The ACPI_HANDLE() macro evaluates ACPI_COMPANION() internally to
return the handle of the device's ACPI companion, so it is much
more straightforward and efficient to use ACPI_COMPANION()
directly to obtain the device's ACPI companion object instead of
using ACPI_HANDLE() and acpi_bus_get_device() on the returned
handle for the same thing.

Do that in three places in the ACPI device PM code.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Wakeup GPEs are currently only enabled when setting up devices for
remote wakeup at run time.  During system-wide transitions they are
enabled by ACPICA at the very last stage of suspend (before asking
the BIOS to take over).  Of course, that only works for system
sleep states supported by ACPI, so in particular it doesn't work
for the "freeze" sleep state.

For this reason, modify the ACPI core device PM code to enable wakeup
GPEs for devices when setting them up for wakeup regardless of whether
that is remote wakeup at runtime or system wakeup.  That allows the
same device wakeup setup routine to be used for both runtime PM and
system-wide PM and makes it possible to reduce code size quite a bit.

This make ACPI-based PCI Wake-on-LAN work with the "freeze" sleep
state on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500 and should help other
systems too.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since ACPI wakeup GPEs are going to be enabled during system suspend
as well as for runtime wakeup by a subsequent patch and the same
notify handlers will be used in both cases, rework the ACPI device
wakeup notification framework so that the part specific to physical
devices is always run asynchronously from the PM workqueue.  This
prevents runtime resume callbacks for those devices from being
run during system suspend and resume which may not be appropriate,
among other things.

Also make ACPI device wakeup notification handling a bit more robust
agaist subsequent removal of ACPI device objects, whould that ever
happen, and create a wakeup source object for each ACPI device
configured for wakeup so that wakeup notifications for those
devices can wake up the system from the "freeze" sleep state.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

No reason for excluding the remaining ones.

Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
[rjw: Rebased and exported the new acpi_subsys_complete() too.]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Rework the ACPI PM domain's PM callbacks to avoid resuming devices
during system suspend (in order to modify their wakeup settings etc.)
if that isn't necessary.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Runtime-suspended devices are resumed during system suspend by
acpi_subsys_prepare() for two reasons: First, because they may need
to be reprogrammed in order to change their wakeup settings and,
second, because they may need to be operatonal for their children
to be successfully suspended.  That is a problem, though, if there
are many runtime-suspended devices that need to be resumed this
way during system suspend, because the .prepare() PM callbacks of
devices are executed sequentially and the times taken by them
accumulate, which may increase the total system suspend time quite
a bit.

For this reason, move the resume of runtime-suspended devices up
to the next phase of device suspend (during system suspend), except
for the ones that have power.ignore_children set.  The exception is
made, because the devices with power.ignore_children set may still
be necessary for their children to be successfully suspended (during
system suspend) and they won't be resumed automatically as a result
of the runtime resume of their children.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

* acpi-processor:
  ACPI / scan: reduce log level of "ACPI: \_PR_.CPU4: failed to get CPU APIC ID"
  ACPI / processor: Return specific error value when mapping lapic id

* acpi-hotplug:
  ACPI / scan: Clear match_driver flag in acpi_bus_trim()

* acpi-init:
  ACPI / init: Flag use of ACPI and ACPI idioms for power supplies to regulator API

* acpi-pm:
  ACPI / PM: Use ACPI_COMPANION() to get ACPI companions of devices

* acpica:
  ACPICA: Remove bool usage from ACPICA.

The ACPI device PM code in device_pm.c uses a special function,
acpi_dev_pm_get_node(), to obtain an ACPI companion object of a given
device.  However, that is not necessary any more after recent changes
that introduced the ACPI_COMPANION() macro serving exactly the same
purpose, but working in a much more straightforward way.  For this
reason, drop acpi_dev_pm_get_node() and use ACPI_COMPANION() instead
of it everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Modify the ACPI namespace scanning code to register a struct
acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device,
processor and so on, even if the device represented by that namespace
node is reported to be not present and not functional by _STA.

There are multiple reasons to do that.  First of all, it avoids
quite a lot of overhead when struct acpi_device objects are
deleted every time acpi_bus_trim() is run and then added again
by a subsequent acpi_bus_scan() for the same scope, although the
namespace objects they correspond to stay in memory all the time
(which always is the case on a vast majority of systems).

Second, it will allow user space to see that there are namespace
nodes representing devices that are not present at the moment and may
be added to the system.  It will also allow user space to evaluate
_SUN for those nodes to check what physical slots the "missing"
devices may be put into and it will make sense to add a sysfs
attribute for _STA evaluation after this change (that will be
useful for thermal management on some systems).

Next, it will help to consolidate the ACPI hotplug handling among
subsystems by making it possible to store hotplug-related information
in struct acpi_device objects in a standard common way.

Finally, it will help to avoid a race condition related to the
deletion of ACPI namespace nodes.  Namely, namespace nodes may be
deleted as a result of a table unload triggered by _EJ0 or _DCK.
If a hotplug notification for one of those nodes is triggered
right before the deletion and it executes a hotplug callback
via acpi_hotplug_execute(), the ACPI handle passed to that
callback may be stale when the callback actually runs.  One way
to work around that is to always pass struct acpi_device pointers
to hotplug callbacks after doing a get_device() on the objects in
question which eliminates the use-after-free possibility (the ACPI
handles in those objects are invalidated by acpi_scan_drop_device(),
so they will trigger ACPICA errors on attempts to use them).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Since DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() is now literally identical to
ACPI_HANDLE(), replace it with the latter everywhere and drop its
definition from include/acpi.h.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>