Pull EFI updates from Ard Biesheuvel:
"Although some more stuff is brewing, the EFI changes that are ready
for mainline are few this cycle:
- improve the PCI DMA paranoia logic in the EFI stub
- some constification changes
- add statfs support to efivarfs
- allow user space to enumerate updatable firmware resources without
CAP_SYS_ADMIN"
* tag 'efi-next-for-v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi:
efi/libstub: Disable PCI DMA before grabbing the EFI memory map
efi/esrt: Allow ESRT access without CAP_SYS_ADMIN
efivarfs: expose used and total size
efi: make kobj_type structure constant
efi: x86: make kobj_type structure constant
Currently, the EFI stub will disable PCI DMA as the very last thing it
does before calling ExitBootServices(), to avoid interfering with the
firmware's normal operation as much as possible.
However, the stub will invoke DisconnectController() on all endpoints
downstream of the PCI bridges it disables, and this may affect the
layout of the EFI memory map, making it substantially more likely that
ExitBootServices() will fail the first time around, and that the EFI
memory map needs to be reloaded.
This, in turn, increases the likelihood that the slack space we
allocated is insufficient (and we can no longer allocate memory via boot
services after having called ExitBootServices() once), causing the
second call to GetMemoryMap (and therefore the boot) to fail. This makes
the PCI DMA disable feature a bit more fragile than it already is, so
let's make it more robust, by allocating the space for the EFI memory
map after disabling PCI DMA.
Fixes: 4444f8541dad16fe ("efi: Allow disabling PCI busmastering on bridges during boot")
Reported-by: Glenn Washburn <development@efficientek.com>
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Pull x86 confidential computing update from Borislav Petkov: - Add support for unaccepted memory as specified in the UEFI spec v2.9. The gist of it all is that Intel TDX and AMD SEV-SNP confidential computing guests define the notion of accepting memory before using it and thus preventing a whole set of attacks against such guests like memory replay and the like. There are a couple of strategies of how memory should be accepted - the current implementation does an on-demand way of accepting. * tag 'x86_cc_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: virt: sevguest: Add CONFIG_CRYPTO dependency x86/efi: Safely enable unaccepted memory in UEFI x86/sev: Add SNP-specific unaccepted memory support x86/sev: Use large PSC requests if applicable x86/sev: Allow for use of the early boot GHCB for PSC requests x86/sev: Put PSC struct on the stack in prep for unaccepted memory support x86/sev: Fix calculation of end address based on number of pages x86/tdx: Add unaccepted memory support x86/tdx: Refactor try_accept_one() x86/tdx: Make _tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_module_call() available in boot stub efi/unaccepted: Avoid load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping into unaccepted memory efi: Add unaccepted memory support x86/boot/compressed: Handle unaccepted memory efi/libstub: Implement support for unaccepted memory efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820() mm: Add support for unaccepted memory
This reverts commit e7b813b32a42a3a6281a4fd9ae7700a0257c1d50 (and the subsequent fix for it: 41a15855c1ee "efi: random: fix NULL-deref when refreshing seed"). It turns otu to cause non-deterministic boot stalls on at least a HP 6730b laptop. Reported-and-bisected-by: Sami Korkalainen <sami.korkalainen@proton.me> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/GQUnKz2al3yke5mB2i1kp3SzNHjK8vi6KJEh7rnLrOQ24OrlljeCyeWveLW9pICEmB9Qc8PKdNt3w1t_g3-Uvxq1l8Wj67PpoMeWDoH8PKk=@proton.me/ Cc: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The UEFI v2.9 specification includes a new memory type to be used in environments where the OS must accept memory that is provided from its host. Before the introduction of this memory type, all memory was accepted eagerly in the firmware. In order for the firmware to safely stop accepting memory on the OS's behalf, the OS must affirmatively indicate support to the firmware. This is only a problem for AMD SEV-SNP, since Linux has had support for it since 5.19. The other technology that can make use of unaccepted memory, Intel TDX, does not yet have Linux support, so it can strictly require unaccepted memory support as a dependency of CONFIG_TDX and not require communication with the firmware. Enabling unaccepted memory requires calling a 0-argument enablement protocol before ExitBootServices. This call is only made if the kernel is compiled with UNACCEPTED_MEMORY=y This protocol will be removed after the end of life of the first LTS that includes it, in order to give firmware implementations an expiration date for it. When the protocol is removed, firmware will strictly infer that a SEV-SNP VM is running an OS that supports the unaccepted memory type. At the earliest convenience, when unaccepted memory support is added to Linux, SEV-SNP may take strict dependence in it. After the firmware removes support for the protocol, this should be reverted. [tl: address some checkscript warnings] Signed-off-by: Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@google.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0d5f3d9a20b5cf361945b7ab1263c36586a78a42.1686063086.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com
