linux.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c, branch v6.0 Linux kernel source tree x86/bugs: Add "unknown" reporting for MMIO Stale Data 2022-08-18T13:35:22+00:00 Pawan Gupta pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com 2022-08-03T21:41:32+00:00 7df548840c496b0141fb2404b889c346380c2b22 Older Intel CPUs that are not in the affected processor list for MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities currently report "Not affected" in sysfs, which may not be correct. Vulnerability status for these older CPUs is unknown. Add known-not-affected CPUs to the whitelist. Report "unknown" mitigation status for CPUs that are not in blacklist, whitelist and also don't enumerate MSR ARCH_CAPABILITIES bits that reflect hardware immunity to MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities. Mitigation is not deployed when the status is unknown. [ bp: Massage, fixup. ] Fixes: 8d50cdf8b834 ("x86/speculation/mmio: Add sysfs reporting for Processor MMIO Stale Data") Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> Suggested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a932c154772f2121794a5f2eded1a11013114711.1657846269.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com 
Older Intel CPUs that are not in the affected processor list for MMIO
Stale Data vulnerabilities currently report "Not affected" in sysfs,
which may not be correct. Vulnerability status for these older CPUs is
unknown.

Add known-not-affected CPUs to the whitelist. Report "unknown"
mitigation status for CPUs that are not in blacklist, whitelist and also
don't enumerate MSR ARCH_CAPABILITIES bits that reflect hardware
immunity to MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities.

Mitigation is not deployed when the status is unknown.

  [ bp: Massage, fixup. ]

Fixes: 8d50cdf8b834 ("x86/speculation/mmio: Add sysfs reporting for Processor MMIO Stale Data")
Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Suggested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a932c154772f2121794a5f2eded1a11013114711.1657846269.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com
x86/speculation: Add RSB VM Exit protections 2022-08-03T09:23:52+00:00 Daniel Sneddon daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com 2022-08-02T22:47:01+00:00 2b1299322016731d56807aa49254a5ea3080b6b3 tl;dr: The Enhanced IBRS mitigation for Spectre v2 does not work as documented for RET instructions after VM exits. Mitigate it with a new one-entry RSB stuffing mechanism and a new LFENCE. == Background == Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation (IBRS) was designed to help mitigate Branch Target Injection and Speculative Store Bypass, i.e. Spectre, attacks. IBRS prevents software run in less privileged modes from affecting branch prediction in more privileged modes. IBRS requires the MSR to be written on every privilege level change. To overcome some of the performance issues of IBRS, Enhanced IBRS was introduced. eIBRS is an "always on" IBRS, in other words, just turn it on once instead of writing the MSR on every privilege level change. When eIBRS is enabled, more privileged modes should be protected from less privileged modes, including protecting VMMs from guests. == Problem == Here's a simplification of how guests are run on Linux' KVM: void run_kvm_guest(void) { // Prepare to run guest VMRESUME(); // Clean up after guest runs } The execution flow for that would look something like this to the processor: 1. Host-side: call run_kvm_guest() 2. Host-side: VMRESUME 3. Guest runs, does "CALL guest_function" 4. VM exit, host runs again 5. Host might make some "cleanup" function calls 6. Host-side: RET from run_kvm_guest() Now, when back on the host, there are a couple of possible scenarios of post-guest activity the host needs to do before executing host code: * on pre-eIBRS hardware (legacy IBRS, or nothing at all), the RSB is not touched and Linux has to do a 32-entry stuffing. * on eIBRS hardware, VM exit with IBRS enabled, or restoring the host IBRS=1 shortly after VM exit, has a documented side effect of flushing the RSB except in this PBRSB situation where the software needs to stuff the last RSB entry "by hand". IOW, with eIBRS supported, host RET instructions should no longer be influenced by guest behavior after the host retires a single CALL instruction. However, if the RET instructions are "unbalanced" with CALLs after a VM exit as is the RET in #6, it might speculatively use the address for the instruction after the CALL in #3 as an RSB prediction. This is a problem since the (untrusted) guest controls this address. Balanced CALL/RET instruction pairs such as in step #5 are not affected. == Solution == The PBRSB issue affects a wide variety of Intel processors which support eIBRS. But not all of them need mitigation. Today, X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT triggers an RSB filling sequence that mitigates PBRSB. Systems setting RSB_VMEXIT need no further mitigation - i.e., eIBRS systems which enable legacy IBRS explicitly. However, such systems (X86_FEATURE_IBRS_ENHANCED) do not set RSB_VMEXIT and most of them need a new mitigation. Therefore, introduce a new feature flag X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE which triggers a lighter-weight PBRSB mitigation versus RSB_VMEXIT. The lighter-weight mitigation performs a CALL instruction which is immediately followed by a speculative execution barrier (INT3). This steers speculative execution to the barrier -- just like a retpoline -- which ensures that speculation can never reach an unbalanced RET. Then, ensure this CALL is retired before continuing execution with an LFENCE. In other words, the window of exposure is opened at VM exit where RET behavior is troublesome. While the window is open, force RSB predictions sampling for RET targets to a dead end at the INT3. Close the window with the LFENCE. There is a subset of eIBRS systems which are not vulnerable to PBRSB. Add these systems to the cpu_vuln_whitelist[] as NO_EIBRS_PBRSB. Future systems that aren't vulnerable will set ARCH_CAP_PBRSB_NO. [ bp: Massage, incorporate review comments from Andy Cooper. ] Signed-off-by: Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com> Co-developed-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> 
tl;dr: The Enhanced IBRS mitigation for Spectre v2 does not work as
documented for RET instructions after VM exits. Mitigate it with a new
one-entry RSB stuffing mechanism and a new LFENCE.

