Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
functions).

As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct prm_module_info.

Link: https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/coccinelle/examples/counted_by.cocci # [1]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Instead of bypassing the kernel's adaptation layer for performing EFI
runtime calls, wire up ACPI PRM handling into it. This means these calls
can no longer occur concurrently with EFI runtime calls, and will be
made from the EFI runtime workqueue. It also means any page faults
occurring during PRM handling will be identified correctly as
originating in firmware code.

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>

__efi_call_virt() exists as an alternative for efi_call_virt() for the
sole reason that ResetSystem() returns void, and so we cannot use a call
to it in the RHS of an assignment.

Given that there is only a single user, let's drop the macro, and expand
it into the caller. That way, the remaining macro can be tightened
somewhat in terms of type safety too.

Note that the use of typeof() on the runtime service invocation does not
result in an actual call being made, but it does require a few pointer
types to be fixed up and converted into the proper function pointer
prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>

The ACPI PRM address space handler calls efi_call_virt_pointer() to
execute PRM firmware code, but doing so is only permitted when the EFI
runtime environment is available. Otherwise, such calls are guaranteed
to result in a crash, and must therefore be avoided.

Given that the EFI runtime services may become unavailable after a crash
occurring in the firmware, we need to check this each time the PRM
address space handler is invoked. If the EFI runtime services were not
available at registration time to being with, don't install the address
space handler at all.

Fixes: cefc7ca46235 ("ACPI: PRM: implement OperationRegion handler for the PlatformRtMechanism subtype")
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

handler_addr is a virtual address passed to efi_call_virt_pointer.
While x86 currently type cast it into the pointer in it's arch specific
arch_efi_call_virt() implementation, ARM64 is restrictive for right
reasons.

Convert the handler_addr type from u64 to void pointer.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>

Handle memory allocation and memory remap failure in acpi_parse_prmt()
when system runs out of memory to avoid the potential NULL pointer
dereference errors.

Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Just remove unnecessary blank lines, no other code changes

Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Find and verify PRMT before parsing it, which eliminates a
warning on machines without PRMT:

	[    7.197173] ACPI: PRMT not present

Fixes: cefc7ca46235 ("ACPI: PRM: implement OperationRegion handler for the PlatformRtMechanism subtype")
Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: 5.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.14+
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

On the system PRMT table is not present, dmesg output:

	$ dmesg | grep PRM
	[    1.532237] ACPI: PRMT not present
	[    1.532237] PRM: found 4294967277 modules

The result of acpi_table_parse_entries need to be checked and return
immediately if PRMT table is not present or no PRM module found.

Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The sparse tool complains as follows:

drivers/acpi/prmt.c:53:1: warning:
 symbol 'prm_module_list' was not declared. Should it be static?

This symbol is not used outside of prmt.c, so marks it static.

Fixes: cefc7ca46235 ("ACPI: PRM: implement OperationRegion handler for the PlatformRtMechanism subtype")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>