The naming of eeh_{add_to|remove_from}_parent_pe() doesn't really reflect
what they actually do. If the PE referred to be edev->pe_config_addr
already exists under that PHB then the edev is added to that PE. However,
if the PE doesn't exist the a new one is created for the edev.

The bulk of the implementation of eeh_add_to_parent_pe() covers that
second case. Similarly, most of eeh_remove_from_parent_pe() is
determining when it's safe to delete a PE.

Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-12-oohall@gmail.com

Retrieve the domain, bus, device, and function numbers from the edev.

Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-10-oohall@gmail.com

Mechanical conversion of the eeh_ops interfaces to use eeh_dev to reference
a specific device rather than pci_dn. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-9-oohall@gmail.com

Mechanical conversion of the eeh_ops interfaces to use eeh_dev to reference
a specific device rather than pci_dn. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-7-oohall@gmail.com

There's a bunch of strange things about this code. First up is that none of
the fields being written to are functional for a VF. The SR-IOV
specification lists then as "Reserved, but OS should preserve" so writing
new values to them doesn't do anything and is clearly wrong from a
correctness perspective.

However, since VFs are designed to be managed by the OS there is an
argument to be made that we should be saving and restoring some parts of
config space. We already sort of do that by saving the first 64 bytes of
config space in the eeh_dev (see eeh_dev->config_space[]). This is
inadequate since it doesn't even consider saving and restoring the PCI
capability structures. However, this is a problem with EEH in general and
that needs to be fixed for non-VF devices too.

There's no real reason to keep around this around so delete it.

Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-6-oohall@gmail.com

This function is a one line wrapper around eeh_phb_pe_create() and despite
the name it doesn't create any eeh_dev structures. Replace it with direct
calls to eeh_phb_pe_create() since that does what it says on the tin
and removes a layer of indirection.

Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-1-oohall@gmail.com

EEH device state is currently removed (by eeh_remove_device()) during
the device release handler, which is invoked as the device's reference
count drops to zero. This may take some time, or forever, as other
threads may hold references.

However, the PCI device state is released synchronously by
pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(). This mismatch causes problems, for
example the device may be re-discovered as a new device before the
release handler has been called, leaving the PCI and EEH state
mismatched.

So instead, call eeh_remove_device() from the bus device removal
handlers, which are called synchronously in the removal path.

Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0a1f5105d3a33b1c090bba31de63eb0cdd25de7b.1588045502.git.sbobroff@linux.ibm.com

With the EEH early probe now being pseries specific there's no need for
eeh_ops->probe() to take a pci_dn. Instead, we can make it take a pci_dev
and use the probe function to map a pci_dev to an eeh_dev. This allows
the platform to implement it's own method for finding (or creating) an
eeh_dev for a given pci_dev which also removes a use of pci_dn in
generic EEH code.

This patch also renames eeh_device_add_late() to eeh_device_probe(). This
better reflects what it does does and removes the last vestiges of the
early/late EEH probe split.

Reviewed-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200306073904.4737-6-oohall@gmail.com

The eeh_ops->probe() function is called from two different contexts:

1. On pseries, where we set EEH_PROBE_MODE_DEVTREE, it's called in
   eeh_add_device_early() which is supposed to run before we create
   a pci_dev.

2. On PowerNV, where we set EEH_PROBE_MODE_DEV, it's called in
   eeh_device_add_late() which is supposed to run *after* the
   pci_dev is created.

The "early" probe is required because PAPR requires that we perform an RTAS
call to enable EEH support on a device before we start interacting with it
via config space or MMIO. This requirement doesn't exist on PowerNV and
shoehorning two completely separate initialisation paths into a common
interface just results in a convoluted code everywhere.

Additionally the early probe requires the probe function to take an pci_dn
rather than a pci_dev argument. We'd like to make pci_dn a pseries specific
data structure since there's no real requirement for them on PowerNV. To
help both goals move the early probe into the pseries containment zone
so the platform depedence is more explicit.

Reviewed-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200306073904.4737-5-oohall@gmail.com

This check for a missing PHB has existing in various forms since the
initial PPC64 port was upstreamed in 2002. The idea seems to be that we
need to guard against creating pci-specific data structures for the non-pci
children of a PCI device tree node (e.g. USB devices). However, we only
create pci_dn structures for DT nodes that correspond to PCI devices so
there's not much point in doing this check in the eeh_probe path.

Reviewed-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200306073904.4737-4-oohall@gmail.com