions to the structures.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <davdi1.zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <davdi1.zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@amd.com>

Unify the two code path again, cause they do pretty much the same thing.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <davdi1.zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@amd.com>

Before this patch the scheduler fence was created when we push the job
into the queue, so we could only get the fence after pushing it.

The mutex now was necessary to prevent the thread pushing the jobs to
the hardware from running faster than the thread pushing the jobs into
the queue.

Otherwise the thread pushing jobs into the queue would have accessed
possible freed up memory when it tries to get a reference to the fence.

So what you get in the end is thread A:
mutex_lock(&job->lock);
...
Kick of thread B.
...
mutex_unlock(&job->lock);

And thread B:
mutex_lock(&job->lock);
....
mutex_unlock(&job->lock);
kfree(job);

I'm actually not sure if I'm still up to date on this, but this usage
pattern used to be not allowed with mutexes. See here as well
https://lwn.net/Articles/575460/.

v2: remove unrelated changes, fix missing owner
v3: rebased, add more commit message

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

No need any more to allocate that structure dynamically, just put it on the
stack. This is a start to cleanup some of the scheduler fallouts.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Just cleanup the function parameters.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Less overhead than a work item and also adds proper cleanup handling.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>