<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa, branch v6.16</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel source tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>firmware: arm_ffa: Replace mutex with rwlock to avoid sleep in atomic context</title>
<updated>2025-06-09T10:24:43+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sudeep Holla</name>
<email>sudeep.holla@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-05-28T08:49:43+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=9ca7a421229bbdfbe2e1e628cff5cfa782720a10'/>
<id>9ca7a421229bbdfbe2e1e628cff5cfa782720a10</id>
<content type='text'>
The current use of a mutex to protect the notifier hashtable accesses
can lead to issues in the atomic context. It results in the below
kernel warnings:

  |  BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:258
  |  in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 9, name: kworker/0:0
  |  preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
  |  RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
  |  CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.14.0 #4
  |  Workqueue: ffa_pcpu_irq_notification notif_pcpu_irq_work_fn
  |  Call trace:
  |   show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C)
  |   dump_stack_lvl+0x78/0x90
  |   dump_stack+0x18/0x24
  |   __might_resched+0x114/0x170
  |   __might_sleep+0x48/0x98
  |   mutex_lock+0x24/0x80
  |   handle_notif_callbacks+0x54/0xe0
  |   notif_get_and_handle+0x40/0x88
  |   generic_exec_single+0x80/0xc0
  |   smp_call_function_single+0xfc/0x1a0
  |   notif_pcpu_irq_work_fn+0x2c/0x38
  |   process_one_work+0x14c/0x2b4
  |   worker_thread+0x2e4/0x3e0
  |   kthread+0x13c/0x210
  |   ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

To address this, replace the mutex with an rwlock to protect the notifier
hashtable accesses. This ensures that read-side locking does not sleep and
multiple readers can acquire the lock concurrently, avoiding unnecessary
contention and potential deadlocks. Writer access remains exclusive,
preserving correctness.

This change resolves warnings from lockdep about potential sleep in
atomic context.

Cc: Jens Wiklander &lt;jens.wiklander@linaro.org&gt;
Reported-by: Jérôme Forissier &lt;jerome.forissier@linaro.org&gt;
Closes: https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/issues/7394
Fixes: e0573444edbf ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add interfaces to request notification callbacks")
Message-Id: &lt;20250528-ffa_notif_fix-v1-3-5ed7bc7f8437@arm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander &lt;jens.wiklander@linaro.org&gt;
Tested-by: Jens Wiklander &lt;jens.wiklander@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The current use of a mutex to protect the notifier hashtable accesses
can lead to issues in the atomic context. It results in the below
kernel warnings:

  |  BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:258
  |  in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 9, name: kworker/0:0
  |  preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
  |  RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
  |  CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.14.0 #4
  |  Workqueue: ffa_pcpu_irq_notification notif_pcpu_irq_work_fn
  |  Call trace:
  |   show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C)
  |   dump_stack_lvl+0x78/0x90
  |   dump_stack+0x18/0x24
  |   __might_resched+0x114/0x170
  |   __might_sleep+0x48/0x98
  |   mutex_lock+0x24/0x80
  |   handle_notif_callbacks+0x54/0xe0
  |   notif_get_and_handle+0x40/0x88
  |   generic_exec_single+0x80/0xc0
  |   smp_call_function_single+0xfc/0x1a0
  |   notif_pcpu_irq_work_fn+0x2c/0x38
  |   process_one_work+0x14c/0x2b4
  |   worker_thread+0x2e4/0x3e0
  |   kthread+0x13c/0x210
  |   ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

To address this, replace the mutex with an rwlock to protect the notifier
hashtable accesses. This ensures that read-side locking does not sleep and
multiple readers can acquire the lock concurrently, avoiding unnecessary
contention and potential deadlocks. Writer access remains exclusive,
preserving correctness.

This change resolves warnings from lockdep about potential sleep in
atomic context.

Cc: Jens Wiklander &lt;jens.wiklander@linaro.org&gt;
Reported-by: Jérôme Forissier &lt;jerome.forissier@linaro.org&gt;
Closes: https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/issues/7394
Fixes: e0573444edbf ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add interfaces to request notification callbacks")
Message-Id: &lt;20250528-ffa_notif_fix-v1-3-5ed7bc7f8437@arm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander &lt;jens.wiklander@linaro.org&gt;
Tested-by: Jens Wiklander &lt;jens.wiklander@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>firmware: arm_ffa: Move memory allocation outside the mutex locking</title>
<updated>2025-06-09T10:24:43+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sudeep Holla</name>
<email>sudeep.holla@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-05-28T08:49:42+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=27e850c88df0e25474a8caeb2903e2e90b62c1dc'/>
<id>27e850c88df0e25474a8caeb2903e2e90b62c1dc</id>
<content type='text'>
The notifier callback node allocation is currently done while holding
the notify_lock mutex. While this is safe even if memory allocation may
sleep, we need to move the allocation outside the locked region in
preparation to move from using muxtes to rwlocks.

