linux.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c, branch v6.15 Linux kernel source tree Merge tag 'its-for-linus-20250509' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip 2025-05-12T00:23:03+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2025-05-12T00:23:03+00:00 6f5bf947bab06f37ff931c359fd5770c4d9cbf87 Pull x86 ITS mitigation from Dave Hansen: "Mitigate Indirect Target Selection (ITS) issue. I'd describe this one as a good old CPU bug where the behavior is _obviously_ wrong, but since it just results in bad predictions it wasn't wrong enough to notice. Well, the researchers noticed and also realized that thus bug undermined a bunch of existing indirect branch mitigations. Thus the unusually wide impact on this one. Details: ITS is a bug in some Intel CPUs that affects indirect branches including RETs in the first half of a cacheline. Due to ITS such branches may get wrongly predicted to a target of (direct or indirect) branch that is located in the second half of a cacheline. Researchers at VUSec found this behavior and reported to Intel. Affected processors: - Cascade Lake, Cooper Lake, Whiskey Lake V, Coffee Lake R, Comet Lake, Ice Lake, Tiger Lake and Rocket Lake. Scope of impact: - Guest/host isolation: When eIBRS is used for guest/host isolation, the indirect branches in the VMM may still be predicted with targets corresponding to direct branches in the guest. - Intra-mode using cBPF: cBPF can be used to poison the branch history to exploit ITS. Realigning the indirect branches and RETs mitigates this attack vector. - User/kernel: With eIBRS enabled user/kernel isolation is *not* impacted by ITS. - Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier (IBPB): Due to this bug indirect branches may be predicted with targets corresponding to direct branches which were executed prior to IBPB. This will be fixed in the microcode. Mitigation: As indirect branches in the first half of cacheline are affected, the mitigation is to replace those indirect branches with a call to thunk that is aligned to the second half of the cacheline. RETs that take prediction from RSB are not affected, but they may be affected by RSB-underflow condition. So, RETs in the first half of cacheline are also patched to a return thunk that executes the RET aligned to second half of cacheline" * tag 'its-for-linus-20250509' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: selftest/x86/bugs: Add selftests for ITS x86/its: FineIBT-paranoid vs ITS x86/its: Use dynamic thunks for indirect branches x86/ibt: Keep IBT disabled during alternative patching mm/execmem: Unify early execmem_cache behaviour x86/its: Align RETs in BHB clear sequence to avoid thunking x86/its: Add support for RSB stuffing mitigation x86/its: Add "vmexit" option to skip mitigation on some CPUs x86/its: Enable Indirect Target Selection mitigation x86/its: Add support for ITS-safe return thunk x86/its: Add support for ITS-safe indirect thunk x86/its: Enumerate Indirect Target Selection (ITS) bug Documentation: x86/bugs/its: Add ITS documentation 
Pull x86 ITS mitigation from Dave Hansen:
 "Mitigate Indirect Target Selection (ITS) issue.

  I'd describe this one as a good old CPU bug where the behavior is
  _obviously_ wrong, but since it just results in bad predictions it
  wasn't wrong enough to notice. Well, the researchers noticed and also
  realized that thus bug undermined a bunch of existing indirect branch
  mitigations.

  Thus the unusually wide impact on this one. Details:

  ITS is a bug in some Intel CPUs that affects indirect branches
  including RETs in the first half of a cacheline. Due to ITS such
  branches may get wrongly predicted to a target of (direct or indirect)
  branch that is located in the second half of a cacheline. Researchers
  at VUSec found this behavior and reported to Intel.

  Affected processors:

   - Cascade Lake, Cooper Lake, Whiskey Lake V, Coffee Lake R, Comet
     Lake, Ice Lake, Tiger Lake and Rocket Lake.

  Scope of impact:

   - Guest/host isolation:

     When eIBRS is used for guest/host isolation, the indirect branches
     in the VMM may still be predicted with targets corresponding to
     direct branches in the guest.

   - Intra-mode using cBPF:

     cBPF can be used to poison the branch history to exploit ITS.
     Realigning the indirect branches and RETs mitigates this attack
     vector.

   - User/kernel:

     With eIBRS enabled user/kernel isolation is *not* impacted by ITS.

   - Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier (IBPB):

     Due to this bug indirect branches may be predicted with targets
     corresponding to direct branches which were executed prior to IBPB.
     This will be fixed in the microcode.

  Mitigation:

  As indirect branches in the first half of cacheline are affected, the
  mitigation is to replace those indirect branches with a call to thunk that
  is aligned to the second half of the cacheline.