== Background ==

Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation (IBRS) was designed to help
mitigate Branch Target Injection and Speculative Store Bypass, i.e.
Spectre, attacks. IBRS prevents software run in less privileged modes
from affecting branch prediction in more privileged modes. IBRS requires
the MSR to be written on every privilege level change.

To overcome some of the performance issues of IBRS, Enhanced IBRS was
introduced.  eIBRS is an "always on" IBRS, in other words, just turn
it on once instead of writing the MSR on every privilege level change.
When eIBRS is enabled, more privileged modes should be protected from
less privileged modes, including protecting VMMs from guests.

== Problem ==

Here's a simplification of how guests are run on Linux' KVM:

void run_kvm_guest(void)
{
	// Prepare to run guest
	VMRESUME();
	// Clean up after guest runs
}

The execution flow for that would look something like this to the
processor:

1. Host-side: call run_kvm_guest()
2. Host-side: VMRESUME
3. Guest runs, does "CALL guest_function"
4. VM exit, host runs again
5. Host might make some "cleanup" function calls
6. Host-side: RET from run_kvm_guest()

Now, when back on the host, there are a couple of possible scenarios of
post-guest activity the host needs to do before executing host code:

* on pre-eIBRS hardware (legacy IBRS, or nothing at all), the RSB is not
touched and Linux has to do a 32-entry stuffing.

* on eIBRS hardware, VM exit with IBRS enabled, or restoring the host
IBRS=1 shortly after VM exit, has a documented side effect of flushing
the RSB except in this PBRSB situation where the software needs to stuff
the last RSB entry "by hand".

IOW, with eIBRS supported, host RET instructions should no longer be
influenced by guest behavior after the host retires a single CALL
instruction.

However, if the RET instructions are "unbalanced" with CALLs after a VM
exit as is the RET in #6, it might speculatively use the address for the
instruction after the CALL in #3 as an RSB prediction. This is a problem
since the (untrusted) guest controls this address.

Balanced CALL/RET instruction pairs such as in step #5 are not affected.

== Solution ==

The PBRSB issue affects a wide variety of Intel processors which
support eIBRS. But not all of them need mitigation. Today,
X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT triggers an RSB filling sequence that mitigates
PBRSB. Systems setting RSB_VMEXIT need no further mitigation - i.e.,
eIBRS systems which enable legacy IBRS explicitly.

However, such systems (X86_FEATURE_IBRS_ENHANCED) do not set RSB_VMEXIT
and most of them need a new mitigation.

Therefore, introduce a new feature flag X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE
which triggers a lighter-weight PBRSB mitigation versus RSB_VMEXIT.

The lighter-weight mitigation performs a CALL instruction which is
immediately followed by a speculative execution barrier (INT3). This
steers speculative execution to the barrier -- just like a retpoline
-- which ensures that speculation can never reach an unbalanced RET.
Then, ensure this CALL is retired before continuing execution with an
LFENCE.

In other words, the window of exposure is opened at VM exit where RET
behavior is troublesome. While the window is open, force RSB predictions
sampling for RET targets to a dead end at the INT3. Close the window
with the LFENCE.