Move the memory allocation to avoid potential sleeping in atomic context
once the locks are moved from mutex to rwlocks.

Fixes: e0573444edbf ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add interfaces to request notification callbacks")
Message-Id: &lt;20250528-ffa_notif_fix-v1-2-5ed7bc7f8437@arm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander &lt;jens.wiklander@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The notifier callback node allocation is currently done while holding
the notify_lock mutex. While this is safe even if memory allocation may
sleep, we need to move the allocation outside the locked region in
preparation to move from using muxtes to rwlocks.

Move the memory allocation to avoid potential sleeping in atomic context
once the locks are moved from mutex to rwlocks.

Fixes: e0573444edbf ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add interfaces to request notification callbacks")
Message-Id: &lt;20250528-ffa_notif_fix-v1-2-5ed7bc7f8437@arm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander &lt;jens.wiklander@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>firmware: arm_ffa: Fix memory leak by freeing notifier callback node</title>
<updated>2025-06-09T10:24:43+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sudeep Holla</name>
<email>sudeep.holla@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-05-28T08:49:41+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=a833d31ad867103ba72a0b73f3606f4ab8601719'/>
<id>a833d31ad867103ba72a0b73f3606f4ab8601719</id>
<content type='text'>
Commit e0573444edbf ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add interfaces to request
notification callbacks") adds support for notifier callbacks by allocating
and inserting a callback node into a hashtable during registration of
notifiers. However, during unregistration, the code only removes the
node from the hashtable without freeing the associated memory, resulting
in a memory leak.

Resolve the memory leak issue by ensuring the allocated notifier callback
node is properly freed after it is removed from the hashtable entry.

Fixes: e0573444edbf ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add interfaces to request notification callbacks")
Message-Id: &lt;20250528-ffa_notif_fix-v1-1-5ed7bc7f8437@arm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander &lt;jens.wiklander@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Commit e0573444edbf ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add interfaces to request
notification callbacks") adds support for notifier callbacks by allocating
and inserting a callback node into a hashtable during registration of
notifiers. However, during unregistration, the code only removes the
node from the hashtable without freeing the associated memory, resulting
in a memory leak.

Resolve the memory leak issue by ensuring the allocated notifier callback
node is properly freed after it is removed from the hashtable entry.

Fixes: e0573444edbf ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add interfaces to request notification callbacks")
Message-Id: &lt;20250528-ffa_notif_fix-v1-1-5ed7bc7f8437@arm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander &lt;jens.wiklander@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>firmware: arm_ffa: Skip Rx buffer ownership release if not acquired</title>
<updated>2025-04-08T09:32:15+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sudeep Holla</name>
<email>sudeep.holla@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-03-21T11:57:00+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=4567bdaaaaa1744da3d7da07d9aca2f941f5b4e5'/>
<id>4567bdaaaaa1744da3d7da07d9aca2f941f5b4e5</id>
<content type='text'>
Completion of the FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET ABI transfers the ownership of
the caller’s Rx buffer from the producer(typically partition mnager) to
the consumer(this driver/OS). FFA_RX_RELEASE transfers the ownership
from the consumer back to the producer.

However, when we set the flag to just return the count of partitions
deployed in the system corresponding to the specified UUID while
invoking FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET, the Rx buffer ownership shouldn't be
transferred to this driver. We must be able to skip transferring back
the ownership to the partition manager when we request just to get the
count of the partitions as the buffers are not acquired in this case.

Firmware may return FFA_RET_DENIED or other error for the ffa_rx_release()
in such cases.

Fixes: bb1be7498500 ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add v1.1 get_partition_info support")
Message-Id: &lt;20250321115700.3525197-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Completion of the FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET ABI transfers the ownership of
the caller’s Rx buffer from the producer(typically partition mnager) to
the consumer(this driver/OS). FFA_RX_RELEASE transfers the ownership
from the consumer back to the producer.

However, when we set the flag to just return the count of partitions
deployed in the system corresponding to the specified UUID while
invoking FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET, the Rx buffer ownership shouldn't be
transferred to this driver. We must be able to skip transferring back
the ownership to the partition manager when we request just to get the
count of the partitions as the buffers are not acquired in this case.

