Pull arm64 updates from Catalin Marinas:
 "Apart from the core arm64 and perf changes, the Spectre v4 mitigation
  touches the arm KVM code and the ACPI PPTT support touches drivers/
  (acpi and cacheinfo). I should have the maintainers' acks in place.

  Summary:

   - Spectre v4 mitigation (Speculative Store Bypass Disable) support
     for arm64 using SMC firmware call to set a hardware chicken bit

   - ACPI PPTT (Processor Properties Topology Table) parsing support and
     enable the feature for arm64

   - Report signal frame size to user via auxv (AT_MINSIGSTKSZ). The
     primary motivation is Scalable Vector Extensions which requires
     more space on the signal frame than the currently defined
     MINSIGSTKSZ

   - ARM perf patches: allow building arm-cci as module, demote
     dev_warn() to dev_dbg() in arm-ccn event_init(), miscellaneous
     cleanups

   - cmpwait() WFE optimisation to avoid some spurious wakeups

   - L1_CACHE_BYTES reverted back to 64 (for performance reasons that
     have to do with some network allocations) while keeping
     ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to 128. cache_line_size() returns the actual
     hardware Cache Writeback Granule

   - Turn LSE atomics on by default in Kconfig

   - Kernel fault reporting tidying

   - Some #include and miscellaneous cleanups"

* tag 'arm64-upstream' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux: (53 commits)
  arm64: Fix syscall restarting around signal suppressed by tracer
  arm64: topology: Avoid checking numa mask for scheduler MC selection
  ACPI / PPTT: fix build when CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT is not enabled
  arm64: cpu_errata: include required headers
  arm64: KVM: Move VCPU_WORKAROUND_2_FLAG macros to the top of the file
  arm64: signal: Report signal frame size to userspace via auxv
  arm64/sve: Thin out initialisation sanity-checks for sve_max_vl
  arm64: KVM: Add ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 discovery through ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID
  arm64: KVM: Handle guest's ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 requests
  arm64: KVM: Add ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 support for guests
  arm64: KVM: Add HYP per-cpu accessors
  arm64: ssbd: Add prctl interface for per-thread mitigation
  arm64: ssbd: Introduce thread flag to control userspace mitigation
  arm64: ssbd: Restore mitigation status on CPU resume
  arm64: ssbd: Skip apply_ssbd if not using dynamic mitigation
  arm64: ssbd: Add global mitigation state accessor
  arm64: Add 'ssbd' command-line option
  arm64: Add ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 probing
  arm64: Add per-cpu infrastructure to call ARCH_WORKAROUND_2
  arm64: Call ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 on transitions between EL0 and EL1
  ...

Without including psci.h and arm-smccc.h, we now get a build failure in
some configurations:

arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c: In function 'arm64_update_smccc_conduit':
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:278:10: error: 'psci_ops' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'sysfs_ops'?

arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c: In function 'arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation':
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:311:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'arm_smccc_1_1_hvc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On a system where firmware can dynamically change the state of the
mitigation, the CPU will always come up with the mitigation enabled,
including when coming back from suspend.

If the user has requested "no mitigation" via a command line option,
let's enforce it by calling into the firmware again to disable it.

Similarily, for a resume from hibernate, the mitigation could have
been disabled by the boot kernel. Let's ensure that it is set
back on in that case.

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In order to avoid checking arm64_ssbd_callback_required on each
kernel entry/exit even if no mitigation is required, let's
add yet another alternative that by default jumps over the mitigation,
and that gets nop'ed out if we're doing dynamic mitigation.

Think of it as a poor man's static key...

Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On a system where the firmware implements ARCH_WORKAROUND_2,
it may be useful to either permanently enable or disable the
workaround for cases where the user decides that they'd rather
not get a trap overhead, and keep the mitigation permanently
on or off instead of switching it on exception entry/exit.

In any case, default to the mitigation being enabled.

Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

As for Spectre variant-2, we rely on SMCCC 1.1 to provide the
discovery mechanism for detecting the SSBD mitigation.

A new capability is also allocated for that purpose, and a
config option.

Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In a heterogeneous system, we can end up with both affected and
unaffected CPUs. Let's check their status before calling into the
firmware.

Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In order for the kernel to protect itself, let's call the SSBD mitigation
implemented by the higher exception level (either hypervisor or firmware)
on each transition between userspace and kernel.

We must take the PSCI conduit into account in order to target the
right exception level, hence the introduction of a runtime patching
callback.

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The NVIDIA Denver CPU also needs a PSCI call to harden the branch
predictor.

Signed-off-by: David Gilhooley <dgilhooley@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

bpi.S was introduced as we were starting to build the Spectre v2
mitigation framework, and it was rather unclear that it would
become strictly KVM specific.

Now that the picture is a lot clearer, let's move the content
of that file to hyp-entry.S, where it actually belong.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>