Pull siginfo updates from Eric Biederman:
 "This set of changes close the known issues with setting si_code to an
  invalid value, and with not fully initializing struct siginfo. There
  remains work to do on nds32, arc, unicore32, powerpc, arm, arm64, ia64
  and x86 to get the code that generates siginfo into a simpler and more
  maintainable state. Most of that work involves refactoring the signal
  handling code and thus careful code review.

  Also not included is the work to shrink the in kernel version of
  struct siginfo. That depends on getting the number of places that
  directly manipulate struct siginfo under control, as it requires the
  introduction of struct kernel_siginfo for the in kernel things.

  Overall this set of changes looks like it is making good progress, and
  with a little luck I will be wrapping up the siginfo work next
  development cycle"

* 'siginfo-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace: (46 commits)
  signal/sh: Stop gcc warning about an impossible case in do_divide_error
  signal/mips: Report FPE_FLTUNK for undiagnosed floating point exceptions
  signal/um: More carefully relay signals in relay_signal.
  signal: Extend siginfo_layout with SIL_FAULT_{MCEERR|BNDERR|PKUERR}
  signal: Remove unncessary #ifdef SEGV_PKUERR in 32bit compat code
  signal/signalfd: Add support for SIGSYS
  signal/signalfd: Remove __put_user from signalfd_copyinfo
  signal/xtensa: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
  signal/xtensa: Consistenly use SIGBUS in do_unaligned_user
  signal/um: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
  signal/sparc: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
  signal/sparc: Use send_sig_fault where appropriate
  signal/sh: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
  signal/s390: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
  signal/riscv: Replace do_trap_siginfo with force_sig_fault
  signal/riscv: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
  signal/parisc: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
  signal/parisc: Use force_sig_mceerr where appropriate
  signal/openrisc: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
  signal/nios2: Use force_sig_fault where appropriate
  ...

Call clear_siginfo to ensure every stack allocated siginfo is properly
initialized before being passed to the signal sending functions.

Note: It is not safe to depend on C initializers to initialize struct
siginfo on the stack because C is allowed to skip holes when
initializing a structure.

The initialization of struct siginfo in tracehook_report_syscall_exit
was moved from the helper user_single_step_siginfo into
tracehook_report_syscall_exit itself, to make it clear that the local
variable siginfo gets fully initialized.

In a few cases the scope of struct siginfo has been reduced to make it
clear that siginfo siginfo is not used on other paths in the function
in which it is declared.

Instances of using memset to initialize siginfo have been replaced
with calls clear_siginfo for clarity.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

Our arm64_skip_faulting_instruction() helper advances the userspace
singlestep state machine, but this is also called by the kernel BRK
handler, as used for WARN*().

Thus, if we happen to hit a WARN*() while the user singlestep state
machine is in the active-no-pending state, we'll advance to the
active-pending state without having executed a user instruction, and
will take a step exception earlier than expected when we return to
userspace.

Let's fix this by only advancing the state machine when skipping a user
instruction.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Since commit:

  a7e6f1ca90354a31 ("arm64: signal: Force SIGKILL for unknown signals in force_signal_inject")

... any signal which is not SIGKILL will be upgraded to a SIGKILL be
force_signal_inject(). This includes signals we do expect, such as
SIGILL triggered by do_undefinstr().

Fix the check to use a logical AND rather than a logical OR, permitting
signals whose layout is SIL_FAULT.

Fixes: a7e6f1ca90354a31 ("arm64: signal: Force SIGKILL for unknown signals in force_signal_inject")
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

We issue the enable() call back for all CPU hwcaps capabilities
available on the system, on all the CPUs. So far we have ignored
the argument passed to the call back, which had a prototype to
accept a "void *" for use with on_each_cpu() and later with
stop_machine(). However, with commit 0a0d111d40fd1
("arm64: cpufeature: Pass capability structure to ->enable callback"),
there are some users of the argument who wants the matching capability
struct pointer where there are multiple matching criteria for a single
capability. Clean up the declaration of the call back to make it clear.

 1) Renamed to cpu_enable(), to imply taking necessary actions on the
    called CPU for the entry.
 2) Pass const pointer to the capability, to allow the call back to
    check the entry. (e.,g to check if any action is needed on the CPU)
 3) We don't care about the result of the call back, turning this to
    a void.

Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
[suzuki: convert more users, rename call back and drop results]
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Using arm64_force_sig_info means that printing messages about unhandled
signals is dealt with for us, so use that in preference to force_sig_info
and remove any homebrew printing code.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited is only called in traps.c, so move it
out of its macro in the dreaded system_misc.h and into a static function
in traps.c

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

arm64_notify_die deals with printing out information regarding unhandled
signals, so there's no need to roll our own code here.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

In preparation for consolidating our handling of printing unhandled
signals, introduce a wrapper around force_sig_info which can act as
the canonical place for dealing with show_unhandled_signals.

Initially, we just hook this up to arm64_notify_die.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

For signals other than SIGKILL or those with siginfo_layout(signal, code)
== SIL_FAULT then force_signal_inject does not initialise the siginfo_t
properly. Since the signal number is determined solely by the caller,
simply WARN on unknown signals and force to SIGKILL.

Reported-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>