There is a subset of eIBRS systems which are not vulnerable to PBRSB.
Add these systems to the cpu_vuln_whitelist[] as NO_EIBRS_PBRSB.
Future systems that aren't vulnerable will set ARCH_CAP_PBRSB_NO.

  [ bp: Massage, incorporate review comments from Andy Cooper. ]

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
x86/bugs: Add Cannon lake to RETBleed affected CPU list 2022-07-07T10:33:53+00:00 Pawan Gupta pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com 2022-07-06T22:01:15+00:00 f54d45372c6ac9c993451de5e51312485f7d10bc Cannon lake is also affected by RETBleed, add it to the list. Fixes: 6ad0ad2bf8a6 ("x86/bugs: Report Intel retbleed vulnerability") Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> 
Cannon lake is also affected by RETBleed, add it to the list.

Fixes: 6ad0ad2bf8a6 ("x86/bugs: Report Intel retbleed vulnerability")
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
x86/cpu/amd: Enumerate BTC_NO 2022-06-27T08:34:01+00:00 Andrew Cooper andrew.cooper3@citrix.com 2022-06-24T13:41:21+00:00 26aae8ccbc1972233afd08fb3f368947c0314265 BTC_NO indicates that hardware is not susceptible to Branch Type Confusion. Zen3 CPUs don't suffer BTC. Hypervisors are expected to synthesise BTC_NO when it is appropriate given the migration pool, to prevent kernels using heuristics. [ bp: Massage. ] Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> 
BTC_NO indicates that hardware is not susceptible to Branch Type Confusion.

Zen3 CPUs don't suffer BTC.

Hypervisors are expected to synthesise BTC_NO when it is appropriate
given the migration pool, to prevent kernels using heuristics.

  [ bp: Massage. ]

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
x86/common: Stamp out the stepping madness 2022-06-27T08:34:01+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2022-06-24T12:03:25+00:00 7a05bc95ed1c5a59e47aaade9fb4083c27de9e62 The whole MMIO/RETBLEED enumeration went overboard on steppings. Get rid of all that and simply use ANY. If a future stepping of these models would not be affected, it had better set the relevant ARCH_CAP_$FOO_NO bit in IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> 
The whole MMIO/RETBLEED enumeration went overboard on steppings. Get
rid of all that and simply use ANY.

If a future stepping of these models would not be affected, it had
better set the relevant ARCH_CAP_$FOO_NO bit in
IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
x86/bugs: Report Intel retbleed vulnerability 2022-06-27T08:33:59+00:00 Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org 2022-06-24T11:48:58+00:00 6ad0ad2bf8a67e27d1f9d006a1dabb0e1c360cc3 Skylake suffers from RSB underflow speculation issues; report this vulnerability and it's mitigation (spectre_v2=ibrs). [jpoimboe: cleanups, eibrs] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> 
Skylake suffers from RSB underflow speculation issues; report this
vulnerability and it's mitigation (spectre_v2=ibrs).

  [jpoimboe: cleanups, eibrs]

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
x86/bugs: Report AMD retbleed vulnerability 2022-06-27T08:33:59+00:00 Alexandre Chartre alexandre.chartre@oracle.com 2022-06-14T21:15:49+00:00 6b80b59b3555706508008f1f127b5412c89c7fd8 Report that AMD x86 CPUs are vulnerable to the RETBleed (Arbitrary Speculative Code Execution with Return Instructions) attack. [peterz: add hygon] [kim: invert parity; fam15h] Co-developed-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> 
Report that AMD x86 CPUs are vulnerable to the RETBleed (Arbitrary
Speculative Code Execution with Return Instructions) attack.

