Mask off xfeatures that aren't exposed to the guest only when saving guest
state via KVM_GET_XSAVE{2} instead of modifying user_xfeatures directly.
Preserving the maximal set of xfeatures in user_xfeatures restores KVM's
ABI for KVM_SET_XSAVE, which prior to commit ad856280ddea ("x86/kvm/fpu:
Limit guest user_xfeatures to supported bits of XCR0") allowed userspace
to load xfeatures that are supported by the host, irrespective of what
xfeatures are exposed to the guest.

There is no known use case where userspace *intentionally* loads xfeatures
that aren't exposed to the guest, but the bug fixed by commit ad856280ddea
was specifically that KVM_GET_SAVE{2} would save xfeatures that weren't
exposed to the guest, e.g. would lead to userspace unintentionally loading
guest-unsupported xfeatures when live migrating a VM.

Restricting KVM_SET_XSAVE to guest-supported xfeatures is especially
problematic for QEMU-based setups, as QEMU has a bug where instead of
terminating the VM if KVM_SET_XSAVE fails, QEMU instead simply stops
loading guest state, i.e. resumes the guest after live migration with
incomplete guest state, and ultimately results in guest data corruption.

Note, letting userspace restore all host-supported xfeatures does not fix
setups where a VM is migrated from a host *without* commit ad856280ddea,
to a target with a subset of host-supported xfeatures.  However there is
no way to safely address that scenario, e.g. KVM could silently drop the
unsupported features, but that would be a clear violation of KVM's ABI and
so would require userspace to opt-in, at which point userspace could
simply be updated to sanitize the to-be-loaded XSAVE state.

Reported-by: Tyler Stachecki <stachecki.tyler@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230914010003.358162-1-tstachecki@bloomberg.net
Fixes: ad856280ddea ("x86/kvm/fpu: Limit guest user_xfeatures to supported bits of XCR0")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20230928001956.924301-3-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Plumb an xfeatures mask into __copy_xstate_to_uabi_buf() so that KVM can
constrain which xfeatures are saved into the userspace buffer without
having to modify the user_xfeatures field in KVM's guest_fpu state.

KVM's ABI for KVM_GET_XSAVE{2} is that features that are not exposed to
guest must not show up in the effective xstate_bv field of the buffer.
Saving only the guest-supported xfeatures allows userspace to load the
saved state on a different host with a fewer xfeatures, so long as the
target host supports the xfeatures that are exposed to the guest.

KVM currently sets user_xfeatures directly to restrict KVM_GET_XSAVE{2} to
the set of guest-supported xfeatures, but doing so broke KVM's historical
ABI for KVM_SET_XSAVE, which allows userspace to load any xfeatures that
are supported by the *host*.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20230928001956.924301-2-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Pull x86 fixes from Dave Hansen:
 "The most important fix here adds a missing CPU model to the recent
  Gather Data Sampling (GDS) mitigation list to ensure that mitigations
  are available on that CPU.

  There are also a pair of warning fixes, and closure of a covert
  channel that pops up when protection keys are disabled.

  Summary:
   - Mark all Skylake CPUs as vulnerable to GDS
   - Fix PKRU covert channel
   - Fix -Wmissing-variable-declarations warning for ia32_xyz_class
   - Fix kernel-doc annotation warning"

* tag 'x86-urgent-2023-09-01' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  x86/fpu/xstate: Fix PKRU covert channel
  x86/irq/i8259: Fix kernel-doc annotation warning
  x86/speculation: Mark all Skylake CPUs as vulnerable to GDS
  x86/audit: Fix -Wmissing-variable-declarations warning for ia32_xyz_class

When XCR0[9] is set, PKRU can be read and written from userspace with
XSAVE and XRSTOR, even when CR4.PKE is clear.

Clear XCR0[9] when protection keys are disabled.

Reported-by: Tavis Ormandy <taviso@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230831043228.1194256-1-jmattson@google.com

Pull x86 shadow stack support from Dave Hansen:
 "This is the long awaited x86 shadow stack support, part of Intel's
  Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET).

  CET consists of two related security features: shadow stacks and
  indirect branch tracking. This series implements just the shadow stack
  part of this feature, and just for userspace.

  The main use case for shadow stack is providing protection against
  return oriented programming attacks. It works by maintaining a
  secondary (shadow) stack using a special memory type that has
  protections against modification. When executing a CALL instruction,
  the processor pushes the return address to both the normal stack and
  to the special permission shadow stack. Upon RET, the processor pops
  the shadow stack copy and compares it to the normal stack copy.

