Broken by d63c63e889bbeeaa461a8addf1245f89f3ce4ece (lmo) rsp.
f1e39a4a616cd9981a9decfd5332fd07a01abb8b (kernel.org).

Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/746/

1. At the end of smtc_distribute_timer, nextstamp is valid and has already
   passed so we goto repeat.
2. Nothing updates nextstamp (only updated if the timeout is in the future
   And we just decided it is in the past)
3. At the end nextstamp still has the same value so it is still valid and
   in the past.
4. This repeats until read_c0_count has a value which causes nextstamp to
   be in the future.

Reported and initial patch and testing  by Mikael Starvik
<mikael.starvik@axis.com>.

Signed-off-by: Kevin D. Kissell <kevink@paralogos.com>
Cc: Mikael Starvik <mikael.starvik@axis.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <Jesper.Nilsson@axis.com>
Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/621/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>

sys_ppoll syscall needs to use a compat handler on 64bit kernels with o32
user-space.

Signed-off-by: Arnaud Patard <apatard@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>

set_saved_sp reads Context register. Avoid reading stale value from
earlier incomplete write.

Issue found and fixed for head.S by Chris Dearman <chris@mips.com>.

Signed-off-by: Chris Dearman <chris@mips.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>

Signed-off-by: Chris Dearman <chris@mips.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>

Signed-off-by: Chris Dearman <chris@mips.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>

Signed-off-by: Chris Dearman <chris@mips.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>

Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>

As the commit 3ee4c147 shows, we need to "Add IRQF_TIMER flag for timer
interrupts", Atsushi Nemoto have reported that some other timer interrupts
should be considered, Here it is.

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>

An o32 aplication passes a 64-bit value in a pair of registers; a 64-bit
kernel expects a 64-bit argument in a single register.

Signed-off-by: Chen Jie <chenj@lemote.com>
Signed-off-by: Hu Hongbing <huhb@lemote.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>