linux.git/arch/powerpc/net, branch v6.10 Linux kernel source tree powerpc/bpf: enforce full ordering for ATOMIC operations with BPF_FETCH 2024-05-29T12:12:42+00:00 Puranjay Mohan puranjay@kernel.org 2024-05-13T10:02:48+00:00 b1e7cee96127468c2483cf10c2899c9b5cf79bf8 The Linux Kernel Memory Model [1][2] requires RMW operations that have a return value to be fully ordered. BPF atomic operations with BPF_FETCH (including BPF_XCHG and BPF_CMPXCHG) return a value back so they need to be JITed to fully ordered operations. POWERPC currently emits relaxed operations for these. We can show this by running the following litmus-test: PPC SB+atomic_add+fetch { 0:r0=x; (* dst reg assuming offset is 0 *) 0:r1=2; (* src reg *) 0:r2=1; 0:r4=y; (* P0 writes to this, P1 reads this *) 0:r5=z; (* P1 writes to this, P0 reads this *) 0:r6=0; 1:r2=1; 1:r4=y; 1:r5=z; } P0 | P1 ; stw r2, 0(r4) | stw r2,0(r5) ; | ; loop:lwarx r3, r6, r0 | ; mr r8, r3 | ; add r3, r3, r1 | sync ; stwcx. r3, r6, r0 | ; bne loop | ; mr r1, r8 | ; | ; lwa r7, 0(r5) | lwa r7,0(r4) ; ~exists(0:r7=0 /\ 1:r7=0) Witnesses Positive: 9 Negative: 3 Condition ~exists (0:r7=0 /\ 1:r7=0) Observation SB+atomic_add+fetch Sometimes 3 9 This test shows that the older store in P0 is reordered with a newer load to a different address. Although there is a RMW operation with fetch between them. Adding a sync before and after RMW fixes the issue: Witnesses Positive: 9 Negative: 0 Condition ~exists (0:r7=0 /\ 1:r7=0) Observation SB+atomic_add+fetch Never 0 9 [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/atomic_t.txt Fixes: aea7ef8a82c0 ("powerpc/bpf/32: add support for BPF_ATOMIC bitwise operations") Fixes: 2d9206b22743 ("powerpc/bpf/32: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg") Fixes: dbe6e2456fb0 ("powerpc/bpf/64: add support for atomic fetch operations") Fixes: 1e82dfaa7819 ("powerpc/bpf/64: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.0+ Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20240513100248.110535-1-puranjay@kernel.org 
The Linux Kernel Memory Model [1][2] requires RMW operations that have a
return value to be fully ordered.

BPF atomic operations with BPF_FETCH (including BPF_XCHG and
BPF_CMPXCHG) return a value back so they need to be JITed to fully
ordered operations. POWERPC currently emits relaxed operations for
these.

We can show this by running the following litmus-test:

  PPC SB+atomic_add+fetch

  {
      0:r0=x;  (* dst reg assuming offset is 0 *)
      0:r1=2;  (* src reg *)
      0:r2=1;
      0:r4=y;  (* P0 writes to this, P1 reads this *)
      0:r5=z;  (* P1 writes to this, P0 reads this *)
      0:r6=0;

      1:r2=1;
      1:r4=y;
      1:r5=z;
  }

  P0                      | P1            ;
  stw         r2, 0(r4)   | stw  r2,0(r5) ;
                          |               ;
  loop:lwarx  r3, r6, r0  |               ;
  mr          r8, r3      |               ;
  add         r3, r3, r1  | sync          ;
  stwcx.      r3, r6, r0  |               ;
  bne         loop        |               ;
  mr          r1, r8      |               ;
                          |               ;
  lwa         r7, 0(r5)   | lwa  r7,0(r4) ;

  ~exists(0:r7=0 /\ 1:r7=0)

  Witnesses
  Positive: 9 Negative: 3
  Condition ~exists (0:r7=0 /\ 1:r7=0)
  Observation SB+atomic_add+fetch Sometimes 3 9

This test shows that the older store in P0 is reordered with a newer
load to a different address. Although there is a RMW operation with
fetch between them. Adding a sync before and after RMW fixes the issue:

  Witnesses
  Positive: 9 Negative: 0
  Condition ~exists (0:r7=0 /\ 1:r7=0)
  Observation SB+atomic_add+fetch Never 0 9