  For more information, refer to the links below for the earlier
  versions of this patch set"

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220130211838.8382-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230613001108.3040476-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com/

* tag 'x86_shstk_for_6.6-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (47 commits)
  x86/shstk: Change order of __user in type
  x86/ibt: Convert IBT selftest to asm
  x86/shstk: Don't retry vm_munmap() on -EINTR
  x86/kbuild: Fix Documentation/ reference
  x86/shstk: Move arch detail comment out of core mm
  x86/shstk: Add ARCH_SHSTK_STATUS
  x86/shstk: Add ARCH_SHSTK_UNLOCK
  x86: Add PTRACE interface for shadow stack
  selftests/x86: Add shadow stack test
  x86/cpufeatures: Enable CET CR4 bit for shadow stack
  x86/shstk: Wire in shadow stack interface
  x86: Expose thread features in /proc/$PID/status
  x86/shstk: Support WRSS for userspace
  x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall
  x86/shstk: Check that signal frame is shadow stack mem
  x86/shstk: Check that SSP is aligned on sigreturn
  x86/shstk: Handle signals for shadow stack
  x86/shstk: Introduce routines modifying shstk
  x86/shstk: Handle thread shadow stack
  x86/shstk: Add user-mode shadow stack support
  ...

0-Day found a 34.6% regression in stress-ng's 'af-alg' test case, and
bisected it to commit b81fac906a8f ("x86/fpu: Move FPU initialization into
arch_cpu_finalize_init()"), which optimizes the FPU init order, and moves
the CR4_OSXSAVE enabling into a later place:

   arch_cpu_finalize_init
       identify_boot_cpu
	   identify_cpu
	       generic_identify
                   get_cpu_cap --> setup cpu capability
       ...
       fpu__init_cpu
           fpu__init_cpu_xstate
               cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_OSXSAVE);

As the FPU is not yet initialized the CPU capability setup fails to set
X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE. Many security module like 'camellia_aesni_avx_x86_64'
depend on this feature and therefore fail to load, causing the regression.

Cure this by setting X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE feature right after OSXSAVE
enabling.

[ tglx: Moved it into the actual BSP FPU initialization code and added a comment ]

Fixes: b81fac906a8f ("x86/fpu: Move FPU initialization into arch_cpu_finalize_init()")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202307192135.203ac24e-oliver.sang@intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230823065747.92257-1-feng.tang@intel.com

The thread flag TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD indicates that the FPU saved state is
valid and should be reloaded when returning to userspace. However, the
kernel will skip doing this if the FPU registers are already valid as
determined by fpregs_state_valid(). The logic embedded there considers
the state valid if two cases are both true:

  1: fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx points to the current tasks FPU state
  2: the last CPU the registers were live in was the current CPU.

This is usually correct logic. A CPU’s fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx is set to
the current FPU during the fpregs_restore_userregs() operation, so it
indicates that the registers have been restored on this CPU. But this
alone doesn’t preclude that the task hasn’t been rescheduled to a
different CPU, where the registers were modified, and then back to the
current CPU. To verify that this was not the case the logic relies on the
second condition. So the assumption is that if the registers have been
restored, AND they haven’t had the chance to be modified (by being
loaded on another CPU), then they MUST be valid on the current CPU.

Besides the lazy FPU optimizations, the other cases where the FPU
registers might not be valid are when the kernel modifies the FPU register
state or the FPU saved buffer. In this case the operation modifying the
FPU state needs to let the kernel know the correspondence has been
broken. The comment in “arch/x86/kernel/fpu/context.h” has:
/*
...
 * If the FPU register state is valid, the kernel can skip restoring the
 * FPU state from memory.
 *
 * Any code that clobbers the FPU registers or updates the in-memory
 * FPU state for a task MUST let the rest of the kernel know that the
 * FPU registers are no longer valid for this task.
 *
 * Either one of these invalidation functions is enough. Invalidate
 * a resource you control: CPU if using the CPU for something else
 * (with preemption disabled), FPU for the current task, or a task that
 * is prevented from running by the current task.
 */

However, this is not completely true. When the kernel modifies the
registers or saved FPU state, it can only rely on
__fpu_invalidate_fpregs_state(), which wipes the FPU’s last_cpu
tracking. The exec path instead relies on fpregs_deactivate(), which sets
the CPU’s FPU context to NULL. This was observed to fail to restore the
reset FPU state to the registers when returning to userspace in the
following scenario:

1. A task is executing in userspace on CPU0
	- CPU0’s FPU context points to tasks
	- fpu->last_cpu=CPU0

2. The task exec()’s

3. While in the kernel the task is preempted
	- CPU0 gets a thread executing in the kernel (such that no other
		FPU context is activated)
	- Scheduler sets task’s fpu->last_cpu=CPU0 when scheduling out

4. Task is migrated to CPU1

5. Continuing the exec(), the task gets to
   fpu_flush_thread()->fpu_reset_fpregs()
	- Sets CPU1’s fpu context to NULL
	- Copies the init state to the task’s FPU buffer
	- Sets TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD on the task

6. The task reschedules back to CPU0 before completing the exec() and
   returning to userspace
	- During the reschedule, scheduler finds TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD is set
	- Skips saving the registers and updating task’s fpu→last_cpu,
	  because TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD is the canonical source.

7. Now CPU0’s FPU context is still pointing to the task’s, and
   fpu->last_cpu is still CPU0. So fpregs_state_valid() returns true even
   though the reset FPU state has not been restored.

So the root cause is that exec() is doing the wrong kind of invalidate. It
should reset fpu->last_cpu via __fpu_invalidate_fpregs_state(). Further,
fpu__drop() doesn't really seem appropriate as the task (and FPU) are not
going away, they are just getting reset as part of an exec. So switch to
__fpu_invalidate_fpregs_state().