Firmware may return FFA_RET_DENIED or other error for the ffa_rx_release()
in such cases.

Fixes: bb1be7498500 ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add v1.1 get_partition_info support")
Message-Id: &lt;20250321115700.3525197-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>firmware: arm_ffa: Set dma_mask for ffa devices</title>
<updated>2025-02-28T11:20:06+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Viresh Kumar</name>
<email>viresh.kumar@linaro.org</email>
</author>
<published>2025-01-17T10:05:52+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=cc0aac7ca17e0ea3ca84b552fc79f3e86fd07f53'/>
<id>cc0aac7ca17e0ea3ca84b552fc79f3e86fd07f53</id>
<content type='text'>
Set dma_mask for FFA devices, otherwise DMA allocation using the device pointer
lead to following warning:

WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/dma/mapping.c:597 dma_alloc_attrs+0xe0/0x124

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar &lt;viresh.kumar@linaro.org&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;e3dd8042ac680bd74b6580c25df855d092079c18.1737107520.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Set dma_mask for FFA devices, otherwise DMA allocation using the device pointer
lead to following warning:

WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/dma/mapping.c:597 dma_alloc_attrs+0xe0/0x124

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar &lt;viresh.kumar@linaro.org&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;e3dd8042ac680bd74b6580c25df855d092079c18.1737107520.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>firmware: arm_ffa: Skip the first/partition ID when parsing vCPU list</title>
<updated>2025-02-23T21:41:14+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sudeep Holla</name>
<email>sudeep.holla@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-02-23T21:39:09+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=c67c2332f8c80b03990914dfb66950c8d2fb87d8'/>
<id>c67c2332f8c80b03990914dfb66950c8d2fb87d8</id>
<content type='text'>
The FF-A notification id list received in response to the call
FFA_NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET is encoded as: partition ID followed by 0 or
more vCPU ID. The count includes all of them.

Fix the issue by skipping the first/partition ID so that only the list
of vCPU IDs are processed correctly for a given partition ID. The first/
partition ID is read before the start of the loop.

Fixes: 3522be48d82b ("firmware: arm_ffa: Implement the NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET interface")
Reported-by: Andrei Homescu &lt;ahomescu@google.com&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;20250223213909.1197786-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The FF-A notification id list received in response to the call
FFA_NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET is encoded as: partition ID followed by 0 or
more vCPU ID. The count includes all of them.

Fix the issue by skipping the first/partition ID so that only the list
of vCPU IDs are processed correctly for a given partition ID. The first/
partition ID is read before the start of the loop.

Fixes: 3522be48d82b ("firmware: arm_ffa: Implement the NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET interface")
Reported-by: Andrei Homescu &lt;ahomescu@google.com&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;20250223213909.1197786-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>firmware: arm_ffa: Explicitly cast return value from NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET</title>
<updated>2025-02-21T11:40:24+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sudeep Holla</name>
<email>sudeep.holla@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-02-21T09:56:32+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=3e282f41585c4dd49b688bd6395fd6f21a57c9f7'/>
<id>3e282f41585c4dd49b688bd6395fd6f21a57c9f7</id>
<content type='text'>
The return value ret.a2 is of type unsigned long and FFA_RET_NO_DATA is
a negative value.

Since the return value from the firmware can be just 32-bit even on
64-bit systems as FFA specification mentions it as int32 error code in
w0 register, explicitly casting to s32 ensures correct sign interpretation
when comparing against a signed error code FFA_RET_NO_DATA.

Without casting, comparison between unsigned long and a negative
constant could lead to unintended results due to type promotions.

Fixes: 3522be48d82b ("firmware: arm_ffa: Implement the NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET interface")
Reported-by: Andrei Homescu &lt;ahomescu@google.com&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;20250221095633.506678-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The return value ret.a2 is of type unsigned long and FFA_RET_NO_DATA is
a negative value.

Since the return value from the firmware can be just 32-bit even on
64-bit systems as FFA specification mentions it as int32 error code in
w0 register, explicitly casting to s32 ensures correct sign interpretation
when comparing against a signed error code FFA_RET_NO_DATA.

Without casting, comparison between unsigned long and a negative
constant could lead to unintended results due to type promotions.