  RETs that take prediction from RSB are not affected, but they may be
  affected by RSB-underflow condition. So, RETs in the first half of
  cacheline are also patched to a return thunk that executes the RET aligned
  to second half of cacheline"

* tag 'its-for-linus-20250509' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  selftest/x86/bugs: Add selftests for ITS
  x86/its: FineIBT-paranoid vs ITS
  x86/its: Use dynamic thunks for indirect branches
  x86/ibt: Keep IBT disabled during alternative patching
  mm/execmem: Unify early execmem_cache behaviour
  x86/its: Align RETs in BHB clear sequence to avoid thunking
  x86/its: Add support for RSB stuffing mitigation
  x86/its: Add "vmexit" option to skip mitigation on some CPUs
  x86/its: Enable Indirect Target Selection mitigation
  x86/its: Add support for ITS-safe return thunk
  x86/its: Add support for ITS-safe indirect thunk
  x86/its: Enumerate Indirect Target Selection (ITS) bug
  Documentation: x86/bugs/its: Add ITS documentation
x86/its: Add "vmexit" option to skip mitigation on some CPUs 2025-05-09T20:22:05+00:00 Pawan Gupta pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com 2024-11-18T17:53:12+00:00 2665281a07e19550944e8354a2024635a7b2714a Ice Lake generation CPUs are not affected by guest/host isolation part of ITS. If a user is only concerned about KVM guests, they can now choose a new cmdline option "vmexit" that will not deploy the ITS mitigation when CPU is not affected by guest/host isolation. This saves the performance overhead of ITS mitigation on Ice Lake gen CPUs. When "vmexit" option selected, if the CPU is affected by ITS guest/host isolation, the default ITS mitigation is deployed. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com> 
Ice Lake generation CPUs are not affected by guest/host isolation part of
ITS. If a user is only concerned about KVM guests, they can now choose a
new cmdline option "vmexit" that will not deploy the ITS mitigation when
CPU is not affected by guest/host isolation. This saves the performance
overhead of ITS mitigation on Ice Lake gen CPUs.

When "vmexit" option selected, if the CPU is affected by ITS guest/host
isolation, the default ITS mitigation is deployed.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
x86/its: Enumerate Indirect Target Selection (ITS) bug 2025-05-09T20:22:04+00:00 Pawan Gupta pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com 2024-06-22T00:40:41+00:00 159013a7ca18c271ff64192deb62a689b622d860 ITS bug in some pre-Alderlake Intel CPUs may allow indirect branches in the first half of a cache line get predicted to a target of a branch located in the second half of the cache line. Set X86_BUG_ITS on affected CPUs. Mitigation to follow in later commits. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com> 
ITS bug in some pre-Alderlake Intel CPUs may allow indirect branches in the
first half of a cache line get predicted to a target of a branch located in
the second half of the cache line.

Set X86_BUG_ITS on affected CPUs. Mitigation to follow in later commits.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
x86/bpf: Add IBHF call at end of classic BPF 2025-05-06T15:18:48+00:00 Daniel Sneddon daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com 2025-05-05T21:35:12+00:00 9f725eec8fc0b39bdc07dcc8897283c367c1a163 Classic BPF programs can be run by unprivileged users, allowing unprivileged code to execute inside the kernel. Attackers can use this to craft branch history in kernel mode that can influence the target of indirect branches. BHI_DIS_S provides user-kernel isolation of branch history, but cBPF can be used to bypass this protection by crafting branch history in kernel mode. To stop intra-mode attacks via cBPF programs, Intel created a new instruction Indirect Branch History Fence (IBHF). IBHF prevents the predicted targets of subsequent indirect branches from being influenced by branch history prior to the IBHF. IBHF is only effective while BHI_DIS_S is enabled. Add the IBHF instruction to cBPF jitted code's exit path. Add the new fence when the hardware mitigation is enabled (i.e., X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_HW is set) or after the software sequence (X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP) is being used in a virtual machine. Note that X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_HW and X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP are mutually exclusive, so the JIT compiler will only emit the new fence, not the SW sequence, when X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_HW is set. Hardware that enumerates BHI_NO basically has BHI_DIS_S protections always enabled, regardless of the value of BHI_DIS_S. Since BHI_DIS_S doesn't protect against intra-mode attacks, enumerate BHI bug on BHI_NO hardware as well. Signed-off-by: Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com> 
Classic BPF programs can be run by unprivileged users, allowing
unprivileged code to execute inside the kernel. Attackers can use this to
craft branch history in kernel mode that can influence the target of
indirect branches.

