<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux.git/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c, branch v6.0</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel source tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>arm64: Treat ESR_ELx as a 64-bit register</title>
<updated>2022-04-29T18:26:27+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Alexandru Elisei</name>
<email>alexandru.elisei@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-04-25T11:44:42+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=8d56e5c5a99ce1d17d39ce5a8260e42c2a2d7682'/>
<id>8d56e5c5a99ce1d17d39ce5a8260e42c2a2d7682</id>
<content type='text'>
In the initial release of the ARM Architecture Reference Manual for
ARMv8-A, the ESR_ELx registers were defined as 32-bit registers. This
changed in 2018 with version D.a (ARM DDI 0487D.a) of the architecture,
when they became 64-bit registers, with bits [63:32] defined as RES0. In
version G.a, a new field was added to ESR_ELx, ISS2, which covers bits
[36:32].  This field is used when the Armv8.7 extension FEAT_LS64 is
implemented.

As a result of the evolution of the register width, Linux stores it as
both a 64-bit value and a 32-bit value, which hasn't affected correctness
so far as Linux only uses the lower 32 bits of the register.

Make the register type consistent and always treat it as 64-bit wide. The
register is redefined as an "unsigned long", which is an unsigned
double-word (64-bit quantity) for the LP64 machine (aapcs64 [1], Table 1,
page 14). The type was chosen because "unsigned int" is the most frequent
type for ESR_ELx and because FAR_ELx, which is used together with ESR_ELx
in exception handling, is also declared as "unsigned long". The 64-bit type
also makes adding support for architectural features that use fields above
bit 31 easier in the future.

The KVM hypervisor will receive a similar update in a subsequent patch.

[1] https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/releases/download/2021Q3/aapcs64.pdf

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei &lt;alexandru.elisei@arm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier &lt;maz@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220425114444.368693-4-alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas &lt;catalin.marinas@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
In the initial release of the ARM Architecture Reference Manual for
ARMv8-A, the ESR_ELx registers were defined as 32-bit registers. This
changed in 2018 with version D.a (ARM DDI 0487D.a) of the architecture,
when they became 64-bit registers, with bits [63:32] defined as RES0. In
version G.a, a new field was added to ESR_ELx, ISS2, which covers bits
[36:32].  This field is used when the Armv8.7 extension FEAT_LS64 is
implemented.

As a result of the evolution of the register width, Linux stores it as
both a 64-bit value and a 32-bit value, which hasn't affected correctness
so far as Linux only uses the lower 32 bits of the register.

Make the register type consistent and always treat it as 64-bit wide. The
register is redefined as an "unsigned long", which is an unsigned
double-word (64-bit quantity) for the LP64 machine (aapcs64 [1], Table 1,
page 14). The type was chosen because "unsigned int" is the most frequent
type for ESR_ELx and because FAR_ELx, which is used together with ESR_ELx
in exception handling, is also declared as "unsigned long". The 64-bit type
also makes adding support for architectural features that use fields above
bit 31 easier in the future.

The KVM hypervisor will receive a similar update in a subsequent patch.

[1] https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/releases/download/2021Q3/aapcs64.pdf

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei &lt;alexandru.elisei@arm.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier &lt;maz@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220425114444.368693-4-alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas &lt;catalin.marinas@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>arm64: expose FAR_EL1 tag bits in siginfo</title>
<updated>2020-11-23T18:17:39+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Peter Collingbourne</name>
<email>pcc@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-11-20T20:33:46+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=dceec3ff78076757311d92a388d50d0251fb7dbb'/>
<id>dceec3ff78076757311d92a388d50d0251fb7dbb</id>
<content type='text'>
The kernel currently clears the tag bits (i.e. bits 56-63) in the fault
address exposed via siginfo.si_addr and sigcontext.fault_address. However,
the tag bits may be needed by tools in order to accurately diagnose
memory errors, such as HWASan [1] or future tools based on the Memory
Tagging Extension (MTE).

Expose these bits via the arch_untagged_si_addr mechanism, so that
they are only exposed to signal handlers with the SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS
flag set.