load_unaligned_zeropad() can lead to unwanted loads across page boundaries. The unwanted loads are typically harmless. But, they might be made to totally unrelated or even unmapped memory. load_unaligned_zeropad() relies on exception fixup (#PF, #GP and now #VE) to recover from these unwanted loads. But, this approach does not work for unaccepted memory. For TDX, a load from unaccepted memory will not lead to a recoverable exception within the guest. The guest will exit to the VMM where the only recourse is to terminate the guest. There are two parts to fix this issue and comprehensively avoid access to unaccepted memory. Together these ensure that an extra "guard" page is accepted in addition to the memory that needs to be used. 1. Implicitly extend the range_contains_unaccepted_memory(start, end) checks up to end+unit_size if 'end' is aligned on a unit_size boundary. 2. Implicitly extend accept_memory(start, end) to end+unit_size if 'end' is aligned on a unit_size boundary. Side note: This leads to something strange. Pages which were accepted at boot, marked by the firmware as accepted and will never _need_ to be accepted might be on unaccepted_pages list This is a cue to ensure that the next page is accepted before 'page' can be used. This is an actual, real-world problem which was discovered during TDX testing. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606142637.5171-7-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
efi_config_parse_tables() reserves memory that holds unaccepted memory configuration table so it won't be reused by page allocator. Core-mm requires few helpers to support unaccepted memory: - accept_memory() checks the range of addresses against the bitmap and accept memory if needed. - range_contains_unaccepted_memory() checks if anything within the range requires acceptance. Architectural code has to provide efi_get_unaccepted_table() that returns pointer to the unaccepted memory configuration table. arch_accept_memory() handles arch-specific part of memory acceptance. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606142637.5171-6-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
UEFI Specification version 2.9 introduces the concept of memory acceptance: Some Virtual Machine platforms, such as Intel TDX or AMD SEV-SNP, requiring memory to be accepted before it can be used by the guest. Accepting happens via a protocol specific for the Virtual Machine platform. Accepting memory is costly and it makes VMM allocate memory for the accepted guest physical address range. It's better to postpone memory acceptance until memory is needed. It lowers boot time and reduces memory overhead. The kernel needs to know what memory has been accepted. Firmware communicates this information via memory map: a new memory type -- EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY -- indicates such memory. Range-based tracking works fine for firmware, but it gets bulky for the kernel: e820 (or whatever the arch uses) has to be modified on every page acceptance. It leads to table fragmentation and there's a limited number of entries in the e820 table. Another option is to mark such memory as usable in e820 and track if the range has been accepted in a bitmap. One bit in the bitmap represents a naturally aligned power-2-sized region of address space -- unit. For x86, unit size is 2MiB: 4k of the bitmap is enough to track 64GiB or physical address space. In the worst-case scenario -- a huge hole in the middle of the address space -- It needs 256MiB to handle 4PiB of the address space. Any unaccepted memory that is not aligned to unit_size gets accepted upfront. The bitmap is allocated and constructed in the EFI stub and passed down to the kernel via EFI configuration table. allocate_e820() allocates the bitmap if unaccepted memory is present, according to the size of unaccepted region. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606142637.5171-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Currently allocate_e820() is only interested in the size of map and size of memory descriptor to determine how many e820 entries the kernel needs. UEFI Specification version 2.9 introduces a new memory type -- unaccepted memory. To track unaccepted memory, the kernel needs to allocate a bitmap. The size of the bitmap is dependent on the maximum physical address present in the system. A full memory map is required to find the maximum address. Modify allocate_e820() to get a full memory map. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606142637.5171-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Access to the files in /sys/firmware/efi/esrt has been restricted to CAP_SYS_ADMIN since support for ESRT was added, but this seems overly restrictive given that the files are read-only and just provide information about UEFI firmware updates. Remove the CAP_SYS_ADMIN restriction so that a non-root process can read the files, provided a suitably-privileged process changes the file ownership first. The files are still read-only and still owned by root by default. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bishop <nicholasbishop@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>