Commit f06147f9fbf1 (ACPICA: Hardware: Enable firmware waking vector
for both 32-bit and 64-bit FACS) added three functions that aren't
present in upstream ACPICA, acpi_hw_set_firmware_waking_vectors(),
acpi_set_firmware_waking_vectors() and acpi_set_firmware_waking_vector64(),
to allow Linux to use the previously existing API for setting the
platform firmware waking vector.

However, that wasn't necessary, since the ACPI sleep support code
in Linux can be modified to use the upstream ACPICA's API easily
and the additional functions may be dropped which reduces the code
size and puts the kernel's ACPICA code more in line with the upstream.

Make the changes as per the above.  While at it, make the relevant
function desctiption comments reflect the upstream ACPICA's ones.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>

* pm-sleep:
  PM / hibernate: fix a comment typo
  input: i8042: Avoid resetting controller on system suspend/resume
  PM / PCI / ACPI: Kick devices that might have been reset by firmware
  PM / sleep: Add flags to indicate platform firmware involvement
  PM / sleep: Drop pm_request_idle() from pm_generic_complete()
  PCI / PM: Avoid resuming more devices during system suspend
  PM / wakeup: wakeup_source_create: use kstrdup_const
  PM / sleep: Report interrupt that caused system wakeup

For an ACPI compatible system, the SCI (ACPI System Control
Interrupt) is used to wake the system up from suspend-to-idle.
Once the CPU is woken up by the SCI, the interrupt handler will
first check if the current IRQ has been configured for system
wakeup, so irq_pm_check_wakeup() is invoked to validate the IRQ
number.  However, during suspend-to-idle, enable_irq_wake() is
called for acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt, although the IRQ number
that the SCI handler has been installed for should be passed to
it instead.  Thus, if acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt happens to be
different from that number, ACPI interrupts will not be able to
wake up the system from sleep.

Fix this problem by passing the IRQ number returned by
acpi_gsi_to_irq() to enable_irq_wake() instead of
acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt.

Cc: 3.18+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18+
Acked-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There are quite a few cases in which device drivers, bus types or
even the PM core itself may benefit from knowing whether or not
the platform firmware will be involved in the upcoming system power
transition (during system suspend) or whether or not it was involved
in it (during system resume).

For this reason, introduce global system suspend flags that can be
used by the platform code to expose that information for the benefit
of the other parts of the kernel and make the ACPI core set them
as appropriate.

Users of the new flags will be added later.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently, in suspend-to-idle, wakeup GPE for PCI devices are
handled properly because acpi_pci_sleep_wake() invokes acpi_enable_gpe()
to enable the wakeup GPE directly. But for the other wakeup-capable
devices in ACPI bus, acpi_enable_wakeup_devices() should be invoked
to update enable_for_wake mask in gpe_register_info structure, thus
acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes() can enable the wakeup GPE referred in
_PRW methods. And acpi_disable_wakeup_devices() will be called
before disable_irq_wake() in acpi_freeze_restore() to restore the mask.

This patch fixes a power button wakeup problem on Surface Pro 3,
on which platform power button uses EC to deliver event
(EC GPE is referred in _PRW).

Note: enabling EC GPE during freeze state may bring some risks
because EC events are expected to fire more frequently than others.
Thus it may bring the system out of freeze state unnecessarily.
(We already have comments about this in bugzilla)

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84651
Reported-and-tested-by: Ethan Schoonover <es@ethanschoonover.com>
Tested-by: Peter Amidon <psa.pub.0@picnicpark.org>
Tested-by: Yani Ioadnnou <yani.ioannou@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Mister Wardrop <mister.wardrop@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Anton Anikin <anton@anikin.name>
Tested-by: Keith McClelland <zismylaptop@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The acpi_suspend() function has no callers, so drop it.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

This makes a difference if the compiler decides not to inline the
function, as then the function's reference to acpisleep_dmi_table[]
yields a section mismatch warning.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

After multiple GPEs have been disabled at the low level in one go,
like when acpi_disable_all_gpes() is called, we should always drain
all of the outstanding events from them, or interesting races become
possible.

For this reason, call acpi_os_wait_events_complete() after
acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes() and acpi_disable_all_gpes() in
acpi_freeze_prepare() and acpi_power_off_prepare(), respectively.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI GPE wakeup from suspend-to-idle is currently based on using
the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag for the ACPI SCI, but that is problematic
for a couple of reasons.  First, in principle the ACPI SCI may be
shared and IRQF_NO_SUSPEND does not really work well with shared
interrupts.  Second, it may require the ACPI subsystem to special-case
the handling of device notifications depending on whether or not
they are received during suspend-to-idle in some places which would
lead to fragile code.  Finally, it's better the handle ACPI wakeup
interrupts consistently with wakeup interrupts from other sources.

For this reason, remove the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag from the ACPI SCI
and use enable_irq_wake()/disable_irq_wake() with it instead, which
requires two additional platform hooks to be added to struct
platform_freeze_ops.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

NVS region is saved and restored unconditionally for machines without
nvs_nosave quirk during S3. Tested some new machines and the operation
is not necessary. Saving NVS region also affects S2RAM speed. The time of
NVS saving and restoring depends on the size of NVS region and it consumes
7~10ms normally.

This patch is to make machines produced from 2012 to now not saving NVS region
to accelerate S3.

Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>