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/atomic_t.txt

Fixes: aea7ef8a82c0 ("powerpc/bpf/32: add support for BPF_ATOMIC bitwise operations")
Fixes: 2d9206b22743 ("powerpc/bpf/32: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg")
Fixes: dbe6e2456fb0 ("powerpc/bpf/64: add support for atomic fetch operations")
Fixes: 1e82dfaa7819 ("powerpc/bpf/64: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.0+
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Reviewed-by: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240513100248.110535-1-puranjay@kernel.org
powerpc/bpf/32: Fix failing test_bpf tests 2024-05-07T12:17:02+00:00 Christophe Leroy christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu 2024-03-05T15:36:23+00:00 8ecf3c1dab1c675721d3d0255556abe2306fa340 Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: #320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: #344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: #345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: #346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: #490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b098e0 ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu 
Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module
exhibits the following failures:

  test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: #165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: #169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: #170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: #172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 301 PASS
  test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 555 PASS
  test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 268 PASS
  test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 269 PASS
  test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 460 PASS
  test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 320 PASS
  test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 222 PASS
  test_bpf: #320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 273 PASS

  test_bpf: #344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B
  eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 432 PASS
  test_bpf: #345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H
  eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 381 PASS
  test_bpf: #346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W
  eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 505 PASS

  test_bpf: #490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1
  eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported
  jited:0 261 PASS

  test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed]

Fix them by adding missing processing.

Fixes: daabb2b098e0 ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
powerpc/bpf: enable kfunc call 2024-05-06T12:05:18+00:00 Hari Bathini hbathini@linux.ibm.com 2024-05-02T17:32:05+00:00 61688a82e047a4166436bf2665716cc070572ffa Currently, bpf jit code on powerpc assumes all the bpf functions and helpers to be part of core kernel text. This is false for kfunc case, as function addresses may not be part of core kernel text area. So, add support for addresses that are not within core kernel text area too, to enable kfunc support. Emit instructions based on whether the function address is within core kernel text address or not, to retain optimized instruction sequence where possible. In case of PCREL, as a bpf function that is not within core kernel text area is likely to go out of range with relative addressing on kernel base, use PC relative addressing. If that goes out of range, load the full address with PPC_LI64(). With addresses that are not within core kernel text area supported, override bpf_jit_supports_kfunc_call() to enable kfunc support. Also, override bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call() to enable 64-bit pointers, as an address offset can be more than 32-bit long on PPC64. Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20240502173205.142794-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com 
Currently, bpf jit code on powerpc assumes all the bpf functions and
helpers to be part of core kernel text. This is false for kfunc case,
as function addresses may not be part of core kernel text area. So,
add support for addresses that are not within core kernel text area
too, to enable kfunc support. Emit instructions based on whether the
function address is within core kernel text address or not, to retain
optimized instruction sequence where possible.

In case of PCREL, as a bpf function that is not within core kernel
text area is likely to go out of range with relative addressing on
kernel base, use PC relative addressing. If that goes out of range,
load the full address with PPC_LI64().

With addresses that are not within core kernel text area supported,
override bpf_jit_supports_kfunc_call() to enable kfunc support. Also,
override bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call() to enable 64-bit pointers,
as an address offset can be more than 32-bit long on PPC64.

Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240502173205.142794-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
powerpc/64/bpf: fix tail calls for PCREL addressing 2024-05-06T12:05:18+00:00 Hari Bathini hbathini@linux.ibm.com 2024-05-02T17:32:04+00:00 2ecfe59cd7de1f202e9af2516a61fbbf93d0bd4d With PCREL addressing, there is no kernel TOC. So, it is not setup in prologue when PCREL addressing is used. But the number of instructions to skip on a tail call was not adjusted accordingly. That resulted in not so obvious failures while using tailcalls. 'tailcalls' selftest crashed the system with the below call trace: bpf_test_run+0xe8/0x3cc (unreliable) bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x348/0x778 __sys_bpf+0xb04/0x2b00 sys_bpf+0x28/0x38 system_call_exception+0x168/0x340 system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec Also, as bpf programs are always module addresses and a bpf helper in general is a core kernel text address, using PC relative addressing often fails with "out of range of pcrel address" error. Switch to using kernel base for relative addressing to handle this better. Fixes: 7e3a68be42e1 ("powerpc/64: vmlinux support building with PCREL addresing") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.4+ Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20240502173205.142794-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com 
With PCREL addressing, there is no kernel TOC. So, it is not setup in
prologue when PCREL addressing is used. But the number of instructions
to skip on a tail call was not adjusted accordingly. That resulted in
not so obvious failures while using tailcalls. 'tailcalls' selftest
crashed the system with the below call trace:

  bpf_test_run+0xe8/0x3cc (unreliable)
  bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x348/0x778
  __sys_bpf+0xb04/0x2b00
  sys_bpf+0x28/0x38
  system_call_exception+0x168/0x340
  system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec

Also, as bpf programs are always module addresses and a bpf helper in
general is a core kernel text address, using PC relative addressing
often fails with "out of range of pcrel address" error. Switch to
using kernel base for relative addressing to handle this better.

