linux.git/crypto/tcrypt.h, branch v2.6.14 Linux kernel source tree [CRYPTO]: Fix XTEA implementation 2005-09-02T00:42:46+00:00 Aaron Grothe ajgrothe@yahoo.com 2005-09-02T00:42:46+00:00 fb4f10ed50f01b0f953068456bfb6e2885921b01 The XTEA implementation was incorrect due to a misinterpretation of operator precedence. Because of the wide-spread nature of this error, the erroneous implementation will be kept, albeit under the new name of XETA. Signed-off-by: Aaron Grothe <ajgrothe@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
The XTEA implementation was incorrect due to a misinterpretation of
operator precedence.  Because of the wide-spread nature of this
error, the erroneous implementation will be kept, albeit under the
new name of XETA.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Grothe <ajgrothe@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
[CRYPTO]: Add cipher speed tests 2005-06-22T20:27:23+00:00 Harald Welte laforge@gnumonks.org 2005-06-22T20:27:23+00:00 ebfd9bcf16e4aaddcfe2d1b76b50e3dd6d3242e2 From: Reyk Floeter <reyk@vantronix.net> I recently had the requirement to do some benchmarking on cryptoapi, and I found reyk's very useful performance test patch [1]. However, I could not find any discussion on why that extension (or something providing a similar feature but different implementation) was not merged into mainline. If there was such a discussion, can someone please point me to the archive[s]? I've now merged the old patch into 2.6.12-rc1, the result can be found attached to this email. [1] http://lists.logix.cz/pipermail/padlock/2004/000010.html Signed-off-by: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
From: Reyk Floeter <reyk@vantronix.net>

I recently had the requirement to do some benchmarking on cryptoapi, and
I found reyk's very useful performance test patch [1].

However, I could not find any discussion on why that extension (or
something providing a similar feature but different implementation) was
not merged into mainline.  If there was such a discussion, can someone
please point me to the archive[s]?

I've now merged the old patch into 2.6.12-rc1, the result can be found
attached to this email.

[1] http://lists.logix.cz/pipermail/padlock/2004/000010.html

Signed-off-by: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
[CRYPTO]: White space and coding style clean up in tcrypt 2005-06-22T20:26:03+00:00 Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au 2005-06-22T20:26:03+00:00 ef2736fc741316913a457abd3731053071c86241 Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 2005-04-16T22:20:36+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org 2005-04-16T22:20:36+00:00 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip! 
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!