If a suitable prepare callback cannot be found for a given device and
its driver has no PM callbacks at all, assume that it can go direct to
complete when the system goes to sleep.

The reason for this is that there's lots of devices in a system that do
no PM at all and there's no reason for them to prevent their ancestors
to do direct_complete if they can support it.

Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

It is unsafe [1] if probing of devices will happen during suspend or
hibernation and system behavior will be unpredictable in this case.
So, let's prohibit device's probing in dpm_prepare() and defer their
probing instead. The normal behavior will be restored in
dpm_complete().

This patch introduces new DD core APIs:
 device_block_probing()
   It will disable probing of devices and defer their probes instead.
 device_unblock_probing()
   It will restore normal behavior and trigger re-probing of deferred
   devices.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/11/554

Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Don't unset the direct_complete flag on devices that have runtime PM
disabled, if they are runtime suspended.

This is needed because otherwise ancestor devices wouldn't be able to
do direct_complete without adding runtime PM support to all its
descendants.

Also removes pm_runtime_suspended_if_enabled() because it's now unused.

Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

* pm-wakeirq:
  PM / wakeirq: Fix typo in prototype for dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq
  PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling

Move the trace_device_pm_callback locations for dpm_prepare and dpm_complete
to encompass the attempt to capture the device mutex prior to callback. This
is needed by analyze_suspend to identify gaps in the trace output caused by
the delay in locking the mutex for a device.

Signed-off-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Turns out we can automate the handling for the device_may_wakeup()
quite a bit by using the kernel wakeup source list as suggested
by Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>.

And as some hardware has separate dedicated wake-up interrupt
in addition to the IO interrupt, we can automate the handling by
adding a generic threaded interrupt handler that just calls the
device PM runtime to wake up the device.

This allows dropping code from device drivers as we currently
are doing it in multiple ways, and often wrong.

For most drivers, we should be able to drop the following
boilerplate code from runtime_suspend and runtime_resume
functions:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	...
	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
		enable_irq_wake(irq);
	...
	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
		disable_irq_wake(irq);
	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

We can replace it with just the following init and exit
time code:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, irq);
	...
	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

And for hardware with dedicated wake-up interrupts:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq);
	...
	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Occasionally, the system can't come back up after suspend/resume
due to problems of device suspending phase. This patch make
PM_TRACE infrastructure cover device suspending phase of
suspend/resume process, and the information in RTC can tell
developers which device suspending function make system hang.

Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

If an asynchronous suspend_late or freeze_late callback fails
during the SUSPEND, FREEZE or QUIESCE phases, we don't propagate the
corresponding error correctly, in effect ignoring the error and
continuing the suspend-to-ram/hibernation. During suspend-to-ram this
could leave some devices without a valid saved context, leading to a
failure to reinitialize them during resume. During hibernation this
could leave some devices active interfeering with the creation /
restoration of the hibernation image. Also this could leave the
corresponding devices without a valid saved context and failure to
reinitialize them during resume.

Fixes: de377b397272 (PM / sleep: Asynchronous threads for suspend_late)
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Subsequent change sets will add platform-related operations between
dpm_suspend_late() and dpm_suspend_noirq() as well as between
dpm_resume_noirq() and dpm_resume_early() in suspend_enter(), so
export these functions for suspend_enter() to be able to call them
separately and split the invocations of dpm_suspend_end() and
dpm_resume_start() in there accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Fix kernel-doc warnings in drivers/base/power/main.c:

Warning(..//drivers/base/power/main.c:473): No description found for parameter 'async'
Warning(..//drivers/base/power/main.c:601): No description found for parameter 'async'
Warning(..//drivers/base/power/main.c:1012): No description found for parameter 'async'
Warning(..//drivers/base/power/main.c:1151): No description found for parameter 'async'
Warning(..//drivers/base/power/main.c:1305): No description found for parameter 'info'

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>