Also, delete the misleading comment that says that either kind of
invalidate will be enough, because it’s not always the case.

Fixes: 33344368cb08 ("x86/fpu: Clean up the fpu__clear() variants")
Reported-by: Lei Wang <lei4.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Lijun Pan <lijun.pan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lijun Pan <lijun.pan@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230818170305.502891-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com

Some applications (like GDB) would like to tweak shadow stack state via
ptrace. This allows for existing functionality to continue to work for
seized shadow stack applications. Provide a regset interface for
manipulating the shadow stack pointer (SSP).

There is already ptrace functionality for accessing xstate, but this
does not include supervisor xfeatures. So there is not a completely
clear place for where to put the shadow stack state. Adding it to the
user xfeatures regset would complicate that code, as it currently shares
logic with signals which should not have supervisor features.

Don't add a general supervisor xfeature regset like the user one,
because it is better to maintain flexibility for other supervisor
xfeatures to define their own interface. For example, an xfeature may
decide not to expose all of it's state to userspace, as is actually the
case for  shadow stack ptrace functionality. A lot of enum values remain
to be used, so just put it in dedicated shadow stack regset.

The only downside to not having a generic supervisor xfeature regset,
is that apps need to be enlightened of any new supervisor xfeature
exposed this way (i.e. they can't try to have generic save/restore
logic). But maybe that is a good thing, because they have to think
through each new xfeature instead of encountering issues when a new
supervisor xfeature was added.

By adding a shadow stack regset, it also has the effect of including the
shadow stack state in a core dump, which could be useful for debugging.

The shadow stack specific xstate includes the SSP, and the shadow stack
and WRSS enablement status. Enabling shadow stack or WRSS in the kernel
involves more than just flipping the bit. The kernel is made aware that
it has to do extra things when cloning or handling signals. That logic
is triggered off of separate feature enablement state kept in the task
struct. So the flipping on HW shadow stack enforcement without notifying
the kernel to change its behavior would severely limit what an application
could do without crashing, and the results would depend on kernel
internal implementation details. There is also no known use for controlling
this state via ptrace today. So only expose the SSP, which is something
that userspace already has indirect control over.

Co-developed-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230613001108.3040476-41-rick.p.edgecombe%40intel.com

When a process is duplicated, but the child shares the address space with
the parent, there is potential for the threads sharing a single stack to
cause conflicts for each other. In the normal non-CET case this is handled
in two ways.

With regular CLONE_VM a new stack is provided by userspace such that the
parent and child have different stacks.

For vfork, the parent is suspended until the child exits. So as long as
the child doesn't return from the vfork()/CLONE_VFORK calling function and
sticks to a limited set of operations, the parent and child can share the
same stack.

For shadow stack, these scenarios present similar sharing problems. For the
CLONE_VM case, the child and the parent must have separate shadow stacks.
Instead of changing clone to take a shadow stack, have the kernel just
allocate one and switch to it.

Use stack_size passed from clone3() syscall for thread shadow stack size. A
compat-mode thread shadow stack size is further reduced to 1/4. This
allows more threads to run in a 32-bit address space. The clone() does not
pass stack_size, which was added to clone3(). In that case, use
RLIMIT_STACK size and cap to 4 GB.

For shadow stack enabled vfork(), the parent and child can share the same
shadow stack, like they can share a normal stack. Since the parent is
suspended until the child terminates, the child will not interfere with
the parent while executing as long as it doesn't return from the vfork()
and overwrite up the shadow stack. The child can safely overwrite down
the shadow stack, as the parent can just overwrite this later. So CET does
not add any additional limitations for vfork().

Free the shadow stack on thread exit by doing it in mm_release(). Skip
this when exiting a vfork() child since the stack is shared in the
parent.

During this operation, the shadow stack pointer of the new thread needs
to be updated to point to the newly allocated shadow stack. Since the
ability to do this is confined to the FPU subsystem, change
fpu_clone() to take the new shadow stack pointer, and update it
internally inside the FPU subsystem. This part was suggested by Thomas
Gleixner.

Co-developed-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230613001108.3040476-30-rick.p.edgecombe%40intel.com

Just like user xfeatures, supervisor xfeatures can be active in the
registers or present in the task FPU buffer. If the registers are
active, the registers can be modified directly. If the registers are
not active, the modification must be performed on the task FPU buffer.

When the state is not active, the kernel could perform modifications
directly to the buffer. But in order for it to do that, it needs
to know where in the buffer the specific state it wants to modify is
located. Doing this is not robust against optimizations that compact
the FPU buffer, as each access would require computing where in the
buffer it is.

The easiest way to modify supervisor xfeature data is to force restore
the registers and write directly to the MSRs. Often times this is just fine
anyway as the registers need to be restored before returning to userspace.
Do this for now, leaving buffer writing optimizations for the future.

Add a new function fpregs_lock_and_load() that can simultaneously call
fpregs_lock() and do this restore. Also perform some extra sanity
checks in this function since this will be used in non-fpu focused code.

Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230613001108.3040476-26-rick.p.edgecombe%40intel.com