After parport starts using the device model, all pardevice drivers
should decide in their match_port callback function if they want to
attach with that particulatr port. ppdev has been converted to use the
new parport device-model code but pp_attach() tried to attach with all
the ports.
Create a new array of pointer and use that to remember the ports we
have attached. And use that information to skip attaching ports which
we have already attached.

Tested-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The coding style recommends not to use printk. Use pr_* macros.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The variable name was only released if parport_register_dev_model()
fails. Now that we are using the device-model the parport driver
will duplicate the name and use it. So we can release the variable
after the device has been registered with the parport.

Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

free_pardevice() is called by parport_unregister_device() and already frees
pp->pdev->name, don't try to do it again.

This bug causes kernel crashes.

I found and verified this with KASAN and some added pr_emerg()s:

[   60.316568] pp_release: pp->pdev->name == ffff88039cb264c0
[   60.316692] free_pardevice: freeing par_dev->name at ffff88039cb264c0
[   60.316706] pp_release: kfree(ffff88039cb264c0)
[   60.316714] ==========================================================
[   60.316722] BUG: Double free or freeing an invalid pointer
[   60.316731] Unexpected shadow byte: 0xFB
[   60.316801] Object at ffff88039cb264c0, in cache kmalloc-32 size: 32
[   60.316813] Allocated:
[   60.316824] PID = 1695
[   60.316869] Freed:
[   60.316880] PID = 1695
[   60.316935] ==========================================================

Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
Acked-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Modify ppdev driver to use the new parallel port device model.

Initially submitted and committed as:
e7223f186033 ("ppdev: use new parport device model")

But due to some regression it was reverted by:
1701f680407c ("Revert "ppdev: use new parport device model"")

Now that the original source of regression is fixed by:
bbca503b2ee0 ("parport: use subsys_initcall") we can again modify ppdev
to use device model.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

This reverts commit e7223f18603374d235d8bb0398532323e5f318b9.

It causes problems when a ppdev tries to register before the parport
driver has been registered with the device model. That will trigger the

        BUG_ON(!drv->bus->p);

at drivers/base/driver.c:153. The call chain is

  kernel_init ->
    kernel_init_freeable ->
      do_one_initcall ->
        ppdev_init ->
          __parport_register_driver ->
            driver_register *BOOM*

Reported-by: kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Reported-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

It is more preffered to use the dev_* family of macros instead of using
the generic pr_*.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Modify ppdev driver to use the new parallel port device model.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

For alignment we should use tab in all possible places.
checkpatch was complaining for using space before tab.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

checkpatch was complaining that the alignment was not matching with the
open parenthesis.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>