The assembly macro get_thread_info() actually returns a task_struct and is
analogous to the current/get_current macro/function.

While it could be argued that thread_info sits at the start of
task_struct and the intention could have been to return a thread_info,
instances of loads from/stores to the address obtained from
get_thread_info() use offsets that are generated with
offsetof(struct task_struct, [...]).

Rename get_thread_info() to state it returns a task_struct.

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

When an NMI is raised while interrupts where disabled, the IRQ tracing
already is in the correct state (i.e. hardirqs_off) and should be left
as such when returning to the interrupted context.

Check whether PMR was masking interrupts when the NMI was raised and
skip IRQ tracing if necessary.

Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Handling of an NMI should not set any TIF flags. For NMIs received from
EL0 the current exit path is safe to use.

However, an NMI received at EL1 could have interrupted some task context
that has set the TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag. Preempting a task should not
happen as a result of an NMI.

Skip preemption after handling an NMI from EL1.

Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In order to replace PSR.I interrupt disabling/enabling with ICC_PMR_EL1
interrupt masking, ICC_PMR_EL1 needs to be saved/restored when
taking/returning from an exception. This mimics the way hardware saves
and restores PSR.I bit in spsr_el1 for exceptions and ERET.

Add PMR to the registers to save in the pt_regs struct upon kernel entry,
and restore it before ERET. Also, initialize it to a sane value when
creating new tasks.

Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Since the enabling and disabling of IRQs within preempt_schedule_irq()
is contained in a need_resched() loop, we don't need the outer arch
code loop.

Reported-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Reported-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In commit:

  3b7142752e4bee15 ("arm64: convert native/compat syscall entry to C")

... we moved the syscall invocation code from assembly to C, but left
behind a number of register aliases which are now unused.

Let's remove them before they confuse someone.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Commit 396244692232 ("arm64: preempt: Provide our own implementation of
asm/preempt.h") extended the preempt count field in struct thread_info
to 64 bits, so that it consists of a 32-bit count plus a 32-bit flag
indicating whether or not the current task needs rescheduling.

Whilst the asm-offsets definition of TSK_TI_PREEMPT was updated to point
to this new field, the assembly usage was left untouched meaning that a
32-bit load from TSK_TI_PREEMPT on a big-endian machine actually returns
the reschedule flag instead of the count.

Whilst we could fix this by pointing TSK_TI_PREEMPT at the count field,
we're actually better off reworking the two assembly users so that they
operate on the whole 64-bit value in favour of inspecting the thread
flags separately in order to determine whether a reschedule is needed.

Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The comment about SYS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE relying on ERET being
context-synchronizing is confusing and misplaced with kpti. Given that
this is already documented under Documentation/ (see arch-support.txt
for membarrier), remove the comment altogether.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Some CPUs can speculate past an ERET instruction and potentially perform
speculative accesses to memory before processing the exception return.
Since the register state is often controlled by a lower privilege level
at the point of an ERET, this could potentially be used as part of a
side-channel attack.

This patch emits an SB sequence after each ERET so that speculation is
held up on exception return.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

It recently came to light that userspace can execute WFI, and that
the arm64 kernel doesn't trap this event. This sounds rather benign,
but the kernel should decide when it wants to wait for an interrupt,
and not userspace.

Let's trap WFI and immediately return after having skipped the
instruction. This effectively makes WFI a rather expensive NOP.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>