[1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.html

Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne &lt;pcc@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas &lt;catalin.marinas@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/Ia8876bad8c798e0a32df7c2ce1256c4771c81446
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0010296597784267472fa13b39f8238d87a72cf8.1605904350.git.pcc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas &lt;catalin.marinas@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The kernel currently clears the tag bits (i.e. bits 56-63) in the fault
address exposed via siginfo.si_addr and sigcontext.fault_address. However,
the tag bits may be needed by tools in order to accurately diagnose
memory errors, such as HWASan [1] or future tools based on the Memory
Tagging Extension (MTE).

Expose these bits via the arch_untagged_si_addr mechanism, so that
they are only exposed to signal handlers with the SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS
flag set.

[1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.html

Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne &lt;pcc@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas &lt;catalin.marinas@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/Ia8876bad8c798e0a32df7c2ce1256c4771c81446
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0010296597784267472fa13b39f8238d87a72cf8.1605904350.git.pcc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas &lt;catalin.marinas@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>arm64: Improve diagnostics when trapping BRK with FAULT_BRK_IMM</title>
<updated>2020-09-18T15:35:54+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Will Deacon</name>
<email>will@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2020-09-15T14:48:09+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=0fdb64c2a303e4d2562245501920241c0e507951'/>
<id>0fdb64c2a303e4d2562245501920241c0e507951</id>
<content type='text'>
When generating instructions at runtime, for example due to kernel text
patching or the BPF JIT, we can emit a trapping BRK instruction if we
are asked to encode an invalid instruction such as an out-of-range]
branch. This is indicative of a bug in the caller, and will result in a
crash on executing the generated code. Unfortunately, the message from
the crash is really unhelpful, and mumbles something about ptrace:

  | Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1
  | Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP

We can do better than this. Install a break handler for FAULT_BRK_IMM,
which is the immediate used to encode the "I've been asked to generate
an invalid instruction" error, and triage the faulting PC to determine
whether or not the failure occurred in the BPF JIT.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200915141707.GB26439@willie-the-truck
Reported-by: Ilias Apalodimas &lt;ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
When generating instructions at runtime, for example due to kernel text
patching or the BPF JIT, we can emit a trapping BRK instruction if we
are asked to encode an invalid instruction such as an out-of-range]
branch. This is indicative of a bug in the caller, and will result in a
crash on executing the generated code. Unfortunately, the message from
the crash is really unhelpful, and mumbles something about ptrace:

  | Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1
  | Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP

We can do better than this. Install a break handler for FAULT_BRK_IMM,
which is the immediate used to encode the "I've been asked to generate
an invalid instruction" error, and triage the faulting PC to determine
whether or not the failure occurred in the BPF JIT.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200915141707.GB26439@willie-the-truck
Reported-by: Ilias Apalodimas &lt;ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>arm64: Use test_tsk_thread_flag() for checking TIF_SINGLESTEP</title>
<updated>2020-07-16T10:42:12+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Will Deacon</name>
<email>will@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2020-02-13T12:12:26+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=5afc78551bf5d53279036e0bf63314e35631d79f'/>
<id>5afc78551bf5d53279036e0bf63314e35631d79f</id>
<content type='text'>
Rather than open-code test_tsk_thread_flag() at each callsite, simply
replace the couple of offenders with calls to test_tsk_thread_flag()
directly.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Rather than open-code test_tsk_thread_flag() at each callsite, simply
replace the couple of offenders with calls to test_tsk_thread_flag()
directly.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>arm64: ptrace: Override SPSR.SS when single-stepping is enabled</title>
<updated>2020-07-16T10:41:21+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Will Deacon</name>
<email>will@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2020-02-13T12:06:26+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=3a5a4366cecc25daa300b9a9174f7fdd352b9068'/>
<id>3a5a4366cecc25daa300b9a9174f7fdd352b9068</id>
<content type='text'>
Luis reports that, when reverse debugging with GDB, single-step does not
function as expected on arm64:

  | I've noticed, under very specific conditions, that a PTRACE_SINGLESTEP
  | request by GDB won't execute the underlying instruction. As a consequence,
  | the PC doesn't move, but we return a SIGTRAP just like we would for a
  | regular successful PTRACE_SINGLESTEP request.

The underlying problem is that when the CPU register state is restored
as part of a reverse step, the SPSR.SS bit is cleared and so the hardware
single-step state can transition to the "active-pending" state, causing
an unexpected step exception to be taken immediately if a step operation
is attempted.

