Consider two devices, A and B, where B is a child of A, and B utilizes
asynchronous suspend (it does not matter whether A is sync or async). If
B fails to suspend_noirq() or suspend_late(), or is interrupted by a
wakeup (pm_wakeup_pending()), then it aborts and sets the async_error
variable. However, device A does not (immediately) check the async_error
variable; it may continue to run its own suspend_noirq()/suspend_late()
callback. This is bad.

We can resolve this problem by doing our error and wakeup checking
(particularly, for the async_error flag) after waiting for children to
suspend, instead of before. This also helps align the logic for the noirq and
late suspend cases with the logic in __device_suspend().

It's easy to observe this erroneous behavior by, for example, forcing a
device to sleep a bit in its suspend_noirq() (to ensure the parent is
waiting for the child to complete), then return an error, and watch the
parent suspend_noirq() still get called. (Or similarly, fake a wakeup
event at the right (or is it wrong?) time.)

Fixes: de377b397272 (PM / sleep: Asynchronous threads for suspend_late)
Fixes: 28b6fd6e3779 (PM / sleep: Asynchronous threads for suspend_noirq)
Reported-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Grygorii Strashko reports:

 The PM runtime will be left disabled for the device if its
 .suspend_late() callback fails and async suspend is not allowed
 for this device. In this case device will not be added in
 dpm_late_early_list and dpm_resume_early() will ignore this
 device, as result PM runtime will be disabled for it forever
 (side effect: after 8 subsequent failures for the same device
 the PM runtime will be reenabled due to disable_depth overflow).

To fix this problem, add devices to dpm_late_early_list regardless
of whether or not device_suspend_late() returns errors for them.

That will ensure failures in there to be handled consistently for
all devices regardless of their async suspend/resume status.

Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>

Commit 32e8d689dc12 (PM / sleep: trace_device_pm_callback coverage in
dpm_prepare/complete) removed all users of this variable but forgot to
remove the variable itself.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

If a suitable prepare callback cannot be found for a given device and
its driver has no PM callbacks at all, assume that it can go direct to
complete when the system goes to sleep.

The reason for this is that there's lots of devices in a system that do
no PM at all and there's no reason for them to prevent their ancestors
to do direct_complete if they can support it.

Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

It is unsafe [1] if probing of devices will happen during suspend or
hibernation and system behavior will be unpredictable in this case.
So, let's prohibit device's probing in dpm_prepare() and defer their
probing instead. The normal behavior will be restored in
dpm_complete().

This patch introduces new DD core APIs:
 device_block_probing()
   It will disable probing of devices and defer their probes instead.
 device_unblock_probing()
   It will restore normal behavior and trigger re-probing of deferred
   devices.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/11/554

Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Don't unset the direct_complete flag on devices that have runtime PM
disabled, if they are runtime suspended.

This is needed because otherwise ancestor devices wouldn't be able to
do direct_complete without adding runtime PM support to all its
descendants.

Also removes pm_runtime_suspended_if_enabled() because it's now unused.

Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

* pm-wakeirq:
  PM / wakeirq: Fix typo in prototype for dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq
  PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling

Move the trace_device_pm_callback locations for dpm_prepare and dpm_complete
to encompass the attempt to capture the device mutex prior to callback. This
is needed by analyze_suspend to identify gaps in the trace output caused by
the delay in locking the mutex for a device.

Signed-off-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Turns out we can automate the handling for the device_may_wakeup()
quite a bit by using the kernel wakeup source list as suggested
by Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>.

And as some hardware has separate dedicated wake-up interrupt
in addition to the IO interrupt, we can automate the handling by
adding a generic threaded interrupt handler that just calls the
device PM runtime to wake up the device.

This allows dropping code from device drivers as we currently
are doing it in multiple ways, and often wrong.

For most drivers, we should be able to drop the following
boilerplate code from runtime_suspend and runtime_resume
functions:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	...
	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
		enable_irq_wake(irq);
	...
	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
		disable_irq_wake(irq);
	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

We can replace it with just the following init and exit
time code:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, irq);
	...
	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

And for hardware with dedicated wake-up interrupts:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq);
	...
	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Occasionally, the system can't come back up after suspend/resume
due to problems of device suspending phase. This patch make
PM_TRACE infrastructure cover device suspending phase of
suspend/resume process, and the information in RTC can tell
developers which device suspending function make system hang.

Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>