  [peterz: add hygon]
  [kim: invert parity; fam15h]

Co-developed-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Merge tag 'x86-bugs-2022-06-01' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip 2022-06-14T14:43:15+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2022-06-14T14:43:15+00:00 8e8afafb0b5571b7cb10b529dc60cadb7241bed4 Pull x86 MMIO stale data fixes from Thomas Gleixner: "Yet another hw vulnerability with a software mitigation: Processor MMIO Stale Data. They are a class of MMIO-related weaknesses which can expose stale data by propagating it into core fill buffers. Data which can then be leaked using the usual speculative execution methods. Mitigations include this set along with microcode updates and are similar to MDS and TAA vulnerabilities: VERW now clears those buffers too" * tag 'x86-bugs-2022-06-01' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/speculation/mmio: Print SMT warning KVM: x86/speculation: Disable Fill buffer clear within guests x86/speculation/mmio: Reuse SRBDS mitigation for SBDS x86/speculation/srbds: Update SRBDS mitigation selection x86/speculation/mmio: Add sysfs reporting for Processor MMIO Stale Data x86/speculation/mmio: Enable CPU Fill buffer clearing on idle x86/bugs: Group MDS, TAA & Processor MMIO Stale Data mitigations x86/speculation/mmio: Add mitigation for Processor MMIO Stale Data x86/speculation: Add a common function for MD_CLEAR mitigation update x86/speculation/mmio: Enumerate Processor MMIO Stale Data bug Documentation: Add documentation for Processor MMIO Stale Data 
Pull x86 MMIO stale data fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
 "Yet another hw vulnerability with a software mitigation: Processor
  MMIO Stale Data.

  They are a class of MMIO-related weaknesses which can expose stale
  data by propagating it into core fill buffers. Data which can then be
  leaked using the usual speculative execution methods.

  Mitigations include this set along with microcode updates and are
  similar to MDS and TAA vulnerabilities: VERW now clears those buffers
  too"

* tag 'x86-bugs-2022-06-01' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  x86/speculation/mmio: Print SMT warning
  KVM: x86/speculation: Disable Fill buffer clear within guests
  x86/speculation/mmio: Reuse SRBDS mitigation for SBDS
  x86/speculation/srbds: Update SRBDS mitigation selection
  x86/speculation/mmio: Add sysfs reporting for Processor MMIO Stale Data
  x86/speculation/mmio: Enable CPU Fill buffer clearing on idle
  x86/bugs: Group MDS, TAA & Processor MMIO Stale Data mitigations
  x86/speculation/mmio: Add mitigation for Processor MMIO Stale Data
  x86/speculation: Add a common function for MD_CLEAR mitigation update
  x86/speculation/mmio: Enumerate Processor MMIO Stale Data bug
  Documentation: Add documentation for Processor MMIO Stale Data
x86/microcode: Default-disable late loading 2022-05-31T07:31:19+00:00 Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de 2022-05-25T16:12:30+00:00 a77a94f86273ce42a39cb479217dd8d68acfe0ff It is dangerous and it should not be used anyway - there's a nice early loading already. Requested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220525161232.14924-3-bp@alien8.de 
It is dangerous and it should not be used anyway - there's a nice early
loading already.

Requested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220525161232.14924-3-bp@alien8.de
Merge tag 'x86_cpu_for_v5.19_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip 2022-05-24T01:01:31+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2022-05-24T01:01:31+00:00 c5a3d3c01e90e74166f95eec9db6fcc3ba72a9d6 Pull x86 CPU feature updates from Borislav Petkov: - Remove a bunch of chicken bit options to turn off CPU features which are not really needed anymore - Misc fixes and cleanups * tag 'x86_cpu_for_v5.19_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/speculation: Add missing prototype for unpriv_ebpf_notify() x86/pm: Fix false positive kmemleak report in msr_build_context() x86/speculation/srbds: Do not try to turn mitigation off when not supported x86/cpu: Remove "noclflush" x86/cpu: Remove "noexec" x86/cpu: Remove "nosmep" x86/cpu: Remove CONFIG_X86_SMAP and "nosmap" x86/cpu: Remove "nosep" x86/cpu: Allow feature bit names from /proc/cpuinfo in clearcpuid= 
Pull x86 CPU feature updates from Borislav Petkov:

 - Remove a bunch of chicken bit options to turn off CPU features which
   are not really needed anymore

 - Misc fixes and cleanups

* tag 'x86_cpu_for_v5.19_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  x86/speculation: Add missing prototype for unpriv_ebpf_notify()
  x86/pm: Fix false positive kmemleak report in msr_build_context()
  x86/speculation/srbds: Do not try to turn mitigation off when not supported
  x86/cpu: Remove "noclflush"
  x86/cpu: Remove "noexec"
  x86/cpu: Remove "nosmep"
  x86/cpu: Remove CONFIG_X86_SMAP and "nosmap"
  x86/cpu: Remove "nosep"
  x86/cpu: Allow feature bit names from /proc/cpuinfo in clearcpuid=