Fixes: 3522be48d82b ("firmware: arm_ffa: Implement the NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET interface")
Reported-by: Andrei Homescu &lt;ahomescu@google.com&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;20250221095633.506678-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>firmware: arm_ffa: Explicitly cast return value from FFA_VERSION before comparison</title>
<updated>2025-02-21T11:40:24+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sudeep Holla</name>
<email>sudeep.holla@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-02-21T09:56:31+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=cecf6a504137aa238d768ae440a1f6488cb2f436'/>
<id>cecf6a504137aa238d768ae440a1f6488cb2f436</id>
<content type='text'>
The return value ver.a0 is unsigned long type and FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED
is a negative value.

Since the return value from the firmware can be just 32-bit even on
64-bit systems as FFA specification mentions it as int32 error code in
w0 register, explicitly casting to s32 ensures correct sign interpretation
when comparing against a signed error code FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED.

Without casting, comparison between unsigned long and a negative
constant could lead to unintended results due to type promotions.

Fixes: 3bbfe9871005 ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add initial Arm FFA driver support")
Reported-by: Andrei Homescu &lt;ahomescu@google.com&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;20250221095633.506678-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The return value ver.a0 is unsigned long type and FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED
is a negative value.

Since the return value from the firmware can be just 32-bit even on
64-bit systems as FFA specification mentions it as int32 error code in
w0 register, explicitly casting to s32 ensures correct sign interpretation
when comparing against a signed error code FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED.

Without casting, comparison between unsigned long and a negative
constant could lead to unintended results due to type promotions.

Fixes: 3bbfe9871005 ("firmware: arm_ffa: Add initial Arm FFA driver support")
Reported-by: Andrei Homescu &lt;ahomescu@google.com&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;20250221095633.506678-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>firmware: arm_ffa: Handle ffa_notification_get correctly at virtual FF-A instance</title>
<updated>2025-02-17T15:42:05+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sudeep Holla</name>
<email>sudeep.holla@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-02-17T15:39:00+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=9472fe20d3968743e683bd48dace02b4accd7736'/>
<id>9472fe20d3968743e683bd48dace02b4accd7736</id>
<content type='text'>
Currently it is assumed that the driver always calls ffa_notification_get()
at the NS physical FF-A instance to request the SPMC to return pending
SP or SPM Framework notifications. However, in order to support the driver
invoking ffa_notification_get() at virtual FF-A instance, we need to make
sure correct bits are enabled in the bitmaps enable flag.

It is expected to have hypervisor framework and VM notifications bitmap
to be zero at the non-secure physical FF-A instance.

Message-Id: &lt;20250217-ffa_updates-v3-19-bd1d9de615e7@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Currently it is assumed that the driver always calls ffa_notification_get()
at the NS physical FF-A instance to request the SPMC to return pending
SP or SPM Framework notifications. However, in order to support the driver
invoking ffa_notification_get() at virtual FF-A instance, we need to make
sure correct bits are enabled in the bitmaps enable flag.

It is expected to have hypervisor framework and VM notifications bitmap
to be zero at the non-secure physical FF-A instance.

Message-Id: &lt;20250217-ffa_updates-v3-19-bd1d9de615e7@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>firmware: arm_ffa: Allow multiple UUIDs per partition to register SRI callback</title>
<updated>2025-02-17T15:42:05+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sudeep Holla</name>
<email>sudeep.holla@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-02-17T15:38:59+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=be61da938576671c664382a059f961d7b4b2fc41'/>
<id>be61da938576671c664382a059f961d7b4b2fc41</id>
<content type='text'>
A partition can implement multiple UUIDs and currently we successfully
register each UUID service as a FF-A device. However when adding the
same partition info to the XArray which tracks the SRI callbacks more
than once, it fails.

In order to allow multiple UUIDs per partition to register SRI callbacks
the partition information stored in the XArray needs to be extended to
a listed list.

A function to remove the list of partition information in the XArray
is not added as there are no users at the time. All the partitions are
added at probe/initialisation and removed at cleanup stage.

Tested-by: Viresh Kumar &lt;viresh.kumar@linaro.org&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;20250217-ffa_updates-v3-18-bd1d9de615e7@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
A partition can implement multiple UUIDs and currently we successfully
register each UUID service as a FF-A device. However when adding the
same partition info to the XArray which tracks the SRI callbacks more
than once, it fails.

In order to allow multiple UUIDs per partition to register SRI callbacks
the partition information stored in the XArray needs to be extended to
a listed list.

A function to remove the list of partition information in the XArray
is not added as there are no users at the time. All the partitions are
added at probe/initialisation and removed at cleanup stage.

Tested-by: Viresh Kumar &lt;viresh.kumar@linaro.org&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;20250217-ffa_updates-v3-18-bd1d9de615e7@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla &lt;sudeep.holla@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
