* for-next/mops:
  : More FEAT_MOPS (memcpy instructions) uses - in-kernel routines
  arm64: mops: Document requirements for hypervisors
  arm64: lib: Use MOPS for copy_page() and clear_page()
  arm64: lib: Use MOPS for memcpy() routines
  arm64: mops: Document booting requirement for HCR_EL2.MCE2
  arm64: mops: Handle MOPS exceptions from EL1
  arm64: probes: Disable kprobes/uprobes on MOPS instructions

# Conflicts:
#	arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c

The search for breakpoint handlers iterate through the entire
linked list. Given that all registered hook has a valid fn field, and no
registered hooks share the same mask and imm. This commit optimize the
efficiency slightly by returning early as a matching handler is found.

Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241024034120.3814224-1-liaochang1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

We will soon be using MOPS instructions in the kernel, so wire up the
exception handler to handle exceptions from EL1 caused by the copy/set
operation being stopped and resumed on a different type of CPU.

Add a helper for advancing the single step state machine, similarly to
what the EL0 exception handler does.

Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240930161051.3777828-3-kristina.martsenko@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

As it is already used in two places, move esr_comment() to a header for
re-use, with a clearer name.

Introduce esr_is_cfi_brk() to detect kCFI BRK syndromes, currently used
by early_brk64() but soon to also be used by hypervisor code.

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Clément Tosi <ptosi@google.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240610063244.2828978-7-ptosi@google.com
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>

Currently only the first attempt to single-step has any effect. After
that all further stepping remains "stuck" at the same program counter
value.

Refer to the ARM Architecture Reference Manual (ARM DDI 0487E.a) D2.12,
PSTATE.SS=1 should be set at each step before transferring the PE to the
'Active-not-pending' state. The problem here is PSTATE.SS=1 is not set
since the second single-step.

After the first single-step, the PE transferes to the 'Inactive' state,
with PSTATE.SS=0 and MDSCR.SS=1, thus PSTATE.SS won't be set to 1 due to
kernel_active_single_step()=true. Then the PE transferes to the
'Active-pending' state when ERET and returns to the debugger by step
exception.

Before this patch:
==================
Entering kdb (current=0xffff3376039f0000, pid 1) on processor 0 due to Keyboard Entry
[0]kdb>

[0]kdb>
[0]kdb> bp write_sysrq_trigger
Instruction(i) BP #0 at 0xffffa45c13d09290 (write_sysrq_trigger)
    is enabled   addr at ffffa45c13d09290, hardtype=0 installed=0

[0]kdb> go
$ echo h > /proc/sysrq-trigger

Entering kdb (current=0xffff4f7e453f8000, pid 175) on processor 1 due to Breakpoint @ 0xffffad651a309290
[1]kdb> ss

Entering kdb (current=0xffff4f7e453f8000, pid 175) on processor 1 due to SS trap @ 0xffffad651a309294
[1]kdb> ss

Entering kdb (current=0xffff4f7e453f8000, pid 175) on processor 1 due to SS trap @ 0xffffad651a309294
[1]kdb>

After this patch:
=================
Entering kdb (current=0xffff6851c39f0000, pid 1) on processor 0 due to Keyboard Entry
[0]kdb> bp write_sysrq_trigger
Instruction(i) BP #0 at 0xffffc02d2dd09290 (write_sysrq_trigger)
    is enabled   addr at ffffc02d2dd09290, hardtype=0 installed=0

[0]kdb> go
$ echo h > /proc/sysrq-trigger

Entering kdb (current=0xffff6851c53c1840, pid 174) on processor 1 due to Breakpoint @ 0xffffc02d2dd09290
[1]kdb> ss

Entering kdb (current=0xffff6851c53c1840, pid 174) on processor 1 due to SS trap @ 0xffffc02d2dd09294
[1]kdb> ss

Entering kdb (current=0xffff6851c53c1840, pid 174) on processor 1 due to SS trap @ 0xffffc02d2dd09298
[1]kdb> ss

Entering kdb (current=0xffff6851c53c1840, pid 174) on processor 1 due to SS trap @ 0xffffc02d2dd0929c
[1]kdb>

Fixes: 44679a4f142b ("arm64: KGDB: Add step debugging support")
Co-developed-by: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230202073148.657746-3-sumit.garg@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Normally we include the full register name in the defines for fields within
registers but this has not been followed for ID registers. In preparation
for automatic generation of defines add the _EL1s into the defines for
ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 to follow the convention. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220910163354.860255-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The naming scheme the architecture uses for the fields in ID_AA64DFR0_EL1
does not align well with kernel conventions, using as it does a lot of
MixedCase in various arrangements. In preparation for automatically
generating the defines for this register rename the defines used to match
what is in the architecture.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220910163354.860255-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In the initial release of the ARM Architecture Reference Manual for
ARMv8-A, the ESR_ELx registers were defined as 32-bit registers. This
changed in 2018 with version D.a (ARM DDI 0487D.a) of the architecture,
when they became 64-bit registers, with bits [63:32] defined as RES0. In
version G.a, a new field was added to ESR_ELx, ISS2, which covers bits
[36:32].  This field is used when the Armv8.7 extension FEAT_LS64 is
implemented.

As a result of the evolution of the register width, Linux stores it as
both a 64-bit value and a 32-bit value, which hasn't affected correctness
so far as Linux only uses the lower 32 bits of the register.

Make the register type consistent and always treat it as 64-bit wide. The
register is redefined as an "unsigned long", which is an unsigned
double-word (64-bit quantity) for the LP64 machine (aapcs64 [1], Table 1,
page 14). The type was chosen because "unsigned int" is the most frequent
type for ESR_ELx and because FAR_ELx, which is used together with ESR_ELx
in exception handling, is also declared as "unsigned long". The 64-bit type
also makes adding support for architectural features that use fields above
bit 31 easier in the future.

The KVM hypervisor will receive a similar update in a subsequent patch.

[1] https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/releases/download/2021Q3/aapcs64.pdf

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220425114444.368693-4-alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The kernel currently clears the tag bits (i.e. bits 56-63) in the fault
address exposed via siginfo.si_addr and sigcontext.fault_address. However,
the tag bits may be needed by tools in order to accurately diagnose
memory errors, such as HWASan [1] or future tools based on the Memory
Tagging Extension (MTE).

Expose these bits via the arch_untagged_si_addr mechanism, so that
they are only exposed to signal handlers with the SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS
flag set.

[1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.html

Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/Ia8876bad8c798e0a32df7c2ce1256c4771c81446
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0010296597784267472fa13b39f8238d87a72cf8.1605904350.git.pcc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

When generating instructions at runtime, for example due to kernel text
patching or the BPF JIT, we can emit a trapping BRK instruction if we
are asked to encode an invalid instruction such as an out-of-range]
branch. This is indicative of a bug in the caller, and will result in a
crash on executing the generated code. Unfortunately, the message from
the crash is really unhelpful, and mumbles something about ptrace:

  | Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1
  | Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP

We can do better than this. Install a break handler for FAULT_BRK_IMM,
which is the immediate used to encode the "I've been asked to generate
an invalid instruction" error, and triage the faulting PC to determine
whether or not the failure occurred in the BPF JIT.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200915141707.GB26439@willie-the-truck
Reported-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>