In hindsight, we probably shouldn't have exposed SPSR.SS in the pstate
accessible by the GPR regset, but it's a bit late for that now. Instead,
simply prevent userspace from configuring the bit to a value which is
inconsistent with the TIF_SINGLESTEP state for the task being traced.

Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Mark Rutland &lt;mark.rutland@arm.com&gt;
Cc: Keno Fischer &lt;keno@juliacomputing.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1eed6d69-d53d-9657-1fc9-c089be07f98c@linaro.org
Reported-by: Luis Machado &lt;luis.machado@linaro.org&gt;
Tested-by: Luis Machado &lt;luis.machado@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Luis reports that, when reverse debugging with GDB, single-step does not
function as expected on arm64:

  | I've noticed, under very specific conditions, that a PTRACE_SINGLESTEP
  | request by GDB won't execute the underlying instruction. As a consequence,
  | the PC doesn't move, but we return a SIGTRAP just like we would for a
  | regular successful PTRACE_SINGLESTEP request.

The underlying problem is that when the CPU register state is restored
as part of a reverse step, the SPSR.SS bit is cleared and so the hardware
single-step state can transition to the "active-pending" state, causing
an unexpected step exception to be taken immediately if a step operation
is attempted.

In hindsight, we probably shouldn't have exposed SPSR.SS in the pstate
accessible by the GPR regset, but it's a bit late for that now. Instead,
simply prevent userspace from configuring the bit to a value which is
inconsistent with the TIF_SINGLESTEP state for the task being traced.

Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Mark Rutland &lt;mark.rutland@arm.com&gt;
Cc: Keno Fischer &lt;keno@juliacomputing.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1eed6d69-d53d-9657-1fc9-c089be07f98c@linaro.org
Reported-by: Luis Machado &lt;luis.machado@linaro.org&gt;
Tested-by: Luis Machado &lt;luis.machado@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>arm64: debug: mark a function as __init to save some memory</title>
<updated>2020-06-04T15:21:29+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Christophe JAILLET</name>
<email>christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr</email>
</author>
<published>2020-05-31T11:00:15+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=5311ebfb612f08ec2a712a86d0af7ee2b423a9fc'/>
<id>5311ebfb612f08ec2a712a86d0af7ee2b423a9fc</id>
<content type='text'>
'debug_monitors_init()' is only called via 'postcore_initcall'.
It can be marked as __init to save a few bytes of memory.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET &lt;christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr&gt;
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson &lt;dianders@chromium.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200531110015.598607-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
'debug_monitors_init()' is only called via 'postcore_initcall'.
It can be marked as __init to save a few bytes of memory.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET &lt;christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr&gt;
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson &lt;dianders@chromium.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200531110015.598607-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>arm64: Call debug_traps_init() from trap_init() to help early kgdb</title>
<updated>2020-05-18T16:51:20+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Douglas Anderson</name>
<email>dianders@chromium.org</email>
</author>
<published>2020-05-13T23:06:37+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=b322c65f8ca37396cfd7d4d0ac2f7f2dc08fa9eb'/>
<id>b322c65f8ca37396cfd7d4d0ac2f7f2dc08fa9eb</id>
<content type='text'>
A new kgdb feature will soon land (kgdb_earlycon) that lets us run
kgdb much earlier.  In order for everything to work properly it's
important that the break hook is setup by the time we process
"kgdbwait".

Right now the break hook is setup in debug_traps_init() and that's
called from arch_initcall().  That's a bit too late since
kgdb_earlycon really needs things to be setup by the time the system
calls dbg_late_init().

We could fix this by adding call_break_hook() into early_brk64() and
that works fine.  However, it's a little ugly.  Instead, let's just
add a call to debug_traps_init() straight from trap_init().  There's
already a documented dependency between trap_init() and
debug_traps_init() and this makes the dependency more obvious rather
than just relying on a comment.

NOTE: this solution isn't early enough to let us select the
"ARCH_HAS_EARLY_DEBUG" KConfig option that is introduced by the
kgdb_earlycon patch series.  That would only be set if we could do
breakpoints when early params are parsed.  This patch only enables
"late early" breakpoints, AKA breakpoints when dbg_late_init() is
called.  It's expected that this should be fine for most people.

