* pm-core:
  PM / runtime: Asynchronous "idle" in pm_runtime_allow()
  PM / runtime: print error when activating a child to unactive parent

* pm-clk:
  PM / clk: Add support for adding a specific clock from device-tree
  PM / clk: export symbols for existing pm_clk_<...> API fcns

* pm-domains:
  PM / Domains: Convert pm_genpd_init() to return an error code
  PM / Domains: Stop/start devices during system PM suspend/resume in genpd
  PM / Domains: Allow runtime PM during system PM phases
  PM / Runtime: Avoid resuming devices again in pm_runtime_force_resume()
  PM / Domains: Remove redundant pm_request_idle() call in genpd
  PM / Domains: Remove redundant wrapper functions for system PM
  PM / Domains: Allow genpd to power on during system PM phases

* pm-pci:
  PCI / PM: check all fields in pci_set_platform_pm()

Arjan reports that it takes a relatively long time to enable runtime
PM for multiple devices at system startup, because all writes to the
"control" attribute in sysfs are handled synchronously and if the
device is suspended as a result of the write, it will block until
that operation is complete.

That may be avoided by passing the RPM_ASYNC flag to rpm_idle()
in pm_runtime_allow() which will make it execute the device's
"idle" callback asynchronously, so writes to "control" changing
it from "on" to "auto" will return without waiting.

Reported-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>

The code currently silently bails out with -EBUSY if you try to
activate a child to an inactive parent.

This typically happens when you have a runtime suspended parent
and runtime resume your child, but forgot to set .ignore_children
on the parent to true with pm_suspend_ignore_children(dev).

Silently ignoring this error is not good as it gives rise to
other strange behaviour like double-resume of devices after
silently bailing out of the .runtime_resume() callback.

Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

If the runtime PM status of the device isn't RPM_SUSPENDED, prevent the
pm_runtime_force_resume() from invoking the ->runtime_resume() callback
for the device, as it's not the expected behaviour from the subsystem/driver.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

As pm_runtime_set_active() may fail because the device's parent isn't
active, we can end up executing the ->runtime_resume() callback for the
device when it isn't allowed.

Fix this by invoking pm_runtime_set_active() before running the callback
and let's also deal with the error code.

Fixes: 37f204164dfb (PM: Add pm_runtime_suspend|resume_force functions)
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Introduce a new runtime PM function, pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(),
that will increment the device's runtime PM usage counter and
return 1 if its status is RPM_ACTIVE and its usage counter
is greater than 0 at the same time (0 will be returned otherwise).

This is useful for things that should only be done if the device
is active (from the runtime PM perspective) and used by somebody
(as indicated by the usage counter) already and they are not worth
bothering otherwise.

Requested-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There are two common expectations among several subsystems/drivers that
deploys runtime PM support, but which isn't met by the driver core.

Expectation 1)
At ->probe() the subsystem/driver expects the runtime PM status of the
device to be RPM_SUSPENDED, which is the initial status being assigned at
device registration.

This expectation is especially common among some of those subsystems/
drivers that manages devices with an attached PM domain, as those requires
the ->runtime_resume() callback at the PM domain level to be invoked
during ->probe().

Moreover these subsystems/drivers entirely relies on runtime PM resources
being managed at the PM domain level, thus don't implement their own set
of runtime PM callbacks.

These are two scenarios that suffers from this unmet expectation.

i) A failed ->probe() sequence requests probe deferral:

->probe()
  ...
  pm_runtime_enable()
  pm_runtime_get_sync()
  ...

err:
  pm_runtime_put()
  pm_runtime_disable()
  ...

As there are no guarantees that such sequence turns the runtime PM status
of the device into RPM_SUSPENDED, the re-trying ->probe() may start with
the status in RPM_ACTIVE.

In such case the runtime PM core won't invoke the ->runtime_resume()
callback because of a pm_runtime_get_sync(), as it considers the device to
be already runtime resumed.

ii) A driver re-bind sequence:

At driver unbind, the subsystem/driver's >remove() callback invokes a
sequence of runtime PM APIs, to undo actions during ->probe() and to put
the device into low power state.

->remove()
  ...
  pm_runtime_put()
  pm_runtime_disable()
  ...

Similar as in the failing ->probe() case, this sequence don't guarantee
the runtime PM status of the device to turn into RPM_SUSPENDED.

Trying to re-bind the driver thus causes the same issue as when re-trying
->probe(), in the probe deferral scenario.

Expectation 2)
Drivers that invokes the pm_runtime_irq_safe() API during ->probe(),
triggers the runtime PM core to increase the usage count for the device's
parent and permanently make it runtime resumed.

The usage count is only dropped at device removal, which also allows it to
be runtime suspended again.

A re-trying ->probe() repeats the call to pm_runtime_irq_safe() and thus
once more triggers the usage count of the device's parent to be increased.

This leads to not only an imbalance issue of the usage count of the
device's parent, but also to keep it runtime resumed permanently even if
->probe() fails.

To address these issues, let's change the policy of the driver core to
meet these expectations. More precisely, at ->probe() failures and driver
unbind, restore the initial states of runtime PM.

Although to still allow subsystem's to control PM for devices that doesn't
->probe() successfully, don't restore the initial states unless runtime PM
is disabled.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Turns out we can automate the handling for the device_may_wakeup()
quite a bit by using the kernel wakeup source list as suggested
by Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>.

And as some hardware has separate dedicated wake-up interrupt
in addition to the IO interrupt, we can automate the handling by
adding a generic threaded interrupt handler that just calls the
device PM runtime to wake up the device.

This allows dropping code from device drivers as we currently
are doing it in multiple ways, and often wrong.

For most drivers, we should be able to drop the following
boilerplate code from runtime_suspend and runtime_resume
functions:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	...
	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
		enable_irq_wake(irq);
	...
	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
		disable_irq_wake(irq);
	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

We can replace it with just the following init and exit
time code:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, irq);
	...
	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

And for hardware with dedicated wake-up interrupts:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq);
	...
	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

If we don't update last_busy in rpm_resume, devices can go back
to sleep immediately after resume. This happens at least in
cases where the device has been powered off and does not have
any interrupt pending until there's something in the FIFO.

Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

After commit b2b49ccbdd54 (PM: Kconfig: Set PM_RUNTIME if PM_SLEEP is
selected) PM_RUNTIME is always set if PM is set, so quite a few
depend on CONFIG_PM or even may be dropped entirely in some cases.

Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM in the PM core code.

Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>