In commit eae5f709a4d7 ("powerpc: Add __printf verification to
prom_printf") __printf attribute was added to prom_printf(), which
means GCC started warning about type/format mismatches. As part of
that commit we changed some "%lx" formats to "%llx" where the type is
actually unsigned long long.

Unfortunately prom_printf() doesn't know how to print "%llx", it just
prints a literal "lx", eg:

  reserved memory map:
    lx - lx
    lx - lx

prom_printf() also doesn't know how to print "%u" (only "%lu"), it
just prints a literal "u", eg:

  Max number of cores passed to firmware: u (NR_CPUS = 2048)

Instead of:

  Max number of cores passed to firmware: 2048 (NR_CPUS = 2048)

This commit adds support for the missing formatters.

Fixes: eae5f709a4d7 ("powerpc: Add __printf verification to prom_printf")
Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

In commit 7a22d6321c3d ("powerpc/mm/radix: Update command line parsing for
disable_radix") an `if` statement was added for a possible empty body
(prom_debug).

Fix the following warning, treated as error with W=1:

  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:656:46: error: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘if’ statement [-Werror=empty-body]

Suggested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

__printf is useful to verify format and arguments. Fix arg mismatch
reported by gcc, remove the following warnings (with W=1):

  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1467:31: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’
  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1471:31: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’
  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1504:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’
  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1505:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’
  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1506:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’
  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1507:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’
  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1508:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’
  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1509:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’
  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1975:39: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘unsigned int’
  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1986:27: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’
  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:2567:38: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’
  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:2567:46: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long unsigned int’
  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:2569:38: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’
  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:2569:46: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long unsigned int’

The patch also include arg mismatch fix for case with #define DEBUG_PROM
(warning not listed here).

This patch fix also the following warnings revealed by checkpatch:

  WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'alloc_up', this function's name, in a string
  #101: FILE: arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1235:
  + prom_debug("alloc_up(%lx, %lx)\n", size, align);

and

  WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'alloc_down', this function's name, in a string
  #138: FILE: arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1278:
  + prom_debug("alloc_down(%lx, %lx, %s)\n", size, align,

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

kernel parameter disable_radix takes different options
disable_radix=yes|no|1|0  or just disable_radix.

prom_init parsing is not supporting these options.

Fixes: 1fd6c0220710 ("powerpc/mm: Add a CONFIG option to choose if radix is used by default")
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

POWER4 has been broken since at least the change 49d09bf2a6
("powerpc/64s: Optimise MSR handling in exception handling"), which
requires mtmsrd L=1 support. This was introduced in ISA v2.01, and
POWER4 supports ISA v2.00.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

Merge our fixes branch from the 4.16 cycle.

There were a number of important fixes merged, in particular some Power9
workarounds that we want in next for testing purposes. There's also been
some conflicting changes in the CPU features code which are best merged
and tested before going upstream.

Currently the pseries kernel advertises radix MMU support even if
the actual support is disabled via the CONFIG_PPC_RADIX_MMU option.

This adds a check for CONFIG_PPC_RADIX_MMU to avoid advertising radix
to the hypervisor.

Suggested-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

With ibm,dynamic-memory-v2 and ibm,drc-info coming around the same
time, byte22 in vector5 of ibm architecture vector table got set twice
separately. The end result is that guest kernel isn't advertising
support for ibm,dynamic-memory-v2.

Fix this by removing the duplicate assignment of byte22.

Fixes: 02ef6dd8109b ("powerpc: Enable support for ibm,drc-info devtree property")
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

This reverts commit 02ef6dd8109b581343ebeb1c4c973513682535d6.

The earlier patch tried to enable support for a new property
"ibm,drc-info" on powerpc systems.

Unfortunately, some errors in the associated patch set break things
in some of the DLPAR operations.  In particular when attempting to
hot-add a new CPU or set of CPUs, the original patch failed to
properly calculate the available resources, and aborted the operation.
In addition, the original set missed several opportunities to compress
and reuse common code.

As the associated patch set was meant to provide an optimization of
storage and performance of a set of device-tree properties for future
systems with large amounts of resources, reverting just restores
the previous behavior for existing systems.  It seems unnecessary
to enable this feature and introduce the consequent problems in the
field that it will cause at this time, so please revert it for now
until testing of the corrections are finished properly.

Fixes: 02ef6dd8109b ("powerpc: Enable support for ibm,drc-info devtree property")
Signed-off-by: Michael W. Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org

From: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Cc: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH V6 4/4] powerpc: Enable support for ibm,drc-info devtree property

prom_init.c: Enable support for new DRC device tree property
"ibm,drc-info" in initial handshake between the Linux kernel and
the front end processor.

Signed-off-by: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>