BHI_DIS_S provides user-kernel isolation of branch history, but cBPF can be
used to bypass this protection by crafting branch history in kernel mode.
To stop intra-mode attacks via cBPF programs, Intel created a new
instruction Indirect Branch History Fence (IBHF). IBHF prevents the
predicted targets of subsequent indirect branches from being influenced by
branch history prior to the IBHF. IBHF is only effective while BHI_DIS_S is
enabled.

Add the IBHF instruction to cBPF jitted code's exit path. Add the new fence
when the hardware mitigation is enabled (i.e., X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_HW is
set) or after the software sequence (X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP) is being
used in a virtual machine. Note that X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_HW and
X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP are mutually exclusive, so the JIT compiler will
only emit the new fence, not the SW sequence, when X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_HW
is set.

Hardware that enumerates BHI_NO basically has BHI_DIS_S protections always
enabled, regardless of the value of BHI_DIS_S. Since BHI_DIS_S doesn't
protect against intra-mode attacks, enumerate BHI bug on BHI_NO hardware as
well.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Merge tag 'x86_bugs_for_v6.15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip 2025-03-25T20:30:18+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2025-03-25T20:30:18+00:00 906174776c0eb539e4d65c54a8019d954a6fb35d Pull x86 speculation mitigation updates from Borislav Petkov: - Some preparatory work to convert the mitigations machinery to mitigating attack vectors instead of single vulnerabilities - Untangle and remove a now unneeded X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB flag - Add support for a Zen5-specific SRSO mitigation - Cleanups and minor improvements * tag 'x86_bugs_for_v6.15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/bugs: Make spectre user default depend on MITIGATION_SPECTRE_V2 x86/bugs: Use the cpu_smt_possible() helper instead of open-coded code x86/bugs: Add AUTO mitigations for mds/taa/mmio/rfds x86/bugs: Relocate mds/taa/mmio/rfds defines x86/bugs: Add X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V2_USER x86/bugs: Remove X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB KVM: nVMX: Always use IBPB to properly virtualize IBRS x86/bugs: Use a static branch to guard IBPB on vCPU switch x86/bugs: Remove the X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB check in ib_prctl_set() x86/mm: Remove X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB checks in cond_mitigation() x86/bugs: Move the X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB check into callers x86/bugs: KVM: Add support for SRSO_MSR_FIX 
Pull x86 speculation mitigation updates from Borislav Petkov:

 - Some preparatory work to convert the mitigations machinery to
   mitigating attack vectors instead of single vulnerabilities

 - Untangle and remove a now unneeded X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB flag

 - Add support for a Zen5-specific SRSO mitigation

 - Cleanups and minor improvements

* tag 'x86_bugs_for_v6.15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  x86/bugs: Make spectre user default depend on MITIGATION_SPECTRE_V2
  x86/bugs: Use the cpu_smt_possible() helper instead of open-coded code
  x86/bugs: Add AUTO mitigations for mds/taa/mmio/rfds
  x86/bugs: Relocate mds/taa/mmio/rfds defines
  x86/bugs: Add X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V2_USER
  x86/bugs: Remove X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB
  KVM: nVMX: Always use IBPB to properly virtualize IBRS
  x86/bugs: Use a static branch to guard IBPB on vCPU switch
  x86/bugs: Remove the X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB check in ib_prctl_set()
  x86/mm: Remove X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB checks in cond_mitigation()
  x86/bugs: Move the X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB check into callers
  x86/bugs: KVM: Add support for SRSO_MSR_FIX
x86/cpufeatures: Warn about unmet CPU feature dependencies 2025-03-19T10:17:31+00:00 Sohil Mehta sohil.mehta@intel.com 2025-03-13T20:16:08+00:00 07e4a6eec269912aa84817449f7a3a126b09671f Currently, the cpuid_deps[] table is only exercised when a particular feature is explicitly disabled and clear_cpu_cap() is called. However, some of these listed dependencies might already be missing during boot. These types of errors shouldn't generally happen in production environments, but they could sometimes sneak through, especially when VMs and Kconfigs are in the mix. Also, the kernel might introduce artificial dependencies between unrelated features, such as making LAM depend on LASS. Unexpected failures can occur when the kernel tries to use such features. Add a simple boot-time scan of the cpuid_deps[] table to detect the missing dependencies. One option is to disable all of such features during boot, but that may cause regressions in existing systems. For now, just warn about the missing dependencies to create awareness. As a trade-off between spamming the kernel log and keeping track of all the features that have been warned about, only warn about the first missing dependency. Any subsequent unmet dependency will only be logged after the first one has been resolved. Features are typically represented through unsigned integers within the kernel, though some of them have user-friendly names if they are exposed via /proc/cpuinfo. Show the friendlier name if available, otherwise display the X86_FEATURE_* numerals to make it easier to identify the feature. Suggested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250313201608.3304135-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com 
Currently, the cpuid_deps[] table is only exercised when a particular
feature is explicitly disabled and clear_cpu_cap() is called. However,
some of these listed dependencies might already be missing during boot.

