* acpi-sleep-fixes:
  Revert "ACPI: Execute _PTS before system reboot"

* acpi-wdat-fixes:
  watchdog: wdat_wdt: Select WATCHDOG_CORE

Revert commit 2c85025c75df (ACPI: Execute _PTS before system reboot)
as it is reported to cause poweroff and reboot to hang on Dell
Latitude E7250.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187061
Reported-by:  Gianpaolo <gianpaoloc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

* acpi-wdat:
  watchdog: wdat_wdt: Fix warning for using 0 as NULL
  watchdog: wdat_wdt: fix return value check in wdat_wdt_probe()
  platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists
  i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists
  mfd: lpc_ich: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists
  ACPI / watchdog: Add support for WDAT hardware watchdog

* acpi-ec:
  ACPI / EC: Fix issues related to boot_ec
  ACPI / EC: Fix a gap that ECDT EC cannot handle EC events
  ACPI / EC: Fix a memory leakage issue in acpi_ec_add()
  ACPI / EC: Cleanup first_ec/boot_ec code
  ACPI / EC: Enable event freeze mode to improve event handling for suspend process
  ACPI / EC: Add PM operations to improve event handling for suspend process
  ACPI / EC: Add PM operations to improve event handling for resume process
  ACPI / EC: Fix an issue that SCI_EVT cannot be detected after event is enabled
  ACPI / EC: Add EC_FLAGS_QUERY_ENABLED to reveal a hidden logic
  ACPI / EC: Add PM operations for suspend/resume noirq stage

This patch makes 2 changes:

1. Restore old behavior
Originally, EC driver stops handling both events and transactions in
acpi_ec_block_transactions(), and restarts to handle transactions in
acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early(), restarts to handle both events and
transactions in acpi_ec_unblock_transactions().
While currently, EC driver still stops handling both events and
transactions in acpi_ec_block_transactions(), but restarts to handle both
events and transactions in acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early().
This patch tries to restore the old behavior by dropping
__acpi_ec_enable_event() from acpi_unblock_transactions_early().

2. Improve old behavior
However this still cannot fix the real issue as both of the
acpi_ec_unblock_xxx() functions are invoked in the noirq stage. Since the
EC driver actually doesn't implement the event handling in the polling
mode, re-enabling the event handling too early in the noirq stage could
result in the problem that if there is no triggering source causing
advance_transaction() to be invoked, pending SCI_EVT cannot be detected by
the EC driver and _Qxx cannot be triggered.
It actually makes sense to restart the event handling in any point during
resuming after the noirq stage. Just like the boot stage where the event
handling is enabled in .add(), this patch further moves
acpi_ec_enable_event() to .resume(). After doing that, the following 2
functions can be combined:
acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early()/acpi_ec_unblock_transactions().

The differences of the event handling availability between the old behavior
(this patch isn't applied) and the new behavior (this patch is applied) are
as follows:
                        !Applied        Applied
before suspend          Y               Y
suspend before EC       Y               Y
suspend after EC        Y               Y
suspend_late            Y               Y
suspend_noirq           Y (actually N)  Y (actually N)
resume_noirq            Y (actually N)  Y (actually N)
resume_late             Y (actually N)  Y (actually N)
resume before EC        Y (actually N)  Y (actually N)
resume after EC         Y (actually N)  Y
after resume            Y (actually N)  Y
Where "actually N" means if there is no triggering source, the EC driver
is actually not able to notice the pending SCI_EVT occurred in the noirq
stage. So we can clearly see that this patch has improved the situation.

Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Tested-by: Todd E Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Now GPE can be masked via the new acpi_mask_gpe() API and this patch
modifies /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpexx to use this new facility.

Writes "mask/unmask" to this file now invokes acpi_mask_gpe().

Reads from this file now returns new "EN/STS" when the corresponding GPE
hardware register's EN/STS bits are flagged, and new "masked/unmasked"
attribute to indicate the status of the masking mechanism.

Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The _PTS control method is defined in the section 7.4.1 of acpi 6.0
spec. The _PTS control method is executed by the OS during the sleep
transition process for S1, S2, S3, S4, and for orderly S5 shutdown.

The _PTS control method provides the BIOS a mechanism for performing
some housekeeping, such as writing the sleep type value to the embedded
controller, before entering the system sleeping state. Note that some
Lenovo Server BIOS use this mechanism to detect reboot event and
prompt user by popped dialog box.

According to section 7.5 of acpi 6.0 spec, _PTS should run after _TTS.
Add a _PTS evaulation to the existing _TTS reboot notifier and change
the notifier name to reflect the fact that it's not for _TTS only any
more.

Signed-off-by: Ocean He <hehy1@lenovo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nagananda Chumbalkar <nchumbalkar@lenovo.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The problem is Linux registers pm_power_off = efi_power_off only if
we are in hardware reduced mode. Actually, what we also want is to do
this when ACPI S5 is simply not supported on non-legacy platforms.
Since some future Intel platforms are HW-full mode where the DSDT
fails to supply an _S5 object(without SLP_TYP), we should let such
kind of platform to leverage efi runtime service to poweroff.

This patch uses efi power off as first choice when S5 is unavailable,
even if there is a customized poweroff(driver provided, eg).
Meanwhile, the legacy platforms will not be affected because there is
no path for them to overwrite the pm_power_off to efi power off.

Suggested-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

* pm-avs:
  PM / AVS: rockchip-io: add io selectors and supplies for rk3399

* pm-clk:
  PM / clk: Add support for obtaining clocks from device-tree

* pm-devfreq:
  PM / devfreq: Spelling s/frequnecy/frequency/

* pm-sleep:
  ACPI / PM: Runtime resume devices when waking from hibernate
  PM / sleep: Clear pm_suspend_global_flags upon hibernate

Commit 58a1fbbb2ee8 ("PM / PCI / ACPI: Kick devices that might have been
reset by firmware") added a runtime resume for devices that were runtime
suspended when the system entered suspend-to-RAM.

Briefly, the motivation was to ensure that devices did not remain in a
reset-power-on state after resume, potentially preventing deep SoC-wide
low-power states from being entered on idle.

Currently we're not doing the same when leaving suspend-to-disk and this
asymmetry is a problem if drivers rely on the automatic resume triggered
by pm_complete_with_resume_check(). Fix it.

Fixes: 58a1fbbb2ee8 (PM / PCI / ACPI: Kick devices that might have been reset by firmware)
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: 4.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

acpi_processor_sleep is neither related nor used by CPUIdle framework.
It's used in system suspend/resume path as a syscore operation. It makes
more sense to move it to acpi/sleep.c where all the S-state transition
(a.k.a. Linux system suspend/hiberate) related code are present.

Also make it depend on CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM_POWER_STATES_SUPPORT so that
it's not compiled on architecture like ARM64 where S-states are not
yet defined in ACPI.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>