It should also be noted that if you crash you can still end up in kgdb
earlier than debug_traps_init().  Since you don't need breakpoints to
debug a crash that's fine.

Suggested-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson &lt;dianders@chromium.org&gt;
Acked-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Catalin Marinas &lt;catalin.marinas@arm.com&gt;
Cc: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200513160501.1.I0b5edf030cc6ebef6ab4829f8867cdaea42485d8@changeid
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
A new kgdb feature will soon land (kgdb_earlycon) that lets us run
kgdb much earlier.  In order for everything to work properly it's
important that the break hook is setup by the time we process
"kgdbwait".

Right now the break hook is setup in debug_traps_init() and that's
called from arch_initcall().  That's a bit too late since
kgdb_earlycon really needs things to be setup by the time the system
calls dbg_late_init().

We could fix this by adding call_break_hook() into early_brk64() and
that works fine.  However, it's a little ugly.  Instead, let's just
add a call to debug_traps_init() straight from trap_init().  There's
already a documented dependency between trap_init() and
debug_traps_init() and this makes the dependency more obvious rather
than just relying on a comment.

NOTE: this solution isn't early enough to let us select the
"ARCH_HAS_EARLY_DEBUG" KConfig option that is introduced by the
kgdb_earlycon patch series.  That would only be set if we could do
breakpoints when early params are parsed.  This patch only enables
"late early" breakpoints, AKA breakpoints when dbg_late_init() is
called.  It's expected that this should be fine for most people.

It should also be noted that if you crash you can still end up in kgdb
earlier than debug_traps_init().  Since you don't need breakpoints to
debug a crash that's fine.

Suggested-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson &lt;dianders@chromium.org&gt;
Acked-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Catalin Marinas &lt;catalin.marinas@arm.com&gt;
Cc: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200513160501.1.I0b5edf030cc6ebef6ab4829f8867cdaea42485d8@changeid
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>arm64: Remove unneeded rcu_read_lock from debug handlers</title>
<updated>2019-08-01T14:00:27+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masami Hiramatsu</name>
<email>mhiramat@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-07-25T08:16:25+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=760d8ed069c4e32a92e2ba251a3b0d9a87a3e771'/>
<id>760d8ed069c4e32a92e2ba251a3b0d9a87a3e771</id>
<content type='text'>
Remove rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() from debug exception
handlers since we are sure those are not preemptible and
interrupts are off.

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu &lt;mhiramat@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Remove rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() from debug exception
handlers since we are sure those are not preemptible and
interrupts are off.

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney &lt;paulmck@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu &lt;mhiramat@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 234</title>
<updated>2019-06-19T15:09:07+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Thomas Gleixner</name>
<email>tglx@linutronix.de</email>
</author>
<published>2019-06-03T05:44:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=caab277b1de0a22b675c4c95fc7b285ec2eb5bf5'/>
<id>caab277b1de0a22b675c4c95fc7b285ec2eb5bf5</id>
<content type='text'>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
  published by the free software foundation this program is
  distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any
  warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or
  fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license
  for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general
  public license along with this program if not see http www gnu org
  licenses

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 503 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras &lt;alexios.zavras@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal &lt;allison@lohutok.net&gt;
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt &lt;info@metux.net&gt;
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190602204653.811534538@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
  published by the free software foundation this program is
  distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any
  warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or
  fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license
  for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general
  public license along with this program if not see http www gnu org
  licenses

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 503 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras &lt;alexios.zavras@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal &lt;allison@lohutok.net&gt;
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt &lt;info@metux.net&gt;
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190602204653.811534538@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>arm64: Clear OSDLR_EL1 on CPU boot</title>
<updated>2019-04-09T11:38:31+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jean-Philippe Brucker</name>
<email>jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-04-08T17:17:18+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux.git/commit/?id=6fda41bf12615ee7c3ddac88155099b1a8cf8d00'/>
<id>6fda41bf12615ee7c3ddac88155099b1a8cf8d00</id>
<content type='text'>
Some firmwares may reboot CPUs with OS Double Lock set. Make sure that
it is unlocked, in order to use debug exceptions.

Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker &lt;jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will.deacon@arm.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Some firmwares may reboot CPUs with OS Double Lock set. Make sure that
it is unlocked, in order to use debug exceptions.

Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker &lt;jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon &lt;will.deacon@arm.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