These types of errors shouldn't generally happen in production
environments, but they could sometimes sneak through, especially when
VMs and Kconfigs are in the mix. Also, the kernel might introduce
artificial dependencies between unrelated features, such as making LAM
depend on LASS.

Unexpected failures can occur when the kernel tries to use such
features. Add a simple boot-time scan of the cpuid_deps[] table to
detect the missing dependencies. One option is to disable all of such
features during boot, but that may cause regressions in existing
systems. For now, just warn about the missing dependencies to create
awareness.

As a trade-off between spamming the kernel log and keeping track of all
the features that have been warned about, only warn about the first
missing dependency. Any subsequent unmet dependency will only be logged
after the first one has been resolved.

Features are typically represented through unsigned integers within the
kernel, though some of them have user-friendly names if they are exposed
via /proc/cpuinfo.

Show the friendlier name if available, otherwise display the
X86_FEATURE_* numerals to make it easier to identify the feature.

Suggested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250313201608.3304135-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com
x86/rfds: Exclude P-only parts from the RFDS affected list 2025-03-19T10:17:23+00:00 Pawan Gupta pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com 2025-03-11T15:03:08+00:00 722fa0dba74f206999244facb177a8bfe3d513e6 The affected CPU table (cpu_vuln_blacklist) marks Alderlake and Raptorlake P-only parts affected by RFDS. This is not true because only E-cores are affected by RFDS. With the current family/model matching it is not possible to differentiate the unaffected parts, as the affected and unaffected hybrid variants have the same model number. Add a cpu-type match as well for such parts so as to exclude P-only parts being marked as affected. Note, family/model and cpu-type enumeration could be inaccurate in virtualized environments. In a guest affected status is decided by RFDS_NO and RFDS_CLEAR bits exposed by VMMs. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250311-add-cpu-type-v8-5-e8514dcaaff2@linux.intel.com 
The affected CPU table (cpu_vuln_blacklist) marks Alderlake and Raptorlake
P-only parts affected by RFDS. This is not true because only E-cores are
affected by RFDS. With the current family/model matching it is not possible
to differentiate the unaffected parts, as the affected and unaffected
hybrid variants have the same model number.

Add a cpu-type match as well for such parts so as to exclude P-only parts
being marked as affected.

Note, family/model and cpu-type enumeration could be inaccurate in
virtualized environments. In a guest affected status is decided by RFDS_NO
and RFDS_CLEAR bits exposed by VMMs.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250311-add-cpu-type-v8-5-e8514dcaaff2@linux.intel.com
x86/stackprotector: Move __stack_chk_guard to percpu hot section 2025-03-04T19:30:33+00:00 Brian Gerst brgerst@gmail.com 2025-03-03T16:52:45+00:00 f3856cd343b6371530c9af3c97354cdc003f3203 No functional change. Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250303165246.2175811-11-brgerst@gmail.com 
No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250303165246.2175811-11-brgerst@gmail.com
x86/percpu: Move current_task to percpu hot section 2025-03-04T19:30:33+00:00 Brian Gerst brgerst@gmail.com 2025-03-03T16:52:44+00:00 a1e4cc0155ad577adc3a2c563fc5eec625945ce7 No functional change. Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250303165246.2175811-10-brgerst@gmail.com 
No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250303165246.2175811-10-brgerst@gmail.com
x86/percpu: Move top_of_stack to percpu hot section 2025-03-04T19:30:33+00:00 Brian Gerst brgerst@gmail.com 2025-03-03T16:52:43+00:00 385f72c83eb609652f02dc9ee415520c23bda629 No functional change. Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250303165246.2175811-9-brgerst@gmail.com 
No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250303165246.2175811-9-brgerst@gmail.com