Fixes: 7e3a68be42e1 ("powerpc/64: vmlinux support building with PCREL addresing")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.4+
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240502173205.142794-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
powerpc/bpf: use bpf_jit_binary_pack_[alloc|finalize|free] 2023-10-23T09:33:19+00:00 Hari Bathini hbathini@linux.ibm.com 2023-10-20T14:13:58+00:00 90d862f370b6e9de1b5d607843c5a2f9823990f3 Use bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc in powerpc jit. The jit engine first writes the program to the rw buffer. When the jit is done, the program is copied to the final location with bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize. With multiple jit_subprogs, bpf_jit_free is called on some subprograms that haven't got bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() yet. Implement custom bpf_jit_free() like in commit 1d5f82d9dd47 ("bpf, x86: fix freeing of not-finalized bpf_prog_pack") to call bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize(), if necessary. As bpf_flush_icache() is not needed anymore, remove it. Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20231020141358.643575-6-hbathini@linux.ibm.com 
Use bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc in powerpc jit. The jit engine first
writes the program to the rw buffer. When the jit is done, the program
is copied to the final location with bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize.
With multiple jit_subprogs, bpf_jit_free is called on some subprograms
that haven't got bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() yet. Implement custom
bpf_jit_free() like in commit 1d5f82d9dd47 ("bpf, x86: fix freeing of
not-finalized bpf_prog_pack") to call bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize(),
if necessary. As bpf_flush_icache() is not needed anymore, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20231020141358.643575-6-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
powerpc/bpf: rename powerpc64_jit_data to powerpc_jit_data 2023-10-23T09:33:19+00:00 Hari Bathini hbathini@linux.ibm.com 2023-10-20T14:13:57+00:00 de04e40600ae15fa5e484be242e74aad6de7418f powerpc64_jit_data is a misnomer as it is meant for both ppc32 and ppc64. Rename it to powerpc_jit_data. Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20231020141358.643575-5-hbathini@linux.ibm.com 
powerpc64_jit_data is a misnomer as it is meant for both ppc32 and
ppc64. Rename it to powerpc_jit_data.

Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20231020141358.643575-5-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
powerpc/bpf: implement bpf_arch_text_invalidate for bpf_prog_pack 2023-10-23T09:33:19+00:00 Hari Bathini hbathini@linux.ibm.com 2023-10-20T14:13:56+00:00 033ffaf0af1f974ecf401db3f70aae6fe1a90fc5 Implement bpf_arch_text_invalidate and use it to fill unused part of the bpf_prog_pack with trap instructions when a BPF program is freed. Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20231020141358.643575-4-hbathini@linux.ibm.com 
Implement bpf_arch_text_invalidate and use it to fill unused part of
the bpf_prog_pack with trap instructions when a BPF program is freed.

Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20231020141358.643575-4-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
powerpc/bpf: implement bpf_arch_text_copy 2023-10-23T09:33:19+00:00 Hari Bathini hbathini@linux.ibm.com 2023-10-20T14:13:55+00:00 6efc1675acb88eef45ef0156b93f95d66a8ee759 bpf_arch_text_copy is used to dump JITed binary to RX page, allowing multiple BPF programs to share the same page. Use the newly introduced patch_instructions() to implement it. Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20231020141358.643575-3-hbathini@linux.ibm.com 
bpf_arch_text_copy is used to dump JITed binary to RX page, allowing
multiple BPF programs to share the same page. Use the newly introduced
patch_instructions() to implement it.

Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20231020141358.643575-3-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
powerpc: Use NULL instead of 0 for null pointers 2023-10-19T06:12:47+00:00 Benjamin Gray bgray@linux.ibm.com 2023-10-11T05:37:03+00:00 ddfb7d9db843fd4fbdff81fb8a8743f865c3dd96 Sparse reports several uses of 0 for pointer arguments and comparisons. Replace with NULL to better convey the intent. Remove entirely if a comparison to follow the kernel style of implicit boolean conversions. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20231011053711.93427-5-bgray@linux.ibm.com 
Sparse reports several uses of 0 for pointer arguments and comparisons.
Replace with NULL to better convey the intent. Remove entirely if a
comparison to follow the kernel style of implicit boolean conversions.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20231011053711.93427-5-bgray@linux.ibm.com
powerpc/bpf: Fixed 'instead' typo in bpf_jit_build_body() 2023-10-18T11:27:00+00:00 Muhammad Muzammil m.muzzammilashraf@gmail.com 2023-10-13T05:31:18+00:00 4b47b0fa4b15e0de916e7dd93cd787fdab208ff2 Fixed 'instead' typo. Signed-off-by: Muhammad Muzammil <m.muzzammilashraf@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20231013053118.11221-1-m.muzzammilashraf@gmail.com 
Fixed 'instead' typo.

Signed-off-by: Muhammad Muzammil <m.muzzammilashraf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20231013053118.11221-1-m.muzzammilashraf@gmail.com